help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Attardi, B.
Right arrow Articles by Happe, H. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Attardi, B.
Right arrow Articles by Happe, H. K.

Endocrinology, Vol 119, 904-915, Copyright © 1986 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Comparison of the physicochemical properties of uterine nuclear estrogen receptors bound to estradiol or 4-hydroxytamoxifen

B Attardi and HK Happe

We have compared the physicochemical properties of rat uterine nuclear estrogen receptors (ER) labeled with (E2) or the high affinity antiestrogen 4-hydroxytamoxifen [OH Tam; 1-[4-(2- dimethylaminoethoxy)phenyl]-1-(4-hydroxyphenyl) 2-phenyl-but-1-(Z)ene]. Nuclear ER labeled in vivo with either ligand had sedimentation rates of 4.5-5S and mol wt (calculated from sedimentation coefficients and Stokes radii) of about 80,000. The 3S and 4S forms labeled by in vitro exchange with [3H]E2 or [3H]OH Tam, respectively, had mol wt of 31,000 and 50,000. Based on apparent Kd values, numbers of binding sites per uterus, and dissociation kinetics, the ligand-binding sites of the nuclear E2- and OH Tam-ER complexes could not be distinguished. An appreciable proportion (25-75%) of 4.5-5S estrogen- or antiestrogen-ER complexes were retained on DNA-cellulose columns and were eluted with 0.21 M KCl, while the 3S and 4S forms had lost the DNA-binding site. Nuclear ER bound to E2 or OH Tam were differentially sensitive to proteolysis with trypsin or alpha-chymotrypsin. Both in vivo and in vitro labeled [3H]OH Tam-ER complexes sedimented as discrete species (S20,w = 3.8-3.9; mol wt, approximately 40,000) after trypsin treatment (50 micrograms/ml; 1 h at 23 C); under the same conditions, peaks of [3H]E2 were obliterated. After digestion with alpha-chymotrypsin (10 micrograms/ml; 1 h at 23 C), nuclear ER labeled in vivo with [3H]E2 or [3H]OH Tam sedimented at 2.9S (mol wt, 29,000) or 4.0S (mol wt, 47,000), respectively; at 50 micrograms/ml, [3H]E2-ER complexes were barely discernible, while binding of [3H]OH Tam was only partially decreased. Nuclear ER labeled with the nonsteroidal estrogen [3H]diethylstilbestrol resembled [3H]E2-ER complexes in sensitivity to proteolysis. These results suggest that nuclear estrogen- and antiestrogen-ER complexes may differ in conformation such that they are differentially susceptible to degradation. This may influence their interactions with chromatin or specific DNA sequences as well as their release from nuclear binding sites.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. A. Holt, T. G. Consler, S. P. Williams, A. H. Ayscue, L. M. Leesnitzer, G. B. Wisely, and A. N. Billin
Helix 1/8 Interactions Influence the Activity of Nuclear Receptor Ligand-Binding Domains
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2003; 17(9): 1704 - 1714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1986 by The Endocrine Society