Endocrinology, Vol 108, 1487-1496, Copyright © 1981 by Endocrine Society

ARTICLES

Facilitation and inhibition of the estrogen-induced luteinizing hormone surge in the rat by progesterone: effects on cytoplasmic and nuclear estrogen receptors in the hypothalamus-preoptic area, pituitary, and uterus

B Attardi

The possibility that inhibition and facilitation of estrogen-induced LH surges by progesterone could be associated with effects of this steroid on the concentration, subcellular distribution, or molecular properties of estrogen receptors in the hypothalamus-preoptic area (HPOA) and pituitary was investigated. Immature rats (28 days old) that received Silastic capsules containing estradiol-17 beta in oil (150 micrograms/ml) at 0900 h had LH surges between 1700 and 2000 h on day 29. This treatment led to depletion of cytoplasmic estrogen receptors (to 25-35% of control levels) and their accumulation in the nucleus. Insertion of crystalline progesterone implants concomitantly with estradiol implants or 24 h later resulted in blockade or enhancement of the LH surge, respectively. Progesterone administered in either mode did not significantly after the levels of estrogen receptors in the HPOA and pituitary; however, progesterone did suppress the quantity of both cytoplasmic and nuclear estrogen receptors in the uterus when administered in conjunction with estradiol for 24 h oe for 8 h after 24- h estrogen priming. The binding affinity and sedimentation properties in sucrose gradients of cytoplasmic estrogen receptors were unchanged by progesterone treatment. The specificity of the effects of progesterone on LH secretion was examined. Testosterone, dexamethasone, and the synthetic progestin R5020 (17,21-dimethyl-19-nor-4,9-pregnadien- 3,20-dione) also inhibited LH surges when injected 8 h after placement of estradiol implants in 28-day-old rats. Only progesterone and R5020 brought about premature and sustained LH release when given to estradiol-primed rats at 0900 h on day 29. None of these compounds interfered directly with the binding of [3H]estradiol to cytoplasmic or nuclear receptors. In conclusion, modulation by progesterone of the estrogen-induced LH surge does not seem to result from effects on neural and hypophysial estrogen receptors. In contrast, suppression of uterine estrogen receptors by progesterone may account in part for antagonism by this steroid of estrogen-stimulated uterine growth.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. B. Becker, A. P. Arnold, K. J. Berkley, J. D. Blaustein, L. A. Eckel, E. Hampson, J. P. Herman, S. Marts, W. Sadee, M. Steiner, et al. Strategies and Methods for Research on Sex Differences in Brain and Behavior Endocrinology, April 1, 2005; 146(4): 1650 - 1673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A M Brown, J M Janik, E S Murphree, R King, and P Callahan Effects of cyclic steroid hormone replacement on prolactin and luteinizing hormone surges in female rats Reproduction, September 1, 2004; 128(3): 373 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T.A. Richter, J.E. Robinson, and N.P. Evans Progesterone Blocks the Estradiol-Stimulated Luteinizing Hormone Surge by Disrupting Activation in Response to a Stimulatory Estradiol Signal in the Ewe Biol Reprod, July 1, 2002; 67(1): 119 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]