help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brar, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Frohman, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brar, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Frohman, L. A.

Endocrinology, Vol 129, 3274-3280, Copyright © 1991 by Endocrine Society

ARTICLES

Biosynthesis of human growth hormone-releasing hormone (hGRH) in the pituitary of hGRH transgenic mice

AK Brar, TR Downs, EP Heimer, AM Felix and LA Frohman
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio 45267.

We have studied the posttranslational processing of prohuman GH- releasing hormone (pro-hGRH) to the mature hormones, hGRH(1-44)-NH2 and hGRH(1-40)-OH, and its carboxyl-terminal peptide (hGCTP) in pituitary cells from transgenic mice bearing a metallothionein-hGRH fusion gene after incubation with [35S]methionine. After separation on HPLC, 35S- labeled and unlabeled hGRH in medium and cell extracts were characterized by RIA and immunoprecipitation with antisera against hGRH and against hGCTP. After a 4-h pulse, unlabeled and [35S]pro-hGRH, hGRH(1-44)-NH2, and hGRH(1-40)-OH were identified in medium and cell extracts by both RIA and immunoprecipitation with anti-hGRH serum. In cell extracts, after a 0.5-h pulse, [35S]pro-hGRH and hGRH(1-44)-NH2 but not [35S]hGRH(1-40)-OH were detectable. After a 0.5-h chase, however, 35S-labeled hGRH(1-40)-OH, pro-hGRH, and [35S]hGRH(1-44)-NH2 were all measurable. After a 4-h chase, comparable levels of [35S]hGRH(1-44)-NH2 and hGRH(1-40)-OH were present, and very little intracellular 35S-pro-hGRH remained. A progressive decrease in the ratio of immunoprecipitable pro-hGRH to mature hGRH peptides and an increase in the ratio of hGRH(1-40)-OH to hGRH(1-44)-NH2 was observed in the two chase periods. In medium, [35S]hGRH(1-44)-NH2 was detectable at all times, whereas only minimal amounts of [35S]hGRH(1-40)-OH were present. Labeled and unlabeled pro-hGRH in cell extracts was also detected with anti-hGCTP serum, and another peak, which coeluted with synthetic hGCTP, was also identified. The low molar ratio of intracellular immunoreactive hGCTP to hGRH (less than 0.02) suggests a more rapid turnover rate of hGCTP than of hGRH. These results demonstrate the processing of hGRH prohormone to both mature forms of hGRH and provide evidence that hGRH(1-40)-OH is derived from hGRH(1-44)- NH2.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1991 by The Endocrine Society