help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ringstrom, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ringstrom, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, N. B.
Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 6 2286-2290
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

The Antiprogestins RU486 and ZK98299 Affect Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Secretion Differentially on Estrus, but not on Proestrus1

Sonia J. Ringstrom, Marta Szabo, Signe M. Kilen, Sara Saberi, Kerry L. Knox2 and Neena B. Schwartz

Department of Neurobiology and Physiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Sonia J. Ringstrom, Department of Neurobiology and Physiology, Northwestern University, 2153 North Campus Drive, Evanston, Illinois 60208-3520. E-mail: s-ringstrom{at}nwu.edu

Previous in vivo studies from our laboratory indicated that administration of the antiprogestin RU486 on proestrus suppresses both the preovulatory gonadotropin surges and the secondary FSH surge, suggesting a role for the progesterone receptor (PR) in the generation of these surges. The present study was designed to test the effects of another antiprogestin, ZK98299, which has been reported to block the PR through a mechanism different from that of RU486, on gonadotropin secretion in vivo. RU486 and ZK98299 (2 and 6 mg/kg) were administered sc at 1230 h on proestrus; uterine intraluminal fluid content, serum gonadotropins, and gonadotropin subunit messenger RNAs (mRNAs) were determined at 1830 h on proestrus and at 0900 h on estrus. At 1830 h on proestrus, both RU486 and ZK98299 at both doses caused equal suppression of the preovulatory FSH surge and FSHß mRNA. Both antiprogestins also equally attenuated the preovulatory LH surge at this time, with the higher doses causing greater suppression. In contrast, at 0900 h on estrus, the antiprogestins affected serum FSH differentially; only RU486 suppressed the secondary FSH surge despite the fact that both drugs prevented the release of uterine intraluminal fluid, confirming blockade of progesterone action at the level of the uterus. Neither drug had a significant effect on FSHß mRNA at 0900 h on estrus. ZK98299 at the higher dose caused a small, but significant, increase in serum LH. In a subsequent experiment, we compared the effects of RU486 and ZK98299 (6 mg/kg, sc), administered at 1230 h on proestrus, on serum FSH raised above the natural secondary FSH surge on the morning of estrus by passive immunization with an antiserum to inhibin-{alpha} (anti-I) at 1700 h on proestrus. Consistent with the results of the first experiment, both antiprogestins blocked the release of uterine intraluminal fluid, but only RU486 lowered serum FSH in both the normal sheep serum-treated controls and anti-I-treated rats; in contrast, ZK98299 actually increased serum FSH in the normal sheep serum-treated control animals. ZK98299 also increased FSHß mRNA in the control group; RU486, on the other hand, reduced FSHß mRNA only in the anti-I group. The results demonstrate unequivocally that whereas the effects of the two antiprogestins on serum FSH and FSHß mRNA are similar on proestrus, they are divergent on estrus. The data suggest that the functional state of the PR/transcriptional activation complex in the gonadotrope on the morning of estrus is different from that on the evening of proestrus.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
J. L Turgeon and D. W Waring
Differential expression and regulation of progesterone receptor isoforms in rat and mouse pituitary cells and L{beta}T2 gonadotropes.
J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2006; 190(3): 837 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
V. G. Thackray, S. M. McGillivray, and P. L. Mellon
Androgens, Progestins, and Glucocorticoids Induce Follicle-Stimulating Hormone {beta}-Subunit Gene Expression at the Level of the Gonadotrope
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2006; 20(9): 2062 - 2079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
L L Burger, D J Haisenleder, A C Dalkin, and J C Marshall
Regulation of gonadotropin subunit gene transcription
J. Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2004; 33(3): 559 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. L. Turgeon and D. W. Waring
Luteinizing Hormone Secretion from Wild-Type and Progesterone Receptor Knockout Mouse Anterior Pituitary Cells
Endocrinology, July 1, 2001; 142(7): 3108 - 3115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. L. Turgeon and D. W. Waring
Progesterone Regulation of the Progesterone Receptor in Rat Gonadotropes
Endocrinology, September 1, 2000; 141(9): 3422 - 3429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Szabo, S. M. Kilen, S. J. Nho, and N. B. Schwartz
Progesterone Receptor A and B Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Levels in the Anterior Pituitary of Rats Are Regulated by Estrogen
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2000; 62(1): 95 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
P. E. Chappell, J. S. Schneider, P. Kim, M. Xu, J. P. Lydon, B. W. O’Malley, and J. E. Levine
Absence of Gonadotropin Surges and Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Self-Priming in Ovariectomized (OVX), Estrogen (E2)-Treated, Progesterone Receptor Knockout (PRKO) Mice
Endocrinology, August 1, 1999; 140(8): 3653 - 3658.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. L. Turgeon, S. M. Van Patten, G. Shyamala, and D. W. Waring
Steroid Regulation of Progesterone Receptor Expression in Cultured Rat Gonadotropes
Endocrinology, May 1, 1999; 140(5): 2318 - 2325.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
F. Gaytán, C. Bellido, C. Morales, and J.E. Sánchez-Criado
Both Prolactin and Progesterone in Proestrus Are Necessary for the Induction of Apoptosis in the Regressing Corpus Luteum of the Rat
Biol Reprod, November 1, 1998; 59(5): 1200 - 1206.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Szabo, S. M. Kilen, S. Saberi, S. J. Ringstrom, and N. B. Schwartz
Antiprogestins Suppress Basal and Activin-Stimulated Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Secretion in an Estrogen-Dependent Manner
Endocrinology, May 1, 1998; 139(5): 2223 - 2228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society