This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by De Vries, G. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by De Vries, G. J.

Minireview: Sex Differences in Adult and Developing Brains: Compensation, Compensation, Compensation

Center for Neuroendocrine Studies, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Geert J. De Vries, Center for Neuroendocrine Studies, Department of Psychology, Tobin Hall, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003-9333. E-mail: devries{at}cns.umass.edu.

Abstract

Despite decades of research, we do not know the functional significance of most sex differences in the brain. We are heavily invested in the idea that sex differences in brain structure cause sex differences in behavior. We rarely consider the possibility that sex differences in brain structure may also prevent sex differences in overt functions and behavior, by compensating for sex differences in physiological conditions, e.g. gonadal hormone levels that may generate undesirable sex differences if left unchecked. Such a dual function for sex differences is unlikely to be restricted to adult brains. This review will entertain the possibility that transient sex differences in gene expression in developing brains may cause permanent differences in brain structure but prevent them as well, by compensating for potentially differentiating effects of sex differences in gonadal hormone levels and sex chromosomal gene expression. Consistent application of this dual-function hypothesis will make the search for the functional significance of sex differences more productive.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. R. Sutin, L. L. Beason-Held, S. M. Resnick, and P. T. Costa Sex Differences in Resting-State Neural Correlates of Openness to Experience among Older Adults Cereb Cortex, April 14, 2009; (2009) bhp066v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J. de Vries, M. Jardon, M. Reza, G. J. Rosen, E. Immerman, and N. G. Forger Sexual Differentiation of Vasopressin Innervation of the Brain: Cell Death Versus Phenotypic Differentiation Endocrinology, September 1, 2008; 149(9): 4632 - 4637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. Smith-Bouvier, A. A. Divekar, M. Sasidhar, S. Du, S. K. Tiwari-Woodruff, J. K. King, A. P. Arnold, R. R. Singh, and R. R. Voskuhl A role for sex chromosome complement in the female bias in autoimmune disease J. Exp. Med., May 12, 2008; 205(5): 1099 - 1108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J. De Vries Sex Steroids and Sex Chromosomes at Odds? Endocrinology, August 1, 2005; 146(8): 3277 - 3279. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Palaszynski, D. L. Smith, S. Kamrava, P. S. Burgoyne, A. P. Arnold, and R. R. Voskuhl A Yin-Yang Effect between Sex Chromosome Complement and Sex Hormones on the Immune Response Endocrinology, August 1, 2005; 146(8): 3280 - 3285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Becker, A. P. Arnold, K. J. Berkley, J. D. Blaustein, L. A. Eckel, E. Hampson, J. P. Herman, S. Marts, W. Sadee, M. Steiner, et al. Strategies and Methods for Research on Sex Differences in Brain and Behavior Endocrinology, April 1, 2005; 146(4): 1650 - 1673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Blaustein Can You Teach an Old Dogma New Tricks? Endocrinology, March 1, 2004; 145(3): 1055 - 1056. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. P. Arnold, J. Xu, W. Grisham, X. Chen, Y.-H. Kim, and Y. Itoh Minireview: Sex Chromosomes and Brain Sexual Differentiation Endocrinology, March 1, 2004; 145(3): 1057 - 1062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]