help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Thorner, M. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evans, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Thorner, M. O.

Endocrinology, Vol 114, 861-867, Copyright © 1984 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

The self-priming effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone on luteinizing hormone release: observations using rat anterior pituitary fragments and dispersed cells continuously perifused in parallel

WS Evans, DR Uskavitch, DL Kaiser, P Hellmann, JL Borges and MO Thorner

To study in vitro the self-priming effect of GnRH on LH release, rat anterior pituitaries were prepared either as fragments or dispersed cells and continuously perifused in parallel chambers. The experimental groups consisted of rats killed at 0800 h on diestrus day 1, diestrus day 2, proestrus or estrus, or at 1400 h on proestrus. To insure truly independent observations, each experimental preparation was tested on three occasions. After basal LH release had stabilized, the tissue preparations were exposed to 10 nM GnRH as two 30-min challenges separated by 1 h. LH secretory rates (nanograms per min/pituitary for fragments; nanograms per min/10(7) cells for dispersed cells) were calculated 1) for basal release (during the 20-min period immediately preceding each GnRH challenge), 2) in response to GnRH, and 3) as the sum of basal and GnRH-stimulated release. Comparison of the two preparations revealed that basal and GnRH-stimulated LH release by pituitary fragments was more variable than LH release by dispersed cells. In addition, while dispersed cells responded promptly to the addition/withdrawal of stimuli, fragments did so more gradually. With respect to GnRH self-priming, the second mean secretory rate for basal LH release by fragments (range, 28.8-46.5) was significantly (0.1 greater than P greater than 0.01) higher than the first rate (range, 14.4-22.0) on diestrus day 1, diestrus day 2, proestrus at 0800 h, and estrus. With dispersed cells, the first and second basal rates were similar to each other on diestrus day 1 and estrus, but on diestrus day 2 and on proestrus at 0800 and 1400 h, the second basal rate (range, 36.8-93) was significantly (P less than 0.001) higher than the first range (range, 17.7-31.7). When fragments received GnRH, the second mean secretory rate (range, 35.2-64.2) was significantly (0.1 greater than P greater than 0.03) higher than the first rate (range, 13.4-34.1) on diestrus day 2 and proestrus at 0800 h. With dispersed cells, the mean secretory rate in response to the second GnRH challenge was higher only on diestrus day 2 (37.0 +/- 4.1 vs. 60.3 +/- 3.8; P less than 0.05). When considered as the total of basal plus GnRH-stimulated LH release, the second secretory rate by fragments (range, 54.5 - 110.8) was significantly (0.1 greater than P greater than 0.02) higher than the first rate (range, 27.9 - 51.4) on diestrus day 1, diestrus day 2, and proestrus at 0800 h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1984 by The Endocrine Society