help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakagawa, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ohtaki, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakagawa, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ohtaki, S.

Endocrinology, Vol 115, 33-40, Copyright © 1984 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Partial purification and characterization of two thiol proteases from hog thyroid lysosomes

H Nakagawa and S Ohtaki

Two proteases were purified from lysosomal supernatants of hog thyroids. The first step of the purification by diethylaminoethyl cellulose chromatography separated the two proteases, which were shown to have quite similar properties with respect to 2-mercaptoethanol requirement and pH optima for benzoyl-L-arginine-2-naphthylamide (BANA) hydrolytic activity, and inhibition by sulfhydryl inhibitors. One of the proteases, designated as thiol protease-1 (TP-1), was further purified by gel filtration (Sephacryl S-200) and vigorously hydrolyzed BANA but not casein. BANA hydrolytic activity of TP-1 was 50% inhibited by 10(-5) M leupeptin and by 10(-7) M L-trans-epoxysuccinyl- leucylamido(4-amino)butane. A highly purified preparation of the other protease, designated as thiol protease-2 (TP-2), was obtained after gel filtration on Sephacryl S-200 and carboxymethyl cellulose chromatography. In contrast to TP-1, TP-2 exhibited high hydrolytic activity against both casein and BANA, and was more sensitive to leupeptin and L-trans-epoxysuccinyl-leucylamido(4-amino)butane, the concentrations for 50% inhibition being 10(-7) and 10(-8) M, respectively. Electrophoresis and chromatofocusing revealed that the two proteases had different isoelectric points. TP-1 could bind to concanavalin A Sepharose and hydrolyzed L-arginine-2-naphthylamide but not carbobenzoxy-L-arginyl-L-arginine methylcoumarylamide whereas TP-2 did not bind to concanavalin A Sepharose and hydrolyzed carbobenzoxy-L- arginyl-L-arginine methylcoumarylamide but not L-arginine-2- naphthylamide. These results suggested that TP-1 and TP-2 had properties similar to those of the liver lysosomal thiol proteases, cathepsins H and B, respectively.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1984 by The Endocrine Society