help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/endo-115-3-1082
Endocrinology Vol. 115, No. 3 1082-1089
Copyright © 1984 by the Endocrine Society.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by OKATANI, Y.
Right arrow Articles by FISHMAN, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by OKATANI, Y.
Right arrow Articles by FISHMAN, J.

Suppression of the Preovulatory Luteinizing Hormone Surge in the Rat by 2-Hydroxyestrone: Relationship to Endogenous Estradiol Levels*

YUJI OKATANI{dagger} and JACK FISHMAN

The Rockefeller University New York, New York 10021

Address requests for reprints to: Dr. Jack Fishman, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021.

Abstract

Injection of 100 µg 2-hydroxyestrone (2OHE1) at various times oh the morning of proestrus into normal 4-day-cycling rats results in abolition of the preovulatory LH surge in a number of animals tested. The greatest response was observed when the administration of 2OHE1 coincided with endogenous estradiol (E2) levels that were close to but not at their maximal proestrous levels. The catechol estrogen failed to abolish the LH surge if given much earlier or after the E2 maximum had already been reached. The effectiveness of 20HE1 inhibition of the LH surge was greatly increased by the administration of 1 µg E2 1 h before the catechol estrogen. 2OHE1 did not interfere with LH secretion in response to LHRH administration, indicating that the inhibitory action of the catechol estrogen is exercised at the hypothalamic level. In contrast to its inhibition of the positive feedback, 2OHE1 administered either before or after the injection of E2 to ovariectomized rats had no effect on the negative feedback of the hormone on pituitary LH secretion.

The narrow and specific "time window" on proestrus when an injection of 20HE1 results in the abolition of the preovulatory LH surge and its relation to the endogenous E2 preovulatory secretion suggest that the catechol estrogen interferes with a brief neuronal triggering event obligatory for LHRH release. The evidence also indicates that this action does not involve conventional competition for the E2 receptor. (Endocrinology 115: 1082–1089, 1984)

Footnotes

* This work was supported by Grant HD-16422 from the NICHHD, Grant CA-22795 from the NCI, and funds from The Rockefeller Foundation.

{dagger} Present address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kochi Medical School, Oko, Nankoku, Kochi, 781-51 Japan.

Received October 5, 1983.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1984 by The Endocrine Society