help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watson-Whitmyre, M.
Right arrow Articles by Stetson, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watson-Whitmyre, M.
Right arrow Articles by Stetson, M. H.

Endocrinology, Vol 112, 763-765, Copyright © 1983 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Simulation of peak pineal melatonin release restores sensitivity to evening melatonin injections in pinealectomized hamsters

M Watson-Whitmyre and MH Stetson

In intact hamsters held on LD 14:10, pineal melatonin production and release peaks late in the evening. If these animals receive a daily injection of melatonin approximately 8 h before the endogenous peak (at the time of lights out), they respond with testicular regression. Pinealectomized hamsters receiving only this evening injection do not respond. The hypothesis tested here is very simple: replacement of the pineal melatonin rhythm in pinealectomized hamsters with a daily melatonin injection at the time of peak melatonin release in intact hamsters should reestablish sensitivity to evening (lights out) injections of melatonin. Conversely, melatonin replacement at times other than this should be ineffective. Pinealectomized hamsters maintained on LD 14:10 (lights 0600 - 2000 h) were injected with melatonin (15 microgram) at the time of the endogenous melatonin peak (2 h prior to lights on) and in the evening (0.5 h prior to lights out). This injection paradigm produced a rapid testicular regression that appears to be dependent on the timing of melatonin injections with respect to the animal's circadian system. Two daily injections given with the same frequency (8.5 h apart) but during a different time of the day were not effective. The results suggest that rhythmic sensitivity to melatonin is not affected by removal of the pineal, and that this gland serves as the source of endogenous melatonin, which must be present at the proper time for exogenous injections of melatonin to produce testicular regression.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
W. S. Warren, D. B. Hodges, and V. M. Cassone
Pinealectomized Rats Entrain and Phase-Shift to Melatonin Injections in a Dose-Dependent Manner
J Biol Rhythms, October 1, 1993; 8(3): 233 - 245.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
F. J. P. Ebling, G. A. Lincoln, F. Wollnik, and N. Anderson
Effects of Constant Darkness and Constant Light on Circadian Organization and Reproductive Responses in the Ram
J Biol Rhythms, December 1, 1988; 3(4): 365 - 384.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
H. Underwood and B. D. Goldman
Vertebrate Circadian and Photoperiodic Systems: Role of the Pineal Gland and Melatonin
J Biol Rhythms, December 1, 1987; 2(4): 279 - 315.
[PDF]


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
V. M. Cassone, M. J. Chesworth, and S. M. Armstrong
Dose-Dependent Entrainment of Rat Circadian Rhythms by Daily Injection of Melatonin
J Biol Rhythms, September 1, 1986; 1(3): 219 - 229.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1983 by The Endocrine Society