help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bumpus, F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bumpus, F. M.

Endocrinology, Vol 116, 1598-1602, Copyright © 1985 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Efficacy of octa- and heptapeptide antagonists of angiotensin II as inhibitors of angiotensin III binding in the rat adrenal glomerulosa

JG Douglas, MC Khosla and FM Bumpus

Angiotensin III (Ang III) is a carboxy-terminal 7-amino acid analog of angiotensin II (Ang II) with similar receptor binding affinity and biological activity in adrenal glomerulosa. Specific competitive antagonists have been synthesized for both compounds, and structure- activity studies have demonstrated that Ang II (octapeptide) antagonists compete better for Ang II receptors in adrenal glomerulosa than do Ang III (heptapeptide) antagonists. These differences were observed in spite of only 1 amino acid difference in chain length of antagonist analogs. These earlier observations by our group provided support for the current hypothesis that Ang III binding would be preferentially inhibited by Ang III antagonists compared to Ang II antagonists. To accomplish these studies, we used [125I]Ang III and [125I]Ang II as ligands and 5 pairs of heptapeptide and octapeptide antagonists with identical substituent amino acids in the carboxy- terminal position. [Sar1,Ile8]- and des Asp1 [Ile8]Ang II did not differ in potency as antagonists of Ang II binding, but with 4 other pairs of antagonists, the octapeptide antagonists were more potent than the corresponding hepatapeptide antagonist. Six of 10 antagonists exhibited similar potencies as antagonists of equimolar concentrations of Ang II and Ang III. One heptapeptide antagonist was twice as potent against Ang III, and 3 octapeptide antagonists were more potent against Ang II. In general, the order of potencies of the 10 antagonists as inhibitors of Ang III binding was linearly related to their potencies against Ang II. Hence, our hypothesis of preferential activity of Ang III antagonists (compared to Ang II antagonists) as inhibitors of Ang III binding to adrenal glomerulosa was not borne out by the present studies. When this observation was combined with the finding of similar receptor densities of Ang III and Ang II receptors, we concluded that Ang III and Ang II probably bind to the same receptor site in the adrenal glomerulosa.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1985 by The Endocrine Society