help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ladenheim, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Charreau, E. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ladenheim, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Charreau, E. H.

Endocrinology, Vol 115, 752-756, Copyright © 1984 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Insulin action and characterization of insulin receptors in rat luteal cells

RG Ladenheim, M Tesone and EH Charreau

The effect of insulin (Ins) on luteal cell function was assayed and Ins binding was characterized in isolated collagenase-dispersed rat luteal cells. Ins stimulated progesterone production at concentrations over 10(-8) M, whereas human CG (hCG) produced maximal stimulation at 10(- 11) M. Ins had an additive effect when it was added to the luteal cells in the presence of hCG in concentrations that produced submaximal stimulation. At 10(-9) M Ins the additive effect on hCG response became apparent (80% of maximal progesterone production). The maximal hCG response cannot be exceeded, even in the presence of high amounts of both hormones. hCG maximally stimulated cAMP production at 10(-10) M, whereas Ins neither stimulated cAMP production nor enhanced hCG response. Ins binding to luteal cells attained highest values after 30 min of incubation at 20 C. A curvilinear Scatchard plot was obtained and it was analyzed using a two-binding site model. The affinity constant values were 2.1 X 10(8) M-1 and 5.2 X 10(6) M-1 and the number of binding sites were 35,000 and 900,000 per cell, respectively. Bound Ins was not displaceable by hCG, human GH, human LH, epidermal growth factor, or ovine PRL. A protein moiety was essential for the receptor activity, since after trypsin digestion marked loss of binding was verified. Subcellular fractionation was performed and the highest binding was observed in the 105,000 X g pellet fraction. This study demonstrates that Ins binds specifically to rat luteal cells and stimulates steroidogenesis, adding support for the hypothesis that insulin acts directly upon the ovary.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1984 by The Endocrine Society