This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Harris, T. G. Articles by Evans, N. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Harris, T. G. Articles by Evans, N. P.

Progesterone Can Block Transmission of the Estradiol-Induced Signal for Luteinizing Hormone Surge Generation during a Specific Period of Time Immediately after Activation of the Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Surge-Generating System¹

Laboratory of Neuroendocrinology, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Hall, Babraham, Cambridge, United Kingdom CB2 4AT

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Neil P. Evans, Department of Veterinary Preclinical Studies, University of Glasgow Veterinary School, Bearsden Road, Glasgow, G61 1QH, United Kingdom. E-mail: n.evans{at}vet.gla.ac.uk

The preovulatory GnRH/LH surge in the ewe is stimulated by a rise in the circulating estradiol concentration that occurs in conjunction with preovulatory ovarian follicle development. In the presence of high levels of progesterone, such as during the luteal phase of the estrous/menstrual cycle, the stimulatory effects of elevated estradiol on GnRH/LH secretion are blocked. Recent work in the ewe has shown that a relatively short period of estradiol exposure can stimulate a GnRH/LH surge that begins after estrogenic support has been removed. This result suggests that surge generation is characterized by an estradiol-dependent period (during which the signal is read) and an estradiol-independent period (during which a cascade of neuronal events transmits the stimulatory signal to the GnRH neurosecretory system, which releases a surge of GnRH). In this series of studies, we addressed the hypothesis that progesterone can block transmission of the stimulatory estradiol signal after it has been read. Nine ovariectomized ewes were run through repeated artificial estrous cycles by sequential addition and removal of exogenous steroids. In study one, ewes received three treatments in a randomized cross-over design. Exposure to a follicular phase estradiol concentration for 10 h (positive control treatment) stimulated an LH surge in all ewes, as determined in hourly jugular blood samples. Maintenance of luteal phase progesterone concentrations throughout the artificial follicular phase (2 x CIDR-G devices, negative control) blocked the stimulatory effects of a 10-h estradiol signal, and no ewes that received this treatment expressed an LH surge. In the experimental group, exposure to luteal phase levels of progesterone, during the period after the surge generating system had been activated by estradiol, blocked the LH surge in six of nine ewes. This result demonstrates that progesterone can block the surge, even when applied after the surge-generating system has been activated and, therefore, that it inhibits either the transmission of the estradiol signal and/or the release of the GnRH/LH surge. In study 2, we assessed whether sensitivity to the inhibitory effects of progesterone was confined to a specific stage of the transmission of the estradiol signal. Eight ewes were exposed to four treatments, over successive artificial estrous cycles. Positive and negative controls were similar to those described in Study 1, except the duration of the stimulatory estradiol signal was reduced to 8 h. The two experimental groups consisted of an EARLY P (progesterone) treatment, in which progesterone was given from hours 8–13 after estradiol insertion (immediately after estradiol removal), and a LATE P treatment, in which progesterone was given from hours 13–18 (immediately before LH surge secretion). As expected, LH surges were stimulated and blocked, in response to the positive and negative controls, respectively. Whereas the EARLY P treatment blocked the LH surge in seven of eight ewes, the LATE P treatment was only successful in inhibiting a surge in one of eight animals. This result demonstrates that progesterone can block the estradiol-induced surge-generating signal soon after the onset of signal transmission (immediately after estradiol removal) but not during the later stages of signal transmission (at the time of GnRH/LH surge onset).

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Ben Said, D. Lomet, D. Chesneau, L. Lardic, S. Canepa, D. Guillaume, C. Briant, C. Fabre-Nys, and A. Caraty Differential Estradiol Requirement for the Induction of Estrus Behavior and the Luteinizing Hormone Surge in Two Breeds of Sheep Biol Reprod, April 1, 2007; 76(4): 673 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Taylor, M.-L. Goubillon, K. D. Broad, and J. E. Robinson Steroid Control of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Secretion: Associated Changes in Pro-Opiomelanocortin and Preproenkephalin Messenger RNA Expression in the Ovine Hypothalamus Biol Reprod, March 1, 2007; 76(3): 524 - 531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. J. Clarke, V. A. Tobin, S. Pompolo, and A. Pereira Effects of Changing Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Pulse Frequency and Estrogen Treatment on Levels of Estradiol Receptor-{alpha} and Induction of Fos and Phosphorylated Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate Response Element Binding Protein in Pituitary Gonadotropes: Studies in Hypothalamo-Pituitary Disconnected Ewes Endocrinology, March 1, 2005; 146(3): 1128 - 1137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. H. Van Vugt, H. J.M. Swarts, B. J.M. Van de Heijning, and E. M. Van der Beek Centrally Applied Somatostatin Inhibits the Estrogen-Induced Luteinizing Hormone Surge via Hypothalamic Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Cell Activation in Female Rats Biol Reprod, September 1, 2004; 71(3): 813 - 819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T.A. Richter, J.E. Robinson, and N.P. Evans Progesterone Blocks the Estradiol-Stimulated Luteinizing Hormone Surge by Disrupting Activation in Response to a Stimulatory Estradiol Signal in the Ewe Biol Reprod, July 1, 2002; 67(1): 119 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A. Richter, D. S. Spackman, J. E. Robinson, S. Dye, T. G. Harris, D. C. Skinner, and N. P. Evans Role of Endogenous Opioid Peptides in Mediating Progesterone-Induced Disruption of the Activation and Transmission Stages of the GnRH Surge Induction Process Endocrinology, December 1, 2001; 142(12): 5212 - 5219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. C. Skinner, T. G. Harris, and N. P. Evans Duration and Amplitude of the Luteal Phase Progesterone Increment Times the Estradiol-Induced Luteinizing Hormone Surge in Ewes Biol Reprod, October 1, 2000; 63(4): 1135 - 1142. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				T. G. Harris, D. F. Battaglia, M. E. Brown, M. B. Brown, N. E. Carlson, C. Viguie, C. Y. Williams, and F. J. Karsch Prostaglandins Mediate the Endotoxin-Induced Suppression of Pulsatile Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone and Luteinizing Hormone Secretion in the Ewe Endocrinology, March 1, 2000; 141(3): 1050 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. F. Battaglia, A. B. Beaver, T. G. Harris, E. Tanhehco, C. Viguié, and F. J. Karsch Endotoxin Disrupts the Estradiol-Induced Luteinizing Hormone Surge: Interference with Estradiol Signal Reading, Not Surge Release Endocrinology, June 1, 1999; 140(6): 2471 - 2479. [Abstract] [Full Text]