help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on October 23, 2009
Endocrinology, doi:10.1210/en.2009-0804
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
150/12/5351    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skibicka, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Grill, H. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Skibicka, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Grill, H. J.

Submitted on July 8, 2009
Accepted on August 18, 2009

Hypothalamic and Hindbrain Melanocortin Receptors Contribute to the Feeding, Thermogenic and Cardiovascular Action of Melanocortins

Karolina P. Skibicka* and Harvey J. Grill

Graduate Group of Psychology and Graduate Group of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: skibicka{at}mail.med.upenn.edu.

Forebrain ventricular delivery of melanocortin receptor (MC3/4R) agonist increases energy expenditure and decreases food intake (FI). Because forebrain ventricular delivery provides ligand to various anatomically distributed MC3/4R-bearing nuclei, it is unclear which of the receptor subpopulations contributes to the feeding suppression and the sympathetic-thermogenic effects observed. The literature indicates that reexpression of MC4R in the paraventricular nucleus (PVH) affects the feeding but not the energetic phenotype of the MC4R knockout, suggesting that divergent MC4R populations mediate energy expenditure (hindbrain) and FI (hypothalamus) effects of stimulation. Not consistent with this view are data indicating that PVH sympathetic projection neurons express MC4Rs and that feeding effects are induced from hindbrain MC4R sites. Therefore, we hypothesize an opposing perspective: that stimulation of anatomically diverse MC3/4R-bearing nuclei triggers energetic as well as feeding effects. To test this hypothesis, ventricle subthreshold doses of MC3/4R agonist (5 and 10 pmol) were applied in separate experiments to six hindbrain and hypothalamic sites; core temperature (Tc), heart rate (HR), spontaneous activity (SPA), and FI were measured in behaving rats. Nucleus tractus solitarius and PVH stimulation increased Tc, HR, and SPA and decreased FI. Rostral ventrolateral medulla, parabrachial nucleus, and retrochiasmatic area stimulation increased Tc, HR, but not SPA, and decreased FI. The response profile differed to some extent for each nucleus tested, suggesting differential output circuitries for the measured parameters. Data are consistent with the view that energetic and feeding responses are not controlled by regionally divergent MC3/4Rs and can be elicited from multiple, anatomically distributed MC3/4R populations.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. E. Schneider
If I Only Had a Whole Brain: The Importance of Extrahypothalamic Areas in the Energy Balance Equation
Endocrinology, December 1, 2009; 150(12): 5195 - 5198.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2009 by The Endocrine Society