help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Hertogh, R.
Right arrow Articles by Glorieux, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Hertogh, R.
Right arrow Articles by Glorieux, B.

Endocrinology, Vol 119, 680-684, Copyright © 1986 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Estrogen and progestogen receptors in the implantation sites and interembryonic segments of rat uterus endometrium and myometrium

R De Hertogh, E Ekka, I Vanderheyden and B Glorieux

Estrogens play a central role in the mechanism of blastocyst implantation. Whether the blastocyst itself contributes to this hormonal effect by locally releasing estrogens at the site of implantation remains debatable. Indirect evidence of estrogen production by the embryo could be obtained if specific estrogenic effects were found to a greater extent at the implantation sites, when compared to the interembryonic segments. Six-day pregnant rats were injected in the morning with Evans' blue, and the uterine blue stripes revealing the implantation sites were separated from the interembryonic segments. Endometrial and myometrial portions of the two sites were separately pooled and analyzed for protein, estradiol receptor (E2R) and progesterone receptor (Prog.R) contents, in cytosol and nuclear fractions. The present results show a significantly higher protein concentration in cytosol of endometrium (20 +/- 6.2 vs. 12 +/- 7.6) (means +/- SD) and, to a lesser extent, in the cytosol of myometrium (10 +/- 2.5 vs. 8.1 +/- 2.2 mg/mg DNA) at the implantation sites as compared to interembryonic segments. Protein levels were slightly higher in nuclei of endometrium only (8.3 +/- 3.4 vs. 6.4 +/- 4.5 mg/mg DNA). E2R concentrations were significantly lower in cytosol of endometrium from implantation sites (3.5 +/- 1.4 vs. 5.0 +/- 2.6 pmol/mg DNA), whereas nuclear levels were higher (0.63 +/- 0.38 vs. 0.47 +/- 0.24 pmol/mg DNA); nuclei-cytosol ratios were significantly higher in endometrium from implantation sites (16 +/- 7 vs. 9.7 +/- 5%). In myometrium no differences were observed between the two sites. Prog.R were higher both in cytosol (3.3 +/- 1.0 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.3) and in nuclei (3.0 +/- 1.2 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.7 pmol/mg DNA) of endometrium from implantation sites; nuclei-cytosol ratios were also higher (97 +/- 32 vs. 71 +/- 34%). In myometrium, differences between the sites were minimal. Our results show higher protein concentration in endometrium from implantation sites, mostly in cytosol and to a lesser extent in nuclei; lower cytosol but higher nuclear E2R concentrations, and both higher cytosol and nuclear Prog.R concentrations in endometrium from implantations sites, and strongly suggest a local estrogenic effect on tissues in close vicinity of the blastocyst. Thus they favor the hypothesis of estrogen release by the embryo itself.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1986 by The Endocrine Society