This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Welsh, M. Articles by Sharpe, R. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Welsh, M. Articles by Sharpe, R. M.

Androgen-Dependent Mechanisms of Wolffian Duct Development and Their Perturbation by Flutamide

Medical Research Council Human Reproductive Sciences Unit, Centre for Reproductive Biology, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, Scotland, United Kingdom

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Michelle Welsh, MRC Human Reproductive Sciences Unit, Centre for Reproductive Biology, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, Scotland, United Kingdom. Email: m.welsh{at}hrsu.mrc.ac.uk.

Androgens play a vital role in Wolffian duct (WD) development, but the mechanisms that underlie this are unknown. The present study used in utero exposure of pregnant rats to the androgen receptor antagonist flutamide (50 or 100 mg/kg) to explore possible mechanisms. Pregnant rats were treated from embryonic d 15.5 (E15.5), and WDs were isolated from fetuses from E17.5–E21.5 and from adults. WD morphology was evaluated, and total length of the duct lumen was determined in fetal samples. Fetal WDs were immunostained for androgen receptor and stromal (inner and outer) and/or epithelial-cell-specific markers and analyzed for cell proliferation and apoptosis. In adulthood, most flutamide-exposed males lacked proximal WD-derived tissues, whereas at E18.5–E19.5, a time when the WD has completely regressed in females, a complete normal WD was present in all flutamide-exposed animals. This suggests that flutamide, at doses of 50 or 100 mg/kg, interferes with WD differentiation, not stabilization. Consistent with this, WD elongation/coiling increased in controls by 204% between E19.5 and E21.5 but increased less significantly (103%) in flutamide-exposed animals. This was associated with reduced cell proliferation, but there was no increase in apoptosis or change in expression of androgen receptor mRNA or protein. Flutamide treatment impaired differentiation of inner stromal cells, shown by decreased expression of smooth muscle actin, before effects were noted in the epithelium, consistent with androgens driving WD development via stromal-epithelial interactions. In conclusion, WD differentiation is far more susceptible to blockade of androgen action than is its initial stabilization, and these effects may be mediated by disruption of stromal-epithelial interactions.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Welsh, R. M. Sharpe, M. Walker, L. B. Smith, and P. T. K. Saunders New Insights into the Role of Androgens in Wolffian Duct Stabilization in Male and Female Rodents Endocrinology, May 1, 2009; 150(5): 2472 - 2480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Welsh, P. T. K. Saunders, and R. M. Sharpe The Critical Time Window for Androgen-Dependent Development of the Wolffian Duct in the Rat Endocrinology, July 1, 2007; 148(7): 3185 - 3195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. M. Scott, G. R. Hutchison, I. K. Mahood, N. Hallmark, M. Welsh, K. De Gendt, G. Verhoeven, P. O'Shaughnessy, and R. M. Sharpe Role of Androgens in Fetal Testis Development and Dysgenesis Endocrinology, May 1, 2007; 148(5): 2027 - 2036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]