help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on June 11, 2009
Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2009-0036
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
150/9/4404    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herington, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bany, B. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herington, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bany, B. M.

Submitted on January 12, 2009
Accepted on June 4, 2009

PARACRINE SIGNALS FROM THE MOUSE CONCEPTUS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR THE NORMAL PROGRESSION OF DECIDUALIZATION

Jennifer L. Herington, Tawny Underwood, Melinda McConaha, and Brent M. Bany*

From Departments of Physiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Carbondale, Illinois, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bbany{at}siumed.edu.

The purpose of this study was to determine if the conceptus directs the formation of a tight- and adherens-dependent permeability barrier formed by the primary decidual zone and normal progression of decidual cell differentiation during embryo implantation. Four artificial models of decidualization were used, some apparently more physiological than others. The results show that both the formation of the permeability barrier and decidual cell differentiation of three of the artificial models were quite different to that of pregnant uteri. One artificial model of decidualization, namely pseudopregnant animals receiving concanavalin A-coated Sepharose bead transfers on Day 2.5 of pseudopregnancy, better recapitulated the decidual changes that occur in the pregnant uterus undergoing decidualization. This included the formation of a primary decidual zone-like permeability barrier and decidual growth. This model also exhibited similar temporal changes of the expression of genes involved in decidualization that are markers of decidual cell differentiation. Overall, the results of this study indicate that some models of inducing decidualization artificially produce responses that are more similar to those occurring in the pregnant uterus while others are quite different. More importantly, the results suggest that concanavalin A-coated Sepharose beads can provide an equivalent stimulus as the trophectoderm to cause the formation of the primary decidual zone permeability barrier.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2009 by The Endocrine Society