Endocrinology, Vol 104, 350-359, Copyright © 1979 by Endocrine Society

ARTICLES

Daily rhythms in adrenal responsiveness to adrenocorticotropin are determined primarily by the time of feeding in the rat

CW Wilkinson, J Shinsako and MF Dallman

These experiments were done to determine: 1) whether feeding-related shifts in daily corticosterone rhythms are dependent upon changes in ACTH rhythms, 2) whether restricted feeding of rats results in abnormally high ACTH and corticosterone levels (i.e. stress), and 3) whether changes in either insulin or glucose levels might be the concomitants of feeding that change adrenal responsiveness to ACTH. Young male rats (80--90 g) on a 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle were allowed access to one of three diets for 2 h/day beginning either at lights off or lights on. The diets contained 3%, 4.5%, or 11% fat. A group of rats had ad libitum access to the food containing 4.5% fat. On day 20 of this regimen, rats were killed at 2- to 4-h intervals during the next 24 h, and plasma ACTH, corticosterone, insulin, and glucose were measured. Adrenal weight and corticosterone content were also determined. In none of these experiments was an ACTH rhythm demonstrable by analysis of variance. Neither ACTH levels nor adrenal and plasma corticosterone levels were higher in animals fed 2 h/day than in rats eating ad libitum. Peak corticosterone levels occurred just before feeding, and the restricted feeding paradigm appeard to sharpen the daily rhythms. However, there was also an effect of the light-dark cycle on corticosterone measures. Dietary fat content was directly related to increases in body weight and mean insulin levels and infersely related to adrenal responsiveness to ACTH. The data show that: 1) the time of feeding determines the timing of the corticosterone rhythm in the absence of a rhythm in ACTH, 2) restricted feeding is not a stress, and 3) neither insulin nor glucose has a substantial influence on adrenal responsiveness to ACTH.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Martin, M. Pearson, L. Kebejian, E. Golden, A. Keselman, M. Bender, O. Carlson, J. Egan, B. Ladenheim, J.-L. Cadet, et al. Sex-Dependent Metabolic, Neuroendocrine, and Cognitive Responses to Dietary Energy Restriction and Excess Endocrinology, September 1, 2007; 148(9): 4318 - 4333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Shen, L.-y. Ma, X.-f. Qin, R. Jandacek, R. Sakai, and M. Liu Diurnal changes in intestinal apolipoprotein A-IV and its relation to food intake and corticosterone in rats Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, January 1, 2005; 288(1): G48 - G53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. E. Westfall How Enteral Feeding Options Influence Corticosterone Patterns in Rats Biol Res Nurs, January 1, 2000; 1(3): 233 - 244. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Choi, L. S. Wong, C. Yamat, and M. F. Dallman Hypothalamic Ventromedial Nuclei Amplify Circadian Rhythms: Do They Contain a Food-Entrained Endogenous Oscillator? J. Neurosci., May 15, 1998; 18(10): 3843 - 3852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Suchecki and S. Tufik Long-term effects of maternal deprivation on the corticosterone response to stress in rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 1997; 273(4): R1332 - R1338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kalsbeek, J. J. van Heerikhuize, J. Wortel, and R. M. Buijs A Diurnal Rhythm of Stimulatory Input to the Hypothalamo-Pituitary-Adrenal System as Revealed by Timed Intrahypothalamic Administration of the Vasopressin V1 Antagonist J. Neurosci., September 1, 1996; 16(17): 5555 - 5565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Heitkemper, J. C. Miller, and J. F. Shaver The Effect of Restricted Liquid Feeding on Gastrointestinal and Adrenocortical Variables in Rats West J Nurs Res, February 1, 1989; 11(1): 34 - 46. [PDF]

				R. McGivern and G. Berntson Mediation of diurnal fluctuations in pain sensitivity in the rat by food intake patterns: reversal by naloxone Science, October 10, 1980; 210(4466): 210 - 211. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Sage, D. Maurel, and O. Bosler Corticosterone-dependent driving influence of the suprachiasmatic nucleus on adrenal sensitivity to ACTH Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, February 1, 2002; 282(2): E458 - E465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]