help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by I’anson, H.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by I’anson, H.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, D. L.
Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 1 230-236
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Regional Differences in the Distribution of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Cells between Rapidly Growing and Growth-Restricted Prepubertal Female Sheep1

Helen I’anson2, Sonja K. Terry3, Michael N. Lehman and Douglas L. Foster

Brown Science Center, Transylvania University (H.I., S.K.T.), Lexington, Kentucky 40508; Reproductive Sciences Program, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (H.I., D.L.F.) and Biology (D.L.F.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109; and the Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine (M.N.L), Cincinnati, Ohio 45267

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: H. I’Anson, Department of Biology, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, Virginia 24450. E-mail: ianson{at}wlu.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Growth retardation induced by dietary restriction in the lamb results in a low GnRH pulse frequency, and thus, puberty is delayed. In our experimental model, in which ovariectomized lambs are maintained at weaning weight (~20 kg BW), hypothalamic GnRH is present and releasable, suggesting that central mechanisms limit the release of GnRH during chronic growth restriction. Our study compared the number and distribution of GnRH-containing neurons in growth-restricted (n = 5) and rapidly growing (n = 5) ovariectomized prepubertal female lambs at 24 weeks of age (normal age of puberty is about 30 weeks). Immunoreactive cells were labeled using LR-1 antiserum (R. Benoit) and an avidin-biotin-immunoperoxidase procedure. GnRH neurons were localized in 60-µm coronal sections from the level of the diagonal band of Broca to the mammillary bodies. The estimated total number of GnRH neurons in the growth-restricted and rapidly growing lambs was similar (3364.8 ± 513.8 vs. 3151.2 ± 279.8, respectively). In addition, the percent distributions of GnRH neurons in the diagonal band of Broca, the anterior hypothalamus, the lateral hypothalamus, and the posterior hypothalamus were not different. A trend (P = 0.07) toward a smaller percent distribution in the preoptic area was noted in growth-restricted lambs (30.6 ± 3.6) compared to rapidly growing lambs (44.0 ± 5.2). By contrast, the percent distribution of GnRH neurons in the medial basal hypothalamus was significantly greater in the growth-restricted lambs compared with the rapidly growing lambs (17.7 ± 2.2 vs. 6.7 ± 1.4, respectively; P < 0.005). It is of interest that the percent distribution of GnRH-containing neurons in the medial basal hypothalamus of the hypogonadotropic growth-restricted lamb is similar to that observed in the fetal lamb, whereas the eugonadotropic rapidly growing lamb is more similar to the adult female. In this context, decreased GnRH secretion and delayed puberty during diet-induced growth restriction may arise from alterations in the GnRH neurosecretory system.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
STUDIES IN a variety of species have shown that growth-related cues are important determinants of gonadotropin secretion during development, as evidenced by hypogonadotropism when food intake is reduced and growth is retarded [in cattle (1), humans (2), rats (3, 4, 5), and sheep (6, 7)]. Further, in nutritionally growth-restricted female lambs, GnRH and LH pulse frequency is low, and puberty is delayed (8); these become synchronized when increased food intake is resumed (6, 7).

To investigate how nutritional and growth-related cues time the increase in GnRH and LH secretion that occurs at puberty (8, 9, 10), we used an experimental model in which ovariectomized lambs were maintained on a restricted diet after weaning to retard growth, and thus to delay puberty (7, 12). Such lambs remain hypogonadotropic even in the absence of inhibitory ovarian steroid feedback (7). They respond normally to physiological doses of GnRH, indicating that the pituitary can function adequately (13). Hypothalamic GnRH content is similar in lambs on a restricted diet with a low LH pulse frequency (less than one pulse per 4 h) and in lambs fed ad libitum with a high LH pulse frequency (four or five pulses per 4 h) (13). Thus, it is unlikely that a decrease in GnRH synthesis underlies hypogonadotropism during chronic low nutrition. Rather, the secretion of GnRH is limited, as evidenced by a low GnRH pulse frequency compared to that observed in rapidly growing lambs (8). In the current study, we asked if variations in the number and distribution of GnRH neurons are responsible for decreased GnRH release during chronic growth restriction. Our approach was to compare these parameters of GnRH-containing neurons in growth-restricted and rapidly growing female lambs.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
General
Springborn (February–April) lambs of predominantly Suffolk breeding were studied under natural conditions. They were born either at the Reproductive Sciences Program Sheep Research Facility or at a commercial sheep facility (Breasbois Farms, Freeland, MI) and transported to the Reproductive Sciences Program Sheep Research Facility in Ann Arbor, MI after weaning at 8 or 9 weeks of age. The lambs were ovariectomized at 12 weeks of age under acepromazine/ketamine anesthesia (0.5 and 20 mg/kg BW, respectively, im). All spring-born lambs were randomized to either a growth-restricted group (n = 40) or a rapidly growing group (n = 26). From these larger groups, 10 lambs were randomly assigned to this experiment (5 lambs/group). Lambs in the growth-restricted group were individually fed a single daily meal of a commercial pelleted ration (Lamb 20, Kent Feed, Muscatine, IA) and crushed alfalfa hay cubes at a level that maintained a postweaning weight of approximately 20 kg. This diet reduction program was begun between 10 and 16 weeks of age such that the lambs were brought up to approximately 20 kg, rather than imposing a sudden diet change once 20 kg was reached. This resulted in a less steep growth curve in the growth-restricted lambs compared to the rapidly growing lambs (Fig. 1Go). The usual diet (~300 g/day, 500 Cal) was approximately 25% of the nutrient requirement for a rapidly growing 20-kg lamb (National Research Council, 1985). The young females were weighed weekly, and feed intake was adjusted to maintain the 20-kg target weight. As evidenced from observations made several times daily, the lambs remain active and healthy despite the reduced caloric intake. The rapidly growing group was fed alfalfa hay and the same commercial pelleted ration, and they exhibited rapid growth, as evidenced from measurements of body weights at weekly intervals.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Experimental design and mean (±SE) growth curves for rapidly growing (closed circles) and growth-restricted (open circles) lambs. The times during the experiment (4-h LH profiles and death) of weaning (wean) and ovariectomy (ovx) are depicted by arrows. Blood samples were collected at 12-min intervals during the 4-h sampling period.

 
All procedures were performed in accordance with NIH guidelines and were approved by the University of Michigan animal care and use review board.

To determine pulsatile patterns of LH secretion, concentrations of the hormone were measured in blood samples collected by jugular venipuncture. Samples were allowed to clot overnight at 4 C; serum was decanted after centrifugation and stored at -20 C until assay.

Experimental design
The study was performed at approximately 24 weeks of age (September). On the day before the perfusions, the pattern of LH pulses between growth-restricted and rapidly growing lambs was compared by measuring LH in blood samples collected every 12 min for 4 h.

On the following day, before the animals were killed, the lambs were injected with heparin (3 ml, 10,000 U/ml) to minimize blood clotting in subsequent procedures. The lambs were then killed with 5 ml Beuthanasia (Schering-Plough Animal Health Corp., Kenilworth, NJ) (containing 390 mg sodium pentibarbital and 50 mg sodium phenytoin/ml), and the heads were perfused bilaterally via the carotid arteries with 0.5 liters 0.9% saline with 0.1% sodium nitrite, followed by 3 liters 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) containing 0.1% sodium nitrite (for vasodilation) and heparin (100 U/ml). After perfusion, the brain was carefully removed from the cranium, and a block of tissue containing the preoptic area and hypothalamus was microdissected out.

Tissue processing
Brains were processed according to the methods of Lehman et al. (14). Briefly, the tissue block was postfixed in 2% paraformaldehyde at 4 C for the next 24 h, and subsequently incubated in 30% sucrose in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB) with 0.1% sodium azide at 4 C for 5 days (the solution was changed daily). Thereafter, the brains were frozen at -90 C until sectioning. All subsequent procedures were performed simultaneously on paired brains, one from a growth-restricted lamb and one from a rapidly growing lamb.

Sixty-micron coronal sections were cut on a freezing microtome and washed overnight in PB, pH 7.3, with 0.1% Triton X-100 at 4 C. Every fourth section was processed for GnRH immunocytochemistry and counterstained with cresyl violet to identify nuclear boundaries.

For visualization of GnRH-containing neurons, the free floating sections were submerged for 30 min in 0.1 M glycine to remove excess aldehydes, washed three times for 10 min each time in PB with 0.1% Triton X-100, and then submerged for 10 min in 0.5% hydrogen peroxide with 1% Triton X-100 to eliminate endogenous peroxidase activity. Sections were washed four times for 10 min each time in PB with Triton X-100 and incubated in 1% normal donkey serum for 1 h. After these procedures, the sections were exposed to primary antiserum (rabbit LR-1, generously provided by Dr. Robert Benoit) at a dilution of 1:20,000 in PB with 1% normal donkey serum, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 0.1% sodium azide for 72 h at 4 C. This antiserum has been validated previously for staining GnRH perikarya and fibers in sheep (14), and it recognizes amino acids 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, and 10 of the decapeptide but no other identified neuropeptide. The sections were then treated at room temperature for 1 h with biotinylated donkey antirabbit IgG, followed by a 1-h incubation at room temperature with avidin-biotin-horseradish peroxidase complex (Vectastain universal kit, Vector Laboratories). Horseradish peroxidase was visualized using 3,3'-diaminobenzidine as the chromogen, with glucose oxidase to generate the hydrogen peroxide substrate (15). This reaction was allowed to proceed for approximately 30 min. Sections were mounted on gelatin-coated slides, dehydrated, counterstained with cresyl violet, dehydrated, cleared, and coverslipped with Permount (Fisher Scientific).

LH assay
LH was measured in duplicate 50- to 200-µl aliquots of serum using a modified RIA (13, 16) developed by Niswender et al. (17). Assay sensitivity (n = 2 assays), defined as 2 SD from maximum binding, averaged 0.6 ng/ml for 200 µl serum, expressed relative to NIH LH-S12. Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation for 200-µl samples of a serum pool containing 2.8 ng/ml LH, which inhibited binding of labeled ligand to 55%, averaged 11.3% and 12.1%, respectively.

Data analyses
LH pulses were identified using a pulse detection algorithm, Pulsefit (13, 18). Undetectable hormone concentrations were assigned a value equivalent to the limit of detection of the assay. Hypothalamic nuclei were identified using the atlas of the sheep brain developed by Welento et al. (19). Using outlines of the cresyl violet-stained hypothalamic nuclei, each section was drawn, and the location of each GnRH-containing neuron was plotted. The number of GnRH neurons in each section was counted. The sections from each brain were subdivided according to the position of nuclei and major nerve tracts into the region of the diagonal band of Broca (DBB), the preoptic area (POA), the anterior hypothalamus (AH), the lateral hypothalamus, the mediobasal hypothalamus (MBH), and the posterior hypothalamus (PH). Morphometric analysis was performed on the MBH because this was the only region that showed a difference in the distribution of GnRH-containing neurons between groups. The neurons were classified as unipolar, bipolar, or multipolar. Neurons in which the processes emanating from the cell soma were difficult to identify due to damage during sectioning were not classified morphologically. The total number of neurons in each brain, the distribution of neurons within the aforementioned brain regions, and the percentages of different morphological subtypes within the MBH from growth-restricted and rapidly growing lambs were compared using ANOVA (Statview 512+, Brainpower, Las Calabas, CA). Percentages were arcsine transformed before ANOVA, and the Scheffe test was used in any post-hoc comparisons made among means. In all analyses, P < 0.05 was considered significant. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Reproductive neuroendocrine status of experimental animals
Figure 2Go depicts serum LH concentrations from the growth-restricted lambs (left panel) and rapidly growing lambs (right panel). As previously reported in the growth-restricted lambs, no LH pulses were observed during the 4-h frequent sampling period, whereas in the rapidly growing lambs, a LH pulse frequency of two to four pulses per 4 h was detected.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Pulsatile LH secretion during the 4-h frequent sampling period in ovariectomized growth-restricted (left panel) and rapidly growing (right panel) lambs.

 
Estimated total number of GnRH neurons (Fig. 3Go)
There was considerable variation between individuals in the number of GnRH-containing neurons counted in every fourth section through the preoptic area/hypothalamus (range, 390-1065 neurons/brain). Thus, given the large SE within each group of lambs, the number of such neurons in the growth-restricted and rapidly growing lambs did not differ (841.2 ± 128.4 vs. 787.8 ± 69.9, respectively). The estimated total number of GnRH-containing neurons (~3300, estimated from counting every fourth section) was slightly higher than that reported for the adult female sheep [666–2418 neurons (14) and ~2500 neurons (20)] or the fetal lamb (~1800 neurons) (21).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Mean estimated number of GnRH-containing neurons (±SE) in the brains of growth-restricted (open bar) and rapidly growing (shaded bar) lambs.

 
Distribution of GnRH-containing neurons in the POA and hypothalamus (Figs. 4Go-6)
Figure 4Go depicts drawings of schematic sections in the POA and hypothalamus from representative growth-restricted and rapidly growing lambs upon which the location of GnRH-containing neurons at similar levels was plotted (closed circles). GnRH-containing neurons were found scattered throughout the POA and hypothalamus from the region of the DBB to the mammillary bodies (Fig. 4Go). The majority of GnRH cell bodies were found in the POA, at the level of the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis (Fig. 4BGo). Rostrally, GnRH cell bodies were observed medially in the region of the DBB/medial septum (Fig. 4AGo) and caudally in the AH and MBH, with the cells spread medially and laterally along the ventral surface of the brain (Fig. 4Go, C and D). Few GnRH cell bodies were observed in the PH at the level of the mammillary bodies. The distribution and appearance of GnRH fiber tracts and terminal fields were similar to those previously described for the adult female sheep (14, 20, 22).



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. The distribution of GnRH-containing neurons (closed circles) in schematic drawings of coronal brain sections from a representative growth-restricted (left panel) and rapidly growing (right panel) lamb. The drawing illustrates single sections at the level of the DBB (dbb; first panel), POA (poa; second panel), AH (ah; third panel), and MBH (fourth panel). The lateral hypothalamus is shown in the third and fourth panels as the region lateral to the fornix (vertical lines show the inner margins of the lateral hypothalamus). ms, Medial septum; fx, fornix; ls, lateral septum; alac, anterior limb of the anterior commissure; mh, medial habenula; pvn, paraventricular nucleus; oc, optic chiasm; lh, lateral hypothalamus; mt, mammilothalamic tract; son, supraoptic nucleus; vmh, ventromedial nucleus; me, median eminence; pt, pituitary.

 
The percent distribution of GnRH-containing neurons in each brain region is depicted in Fig. 5Go. Despite the range of the total number of GnRH-containing neurons observed among lambs, the relative percent distribution of GnRH-containing neurons in each brain region within an individual lamb remained similar. There was no difference between the growth-restricted and rapidly growing lambs in the percent distribution of GnRH-containing neurons in the region of the DBB, AH, lateral hypothalamus, or PH. There appeared to be a trend toward a smaller percent distribution of GnRH-containing neurons in the POA of the growth-restricted lambs compared with the rapidly growing lambs (30.6 ± 3.6 vs. 44.0 ± 5.2, respectively; P = 0.07). In contrast, the percent distribution of GnRH-containing neurons in the MBH was nearly 3 times greater in the growth-restricted lambs compared with that in the rapidly growing lambs (17.7 ± 2.2 vs. 6.7 ± 1.4, respectively; P < 0.005). Photomicrographs showing GnRH-containing neurons in the MBH from a representative growth-restricted and rapidly growing lamb are presented in Fig. 6Go.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Relative distribution of GnRH-containing neurons in different brain regions throughout the POA and hypothalamus in growth-restricted (open bars) and rapidly growing (shaded bars) lambs (mean ± SE). LH, Lateral hypothalamus.

 


View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Photomicrographs of selected immunostained sections through the MBH of a growth-restricted (upper panel) and a rapidly growing (lower panel) lamb, showing representative GnRH neurons in this region. V, Third ventricle. Scale bar = 300 µm.

 
Neuronal morphology of GnRH-containing neurons in the MBH (Fig. 7Go)
No differences were observed between growth-restricted and rapidly growing lambs in the relative numbers of unipolar, bipolar, and multipolar GnRH-containing neurons found in the MBH. The majority of these neurons were multipolar (restricted, 53.7 ± 4.3%; rapidly growing, 56.7 ± 5.2%). The remaining neurons were either bipolar (restricted, 14.4 ± 1.8%; rapidly growing, 18.6 ± 3.6%) or unipolar (restricted, 9.1 ± 1.5%; rapidly growing, 6.4 ± 0.6%).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Mean relative numbers (±SE) of unipolar, bipolar, and multipolar neurons in the MBH of growth-restricted (open bars) and rapidly growing (shaded bars) lambs.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The study presented herein describes the distribution of GnRH-containing neurons in the POA and hypothalamus of growth-restricted and rapidly growing lambs in relation to their pattern of LH secretion. The total number of GnRH-containing neurons was not different between growth-restricted and rapidly growing lambs despite the fact that, as previously reported (7), LH pulse frequency was very low in the growth-restricted lambs compared to a high pulse frequency in the rapidly growing lambs. In contrast to the similarity in the total number of GnRH-containing neurons, the relative distributions of these neurons were different in the growth-restricted lambs compared to the rapidly growing lambs. A trend toward a smaller percentage of GnRH-containing neurons was measured in the POA of growth-restricted compared to rapidly growing lambs (P = 0.07). A more striking difference was observed in the MBH, where a greater percentage of GnRH-containing neurons was measured in growth-restricted compared to rapidly growing lambs.

There are several considerations that must be taken into account to explain these differences in population distribution of GnRH-containing neurons. It is of interest to note that a related study from our laboratory reported no differences in total GnRH content in the POA/AH and MBH/arcuate nucleus of growth-restricted and rapidly growing lambs (13). However, this study may not be comparable with the present data, because total content also measures GnRH contained in fibers as well as cell bodies. In addition, the data were not expressed per mg tissue, but rather per region. Thus, any differences in content may have been obscured because the sizes of these regions are very different in such lambs. In the protein-deficient growing male lamb, GnRH content within the median eminence is increased (23), whereas in the rat, hypothalamic GnRH content is not altered in the prepubertal growth-restricted female (24), but is increased during acute undernutrition in the adult male (25). GnRH messenger RNA analysis in lambs during development or when maintained in different metabolic states has yet to be reported.

It is unlikely that any differences in immunostaining occurred between the two groups of lambs, as immunocytochemistry was always performed simultaneously on sections from paired brains, one from each group. In addition, there was little possibility of bias in counting the GnRH-containing neurons, as this was performed such that the group identity of each lamb was hidden during this phase of the experiment. It is also unlikely that GnRH-containing neurons migrated from one brain region to another in the growth-restricted lambs. Migration of the GnRH-containing neurons from the nasal placode is well documented during embryonic development in a variety of species (chick, 26–28; mouse, 29–31; rat, 32; primate, 33), but does not appear to continue postnatally.

Several studies have examined the distribution of GnRH-containing neurons in the sheep brain. In the female fetal lamb, 19% of such neurons are located in the MBH and 17% in the POA (21), whereas in the adult female, only 1–5% are found in the MBH (14, 34) and 50–60% in the POA (14). The aforementioned studies were conducted in the animals of the Suffolk breed, as is used in the current study, and all used the same LR-1 antiserum and very similar immunocytochemical procedures. In studies using other sheep breeds and antiserum, the results concerning the distribution of GnRH-containing neurons in the MBH are equivocal. Caldani and co-workers (20) observed 15% GnRH-containing neurons in the MBH of adult females, a percentage similar to that reported in the fetal lamb, whereas Glass and co-workers (22) found no such neurons in the MBH. However, if one compares the results from the studies mentioned above using Suffolk sheep and the same antiserum as the experiment described herein (14, 21, 34), it is interesting to note that the growth-restricted and rapidly growing lambs have a distribution of GnRH-containing neurons intermediate between the fetal and the adult female. Further, in terms of MBH neuron distribution, the growth-restricted lamb is more similar to the fetal lamb (fetus, 19%; growth-restricted lamb, 18%), whereas the rapidly growing lamb appears to be more similar to the adult female (adult, 1–5%; rapidly growing lamb, 7%). Finally, there appears to be a trend toward an increase in GnRH-containing neurons within the POA with age; the neurons are most numerous in the adult ewe (50–60%), fewer neurons were measured in rapidly growing and growth-restricted lambs (44% and 31%, respectively), and even fewer were found in fetal lambs (17%).

Even though the preceding results were not obtained in the same experiment, the differences are striking, and one can suggest several alternative hypotheses to try to explain the picture of GnRH neuron development that appears to be emerging.

One such hypothesis would suggest that the growth-restricted lamb is developmentally delayed in terms of the GnRH neurosecretory system compared to the rapidly growing lamb. This would imply that the GnRH neurosecretory system of the growth-restricted lamb is more similar developmentally to that of the fetal lamb. The ovine fetus appears to possess a functional GnRH neurosecretory system, such that LH pulse frequency is approximately one pulse per 3 h (35), a slow pulse rate similar to that measured in the growth-restricted lamb (normally zero or one pulse per 4 h). These observations would appear to confirm the hypothesis that the growth-restricted lamb is developmentally delayed in terms of the GnRH neurosecretory system. Interestingly, however, hourly LH pulses occur as early as 6 weeks of age in the ovariectomized female lamb (36) after removal of estradiol negative feedback. Thus, even in the young lamb, the GnRH neurosecretory system is functionally competent to produce a LH pulse frequency similar to that observed during the first follicular phase at puberty (10). In the context of our study, the growth-restricted lamb would have already achieved this level of maturity before growth restriction, which was between 10 and 16 weeks of age. Thus, it is unlikely that the GnRH neurosecretory system is developmentally delayed in such lambs, even though GnRH release becomes reduced during growth restriction (8) due to central nervous system inhibition (37) by as yet unknown neurotransmitter pathways.

A second possibility is that the differences in distribution of GnRH-containing neurons in growth-restricted vs. rapidly growing lambs may reflect a difference in the functionality of these neurons. The larger population of GnRH-containing neurons in the MBH of growth-restricted lambs compared to rapidly growing lambs could be responsible at least in part for the reduced release of GnRH in such lambs. GnRH is known to exert ultrashort loop feedback on its own release (39, 40, 41, 42, 43). Thus, activation of such an inhibitory GnRH neuronal population could be induced during growth restriction, thereby decreasing GnRH release. A similar hypothesis has been suggested for the decrease in arcuate nucleus GnRH-containing neurons observed after puberty in the male ferret (44).

Finally, the LR-1 antiserum recognizes GnRH within its precursor as well as the decapeptide itself (Benoit, R., personal communication) (45). Thus, a third possibility for the increase in GnRH-containing neurons within the MBH of growth-restricted lambs is that this population of neurons produces GnRH, but that it is not released due to increased activity of inhibitory neurotransmitter pathways or to decreased activity of stimulatory pathways. Previous studies have revealed that although GnRH secretion is decreased in the growth-restricted lamb, it can be induced repeatedly by hourly administration of the glutamate/aspartate neurotransmitter agonist, N-methyl-D,L-aspartate (13). Thus, GnRH is synthesized, but not normally secreted, in the growth-restricted lamb. A similar inverse relationship between distribution of GnRH-containing neurons and GnRH/LH release has been observed in a study that compared pre- and postpubertal male ferrets (44). There were 50% fewer GnRH-containing neurons in the arcuate nucleus of postpubertal ferrets, which is correlated with an increase in LH release compared with that in the prepubertal ferret. However, in this study the smaller number of GnRH-containing neurons did not reflect a higher secretory activity of these neurons, as colchicine treatment of postpubertal (25-week-old) ferrets did not increase the number of GnRH-containing neurons to levels observed in prepubertal ferrets. Such colchicine treatment has not been attempted in lambs to address the issue of changes in secretory activity as they relate to our study.

The percent distribution of GnRH-containing neurons within the POA of growth-restricted and rapidly growing lambs (31% and 44%, respectively) is intriguing in light of the differences measured in this region in the adult ewe compared to the fetal lamb (50–60% and 17%, respectively) (14, 21, 34). As previously mentioned, both the fetal lamb and the growth-restricted lamb secrete GnRH and LH at a low pulse frequency [one pulse per 3 h (35) vs. zero to one pulse per 4 h (8)]. Thus, it is conceivable that the decreased number of GnRH-containing neurons within the POA of such lambs may reflect a decrease in the synthesis of GnRH and its precursor in this region. GnRH messenger RNA analysis in lambs during development and when maintained in different metabolic states would provide some insight into this possibility. Another possibility is that the differences in GnRH-containing neurons in this region reflect the ability of such lambs to secrete surge levels of GnRH at ovulation. The POA has been implicated in induction of the GnRH, and hence LH, surge that induces ovulation (46, 47, 48, 49, 50). The potential to respond to the stimulatory feedback action of estradiol and produce a LH surge is attained a few weeks after birth (51), and the capacity to produce a LH surge is still present in the growth-restricted lamb (7). Because a GnRH surge has been observed to induce a LH surge in the prepubertal female (52) and adult sheep (53, 54, 55), one assumes that a GnRH surge is required to induce a LH surge in the sheep. If this is the case, then it is tempting to suggest that the relatively low percentage of GnRH-containing neurons in the fetal lamb POA (17%) reflects an immature surge-inducing GnRH neurosecretory system. Perhaps the increased GnRH immunostaining in the POA of the other three groups of sheep reflects maturation of the surge-inducing GnRH neurosecretory system to a level where a GnRH surge can now be induced.

In conclusion, the distribution of GnRH-containing neurons in the growth-restricted lamb and that in the rapidly growing lamb were similar, except in the regions of the MBH and POA. The differences in GnRH immunostaining in these regions suggest that growth retardation induced by dietary restriction produces changes in the GnRH neurosecretory system that may be responsible for the decreased release of GnRH, and thus delayed puberty, in such lambs.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. S. W. Newman for expert advice in the preparation of neuroanatomical sections and for making her laboratory available for the immunocytochemistry and its analysis; Dr. R. I. Wood for assistance during animal surgery and advise concerning the immunocytochemistry; Mr. D. D. Doop and Mr. G. R. McCalla of the Reproductive Sciences Program Sheep Research Facility for conscientious animal care; Ms. J. Pell for expert technical assistance; Ms. R. K. Brabec and Ms. L. Dudus of the Reproductive Sciences Program Morphology Core Facility for assistance in preparing and staining tissue sections; Dr. L. E. Reichert, Jr., Albany Medical College of Union University, and Dr. G. D. Niswender, Colorado State University, for reagents for RIA of LH; the Reproductive Sciences Program Standards and Reagents Core Facility for preparation of reagents for RIA; and Mr. M. R. Muha for administrative support.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by grants from The Jones Faculty Development Fund, Transylvania University (to H.I.), and from the NIH (HD-07433 to H.I., HD-18258 to the Reproductive Sciences Program, and HD-18394 to D.L.F.) at the University of Michigan. A preliminary report of the investigations has appeared in the program of the 26th Annual Meeting of The Society for the Study of Reproduction, Fort Collins, CO, 1993 (Abstract 320). Back

2 Current address: Department of Biology, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, Virginia 24450. Back

3 Current address: University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky 40292. Back

Received July 9, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Day MI, Imakawa K, Zalesky DD, Kittok RJ, Kinder JB 1986 Effects of restriction of dietary energy intake during the prepubertal period on secretion of LH and responsiveness of the pituitary to LHRH in heifers. J Anim Sci 62:1941–1648
  2. Chakravarty I, Sreedhar R, Ghosh KK, Card D, Bulusu S 1982 Circulating gonadotropin profile in severe cases of protein calorie malnutrition. Fertil Steril 37:650–654[Medline]
  3. Glass AR, Swerdloff RS 1980 Nutritional influences on sexual maturation in the rat. Fed Proc 39:2360–2364[Medline]
  4. Bronson FH 1986 Food-restricted, prepubertal, female rats: rapid recovery of LH pulsing with excess food and full recovery of pubertal development with GnRH. Endocrinology 118:2483–2487[Abstract]
  5. Sisk CL, Bronson FH 1986 Effects of food restriction and restoration of gonadotropin and growth hormone secretion in immature male rats. Biol Reprod 35:554–561[Abstract]
  6. Fitzgerald J, Michel F, Butler WR 1982 Growth and sexual maturation in ewes: dietary and seasonal effects modulating LH and first ovulation. Biol Reprod 27:864–870[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Foster DL, Olster DH 1985 Effect of restricted nutrition on puberty in the lamb: patterns of tonic LH secretion and competency of the LH surge system. Endocrinology 116:375–381[Abstract]
  8. Manning JM, Herbosa CG, Friedman CR, Foster DL Pattern of GnRH secretion in the pituitary portal circulation of the growth-retarded female sheep during hypogonadotropism. 21st Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Anaheim CA, 1992, p 191 (Abstract)
  9. Foster DL, Yellon SM, Olster DH 1985 Internal and external determinants of puberty in the female. J Reprod Fertil 75:327–344[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Huffman IJ, Inskeep EK, Goodman RL 1987 Changes in episodic luteinizing hormone secretion leading to puberty in the lamb. Biol Reprod 37:755–761[Abstract]
  11. Foster DL 1994 Puberty in the female sheep. In: Knobil E, Neill J (eds) The Physiology of Reproduction, ed 2. Raven Press, New York, pp 411–451
  12. Trenkle A, Topel DG 1978 Relationship of some endocrine measurements to growth and carcass composition in cattle. J Anim Sci 46:1604–1609[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Ebling FJP, Wood RI, Karsch FJ, Wannerson LA, Suttie JM, Bucholtz DC, Schall RE, Foster DL 1990 Metabolic interfaces between growth and reproduction. III. Central mechanisms controlling pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion in the nutritionally growth-limited female lamb. Endocrinology 126:2719–2727[Abstract]
  14. Lehman MN, Robinson JE, Karsch FJ, Silverman A-J 1986 Immunocytochemical localization of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) pathways in the sheep brain during anestrus and the mid-luteal phase of the estrous cycle. J Comp Neurol 244:19–35[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Itoh K, Konishi A, Nomura S, Mizuno N, Nakamura Y, Sugimoto T 1979 Application of coupled oxidation reaction to electron microscopic demonstration of horseradish peroxidase: cobalt-glucose method. Brain Res 175:341–344[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Hauger RL, Karsch FJ, Foster DL 1977 A new concept for control of the estrous cycle of the ewe based upon temporal relationships between luteinizing hormone, estradiol, and progesterone and evidence that progesterone inhibits tonic LH secretion. Endocrinology 101:807–817[Abstract]
  17. Niswender GD, Reichert LB Jr, Midgley AR Jr, Nalbandov AV 1969 Radioimmunoassay for bovine and ovine luteinizing hormone. Endocrinology 84:1166–1173[Medline]
  18. Kushler RH, Brown MB 1991 A model for the identification of hormone pulses. Stat Med 10:329–340[Medline]
  19. Welento J, Szteyn S, Milart T 1969 Observations on the stereotaxic configuration of the hypothalamic nuclei in the sheep. Anat Anz 124:1–27[Medline]
  20. Caldani M, Batailler M, Thiery JC, Dubois MP 1988 LHRH-immunoreactive structures in the sheep brain. Histochemistry 89:129–139[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Wood RI, Newman SW, Lehman MN, Foster DL 1992 GnRH neurons in the fetal lamb hypothalamus are similar in males and females. Neuroendocrinology 55:427–433[Medline]
  22. Glass JD, Mastran T, Nett TM 1986 Effects of estradiol and progesterone on the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-immunoreactive neuronal system of the anestrous ewe. Brain Res 381:336–344[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Polkowska J 1989 Effect of protein deficiency on some hypothalamic and pituitary hormones in growing male lambs. An immunohistochemical study. Reprod Nutr Dev 29:347–356
  24. Bronson FH 1988 Effect of food manipulation on the GnRH-LH estradiol axis of young rats. Am J Physiol 254:R616–R621
  25. Pirke KM, Spyra B 1981 Influence of starvation on testosterone-luteinizing hormone feedback in the rat. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 96:413–421[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Sullivan KA, Silverman AJ Ontogeny of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons in the chick. 22nd Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, New Orleans LA, 1991, p 427 (Abstract)
  27. Norgren RB, Lehman MN 1991 Neurons that migrate from the olfactory epithelium in the chick express luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone. Endocrinology 128:1676–1678[Abstract]
  28. Murakami S, Seki T, Wakabayashi K, Arai Y 1991 The ontogeny of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) producing neurons in the chick embryo: possible evidence for migrating LHRH neurons from the olfactory epithelium expressing a highly polysialatedneural cell adhesion molecule. Neurosci Res 12:421–431[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Wray S, Nieburgs A, Elkabes S 1989 Spatiotemporal cell expression of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone in the neonatal mouse: evidence for an embryonic origin in the olfactory placode. Dev Brain Res 46:309–318[Medline]
  30. Wray S, Grant P, Gainer H 1989 Evidence that cells expressing luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone mRNA are derived from progenitor cells in the olfactory placode. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:8132–8136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Schwanzel-Fukuda M, Pfaff DW 1989 Origin of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone neurons. Nature 338:161–163[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Daikoku-Ishido H, Okamura Y, Yanaihara N, Daikoku S 1990 Development of the hypothalamic luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone-containing neuron system in the rat: in vivo and in transplantation studies. Dev Biol 140:374–387[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Ronnekleiv OK, Resko JA 1990 Ontogeny of gonadotropin-releasing hormone-containing neurons in early fetal development of rhesus macaques. Endocrinology 126:498–511[Abstract]
  34. Webster JR, Moenter SM, Barrell GK, Lehman MN, Karsch FJ 1991 Role of thyroid gland in seasonal reproduction. III. Thyroidectomy blocks seasonal suppression of gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion in sheep. Endocrinology 129:1635–1643[Abstract]
  35. Matwijiw I, Faiman C 1989 Control of gonadotropin secretion in the ovine fetus. II. A sex difference in pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion after castration. Endocrinology 124:1352–1358[Abstract]
  36. Foster DL, Ebling FJP, Vannerson LA, Wood RI, Fenner DE 1988 Regulation of puberty in the lamb: internal and external cues. In: Imura H, Shizume K, Yoshida S (eds) Progress in Endocrinology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, vol 2:861–866
  37. I’Anson H, Foster DL, Foxcroft GR, Booth PJ 1990 Nutrition and Reproduction. In: Milligan SR (ed) Oxford Reviews of Reproductive Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, vol 13:239–311
  38. Evans NP, Dahl GE, Karsch FJ 1992 Estradiol reduces the amplitude and increases the frequency of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion prior to the preovulatory GnRH surge in the ewe. Abstr Soc Neurosci 18:191
  39. Bedran de Castro JC, Khorram O, McCann SM 1985 Possible negative ultra-short loop feedback of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) in the ovariectomized rat. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 179:132–135[Abstract]
  40. DePaolo LV, King RA, Carrillo JA 1987 In vivo and in vitro examination of an autoregulatroy mechanism for LHRH. Endocrinology 120:272–279[Abstract]
  41. Valenca AA, Johnstone CA, Ching M, Negro-Vilar A 1986 Evidence for a negative ultrashort loop feedback mechanism operating on the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone neuronal system. Endocrinology 121:2256–2259[Abstract]
  42. Zanisi M, Messi E, Motta M, Martin L 1987 Ultrashort feedback control of luteinizing hromone-releasing hormone secretion in vitro. Endocrinology 121:2199–2204[Abstract]
  43. Naylor AM, Porter DWF, Lincoln DW 1989 Inhibitory effect of central LHRH on LH secretion in the ovariectomized ewe. Neuroendocrinology 49:531–536[Medline]
  44. Tang YP, Sisk CL 1992 LHRH in the ferret: pubertal decrease in the number of immunopositive arcuate neurons. Peptides 13:241–247[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Silverman A-J, Witkin JW, Millar RP 1990 Light and electron microscopic immunocytochemical analysis of antibodies directed against GnRH and its precursor in hypothalamic neurons. J Histochem Cytochem 38:803–813[Abstract]
  46. Prezkop F 1978 Effect of anterior deafferentation of the hypothalamus on the release of luteinizing hormone (LH) and reproductive function in sheep. Acta Physiol Pol 29:393–407[Medline]
  47. Thiery JC, Pelletier J, Signoret JP 1978 Effect of hypothalamic deafferentation on sexual behaviour in ovariectomized ewes under hormonally induced oestrous cycle. Ann Biol Anim Biochem Biophys 186:1413–1426
  48. Domanski E, Przekop F, Polkowska J 1980 Hypothalamic centers involved in the control of gonadotrophin secretion. J Reprod Fertil 58:493–499[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Jackson GL, Kuehl D, McDowell K, Zaleski A 1978 Effect of hypothalamic deafferentation on secretion of luteinizing hormone in the ewe. Biol Reprod 17:808–819
  50. Radford HM 1979 The effect of hypothalamic lesions on estradiol-induced changes in LH release in the ewe. Neuroendocrinology 28:307–312[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Foster DL, Karsch FJ 1975 Development of the mechanism regulating the preovulatory surge of luteinizing hormone in sheep. Endocrinology 97:1205–1209[Abstract]
  52. Herbosa CG, Dahl GE, Evans NP, Pelt J, Wood RI, Foster DL Sexual differentiation of the surge mode of gonadotropin secretion: evidence that prenatal androgens abolish the GnRH surge in the lamb. 24th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Miami Beach FL, 1994, p 638 (Abstract)
  53. Clarke IJ, Thomas GB, Yao B, Cummings JT 1987 GnRH secretion throughout the ovine estrous cycle. Neuroendocrinology 46:82–88[Medline]
  54. Moenter SM, Caraty A, Lacatelli A, Karsch FJ 1991 Pattern of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion leading up to ovulation in the ewe: existence of a preovulatory GnRH surge. Endocrinology 129:1175–1182[Abstract]
  55. Domanski E, Chomicka LK, Ostrowska A, Gajewska A, Mateusiak K 1991 Release of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, ß-endorphin and noradrenaline by the nucleus infundibularis/median eminence during periovulatory period in sheep. Neuroendocrinology 54:151–158[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
T. Cogliati, P. Delgado-Romero, E. R. Norwitz, J. Guduric-Fuchs, U. B. Kaiser, S. Wray, and I. R. Kirsch
Pubertal Impairment in Nhlh2 Null Mice Is Associated with Hypothalamic and Pituitary Deficiencies
Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2007; 21(12): 3013 - 3027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
G. N. Wade and J. E. Jones
Neuroendocrinology of nutritional infertility
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): R1277 - R1296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
E. Terasawa and D. L. Fernandez
Neurobiological Mechanisms of the Onset of Puberty in Primates
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2001; 22(1): 111 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. L. Temple and E. F. Rissman
Acute Re-Feeding Reverses Food Restriction-Induced Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Gonadal Axis Deficits
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2000; 63(6): 1721 - 1726.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. I'Anson, J. M. Manning, C. G. Herbosa, J. Pelt, C. R. Friedman, R. I. Wood, D. C. Bucholtz, and D. L. Foster
Central Inhibition of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Secretion in the Growth-Restricted Hypogonadotropic Female Sheep
Endocrinology, February 1, 2000; 141(2): 520 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
R. Boukhliq, R. L. Goodman, S. J. Berriman, B. Adrian, and M. N. Lehman
A Subset of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons in the Ovine Medial Basal Hypothalamus Is Activated during Increased Pulsatile Luteinizing Hormone Secretion
Endocrinology, December 1, 1999; 140(12): 5929 - 5936.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by I’anson, H.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by I’anson, H.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, D. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals