help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Norstedt, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Norstedt, G.

Endocrinology, Vol 110, 2107-2112, Copyright © 1982 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

A comparison between the effects of growth hormone on prolactin receptors and estrogen receptors in rat liver

G Norstedt

Human GH (hGH) increased hepatic PRL and estrogen receptors in hypophysectomized (Hx) female rats after continuous infusion of the hormone (5 micrograms/h) using osmotic minipumps, but not after the infrequent administration of the same daily dose (120 micrograms) of the hormone by sc injections (60 micrograms/12 h). The effects of hGH on body weight (an increase) and tibial epiphyseal zones (a widening) were observed regardless of the mode of hGH administration. Thus, it would seem as if the mode of administration of hGH is of importance for the type of biological effect exerted by the hormone. Furthermore, rGH was effective in increasing both PRL and estrogen receptors in the liver of Hx ovariectomized (HxOx) rats, whereas rat PRL (rPRL) was much less efficient. Finally, rat GH (rGH) suppressed the concentration of a nonreceptor estrogen-binding protein in the liver of HxOx rats; the protein occurred at a low concentration in Ox rats and was markedly increased after hypophysectomy rPRL was inefficient in modulating the concentration of estrogen-binding protein. Thus, rGH, but not rPRL, seems to regulate both sexually differentiated (PRL receptors and estrogen-binding protein) and sexually nondifferentiated (estrogen receptor) functions in the rat liver. The mechanism behind this dual effect of rGH is obscure, but may possibly be related to the presence of isohormones of rGH with different effects on the liver.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1982 by The Endocrine Society