This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 147/1/61    most recent Author Manuscript (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pessina, M. A. Articles by Traish, A. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pessina, M. A. Articles by Traish, A. M.

Differential Effects of Estradiol, Progesterone, and Testosterone on Vaginal Structural Integrity

Departments of Anatomy and Neurobiology (M.A.P., R.F.H.) and Urology (I.G., A.M.T.), Institute for Sexual Medicine, and Department of Biochemistry (A.M.T.), Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Abdulmaged M. Traish, Ph.D., Boston University School of Medicine, 700 Albany Street W607, Boston, Massachusetts 02118. E-mail: atraish{at}bu.edu.

Ovarian steroids are known to be important in maintaining vaginal tissue, and evidence is mounting that imbalances in the hormonal milieu contribute to vaginal pathophysiology. To date, limited data are available on the effects of hormone deprivation and replacement on vaginal tissue morphology and vaginal innervation. The goal of this study was to assess the dynamic changes in vaginal tissue structure in response to sex steroid hormone deprivation and administration. Female Sprague-Dawley rats were either kept intact (controls) or ovariectomized. Ovariectomized animals were treated with vehicle, estradiol, testosterone, progesterone, or a combination of estradiol plus testosterone or progesterone. Histological techniques, including stereological analysis and immunohistochemistry for localization of neuronal markers, were used. Ovariectomy produced a significant decrease in epithelial height that was restored with estradiol replacement. Interestingly, a subphysiological dose of estradiol resulted in hyperplasia of the vaginal epithelium and nonvascular smooth muscle. Neither testosterone nor progesterone had a significant effect on epithelial height or muscularis thickness. However, testosterone treatment resulted in a significant increase in small adrenergic nerve fibers. Addition of either testosterone or progesterone to estradiol mitigated but did not abolish the effects of estradiol alone. This study demonstrates that estradiol and testosterone have differential effects on vaginal tissue parameters and that ovarian hormones are critical for the maintenance of genital tissue structure. Present observations also suggest that combined replacement regimens may be required for an optimal physiological response.