help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Monahan, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Monahan, J. W.

Endocrinology, Vol 116, 835-842, Copyright © 1985 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Suppressive effect of inflammation and other forms of stress on the binding of prolactin by rat liver

AD Goodman, S Hoekstra and JW Monahan

We have found that in female rats a variety of stressful stimuli, including sc inflammation, skin incision, endotoxin injection, and cold exposure, cause a significant decrease (30-86%) in the capacity of the hepatic cell membranes to specifically bind [125I]ovine PRL. Stress- induced decrease in food intake was not a factor in these studies, as nourishment was given only by tube feeding. Neither sc inflammation nor cold exposure affected hepatic binding of [125I]insulin. Further, the induction of inflammation in lactating rats and rats bearing 7,12- dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced mammary carcinomas did not affect the binding of PRL by the lactating or malignant mammary tissue. The suppressive effect of inflammation on hepatic binding of PRL was demonstrable in adrenalectomized-ovariectomized rats, in hypophysectomized rats receiving hormone replacement, and in adrenalectomized rats that had undergone partial chemical sympathectomy. We conclude that sc inflammation, as well as other forms of stress, decreases hepatic binding of PRL, but does not affect hepatic binding of insulin or mammary binding of PRL. The decrease in hepatic PRL binding is not mediated by a hormone secreted by the adrenals, ovaries, or pituitary, or by catecholamines, but could be mediated by another plasma factor or by peripheral dopaminergic neurons. Stress-induced decrease in hepatic PRL binding, or a related decrease in the binding of other polypeptide hormones, could play a role in the physiological response to stress.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. M. Corbacho, G. Valacchi, L. Kubala, E. Olano-Martin, B. C. Schock, T. P. Kenny, and C. E. Cross
Tissue-specific gene expression of prolactin receptor in the acute-phase response induced by lipopolysaccharides
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2004; 287(4): E750 - E757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1985 by The Endocrine Society