| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
REPRODUCTION-DEVELOPMENT |
Department of Pediatrics (V.P., J.S.L.), Biostatistics (N.E.C., W.Y.), and the Reproductive Sciences Program (C.R.W., T.P.S., V.P.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109; and Medical Research Council Human Reproductive Sciences Unit (A.S.M.), Edinburgh, Scotland EH3 9ET, United Kingdom
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Vasantha Padmanabhan, Reproductive Sciences Program, 300 North Ingalls Building, Room 1109 SW, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0404. E-mail: vasantha{at}umich.edu
FSH is secreted as a mix of isoforms with varying biologic attributes. To determine the functional significance of FSH heterogeneity, an acidic (ovine pituitary FSH; C-FSH) and less acidic mix (C-FSH exposed to neuraminidase; N-FSH) were administered to prepubertal lambs. Production of GnRH- induced less acidic FSH was blocked with a competitive GnRH receptor antagonist, Nal-Glu. Beginning 24 h after Nal-Glu, lambs were injected with C-FSH or N-FSH and LH. Controls included untreated, GnRH-treated, and Nal-Glu-treated groups. Blood samples were obtained at 2-h intervals. Plasma FSH levels were similar before treatment and increased over time in the C-FSH but not the N-FSH group (P < 0.001). Three of the six GnRH-treated ewes exhibited an LH surge. Peak E2 concentrations in the GnRH-treated animals were achieved 3036 h after initiation of treatment. Peak circulating E2 levels tended to be higher in the C-FSH than in the GnRH-treated group. Only two of six N-FSH-treated ewes had a serum E2 rise. The C-FSH ewes had more estrogenic follicles than the GnRH and N-FSH groups (P < 0.05). Our findings show that C-FSH clears more slowly than N-FSH, and C-FSH is a better facilitator of follicular development and maturation than N-FSH.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. N. Sarma, M. Manikkam, C. Herkimer, J. Dell'Orco, K. B. Welch, D. L. Foster, and V. Padmanabhan Fetal Programming: Excess Prenatal Testosterone Reduces Postnatal Luteinizing Hormone, But Not Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Responsiveness, to Estradiol Negative Feedback in the Female Endocrinology, October 1, 2005; 146(10): 4281 - 4291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ulloa-Aguirre, C. Timossi, J. Barrios-de-Tomasi, A. Maldonado, and P. Nayudu Impact of Carbohydrate Heterogeneity in Function of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone: Studies Derived from in Vitro and in Vivo Models Biol Reprod, August 1, 2003; 69(2): 379 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Padmanabhan, M. B. Brown, G. E. Dahl, N. P. Evans, F. J. Karsch, D. T. Mauger, J. D. Neill, and J. Van Cleeff Neuroendocrine Control of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Secretion: III. Is There a Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone-Independent Component of Episodic FSH Secretion in Ovariectomized and Luteal Phase Ewes? Endocrinology, April 1, 2003; 144(4): 1380 - 1392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |