help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Little, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Little, A. B.

Endocrinology, Vol 130, 1090-1096, Copyright © 1992 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Chronic hyperestrogenemia: lack of positive feedback action on gonadotropin-releasing hormone-induced luteinizing hormone release and dual site of negative feedback action

DW Richardson, K Gordon, RB Billiar and AB Little
Department of Internal Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk 23507.

To test whether sustained midfollicular estrogen concentrations sensitize the pituitary response to GnRH in the continued presence of a GnRH stimulus, six female monkeys with regular menstrual cycles were administered hourly pulses of GnRH in the presence or absence of an sc estrone implant. Three were studied in a sequence of 2- to 8-week blocks of 1) control, 2) hourly pulses of exogenous GnRH (6 micrograms/1 min), 3) hourly GnRH pulses plus an estrone (E1) implant, and 4) the E1 alone. In the other three animals the sequence was 1) control, 2) E1, 3) E1 implant plus hourly GnRH pulses, and 4) GnRH pulses only. E1 increased mean estradiol concentrations from 55 pg/ml to 100 pg/ml and the corresponding E1 concentrations from 95 pg/ml to 160 pg/ml. LH concentrations, excluding midcycle surges, were 10.9 +/- 2.2 (SEM) ng/ml, 12.6 +/- 1.5 ng/ml, 11.7 +/- 1.5 ng/ml, and undetectable (less than 6 ng/ml) for the control, GnRH, GnRH plus E1, and E1-treatment periods, respectively. Of note was the suppression of LH concentrations to undetectable levels by midfollicular concentrations of estrogen during the E1-alone treatment period, and the return of LH concentrations to normal follicular phase levels by the application of exogenous GnRH support. This observation suggested that an estrogen negative feedback signal can suppress endogenous GnRH. To further examine this hypothesis we applied the same protocol to two hypogonadal female monkeys. E1 capsule placement increased the mean estradiol concentration from 22 to 61 pg/ml and suppressed LH and FSH to undetectable levels. When hourly pulses of GnRH (6 micrograms/1 min) were supplied, mean LH and FSH increased to 29.8 and 14.9 ng/ml, respectively. These studies demonstrate that elevation of estrogen concentrations to midfollicular levels does not sensitize the pituitary to GnRH stimulation, and pituitary sensitization is therefore unlikely to be important as a cause of elevated LH secretion in anovulatory states, such as the polycystic ovaries syndrome. In the hypogonadal monkeys, a 5-fold decrease in gonadotropin concentrations occurred in spite of full exogenons GnRH support, consistent with a hypophyseal site of estrogen negative feedback action. However, the GnRH clamp did prevent the complete suppression of LH and FSH noted when only estrogen was applied, consistent with an additional negative feedback effect on the hypothalamus. Although this same phenomenon is observed in the eugonadal monkeys, it appears unlikely that a hypothalamic site of estrogen inhibition plays a significant role during the menstrual cycle, otherwise the progressive rise in follicular phase estrogen concentrations would, by arresting GnRH secretion, abort folliculogenesis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
I. E. Messinis
Ovarian feedback, mechanism of action and possible clinical implications
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2006; 12(5): 557 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. A.R. Doi, M. Al-Zaid, P. A. Towers, C. J. Scott, and K. A.S. Al-Shoumer
Irregular cycles and steroid hormones in polycystic ovary syndrome
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2402 - 2408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
A. E. Herbison
Multimodal Influence of Estrogen upon Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 1998; 19(3): 302 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1992 by The Endocrine Society