help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsuji, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cunha, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsuji, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cunha, G. R.

Endocrinology, Vol 131, 1481-1488, Copyright © 1992 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Effect of human recombinant mullerian inhibiting substance on isolated epithelial and mesenchymal cells during mullerian duct regression in the rat

M Tsuji, H Shima, CY Yonemura, J Brody, PK Donahoe and GR Cunha
Department of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco 94143.

The effect of human recombinant Mullerian Inhibiting Substance (MIS) on the regression of the Mullerian duct (MD) of female rat fetuses was examined in vitro to determine whether MIS acts on MD epithelium and/or mesenchyme at the critical periods of sexual differentiation. Urogenital ridges (URs) of female rat fetuses at 14.5- to 18.5-days of gestation (plug day = 0) were cultured for 3 days with or without recombinant human MIS in CMRL 1066 medium with 10% female fetal calf serum. In URs from 14.5- and 15.5-day-old fetuses, the cranial portion of the MD regressed almost completely during the 3-day culture period in the presence of MIS, whereas the caudal half to third of the MD remained intact but tapered to a fine point cranially. MDs survived in URs from 16.5-day-old fetuses cultured in the presence of MIS except that the cranial portion of the MDs was deformed. MIS did not elicit regression of MDs in URs obtained from 17.5- and 18.5-day-old fetuses, but instead caused the MD epithelium to form bulges projecting into the mesenchyme. MD epithelium at 15.5-days of gestation was separated from the surrounding UR mesenchyme, and both components (MD epithelium and mesenchyme) were cultured separately for 3 days in the presence or absence of MIS. Both epithelial and mesenchymal cells survived in the presence or absence of MIS. MD epithelium formed typical epithelial colonies, whereas UR mesenchyme spread as fibroblastic cells. Analysis of labeling index after incorporation of [3H] thymidine demonstrated that MD epithelial DNA synthesis was not influenced by MIS. In contrast, mesenchymal labeling index was reduced significantly by MIS. This effect of MIS on UR mesenchyme in conjunction with earlier histological observations of mesenchymal condensation during MD regression and an absence of direct effects of MIS on the epithelium suggests that MIS elicits its effect on the MD epithelium via the surrounding mesenchyme.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
L. Yao, A. I. Agoulnik, P. S. Cooke, D. D. Meling, and O. D. Sherwood
Relaxin Acts on Stromal Cells to Promote Epithelial and Stromal Proliferation and Inhibit Apoptosis in the Mouse Cervix and Vagina
Endocrinology, May 1, 2008; 149(5): 2072 - 2079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
Y. Zhan, A. Fujino, D. T. MacLaughlin, T. F. Manganaro, P. P. Szotek, N. A. Arango, J. Teixeira, and P. K. Donahoe
Mullerian inhibiting substance regulates its receptor/SMAD signaling and causes mesenchymal transition of the coelomic epithelial cells early in Mullerian duct regression
Development, June 15, 2006; 133(12): 2359 - 2369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
J. Teixeira, S. Maheswaran, and P. K. Donahoe
Mullerian Inhibiting Substance: An Instructive Developmental Hormone with Diagnostic and Possible Therapeutic Applications
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2001; 22(5): 657 - 674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
T. R. Clarke, Y. Hoshiya, S. E. Yi, X. Liu, K. M. Lyons, and P. K. Donahoe
Mullerian Inhibiting Substance Signaling Uses a Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP)-Like Pathway Mediated by ALK2 and Induces Smad6 Expression
Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2001; 15(6): 946 - 959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
S. Nef and L. F. Parada
Hormones in male sexual development
Genes & Dev., December 15, 2000; 14(24): 3075 - 3086.
[Full Text]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
S Allard, P Adin, L Gouedard, N di Clemente, N Josso, M. Orgebin-Crist, J. Picard, and F Xavier
Molecular mechanisms of hormone-mediated Mullerian duct regression: involvement of beta-catenin
Development, January 8, 2000; 127(15): 3349 - 3360.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Rajpert-De Meyts, N. Jorgensen, N. Gram, J. Muller, R. L. Cate, and N. E. Skakkebak
Expression of Anti-Mullerian Hormone during Normal and Pathological Gonadal Development: Association with Differentiation of Sertoli and Granulosa Cells
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 1999; 84(10): 3836 - 3844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. A. Visser, A. McLuskey, M. Verhoef-Post, P. Kramer, J. A. Grootegoed, and A. P. N. Themmen
Effect of Prenatal Exposure to Diethylstilbestrol on Mullerian Duct Development in Fetal Male Mice
Endocrinology, October 1, 1998; 139(10): 4244 - 4251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
C. M. HAQQ and P. K. DONAHOE
Regulation of Sexual Dimorphism in Mammals
Physiol Rev, January 1, 1998; 78(1): 1 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
W. Baarends, M. van Helmond, M Post, P. van der Schoot, J. Hoogerbrugge, J. de Winter, J. Uilenbroek, B Karels, L. Wilming, J. Meijers, et al.
A novel member of the transmembrane serine/threonine kinase receptor family is specifically expressed in the gonads and in mesenchymal cells adjacent to the mullerian duct
Development, January 1, 1994; 120(1): 189 - 197.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1992 by The Endocrine Society