Endocrinology, Vol 121, 266-270, Copyright © 1987 by Endocrine Society

ARTICLES

The suppression of nocturnal pineal melatonin in the Syrian hamster: dose-response curves at 500 and 360 nm

PL Podolin, MD Rollag and GC Brainard

It has recently been shown that wavelengths in the near-UV range (UV-A, 320-400 nm) are capable of influencing pineal melatonin content in the hamster. The purpose of this study was to compare the capacities of monochromatic visible and UV radiation for suppressing nocturnal pineal melatonin. Groups of male Syrian hamsters adapted to a 14-h light, 10-h dark cycle (lights on, 1700-0700 h) were exposed to irradiances of 500 or 360 nm light for 5 min during their dark phase. Both wavelengths suppressed pineal melatonin in a dose-related manner. The resultant fluence-response curves were similar in shape, although their corresponding threshold irradiances were markedly different. The calculated ED50 values for 500 and 360 nm light were 0.022 microW/cm2 (1.66 X 10(13) photons/cm2) and 0.306 microW/cm2 (1.66 X 10(14) photons/cm2), respectively. These data show that the induction of a 50% depression of pineal melatonin requires 10 times the number of 360-nm photons compared to 500-nm photons at the level of the cornea. Despite this difference in sensitivity to wavelength, environmental irradiances of UV-A are well above the threshold for melatonin suppression in the hamster. These results thus demonstrate the importance of considering UV-A, in addition to the visible wavelengths, in the regulation of hamster pineal physiology.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. C. Brainard and J. P. Hanifin Photons, Clocks, and Consciousness J Biol Rhythms, August 1, 2005; 20(4): 314 - 325. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. C. Brainard, J. P. Hanifin, F. M. Barker, B. Sanford, and M. H. Stetson Influence of near-ultraviolet radiation on reproductive and immunological development in juvenile male Siberian hamsters J. Exp. Biol., March 9, 2002; 204(14): 2535 - 2541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. C. Brainard, J. P. Hanifin, J. M. Greeson, B. Byrne, G. Glickman, E. Gerner, and M. D. Rollag Action Spectrum for Melatonin Regulation in Humans: Evidence for a Novel Circadian Photoreceptor J. Neurosci., August 15, 2001; 21(16): 6405 - 6412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Dkhissi-Benyahya, B. Sicard, and H. M. Cooper Effects of Irradiance and Stimulus Duration on Early Gene Expression (Fos) in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus: Temporal Summation and Reciprocity J. Neurosci., October 15, 2000; 20(20): 7790 - 7797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Lucas and R. G. Foster Neither Functional Rod Photoreceptors nor Rod or Cone Outer Segments Are Required for the Photic Inhibition of Pineal Melatonin Endocrinology, April 1, 1999; 140(4): 1520 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				D. B. Boivin, J. F. Duffy, R. E. Kronauer, and C. A. Czeisler Sensitivity of the Human Circadian Pacemaker to Moderately Bright Light J Biol Rhythms, December 1, 1994; 9(3-4): 315 - 331. [Abstract] [PDF]