help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bartke, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hebert, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bartke, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hebert, A.

Endocrinology, Vol 115, 1506-1510, Copyright © 1984 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Does prolactin modify testosterone feedback in the hamster? Pituitary grafts alter the ability of testosterone to suppress luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone release in castrated male hamsters

A Bartke, KS Matt, TM Siler-Khodr, MJ Soares, F Talamantes, BD Goldman, MP Hogan and A Hebert

Adult male golden hamsters maintained in a long photoperiod (14 h of light and 10 h of darkness) or in a short photoperiod (5 h of light and 19 h of darkness for 7 weeks) were castrated and either given one anterior pituitary transplant under the kidney capsule or sham- operated. Additional animals were castrated and grafted or sham-grafted at the time of transfer to the short photoperiod. Starting 2 weeks after castration, all animals were injected three times a week with 20 micrograms testosterone propionate (TP). After 3 weeks, the dose of TP was increased to 80 micrograms and, after an additional 2 weeks, to 320 micrograms per injection. Blood samples were collected 2 weeks after castration and 1 day after the last injection of 20, 80, and 320 micrograms TP. Short photoperiod reduced and pituitary grafts increased plasma PRL levels. Plasma testosterone levels were related to the dose of injected TP, but were not influenced by photoperiod or pituitary transplants. Before the onset of TP injections, plasma LH and FSH levels in grafted and sham-grafted hamsters did not differ. In each of the three photoperiod conditions, injections of TP were consistently less effective in suppressing plasma gonadotropin levels in pituitary- grafted animals than in sham-grafted controls. These results indicate that PRL modulates the effects of exogenous testosterone on LH and FSH release in adult castrated male golden hamsters, this effect of PRL is due to reducing the sensitivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary system to feedback inhibition by testosterone, and suppression of pituitary PRL release in short photoperiod may be partially responsible for the concomitant increase in the sensitivity of LH and FSH release to inhibition by testosterone.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J AndrolHome page
A. Bartke
Prolactin in the Male: 25 Years Later
J Androl, September 1, 2004; 25(5): 661 - 666.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
R. W. Steger, V. Chandrashekar, W. Zhao, A. Bartke, and N. D. Horseman
Neuroendocrine and Reproductive Functions in Male Mice with Targeted Disruption of the Prolactin Gene
Endocrinology, September 1, 1998; 139(9): 3691 - 3695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1984 by The Endocrine Society