help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roguin, L. P.
Right arrow Articles by Retegui, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roguin, L. P.
Right arrow Articles by Retegui, L. A.

Endocrinology, Vol 127, 1009-1015, Copyright © 1990 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Monoclonal antibodies as probes to study the human growth hormone- binding domain to lactogenic rat liver receptors

LP Roguin, CE Cohen and LA Retegui
Instituto de Quimica y Fisicoquimica Biologicas (UBA-CONICET), Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquimica, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

A set of monoclonal antibodies (MAb) to human GH (hGH) was used to study the hormone binding orientation to its receptors (R) from female rat liver. The hGH antigenic region left exposed after its binding to liver microsomes was detected by measuring the ability of various [125I]MAb to bind to the preformed hGH-R complexes. Results indicated that a cluster of epitopes defined by the MAb, termed AE5, AC8, and AE12, remains accessible in the hGH-R complex whereas overlapping epitopes 3C11 and HG3 would define a hGH region involved in the binding site. Supporting these findings, solubilization and HPLC gel filtration of [125I]MAb-hGH-R complexes showed a radioactive peak of about 450,000 mol wt for MAb AE5 or AC8, but not for MAb 3C11 or HG3. [125I]MAb AE12 behaved differently, suggesting that epitope AE12 may be masked or altered in hGH-R-solubilized complexes. MAb directed to the putative hGH-binding site (MAb 3C11, HG3, and the closely related MAb 10C1 and NA71) failed to inhibit binding of the preformed [125I]MAb AE5-hGH complex to the receptors, suggesting a hormone modification after MAb AE5 binding. Accordingly competition experiments indicated an increase in the affinity of hGH for its receptors induced by this MAb. A higher hGH concentration was required to obtain 50% [125I]hGH binding to liver microsomes in the presence of MAb AE5 than in its absence. As the MAb used define epitopes that were previously correlated with the hGH structure, we concluded that a high flexible region (sequences 134-150) is exposed in the hGH-R complex. Furthermore, some MAb directed to this region enhance the hormone affinity for its rat liver receptors, probably through an induced conformational change.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1990 by The Endocrine Society