help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schonbrunn, A.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schonbrunn, A.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, J. B.

Endocrinology, Vol 113, 1559-1567, Copyright © 1983 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Somatostatin analogs: correlation between receptor binding affinity and biological potency in GH pituitary cells

A Schonbrunn, OP Rorstad, JM Westendorf and JB Martin

Somatostatin (SRIF) is a hypothalamic tetradecapeptide which acts on several different types of pituitary cells to inhibit hormone release both in vivo and in vitro. We have previously shown that the GH4C1 clonal strain of rat pituitary tumor cells contains a single class of specific high-affinity SRIF receptors and that SRIF is a potent inhibitor of GH and PRL release by these cells. In this study, we have determined the relationship between the apparent binding affinity and biological potency of 19 SRIF analogs in GH4C1 cells. Receptor binding and biological activity were assayed under identical conditions. A good correlation (r = 0.96) was observed over a 10,000-fold range between the receptor binding affinities and biological potencies of SRIF analogs. Modifications at the C- and N-terminal regions of the SRIF molecule had minimal effects on binding to the receptor or potency to inhibit PRL release. However, substitution of residues 6 through 10 or reduction of the disulfide bond resulted in a 100-fold or greater decrease in both activities. The N-terminal extended SRIF analogs, SRIF- 28, [D-Trp22]SRIF-28, and SRIF-25, were all somewhat less potent than SRIF. These results strongly support the involvement of the characterized SRIF receptor in initiating the biological actions of SRIF in GH4C1 cells and define the structural features of the SRIF molecule required for both receptor binding and activation.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1983 by The Endocrine Society