This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bowen, J. M. Articles by Karsch, F. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bowen, J. M. Articles by Karsch, F. J.

Importance of the Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Surge for Induction of the Preovulatory Luteinizing Hormone Surge of the Ewe: Dose-Response Relationship and Excess of GnRH¹

Departments of Physiology (J.M.B., F.J.K.), Biology (L.A.T.), and Biostatistics (Y.W., M.B.B.), and Reproductive Sciences Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. F. J. Karsch, Reproductive Sciences Program, University of Michigan, 300 North Ingalls Building, Room 1101 SW, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0404. E-mail: fjkarsch{at}umich.edu

The preovulatory LH surge in the ewe is stimulated by a large sustained surge of GnRH. We have previously demonstrated that the duration of this GnRH signal exceeds that necessary to initiate and sustain the LH surge. The objective of the present study was to determine whether a similar excess exists for amplitude of the GnRH surge. Experiments were performed using an animal model in which GnRH secretion was blocked by progesterone, which in itself does not block the pituitary response to GnRH. To assess the amplitude of the GnRH surge needed to induce the LH surge, we introduced artificial GnRH surges of normal contour and duration but varying amplitudes. Twelve ewes were run through 3 successive artificial follicular phases (total of 36). Six of these artificial follicular phases were positive controls, in which progesterone was removed, the estradiol stimulus was provided, and vehicle was infused. In these control cycles, animals generated endogenous LH surges. In the remaining artificial follicular phases, progesterone was not withdrawn, the estradiol stimulus was provided, and either vehicle (negative control) or GnRH solutions of varying concentrations (experimental) were infused. The circulating GnRH concentrations achieved by infusion were monitored. No LH surges were observed in negative controls, whereas LH surges were induced in experimental cycles provided a sufficient dose of GnRH was infused. A highly significant dose-response relationship was observed between the amplitude of the GnRH surge and both the amplitude of the LH surge and the area under the curve describing the LH response, but no such relationship existed between the amplitude of the GnRH surge and the duration of the LH response. In numerous cases, LH surges similar to those in the positive control animals resulted from infusion of amounts of GnRH estimated to be considerably less than those delivered to the pituitary during the endogenously generated GnRH/LH surge. These findings indicate that, in the ewe, increased GnRH secretion drives the preovulatory LH surge in a dose-dependent fashion, and they provide evidence that the amplitude of the GnRH surge may exceed that needed to generate the LH surge.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Savabieasfahani, K. Kannan, O. Astapova, N. P. Evans, and V. Padmanabhan Developmental Programming: Differential Effects of Prenatal Exposure to Bisphenol-A or Methoxychlor on Reproductive Function Endocrinology, December 1, 2006; 147(12): 5956 - 5966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. P. Unsworth, J. A. Taylor, and J. E. Robinson Prenatal Programming of Reproductive Neuroendocrine Function: The Effect of Prenatal Androgens on the Development of Estrogen Positive Feedback and Ovarian Cycles in the Ewe Biol Reprod, March 1, 2005; 72(3): 619 - 627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Breen, H. J. Billings, N. Debus, and F. J. Karsch Endotoxin Inhibits the Surge Secretion of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone via a Prostaglandin-Independent Pathway Endocrinology, January 1, 2004; 145(1): 221 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. Anderson, S. L. Hardy, M. Valent, H. J. Billings, J. M. Connors, and R. L. Goodman Evidence that Thyroid Hormones Act in the Ventromedial Preoptic Area and the Premammillary Region of the Brain to Allow the Termination of the Breeding Season in the Ewe Endocrinology, July 1, 2003; 144(7): 2892 - 2901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A. Richter, D. S. Spackman, J. E. Robinson, S. Dye, T. G. Harris, D. C. Skinner, and N. P. Evans Role of Endogenous Opioid Peptides in Mediating Progesterone-Induced Disruption of the Activation and Transmission Stages of the GnRH Surge Induction Process Endocrinology, December 1, 2001; 142(12): 5212 - 5219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Y. Williams, T. G. Harris, D. F. Battaglia, C. Viguié, and F. J. Karsch Endotoxin Inhibits Pituitary Responsiveness to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Endocrinology, May 1, 2001; 142(5): 1915 - 1922. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				D. F. Battaglia, A. B. Beaver, T. G. Harris, E. Tanhehco, C. Viguié, and F. J. Karsch Endotoxin Disrupts the Estradiol-Induced Luteinizing Hormone Surge: Interference with Estradiol Signal Reading, Not Surge Release Endocrinology, June 1, 1999; 140(6): 2471 - 2479. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. Caraty and D. C. Skinner Progesterone Priming Is Essential for the Full Expression of the Positive Feedback Effect of Estradiol in Inducing the Preovulatory Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Surge in the Ewe Endocrinology, January 1, 1999; 140(1): 165 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text]