help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fauser, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hsueh, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fauser, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hsueh, A. J.

Endocrinology, Vol 123, 2935-2941, Copyright © 1988 by Endocrine Society

ARTICLES

Fibroblast growth factor inhibits luteinizing hormone-stimulated androgen production by cultured rat testicular cells

BC Fauser, A Baird and AJ Hsueh
Department of Reproductive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093.

The effect of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) on LH-stimulated testosterone production was investigated using primary cultures of rat testicular cells. Testicular cells obtained from neonatal rats (8-9 days of age) were maintained in culture for 3 days and then challenged with LH with or without basic FGF. After 3 additional days of culture, the media were collected for steroid RIA. LH treatment of cultured cells stimulated testosterone production in a dose-dependent fashion whereas FGF alone did not affect androgen biosynthesis. In contrast, cotreatment with FGF caused a dose-dependent decrease of LH-stimulated testosterone production, with an IC50 value of 1.1 X 10(-9) M (as calculated from three separate experiments). The inhibitory effect of FGF was evident 24 h after the initiation of treatment and this effect was reversible 1 day after the cessation of FGF treatment. The inhibition of LH-induced testosterone production by FGF (maximal inhibition greater than 90%) was accompanied by a 12-fold increase in progesterone levels, suggesting that the inhibitory effect of FGF was distal to the step of progesterone formation. FGF also inhibited forskolin (10(-5) M)- and (Bu)2cAMP (5 X 10(-4) M)-stimulated testosterone production. Furthermore, FGF inhibited the conversion of exogenously added androgen precursors (progesterone and 17 alpha- hydroxyprogesterone) to testosterone in LH-stimulated cultures indicating that FGF might inhibit 17 alpha-hydroxylase activity. The concept of a direct testicular action of FGF was further supported by the demonstration of high affinity (Kd: 3.9 X 10(-10) M; n = 3 experiments) and low capacity (46,900 sites per cell) FGF receptors in cultured testis cells. The binding of [125I]FGF was inhibited by basic and acidic FGF but not by several other growth factors. In conclusion, we suggest that FGF binds to testicular cells and inhibits LH- stimulated testosterone production by inhibiting, at least partially, 17 alpha-hydroxylase enzyme activities. Because FGF has been purified from testis extracts, this growth factor may have intratesticular paracrine or autocrine functions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Endocr. Rev.Home page
L. M. Cotton, M. K. O'Bryan, and B. T. Hinton
Cellular Signaling by Fibroblast Growth Factors (FGFs) and Their Receptors (FGFRs) in Male Reproduction
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2008; 29(2): 193 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1988 by The Endocrine Society