help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carbajo, P.
Right arrow Articles by Skafar, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carbajo, P.
Right arrow Articles by Skafar, D. F.

Endocrinology, Vol 137, 2339-2346, Copyright © 1996 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Binding of [3H]progesterone to the human progesterone receptor: differences between individual and mixed isoforms

P Carbajo, K Christensen, DP Edwards and DF Skafar
Department of Physiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA.

The human progesterone receptor (hPR) exists as two isoforms, hPR-A and hPR-B, which differ only in that hPR-A lacks 164 amino acids present at the amino-terminus of hPR-B. In this study we have separately expressed hPR-A and hPR-B and asked whether the progesterone-binding mechanisms are the same or different for the two forms of hPR and for their mixture. We investigated 1) the cooperativity of binding [3H]progesterone to the receptor, as measured by the Hill coefficient (nH); and 2) the dissociation rate of [3H]progesterone from the receptor. To compare the effects of dimerization, these ligand-binding properties were measured over a range of receptor concentrations. Binding of [3H]progesterone to hPR-A was positively cooperative at all concentrations used; the limiting value for the Hill coefficient was 1.47 +/- 0.11 at high receptor concentrations (5-19 nM) and 1.31 +/- 0.06 at low receptor concentrations (1-4 nM). Similarly, little change was observed in the dissociation rate constant over the same concentration range; the values at high and low concentrations were 4.59 +/- 0.15 and 3.03 +/- 0.25 x 10(-3) min-1, respectively. By contrast, the hPR-B concentration had a marked effect on positive cooperative binding and the dissociation rate of progesterone. At high hPR-B concentrations (3-5 nM), the limiting Hill coefficient was 1.49 +/- 0.11, which is indicative of moderately strong positive cooperativity, whereas at lower hPR-B concentrations (1-3 nM), the Hill coefficient was reduced to 1.1, which is essentially noncooperative. The [3H]progesterone dissociation rate was 4.52 +/- 0.44 x 10(-3) min-1 at the higher concentrations of hPR-B and was increased to 1.6 +/- 0.11 x 10(-3) min-1 at the lower concentrations. Thus, over the same concentration range where hPR-A exhibited no significant change in positive cooperativity or the dissociation rate, these progesterone- binding properties were highly dependent on the concentration of hPR-B. When hPR-A and hPR-B were mixed, positive cooperative binding and the dissociation rate were more similar to hPR-B than to hPR-A, in that both binding parameters were dependent on the concentration of receptor. However, the hPR-AB mixture differed from hPR-B alone in that the mixture required a greater receptor concentration (7-10 vs. 3-5 nM) to exhibit positive cooperativity and the increased dissociation rate. These results show, first, that each hPR isoform displays different [3H]progesterone-binding properties, which are most prominent at low concentrations of receptor, and second, that one isoform can influence the other. As the two receptor forms differ only at the N-terminus, yet positive cooperativity and changes in the dissociation rate constant are indicative of conformational changes affecting hormone binding, these results also strongly suggest that the N-terminus may directly or indirectly interact with the C-terminal ligand-binding domain.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S. K. Mani, A. M. Reyna, J. Z. Chen, B. Mulac-Jericevic, and O. M. Conneely
Differential Response of Progesterone Receptor Isoforms in Hormone-Dependent and -Independent Facilitation of Female Sexual Receptivity
Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2006; 20(6): 1322 - 1332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. F. Skibola, J. D. Curry, C. VandeVoort, A. Conley, and M. T. Smith
Brown Kelp Modulates Endocrine Hormones in Female Sprague-Dawley Rats and in Human Luteinized Granulosa Cells
J. Nutr., February 1, 2005; 135(2): 296 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
X. Fang, S. Wong, and B. F. Mitchell
Messenger RNA for progesterone receptor isoforms in the late-gestation rat uterus
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, December 1, 2002; 283(6): E1167 - E1172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. A. Patel and J. R. G. Challis
Cortisol/Progesterone Antagonism in Regulation of 15-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Activity and mRNA Levels in Human Chorion and Placental Trophoblast Cells at Term
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2002; 87(2): 700 - 708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
U. Ottander, K. Hosokawa, K. Liu, A. Bergh, T. Ny, and J. I. Olofsson
A Putative Stimulatory Role of Progesterone Acting via Progesterone Receptors in the Steroidogenic Cells of the Human Corpus Luteum
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2000; 62(3): 655 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. S. Sperry and P. Thomas
Characterization of Two Nuclear Androgen Receptors in Atlantic Croaker: Comparison of Their Biochemical Properties and Binding Specificities
Endocrinology, April 1, 1999; 140(4): 1602 - 1611.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S. A. Leonhardt, M. Altmann, and D. P. Edwards
Agonist and Antagonists Induce Homodimerization and Mixed Ligand Heterodimerization of Human Progesterone Receptors in Vivo by a Mammalian Two-Hybrid Assay
Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 1998; 12(12): 1914 - 1930.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M. J. Tetel, S. Jung, P. Carbajo, T. Ladtkow, D. F. Skafar, and D. P. Edwards
Hinge and Amino-Terminal Sequences Contribute to Solution Dimerization of Human Progesterone Receptor
Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 1997; 11(8): 1114 - 1128.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1996 by The Endocrine Society