help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Litwack, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Litwack, G.

Endocrinology, Vol 109, 803-812, Copyright © 1981 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

The effects of 1,10-phenanthroline on the binding of activated rat hepatic glucocorticoid-receptor complexes to deoxyribonucleic acid- cellulose

TJ Schmidt, BC Sekula and G Litwack

1,10-Phenanthroline, a metal ion chelator, inhibits the binding of previously activated (25 C for 30 min) rat hepatic [3H]triamcinolone acetonide (3H-labeled 9-fluoro-11 beta, 21-dihydroxy-16 alpha, 17-1-[1- metylethylidenebis(oxy)]pregna-1,4-diene-3,20-dione ([3H]TA)-receptor complexes to DNA-cellulose. The observed inhibition increases as the temperature of the preincubation with chelator is increased from 0 to 25 C. Fifty percent of the maximal inhibition (greater than 90%) detected at 25 C is achieved with 1 mM 1,10-phenanthroline. The observed inhibition is not the consequence of DNA degradation by 1,10- phenanthroline-Cu2+ complexes, since preincubation of activated cytosol with neocuproine (2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline), a potent Cu2+ chelator, fails to block the subsequent inhibition of DNA-cellulose binding by 1,10-phenanthroline. The failure of other chelators which complex siilar metal ions (alpha, alpha'-dipyridyl,8-hydroxyquinoline, 2,2',2"-tripyridine, EDTA, EGTA, and Na azide) to inhibit DNA-cellulose binding suggests that the effectiveness of 1,10-phenanthroline does not result from removal of a required free metal ion(s) but, rather, from a specific interaction with a metal ion(s) which may be located within the activated receptor protein. The observed inhibition is dependent on the metal chelating properties of 1,10-phenanthroline, since preincubation with several divalent metal cations (Zn2+, Co2+, and Ni2+) which are known to be chelated by this compound block its subsequent inhibitory effect. Ferroin (1,10-phenanthroline-ferrous sulfate complex) and 1,7-phenanthroline (nonchelating isomer) also fail to inhibit DNA-cellulose binding. The inhibition mediated by 1,10- phenanthroline persists after gel filtration, suggesting that 1,10- phenanthroline associated with a macromolecule is the effective form of the inhibitor, rather than free 1,10-phenanthroline. Finally, 1,10- phenanthroline appears to interact directly with activated [3H]TA- receptor complexes, since it alters their net charge and results in their elution from DEAE-cellulose at a salt concentration characteristic of unactivated complexes. Collectively, the data suggest that the activated [3H]TA-receptor complex is a metalloprotein and that the metal ion(s) may be associated directly with the DNA-binding site or may regulate this site indirectly through an allostreic mechanism.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1981 by The Endocrine Society