help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katsuyama, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ichikawa, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katsuyama, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ichikawa, A.
Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 1 344-350
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

‘Distinct Cellular Localization of the Messenger Ribonucleic Acid for Prostaglandin E Receptor Subtypes in the Mouse Uterus during Pseudopregnancy1

Masato Katsuyama2, Yukihiko Sugimoto, Kimiko Morimoto, Ken-yuh Hasumoto, Manabu Fukumoto, Manabu Negishi and Atsushi Ichikawa

Department of Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, and Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine (M.F.), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Atsushi Ichikawa, Ph.D., Department of Physiological Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606, Japan.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
As an initial step to clarify the mechanisms of various uterine actions of PGE2, expression patterns of the messenger RNAs (mRNAs) for four subtypes of PGE receptors, EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4, were investigated in the mouse uterus during pseudopregnancy. Relative expression levels were investigated by Northern blot analysis of mRNA levels in uteri obtained on days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 of pseudopregnancy (day 0 = 48 h after PMSG injection), and cellular localization was determined by in situ hybridization in uteri obtained on days 0 and 5. EP2 mRNA was specifically expressed on day 5, and its expression was confined to the luminal epithelium. On the other hand, the level of the EP3 mRNA expression progressively increased until day 5. Cell populations expressing the EP3 mRNA were confined to the longitudinal smooth muscle on day 0, but they changed to the circular smooth muscle on day 5. The expression level of EP4 mRNA was low on days 0 and 1, but it became high on days 3 and 5. On day 0, EP4 mRNA was localized to the luminal epithelium. On day 5, diffuse, but significant, EP4 expression was observed over the endometrial stroma and epithelium. No EP1 mRNA signals were observed. Transient expression of EP2 on day 5 of pseudopregnancy in the luminal epithelium suggests its involvement in blastocyst implantation signaling. EP4 in the endometrial stroma is suggested to be involved in decidual transformation of the stromal cells, whereas EP3 in the myometrium is believed to be involved in regulation of myometrial activity.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PGE2 IS A MAJOR metabolite of arachidonic acid synthesized by cyclooxygenase pathways in the uterus, which is demonstrated to be produced in the implantation sites or the amnion and decidua at the onset of labor (1, 2). PGE2 regulates various uterine functions, such as contraction and relaxation of the uterine smooth muscles, cervical ripening and labor induction, elevation of endometrial vascular permeability, and induction of decidualization (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). These actions of PGE2 are exerted through its binding to specific receptors on plasma membranes. PGE2-binding activity has been determined in the myometrium in various species (5, 6, 7, 8), and changes in the number of binding sites, depending on the state of pseudopregnancy or the estrous cycle, were reported in the endometrium (9, 10, 11). The PGE receptor is pharmacologically divided into four subtypes, EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4 (5, 12), but the contributions of the four receptor subtypes to PGE2-induced uterine actions have not yet been well established, except for the contractile action on the myometrium, which is probably mediated by EP3 (6, 7, 8). We recently isolated complementary DNAs encoding these four PGE receptor subtypes (13, 14, 15, 16, 17), which enabled us to investigate their cellular distribution in pseudopregnant mouse uterus by Northern blot and in situ hybridization analyses. We report here distinct cellular localization of the messenger RNAs (mRNAs) encoding mouse PGE receptor subtypes in the uterus during pseudopregnancy.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
ddY mice were purchased from Japan SLC (Hamamatsu, Japan). Pseudopregnancy was achieved in virgin mice as follows. Immature (21-day-old) female mice were obtained and housed under a 12-h light, 12-h dark photoperiod, with lights on at 0800 h. The mice received a single ip injection of 5 IU PMSG. After 48 h, mice were injected ip with 5 IU hCG and paired overnight with a vasectomized male of the same inbred line. The morning on which a vaginal plug was detected was taken as day 0.5 of pseudopregnancy. Mice were killed at different intervals after mating, and the uteri were isolated, frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen (for RNA isolation) or in 2-methylbutane at -50 C (for preparation of uterine sections), and stored at -80 C until use. For RNA isolation, uteri were collected from three mice for each day of pseudopregnancy studied, and Northern blot experiments were independently repeated three times. In situ hybridizations were repeated twice or three times for each day of pseudopregnancy studied.

Hybridization probes
Mouse complementary DNAs for EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4 were subcloned into pBluescript II (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) for synthesis of both sense and antisense complementary RNA (cRNA) probes (13, 14, 15, 17). For Northern hybridization, antisense 32P-labeled cRNA probes were generated, whereas for in situ hybridization, sense and antisense 35S-labeled cRNA probes were generated using the appropriate polymerases. Cold antisense riboprobes were also synthesized by the same procedure with unlabeled nucleotides.

Northern blot analysis
Uteri were collected from three mice for each day of pseudopregnancy studied. Uterine total RNAs were isolated by the acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform method (18). Total RNA (15 µg) was separated by electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel and transferred onto a nylon membrane (Hybond-N, Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). Four different blots were prepared and separately hybridized with 32P-labeled probes for EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4. Hybridization was carried out essentially as described previously (17). After hybridization, the blots were washed under stringent conditions, and the hybrids were detected by autoradiography. Then, the blots were stripped and rehybridized with 32P-labeled DNA probe for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as described previously (14). Autoradiograms were subjected to densitometric scanning (AE-6900M, ATTO, Tokyo, Japan) for quantitation of PGE receptor mRNA levels relative to GAPDH mRNA levels. Northern blot experiments were independently repeated three times, and similar results were obtained. Representative results are shown in Fig. 1Go.



View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. a, Time-dependent expression of the mRNAs for PGE receptor subtypes in the mouse uterus during pseudopregnancy. Uteri were collected from three mice for each day of pseudopregnancy studied, and total RNAs were isolated. mRNA values were determined by Northern blot analysis using 32P-labeled antisense riboprobes as described in Materials and Methods. The same blots were rehybridized with 32P-labeled DNA probe for GAPDH, and the representative results are shown. The day of pseudopregnancy is shown at the top. Day 0 represents 48 h after PMSG injection. The positions of the major bands are indicated by arrowheads. b, Quantitation of the signals for the PGE receptor (EP) mRNAs in a. The autoradiograms were subjected to densitometric scanning, and EP mRNA levels were normalized to GAPDH mRNA levels. The increase in EP mRNA levels is expressed as the fold increase over the level on the control day (days 3, 1, and, 0 for EP2, EP3, and EP4, respectively). Northern blot analyses were independently repeated three times, and similar results were obtained. Representative results are shown.

 
Preparation of uterine sections
Uterine sections 10 µm thick were cut on a Jung Frigocut 2800E cryostat and mounted onto poly-L-lysine-coated glass slides. The sections were fixed in 4% formalin in PBS for 10 min, rinsed in PBS, and acetylated with 0.25% acetic anhydride in 0.1 M triethanolamine-0.9% NaCl for 10 min at room temperature. After dehydration sequentially in 70%, 95%, and 100% ethanol, the sections were air-dried and stored at -80 C until use.

In situ hybridization
Riboprobes were prepared essentially as described above by transcription in the presence of [{alpha}-35S]CTP to specific activities of 1.0 x 109 cpm/µg. After removing unincorporated nucleotides, riboprobes were degraded to about 150 bases by alkaline hydrolysis. Hybridization was carried out essentially as described previously (19). The specificity of the signal with each antisense probe was verified either by its disappearance with the addition of an excess of unlabeled probe (see an example in Fig. 4fGo for EP3, not shown for others) or by no specific hybridization with sense probe (data not shown). Hybridized sections were dipped in nuclear track emulsion (NTB3, Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY), diluted 1:1 with water. After exposure for about 4 weeks at 4 C, the dipped slides were developed and fixed, then counterstained with hematoxylin and eosin. These experiments were repeated twice or three times on each day of pseudopregnancy studied.



View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Regional distribution of the mRNAs for PGE receptor subtypes in the mouse uterus on day 5 of pseudopregnancy. a, Brightfield transverse section through the uterus. b–e, Darkfield photomicrographs of transverse sections hybridized with 35S-labeled antisense riboprobe for the EP1 (b), EP2 (c), EP3 (d), and EP4 mRNA (e). Hybridization signals for EP3 shown in d were abolished in the presence of excess unlabeled probe (f). Scale bar = 300 µm.

 

    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Changes in the expression levels of the PGE receptor mRNAs in the uterus during pseudopregnancy
In the uteri from pseudopregnant mice, the mRNAs encoding three PGE receptor subtypes, EP2, EP3, and EP4, were detected by Northern blot analyses (Fig. 1aGo); the major transcripts were 2.8, 2.3, and 3.9 kilobases for EP2, EP3, and EP4, respectively. Minor bands for the EP2 and EP3 mRNAs were also observed, as reported previously (13, 17). No expression of the EP1 transcript was detected (data not shown). The level of expression of the EP2 transcript showed marked variations during the period examined. The transcript was barely detectable on days 0 and 1 of pseudopregnancy. On day 3, EP2 mRNA was detected at a very low level, and the increase was evident on day 5: the mRNA level was 11-fold the level on day 3. The EP2 mRNA thereafter sharply decreased to that seen on day 3. EP3 mRNA was hardly detected on day 0. Beginning on day 1, the transcript progressively increased in abundance to reach the maximum on day 5, which was about 13-fold the level observed on day 1 (Fig. 1bGo). On days 7 and 9, expression decreased to lower levels than those on day 3. The expression of EP4 mRNA, which was low on days 0 and 1, progressively increased and was maintained at a high level after day 5, which was approximately 10- to 15-fold the level on day 0 (Fig. 1bGo).

Cellular localization of PGE receptor mRNAs in the pseudopregnant uterus
To define the cell populations expressing the PGE receptor subtype mRNAs, in situ hybridization analysis was performed on uteri on days 0 and 5 of pseudopregnancy. In situ hybridization using 35S-labeled riboprobes revealed distinct regional distributions of EP2, EP3, and EP4 mRNAs in the uterus ( Figs. 2–5GoGoGoGo). No signals for the EP1 mRNA were detected in uteri on days 0 and 5 (Fig. 4bGo for day 5).



View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Regional distribution of the mRNAs for PGE receptor subtypes in the mouse uterus on day 0 of pseudopregnancy (48 h after PMSG injection). a, Brightfield transverse section through the uterus. b–d, Darkfield photomicrographs of transverse sections hybridized with 35S-labeled antisense riboprobe for the EP2 (b), EP3 (c), and EP4 mRNA (d). Scale bar = 300 µm.

 


View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Cellular localization of the mRNAs for PGE receptor subtypes in the mouse uterus on day 0 of pseudopregnancy. a and b, Bright- and darkfield photomicrographs of the myometrium, respectively, showing hybridization signals for the EP3 mRNA. c and d, Bright- and darkfield photomicrographs of the luminal epithelium, respectively, showing hybridization signals for the EP4 mRNA. Arrowheads, Cells labeled with each probe. CM, Circular smooth muscle; LM, longitudinal smooth muscle; L, uterine lumen; LE, luminal epithelium; S, stroma. Scale bar = 50 µm.

 


View larger version (197K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Cellular localization of the mRNAs for PGE receptor subtypes in the mouse uterus on day 5 of pseudopregnancy. a and b, Bright- and darkfield photomicrographs of the luminal epithelium, respectively, showing hybridization signals for the EP2 mRNA. c and d, Bright- and darkfield photomicrographs of the myometrium, respectively, showing hybridization signals for the EP3 mRNA. e and f, Bright- and darkfield photomicrographs of the endometrium, respectively, showing hybridization signals for the EP4 mRNA. Arrowheads, Cells labeled with each probe. L, uterine lumen; LE, luminal epithelium; S, stroma; G, glandular epithelium; CM, circular smooth muscle; LM, longitudinal smooth muscle. Scale bar = 50 µm.

 
On day 0 of pseudopregnancy, EP3 and EP4 mRNAs were detected (Fig. 2Go, c and d), but no significant signals for EP2 were seen (Fig. 2bGo). Hybridization signals for the EP3 mRNA were found in the myometrium (Fig. 2cGo). Microscopic examination of the myometrium exhibited weak, but significant, labeling of the longitudinal smooth muscle cells, but the circular smooth muscle cells were hardly labeled with the EP3 probe (Fig. 3Go, a and b). As shown in Fig. 3Go, c and d, signals for the EP4 mRNA were localized in the luminal epithelium.

On day 5 of pseudopregnancy, strong hybridization signals for EP2 mRNA were observed in the luminal epithelial cells (Figs. 4cGo and 5Go, a and b). As shown in Fig. 4dGo, strong hybridization signals for EP3 mRNA were seen in the myometrium. Microscopic examination of the myometrium exhibited intense labeling of the circular smooth muscle cells, but the longitudinal smooth muscle cells were not labeled (Fig. 5Go, c and d). Diffuse, but significant, EP4 expression was observed in the endometrium (Fig. 4eGo). Microscopic examination of the endometrium revealed significant labeling of the luminal epithelial cells like that on day 0 of pseudopregnancy. In addition, endometrial stromal cells and glandular epithelium were labeled (Fig. 5Go, e and f).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the present study, we demonstrated time-dependent changes in expression level and distinct cellular localization of the mRNAs encoding three subtypes of PGE receptors, EP2, EP3, and EP4, in the mouse uterus during pseudopregnancy. Such time-dependent fluctuation of PGE receptor mRNAs has not been identified in the other tissues or systems, except the uterus. In this study, mice were administered PMSG; on day 0, defined as 48 h after injection, mice were regarded as being in proestrous by analysis of vaginal smears or by confirmation of ovulation on the following morning. On the other hand, day 5 was chosen as a time of maximal uterine sensitivity to the presence of blastocysts (20, 21). We used superovulation of immature mice and induction of pseudopregnancy as a model system to examine the changes in PGE receptor expression. Although this system is known to include nonphysiological hormone stimuli, we preliminary performed in situ hybridization on pseudopregnant day 5 mice that were generated from mature and cycling females, and consequently obtained almost the same results as those achieved using superovulated day 5 mice (data not shown).

The mRNA encoding EP2, which is coupled to the stimulation of adenylate cyclase, was expressed almost exclusively on day 5 of pseudopregnancy, and its expression was confined to the luminal epithelium. This observation is inconsistent with the previous report that no [3H]PGE2-binding sites were detected in the luminal epithelium (22). In this previous study, however, binding experiments were performed using the uterine epithelium of progesterone-treated ovariectomized rats, not that of rats on day 5 of pseudopregnancy. The high level selective expression of EP2 on day 5 suggests the involvement of PGE2 in blastocyst implantation that occurs during days 4 and 5 of pregnancy in the mouse (21, 23, 24). It was noted that cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is transiently expressed on day 4.5 of pregnancy in the luminal epithelium (25). Considering the similarity in fluctuation between EP2 and COX-2 expression, PGE2 synthesized in the luminal epithelium may exert its effect through EP2 in an autocrine manner. EP2 might mediate signals for morphological changes in the luminal epithelium essential for blastocyst implantation (1). In fact, treatment with indomethacin, a COX inhibitor, has been shown to elicit ultrastructural changes in the luminal epithelium and to inhibit blastocyst implantation (26). Thus, EP2 expressed in the luminal epithelium might be involved in transmission of the signal from the blastocyst to the underlying stromal cells.

The expression of EP4, which is also positively coupled to adenylate cyclase, sharply increased on day 3 of pseudopregnancy. This increase may be reflecting the change in stromal cells; EP4 mRNA was expressed in the stroma on day 5, but not on day 0. As the serum progesterone level was reported to rise and reach its maximum on day 5 of pseudopregnancy in the rat (27), it is possible that the EP4 expression in stromal cells is induced by progesterone, as reported previously (22). PGE2 was reported to cause an increase in alkaline phosphatase activity in the stromal cells during decidualization via elevation of the cAMP level (28). This effect may be mediated by EP4. Thus, EP4 may mediate signals for decidualization of the stromal cells.

The mRNA encoding EP3, which is coupled to the inhibition of adenylate cyclase, was specifically localized to the myometrium. Previous pharmacological studies demonstrated that PGE2 causes uterine contraction through elevation of the intracellular Ca2+ concentration (8). Mouse EP3 expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells is coupled not only to the inhibition of adenylate cyclase, but also to Ca2+ mobilization via Gi (29). Therefore, PGE2-induced uterine contraction may be mediated by an EP3-mediated Ca2+ signal in the myometrium.

As in the cases of EP2 and EP4, the level of EP3 expression also changed during pseudopregnancy; EP3 expression was low on day 0, but increased to reach a maximal level on day 5. The temporal changes in EP3 expression coincided well with the change in myometrial activity in pregnant and pseudopregnant rats; the myometrial activity was reported to increase after mating and reached a maximal level on day 5 (30). Therefore, the level of EP3 expression might affect myometrial activity. The cell populations expressing EP3 also changed in a temporally specific manner; EP3 transcript was localized to the longitudinal smooth muscle on day 0, but expression was confined to the circular smooth muscle on day 5. To date, there have been no reports concerning changes in PGE2-induced myometrial contractility in these two distinct types of smooth muscle during pregnancy or pseudopregnancy. However, EP3 expressed in the longitudinal smooth muscle on day 0 might be involved in longitudinal contraction observed during the periovulatory period (31). EP3-mediated longitudinal contraction might contribute to sperm transport (32). On the other hand, EP3 highly expressed in the circular smooth muscle on day 5 might be involved in circular contraction necessary for retention and spacing of embryos (30). At present, there is no information regarding the mechanism underlying such time-dependent changes in the expression of EP3 mRNA in two distinct types of smooth muscle cells. More detailed analyses are, therefore, required.

In summary, the results presented in this paper indicated distinct cellular localizations of PGE receptor subtypes in the mouse uterus during pseudopregnancy. Furthermore, each of the receptors showed time-dependent changes in the level of expression in individual cells, suggestive of hormonal regulation. Thus, it is suggested that PGE2 modulates uterine functions through at least three receptors; EP2 is involved in blastocyst implantation signaling, EP4 is involved in decidual transformation of the stromal cells, and EP3 is involved in regulation of myometrial contractility.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. K. Takabatake of the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Faculty of Medicine, for helpful discussion. We also thank Mr. K. Tsuboi and Mr. E. Funakoshi of the Department of Physiological Chemistry, Kyoto University Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, for their technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research 07672353, 07278220, 07772167, and 07557156 from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan and by grants from the Sankyoh Life Science Research Foundation and the Katoh Memorial Foundation. Back

2 Recipient of research fellowships from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists. Back

Received June 11, 1996.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Parr MB, Parr EL 1989 The implantation reaction. In: Wynn RM, Jollie WP (eds) Biology of the Uterus, ed 2. Plenum Medical, New York, pp 233–277
  2. Soloff MS 1989 Endocrine control of parturition. In: Wynn RM, Jollie WP (eds) Biology of the Uterus, ed 2. Plenum Medical, New York, pp 559–607
  3. Weitlauf HM 1988 Biology of implantation. In: Knobil E, Neill J (eds) The Physiology of Reproduction, Raven Press, New York, pp 231–262
  4. Huszar G, Walsh MP 1989 Biochemistry of the myometrium and cervix. In: Wynn RM, Jollie WP (eds) Biology of the Uterus, ed 2. Plenum Medical, New York, pp 355–402
  5. Coleman RA, Kennedy I, Humphrey PPA, Bunce K, Lumley P 1990 Prostanoids and their receptors. In: Hansch C, Sammes PG, Taylor JB, Emmett JC (eds) Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry. Pergamon, Oxford, vol 3:643–714
  6. Senior J, Marshall K, Sangha R, Baxter GS, Clayton JK 1991 In vitro characterization of prostanoid EP-receptors in the non-pregnant human myometrium. Br J Pharmacol 102:747–753[Medline]
  7. Senior J, Marshall K, Sangha R, Clayton JK 1993 In vitro characterization of prostanoid receptors on human myometrium at term pregnancy. Br J Pharmacol 108:501–506[Medline]
  8. Goureau O, Tanfin Z, Marc S, Harbon S 1992 Diverse prostaglandin receptors activate distinct signal transduction pathways in rat myometrium. Am J Physiol 32:C257–C265
  9. Kennedy TG, Martel D, Phychoyos A 1983a Endometrial prostaglandin E2 binding: characterization in rats sensitized for the decidual cell reaction and changes during pseudopregnancy. Biol Reprod 29:556–564
  10. Kennedy TG, Keys JL, King GJ 1986 Endometrial prostaglandin E2-binding sites in the pig: characterization and changes during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy. Biol Reprod 35:624–632[Abstract]
  11. Hofmann GE, Rao ChV, De Leon FD, Toledo AA, Sanfilippo JS 1985 Human endometrial prostaglandin E2 binding sites and their profiles during the menstrual cycle and in pathologic states. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151:369–375[Medline]
  12. Coleman RA, Grix SP, Head SA, Louttit JB, Mallett A, Sheldrick RLG 1994 A novel inhibitory prostanoid receptor in piglet saphenous vein. Prostaglandins 47:151–168[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Sugimoto Y, Namba T, Honda A, Hayashi Y, Negishi M, Ichikawa A, Narumiya S 1992 Cloning and expression of a cDNA for mouse prostaglandin E receptor EP3 subtype. J Biol Chem 267:6463–6466[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Honda A, Sugimoto Y, Namba T, Watabe A, Irie A, Negishi M, Narumiya S, Ichikawa A 1993 Cloning and expression of a cDNA for mouse prostaglandin E receptor EP2 subtype. J Biol Chem 268:7759–7762[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Watabe A, Sugimoto Y, Honda A, Irie A, Namba T, Negishi M, Ito S, Narumiya S, Ichikawa A 1993 Cloning and expression of cDNA for a mouse EP1 subtype of prostaglandin E receptor. J Biol Chem 268:20175–20178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Nishigaki N, Negishi M, Honda A, Sugimoto Y, Namba T, Narumiya S, Ichikawa A 1995 Identification of prostaglandin E receptor "EP2" cloned from mastocytoma cells as EP4 subtype. FEBS Lett 364:339–341[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Katsuyama M, Nishigaki N, Sugimoto Y, Morimoto K, Negishi M, Narumiya S, Ichikawa A 1995 The mouse prostaglandin E receptor EP2 subtype: cloning, expression, and Northern blot analysis. FEBS Lett 372:151–156[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N 1987 Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162:156–159[Medline]
  19. Sugimoto Y, Namba T, Shigemoto R, Negishi M, Ichikawa A, Narumiya S 1994 Distinct cellular localization of mRNAs for three subtypes of prostaglandin E receptor in kidney. Am J Physiol 266:F823–F828
  20. Moulton BC, Koenig BB 1986 Biochemical responses of the luminal epithelium and uterine sensitization. Ann NY Acad Sci 476:95–109[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Markoff E, Henemyre C, Fellows J, Pennington E, Zeitler PS, Cedars MI 1995 Localization of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-4 expression in the mouse uterus during the peri-implantation period. Biol Reprod 53:1103–1109[Abstract]
  22. Kennedy TG, Martel D, Phychoyos A 1983b Endometrial prostaglandin E2 binding during the estrous cycle and its hormonal control in ovariectomized rats. Biol Reprod 29:565–571
  23. Das SK, Flanders KC, Andrews GK, Dey SK 1992 Expression of transforming growth factor-ß isoforms (ß2 and ß3) in the mouse uterus: analysis of the periimplantation period and effects of ovarian steroids. Endocrinology 130:3459–3466[Abstract]
  24. Schiff R, Arensburg J, Itin A, Keshet E, Orly J 1993 Expression and cellular localization of uterine side-chain cleavage cytochrome P450 messenger ribonucleic acid during early pregnancy in mice. Endocrinology 133:529–537[Abstract]
  25. Jacobs AL, Hwang D, Julian J, Carson DD 1994 Regulated expression of prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase-2 by uterine stroma. Endocrinology 135:1807–1815[Abstract]
  26. Lundkvist Ö, Nilsson BO 1980 Ultrastructural changes of the trophoblast-epithelial complex in mice subjected to implantation blocking treatment with indomethacin. Biol Reprod 22:719–726[Abstract]
  27. Pepe GJ, Rothchild I 1974 A comparative study of serum progesterone levels in pregnancy and in various types of pseudopregnancy in the rat. Endocrinology 95:275–279[Medline]
  28. Yee GM, Kennedy TG 1991 Role of cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate in mediating the effect of prostaglandin E2 on decidualization in vitro. Biol Reprod 45:163–171[Abstract]
  29. Irie A, Segi E, Sugimoto Y, Ichikawa A, Negishi M 1994 Mouse prostaglandin E receptor EP3 subtype mediates calcium signals via Gi in cDNA-transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 204:303–309[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Crane LH, Martin L 1991a In vivo myometrial activity during early pregnancy and pseudopregnancy in the rat. Reprod Fertil Dev 3:233–244
  31. Crane LH, Martin L 1991b In vivo myometrial activity in the rat during the oestrous cycle: studies with a novel technique of video laparoscopy. Reprod Fertil Dev 3:185–199
  32. Chalubinski K, Deutinger J, Bernaschek G 1993 Vaginosonography for recording of cycle-related myometrial contractions. Fertil Steril 59:225–228[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
T. G Kennedy, C. Gillio-Meina, and S. H. Phang
Prostaglandins and the initiation of blastocyst implantation and decidualization
Reproduction, November 1, 2007; 134(5): 635 - 643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Sugimoto and S. Narumiya
Prostaglandin E Receptors
J. Biol. Chem., April 20, 2007; 282(16): 11613 - 11617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E.A. Campbell, L. O'Hara, R.D. Catalano, A.M. Sharkey, T.C. Freeman, and M. H. Johnson
Temporal expression profiling of the uterine luminal epithelium of the pseudo-pregnant mouse suggests receptivity to the fertilized egg is associated with complex transcriptional changes
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2495 - 2513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
S. Chandrasekharan, N. A. Foley, L. Jania, P. Clark, L. P. Audoly, and B. H. Koller
Coupling of COX-1 to mPGES1 for prostaglandin E2 biosynthesis in the murine mammary gland
J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2005; 46(12): 2636 - 2648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
E. Segi, K. Haraguchi, Y. Sugimoto, M. Tsuji, H. Tsunekawa, S. Tamba, K. Tsuboi, S. Tanaka, and A. Ichikawa
Expression of Messenger RNA for Prostaglandin E Receptor Subtypes EP4/EP2 and Cyclooxygenase Isozymes in Mouse Periovulatory Follicles and Oviducts During Superovulation
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2003; 68(3): 804 - 811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Ikegami, Y. Sugimoto, E. Segi, M. Katsuyama, H. Karahashi, F. Amano, T. Maruyama, H. Yamane, S. Tsuchiya, and A. Ichikawa
The Expression of Prostaglandin E Receptors EP2 and EP4 and Their Different Regulation by Lipopolysaccharide in C3H/HeN Peritoneal Macrophages
J. Immunol., April 1, 2001; 166(7): 4689 - 4696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. D. Papay and T. G. Kennedy
Characterization of Temporal and Cell-Specific Changes in Transcripts for Prostaglandin E2 Receptors in Pseudopregnant Rat Endometrium
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2000; 62(6): 1515 - 1525.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
S. Narumiya, Y. Sugimoto, and F. Ushikubi
Prostanoid Receptors: Structures, Properties, and Functions
Physiol Rev, October 1, 1999; 79(4): 1193 - 1226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. Hizaki, E. Segi, Y. Sugimoto, M. Hirose, T. Saji, F. Ushikubi, T. Matsuoka, Y. Noda, T. Tanaka, N. Yoshida, et al.
Abortive expansion of the cumulus and impaired fertility in mice lacking the prostaglandin E receptor subtype EP2
PNAS, August 31, 1999; 96(18): 10501 - 10506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. Lim and S. K. Dey
Prostaglandin E2 Receptor Subtype EP2 Gene Expression in the Mouse Uterus Coincides with Differentiation of the Luminal Epithelium for Implantation
Endocrinology, November 1, 1997; 138(11): 4599 - 4606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katsuyama, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ichikawa, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katsuyama, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ichikawa, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals