This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by NAGY, G. M. Articles by FRAWLEY, L. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by NAGY, G. M. Articles by FRAWLEY, L. S.

The Suckling Stimulus Increases the Responsiveness of Mammotropes Located Exclusively within the Central Region of the Adenohypophysis^*

Division of Cellular and Molecular Endocrinology, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of South Carolina Charleston, South Carolina 29425

Abstract

Studies from several groups, including our own, have shown that the suckling stimulus increases the responsiveness of pituitary cells to PRL-releasing stimuli. These findings, when viewed in light of differences in PRL cell responsiveness from one pituitary region to another, raised the possibility that suckling may influence responsiveness of cells in only a specific portion of the gland rather than in the entire pituitary. To address this issue, we evaluated cell responsiveness by performing plaque assays [with and without TRH, Angiotensin II (All), and dopamine] on cells from two different regions of pituitaries from suckled and nonsuckled rats. These pituitary regions consisted of the inner zone, which is a central area proximate to the neurointermediate lobe, and an outer zone, which encompasses the remaining peripheral area of the anterior lobe. We found that inner zone cells from nonsuckled animals were highly responsive to dopamine and relatively unresponsive to TRH and AIL However, after suckling, a complete shift occurred with inner zone cells becoming sensitive to TRH and All and resistant to dopamine. In contrast to these inner zone alterations, outer zone cells did not change after suckling, but remained responsive to TRH and All and unresponsive to dopamine. Our results demonstrate clearly that suckling-induced alterations in PRL cell responsiveness to certain modulatory agents can be attributed to a discrete subpopulation of cells located in a specific region of the pituitary. (Endocrinology 128: 761–764, 1991)

Footnotes

^* This work was supported by NIH Grant DK-38215 (to L.S.F.).

Received September 4, 1990.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. E. Freeman, B. Kanyicska, A. Lerant, and G. Nagy Prolactin: Structure, Function, and Regulation of Secretion Physiol Rev, October 1, 2000; 80(4): 1523 - 1631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Muranyi, P. Gergely, M. I. K. Fekete, and G. M. Nagy Protein Phosphatase 2A Plays a Role in the Suckling-Induced Changes in the Responsiveness of Pituitary Mammotropes Endocrinology, November 1, 1998; 139(11): 4590 - 4597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Nunez and L. S. Frawley alpha -MSH potentiates the responsiveness of mammotropes by increasing Ca2+ entry Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 1998; 274(6): E971 - E977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]