help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beach, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Everett, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beach, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Everett, J. W.

Endocrinology, Vol 96, 1241-1246, Copyright © 1975 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Serum prolactin and LH in early phases of delayed versus direct pseudopregnancy in the rat

JE Beach, L Tyrey and JW Everett

Delayed or direct pseudopregnancies were induced by electrical stimulation of the cervix at 1400 h on diestrus day 2 (D-2) or on estrus, respectively. Blood samples for measurement of prolactin and LH by radioimmunoassay were collected by rapid decapitation at 5, 15, 30, 45 or 60 min after cervical stimulation or thereafter at 3-h intervals throughout the first 6 days of leukocytic vaginal smears of pseudopregnancy (PSP L-1 to L-6). For comparison, untreated animals were decapitated at the same 3-h intervals throughout the 4-day cycle. Serum LH concentrations in all the experimental animals did not vary from those measured in the cyclic controls. Compared with the normal cycle, prolactin (PRL) levels were not different until 10 h after cervical stimulation during estrus. After stimulation on D-2, PRL secretion did not differ from that in the normal cycle until approximately 37 h later, when there was a short rise following the usual proestrus surge. In both direct and delayed pseudopregnancy, twice-daily PRL surges appeared on L-1 and, except for a missing nocturnal surge on L-2 in delayed PSP, continued regularly through L-6. The absence of any immediate increase of PRL following the D-2 stimulus strongly supports the view that information from the stimulus is retained in the central nervous system to be expressed later after a set of new, competent corpora lutea has been formed.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1975 by The Endocrine Society