| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
: Implications for Osteoporosis and Breast CancerFrom Departments of Urology (O.K., Y.G., G.A.C.), Preventive Medicine (O.K., G.A.C.), Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (S.K.B., D.J.P., N.L., M.R.S., B.F.), and Orthopedic Surgery (B.F.), Norris Cancer Center (O.K., D.J.P., Y.G., M.R.S., G.A.C.), Institute for Genetic Medicine (S.K.B., N.L., Y.G., B.F.), Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Baruch Frenkel, D.M.D., Ph.D., USC/IGM, 2250 Alcazar Street, CSC-250, Los Angeles, California 90033. E-mail: frenkel{at}usc.edu; or Gerhard A. Coetzee, Ph.D., USC/Norris Cancer Center, NOR 6411, 1441, Eastlake Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90033. E-mail: coetzee{at}usc.edu.
The transcription factors Runx2 and estrogen receptor-
(ER
) are involved in numerous normal and disease processes, including postmenopausal osteoporosis and breast cancer. Using indirect immunofluorescence microscopy and pull-down techniques, we found them to colocalize and form complexes in a ligand-dependent manner. Estradiol-bound ER
strongly interacted with Runx2 directly through its DNA-binding domain and only indirectly through its N-terminal and ligand-binding domains. Runx2s amino acids 417–514, encompassing activation domain 3 and the nuclear matrix targeting sequence, were sufficient for interaction with ER
s DNA-binding domain. As a consequence of the interaction, Runx2s transcriptional activation activity was strongly repressed, as shown by reporter assays in COS7 cells, breast cancer cells, and late-stage MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cultures. Metaanalysis of gene expression in 779 breast cancer biopsies indicated negative correlation between the expression of ER
and Runx2 target genes. Selective ER modulators (SERM) induced ER
-Runx2 interactions but led to various functional outcomes. The regulation of Runx2 by ER
may play key roles in osteoblast and breast epithelial cell growth and differentiation; hence, modulation of Runx2 by native and synthetic ER
ligands offers new avenues in selective ER modulator evaluation and development.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. K. Baniwal, O. Khalid, D. Sir, G. Buchanan, G. A. Coetzee, and B. Frenkel Repression of Runx2 by Androgen Receptor (AR) in Osteoblasts and Prostate Cancer Cells: AR Binds Runx2 and Abrogates Its Recruitment to DNA Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2009; 23(8): 1203 - 1214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |