help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, J. H.

Endocrinology, Vol 96, 160-167, Copyright © 1975 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Estrogen-induced uterine responses and growth: relationship to receptor estrogen binding by uterine nuclei

JN Anderson, EJ Peck Jr and JH Clark

The relationship between estrogen receptor(R) binding by uterine nuclei and uterotrophic responses was examined. Immature rats received a single injection of estradiol (E2) or estriol (E3) and the following parameters were measured: accumulation and retention of the estrogen receptor by the nuceus of uterine cells; incorporation of 14C-glucose into CO2 lipid, protein and RNA; RNA polymerase activity; water imbibition and increased dry weight. E2 and E3 were of equal potency with regard to the rapid accumulation of R by the nucleus but differed with respect to long term retention of R. The concentrations of nuclear RE2 and RE3 complexes were equivalent between 1 and 3 hr after estrogen injection; however, by 6 hr RE2 remained significantly elevated while RE3 levels had fallen to control values. E2 and E3 were also of equal potency with respect to the stimulation of enhanced glucose utilization, water imbibition, the incorporation of 14C-glucose into lipid, protein and RNA 3 hours following an injection of the hormone. Likewise the activity of RNA polymerase was equally stimulated by E2 and E3 3 hr after injection. Thus all early uterotropic responses (0-3 hrs) that were measured were equally stimulated by E2 and E3. However, E3 failed to stimulate true uterine growth (increase dry weight 24 hr after injection), whereas E2 produced a significant stimulation of true uterine growth. These data suggest that the RE complex is capable of stimulating early uterotrohic events regardless of which estrogen is present; however, in order to produce true uterine growth the RE complex must be retained in the nucleus for long periods of time. This proposal was tested by the administration of repetitive injections of E3. This treatment resulted in an increase in dry weight that was equivalent to the growth that was produced by repetitive injections of E2. These results demonstrate that E2 and E3 elicit early uterotrophic responses with equal facility following a single injection but that only E2 causes true uterine growth. The ability of E2 to stimulate true uterine growth appears to be related to the time of residence of the RE complex in the nucleus.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. He, R. T. Gampe Jr., A. T. Hnat, J. L. Faggart, J. T. Minges, F. S. French, and E. M. Wilson
Probing the Functional Link between Androgen Receptor Coactivator and Ligand-binding Sites in Prostate Cancer and Androgen Insensitivity
J. Biol. Chem., March 10, 2006; 281(10): 6648 - 6663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. Hung
Suppression of ps20 Expression in the Rat Uterus by Tamoxifen and Estrogens
Endocrinology, May 1, 2005; 146(5): 2388 - 2396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
K. C. Fertuck, J. E. Eckel, C. Gennings, and T. R. Zacharewski
Identification of temporal patterns of gene expression in the uteri of immature, ovariectomized mice following exposure to ethynylestradiol
Physiol Genomics, October 17, 2003; 15(2): 127 - 141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
B. J. Tarleton, T. D. Braden, A. A. Wiley, and F. F. Bartol
Estrogen-Induced Disruption of Neonatal Porcine Uterine Development Alters Adult Uterine Function
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2003; 68(4): 1387 - 1393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Takahashi, M. Okada, T. Ozaki, H. Kurioka, A. Manabe, H. Kanasaki, and K. Miyazaki
Safety and efficacy of oestriol for symptoms of natural or surgically induced menopause
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2000; 15(5): 1028 - 1036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Chen, X. Xu, L.-J. Zhu, M. Angervo, Q. Li, M. K. Bagchi, and I. C. Bagchi
Cloning and Uterus/Oviduct-specific Expression of a Novel Estrogen-regulated Gene (ERG1)
J. Biol. Chem., November 5, 1999; 274(45): 32215 - 32224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M. Melamed, E. Castaño, A. C. Notides, and S. Sasson
Molecular and Kinetic Basis for the Mixed Agonist/Antagonist Activity of Estriol
Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 1997; 11(12): 1868 - 1878.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ScienceHome page
D. Pfaff and B. McEwen
Actions of estrogens and progestins on nerve cells
Science, February 18, 1983; 219(4586): 808 - 814.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. T. Preisler-Mashek, N. Solodin, B. L. Stark, M. K. Tyriver, and E. T. Alarid
Ligand-specific regulation of proteasome-mediated proteolysis of estrogen receptor-alpha
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, April 1, 2002; 282(4): E891 - E898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1975 by The Endocrine Society