| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLES |
Developmental Endocrinology Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health (V.A., J.A.U., F.D.L., J.B.), Bethesda, Maryland 20892; and Walter Reed Army Medical Center (H.T.T.), Washington, D.C. 20307
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Jeffrey Baron, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 10N262, 10 Center Drive, MSC 1862, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1862. E-mail: jeffrey_baron{at}nih.gov
Growth of long bones occurs at the growth plate, a layer of cartilage that separates the epiphysis from the metaphysis. Growth plate exhibits spatial polarity. Proliferative chondrocytes undergo terminal differentiation when they approach the metaphyseal, but not the epiphyseal, border of the growth plate. The adjacent bone also exhibits spatial polarity. Metaphyseal, but not epiphyseal, blood vessels and bone cells invade the adjacent growth plate, remodeling it into bone. As a result, the metaphysis, but not the epiphysis, elongates over time. To determine whether cartilage polarity determines bone polarity and/or whether bone polarity determines cartilage polarity, rabbit distal ulnar growth plates were excised, inverted, and reimplanted in their original beds. Thus, cartilage polarity was inverted relative to bone polarity. Histological examination showed that the inverted cartilage polarity was maintained over time. In contrast, the polarity of the adjacent bone reversed after surgery, to match that of the cartilage. Blood vessel and bone cell invasion ceased in the metaphysis and arose in the epiphysis. Longitudinal bone growth (measured with weekly radiographs) occurred at the epiphyseal, not at the metaphyseal, surface of the growth plate. We conclude that the polarity of growth plate cartilage is determined by intrinsic factors. The cartilage polarity then determines the polarity of the adjacent bone and, consequently, the functional polarity of longitudinal bone growth.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Abad, J. L. Meyers, M. Weise, R. I. Gafni, K. M. Barnes, O. Nilsson, J. D. Bacher, and J. Baron The Role of the Resting Zone in Growth Plate Chondrogenesis Endocrinology, May 1, 2002; 143(5): 1851 - 1857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Robson Bone growth mechanisms and the effects of cytotoxic drugs Arch. Dis. Child., October 1, 1999; 81(4): 360 - 364. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |