help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schanbacher, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ford, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schanbacher, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ford, J. J.

Endocrinology, Vol 99, 752-757, Copyright © 1976 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Seasonal profiles of plasma luteinizing hormone, testosterone and estradiol in the ram

BD Schanbacher and JJ Ford

Plasma profiles of luteinizing hormone (LH), testosterone (T), and estradiol (E2) have been determined in five mature rams during the primary breeding season (September) and again when breeding activity was low (May). Blood samples collected every half h for 24 h during September or May showed that LH was released into the general circulation as distinct peaks. Although this secretory pattern was not the same for all rams and seasonal differences were noted in certain individuals, it is suggested that an inherent rhythm persists within each ram. With the exception of one ram in September, obvious T peaks were preceded by LH peaks greater than 2 ng/ml (LH-T interval less than 60 min). Season had no effect on the number and magnitude of LH peaks or on the mean concentrations; however, basal levels of LH were higher (P less than 0.01) in September than in May. Seasonal differences in peripheral T levels were more dramatic with mean, baseline, and peak concentrations elevated (p less than 0.01) during the fall. The number of T peaks, like those of LH, was not affected by season. Large variations in circulating levels of E2 made any possible relationship between this hormone and LH or T difficult to identify. Furthermore, a diurnal or seasonal rhythm could not be established for E2 in this study. It is concluded that seasonal differences occur in secretory patterns of LH and T and that a cause and effect relationship between these two hormones exists. Under conditions of this study, neither a consistent relationship between E2 and LH or T, nor a seasonal difference in mean E2 levels, was apparent.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
F Stormshak, C T Estill, J A Resko, and C E Roselli
Changes in LH secretion in response to an estradiol challenge in male- and female-oriented rams and in ewes
Reproduction, May 1, 2008; 135(5): 733 - 738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T.E. Adams, H. Sakurai, and B.M. Adams
Effect of Stress-Like Concentrations of Cortisol on Estradiol-Dependent Expression of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor in Orchidectomized Sheep
Biol Reprod, January 1, 1999; 60(1): 164 - 168.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
J. D. Veldhuis, M. L. Johnson, A. Iranmanesh, and G. Lizarralde
Temporal Structure of In Vivo Adrenal Secretory Activity Estimated by Deconvolution Analysis
J Biol Rhythms, September 1, 1990; 5(3): 247 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
C. Harding and B. Follett
Hormone changes triggered by aggression in a natural population of blackbirds
Science, March 2, 1979; 203(4383): 918 - 920.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1976 by The Endocrine Society