help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rideau, N.
Right arrow Articles by Leclercq, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rideau, N.
Right arrow Articles by Leclercq, B.

Endocrinology, Vol 119, 2635-2641, Copyright © 1986 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Further characterization of insulin secretion from the perfused duodenum-pancreas of chicken: a comparison of insulin release in chickens selected for high and low abdominal fat content

N Rideau, J Simon and B Leclercq

Insulin release from the perfused pancreas was studied in genetically selected fat and lean chickens. The previously described glucose insensitivity of the chicken pancreas cannot be overcome by 5 or 10 mM D-glyceraldehyde, suggesting that the resistance is not related to glucose metabolism before the triose phosphate step. At 42 mM, glucose induced a biphasic insulin release which was specific, since 42 mM mannitol did not elicit insulin release. Arginine (10 mM) or acetylcholine (0.1-1 microM), which in themselves do not cause insulin release, generated a biphasic insulin release in the presence of a low nonstimulating glucose concentration (14 mM); the effect was synergistic. In contrast to the glucose tolerance test observed in vivo, the pancreas from the fat line chicken in response to glucose or glucose plus arginine released significantly less insulin during the first phase. The significance of this defect awaits further elucidation. On the other hand, acetylcholine, a more potent secretagogue, did not reveal any significant difference between fat and lean chickens.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. Dupont, J. Chen, M. Derouet, J. Simon, B. Leclercq, and M. Taouis
Metabolic Differences between Genetically Lean and Fat Chickens Are Partly Attributed to the Alteration of Insulin Signaling in Liver
J. Nutr., November 1, 1999; 129(11): 1937 - 1944.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1986 by The Endocrine Society