help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schubert, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Puett, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schubert, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Puett, D.
Endocrinology Vol. 144, No. 1 129-137
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLE

Specificity of Cognate Ligand-Receptor Interactions: Fusion Proteins of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin and the Heptahelical Receptors for Human Luteinizing Hormone, Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone, and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone

Rebecca L. Schubert, Prema Narayan and David Puett

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. David Puett, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, B129 Life Sciences Building, 120 Green Street, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-7229. E-mail: puett{at}bmb.uga.edu.

The family of glycoprotein hormones and their homologous heptahelical receptors represent an excellent system for comparative structure-function studies. We have engineered single chain molecules of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) fused to its cognate receptor, LH receptor (LHR), and to the noncognate receptors, TSH receptor (TSHR) and FSH receptor (FSHR; N-ß-{alpha}-receptor-C), to create the yoked (Y) complexes YCG/LHR, YCG/TSHR, and YCG/FSHR. The expression and bioactivity of these fusion proteins were examined in transiently transfected HEK 293 cells. Western blot analysis and antibody binding assays demonstrated that each of the proteins was expressed. In the case of YCG/LHR, minimal binding of exogenous hormone was observed due to the continued occupation of receptor by the fused ligand. The presence of hCG in the YCG/TSHR and YCG/FSHR, however, did not prevent binding of exogenous cognate ligand, presumably due to the lower affinity of hCG. The basal cAMP levels in cells expressing the YCG/LHR complex was approximately 20-fold higher than that in cells expressing LHR. Increases in basal cAMP production were also observed with YCG/TSHR and YCG/FSHR, e.g. 13- and 4-fold increases, respectively. Whereas the affinity and specificity of hCG for LHR are extraordinarily high, the hormone is capable of binding to and activating both TSHR and FSHR under these conditions that mimic high ligand concentrations. These findings were confirmed by adding high concentrations of hCG to cells expressing TSHR and FSHR. Although the functional interaction of hCG and TSHR has been recognized in gestational hyperthyroidism, there are no reports linking hCG to FSHR activation. This study, however, suggests that such a functional interaction is capable of occurring under conditions of high circulating levels of hCG, e.g. the first trimester of pregnancy and in patients with hCG-secreting tumors.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. De Leener, L. Montanelli, J. Van Durme, H. Chae, G. Smits, G. Vassart, and S. Costagliola
Presence and Absence of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor Mutations Provide Some Insights into Spontaneous Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome Physiopathology
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2006; 91(2): 555 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Delbaere, G. Smits, O. Olatunbosun, R. Pierson, G. Vassart, and S. Costagliola
New insights into the pathophysiology of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. What makes the difference between spontaneous and iatrogenic syndrome?
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 486 - 489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
H. F. Vischer, J. C. M. Granneman, and J. Bogerd
Opposite Contribution of Two Ligand-Selective Determinants in the N-Terminal Hormone-Binding Exodomain of Human Gonadotropin Receptors
Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2003; 17(10): 1972 - 1981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
G. Smits, O. Olatunbosun, A. Delbaere, R. Pierson, G. Vassart, and S. Costagliola
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome Due to a Mutation in the Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor
N. Engl. J. Med., August 21, 2003; 349(8): 760 - 766.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society