help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tiong, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Herington, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tiong, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Herington, A. C.

Endocrinology, Vol 129, 1628-1634, Copyright © 1991 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Tissue distribution, characterization, and regulation of messenger ribonucleic acid for growth hormone receptor and serum binding protein in the rat

TS Tiong and AC Herington
Prince Henry's Institute of Medical Research, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

The distribution of GH receptor (GHR) and GH-binding protein (GHBP) mRNAs in multiple rat tissues was examined by Northern blotting using a cDNA fragment encoding the common extracellular domain of the GHR and the serum GHBP. Both GHR and GHBP mRNAs [4.5 and 1.2 kilobases (kb), respectively] were present in liver, kidney, adrenal, heart, muscle, ovary, mammary gland, gastrointestinal tract, and adipose tissue, but were barely or not detectable in testis, thymus, or brain. These observations suggest that GH exerts direct effects across a broad spectrum of rat tissues. Nuclease protection analysis also confirmed the presence in extrahepatic tissues of a GHR mRNA with up to 50% of the cytoplasmic domain being identical in sequence to that of the hepatic GHR mRNA. This suggests, but does not prove, that different receptor classes with differing intracellular signalling mechanisms may not exist. It is also clear from our studies that liver was the most abundant source of the truncated (1.2 kb) mRNA and is, therefore, believed to be the primary site of GHBP synthesis. Also, more importantly, at least in the rat, it was only GHBP mRNA that was up- regulated to any extent during pregnancy (female vs. pregnant, P less than 0.001). No significant changes were observed in the abundance of the full-length (4.5 kb) GHR mRNA. This pregnancy-related change in GHBP mRNA was also accompanied by a comparable increase in the actual level of measurable serum GHBP (female vs. pregnant, P = 0.005). Little change was seen in hepatic membrane binding. These data suggest that the GHBP and GHR are both widely coexpressed, but that the expression is not always coordinately regulated. This raises the possibility that the GHBP and GHR may have distinct roles in the regulation of GH delivery and action.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1991 by The Endocrine Society