help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/endo-31-1-63
Endocrinology Vol. 31, No. 1 63-70
Copyright © 1942 by the Endocrine Society.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints, Permissions and Rights
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FRANK, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by KRISS, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by FRANK, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by KRISS, B.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUE FOR ANDROGEN ASSAY BY THE CHICK COMB METHOD1

ROBERT T. FRANK, EMANUEL KLEMPNER, FRANKLIN HOLLANDER and BRUNO KRISS

the Laboratories of The Mount Sinai Hospital NEW YORK CITY

Abstract

CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS involving assays for androgenic activity have lagged behind those related to the estrogens because of the lack of a convenient and reliable bio-assay technique. Of all of the numerous methods which have been proposed from time to time, that of Gallagher and Koch (1), based on the capon’s comb as a quantitative indicator of the potency of injected androgenic material, has been used most extensively. During the past four years we have been engaged in developing a bio-assay method for androgenic activity in urine and tumors, which is relatively simple and of recognizable reliability (for preliminary reports on this work see 2, 3, 4). This investigation has finally been concluded and a detailed report on the work is now nearing completion. Along with a careful description of the proced-ure, this report will include the evidence, both historical and experimental, which guided us in the development of our method; it will contain also a minute statistical analysis of the data, collected over more than a year on about 1500 chicks, which led us to the final dose-response equation.

Footnotes

1 This investigation was supported in part by grants from the Friedsam Foundation.

Received April 15, 1942.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1942 by The Endocrine Society