help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Helman, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gertler, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Helman, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gertler, A.
Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 10 4069-4080
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Site-Directed Mutagenesis of Recombinant Bovine Placental Lactogen at Lysine-73 Leads to Selective Attenuation of Its Somatogenic Activity1

Daniel Helman, Nicholas R. Staten, John Byatt, Jeanne Grosclaude, Russell E. McKinnie, Jean Djiane and Arieh Gertler

Institute of Biochemistry, Food Science and Nutrition (D.H., A.G.), Faculty of Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel; Unite d’Endocrinologie Moleculaire (J.D.), Unite de Virologie et Immunologie Moleculaire (J.G.), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas Cedex, France; and Animal Science Division and Searle (N.R.S., J.B., R.E.M.), c/o Monsanto Co., Department of Molecular Biology, St. Louis, Missouri 63198

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Arieh Gertler, Institute of Biochemistry, Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel. E-mail: gertler{at}agri.huji.ac.il


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Bovine placental lactogen (bPL) is capable of binding and transducing biological activity via somatogenic and lactogenic receptors. To modify this capability, three analogs, bPL(K73D), bPL(K73F) and bPL(K73A), mutated at position 73, and corresponding to R64 in human GH (hGH), were produced in Escherichia coli. Circular dichroic spectrum analyses indicated proper refolding in all cases. Biological activity of these analogs was tested in vitro. In a lactogenic-receptor-mediated Nb2 rat lymphoma cell bioassay, bPL and its analogs acted similarly. In another lactogenic bioassay that measures ß-casein synthesis by HC-11 mouse mammary-gland cells, the analogs were 30–40% as potent as bPL. In contrast, somatogenic receptor-mediated bioactivity in FDC-P1 cells transfected with either rabbit (rb) or hGH receptor (R) was almost completely abolished in these analogs. In receptor binding assays, the effect was more conspicuous and the mutations affected not only somatogenic but also lactogenic binding. Binding to rat (r) and rabbit PRL receptor extracellular domains (ECDs) or membrane-embedded receptors was only slightly changed, except for bPL (K73D), which displayed very low affinity. In somatogenic binding assays to intact IM-9 human lymphocytes, hGHR-ECD or bovine liver membranes, bPL (K73D) did not bind at all, and bPL(K73F) or bPL(K73A) binding was drastically reduced. Binding experiments performed in real time using a BIAcore apparatus revealed that the decreased binding could be mainly attributed to increased koff rather than decreased kon values. The complex with hGHR-ECD revealed a 2:1 stoichiometry with bPL, bPL(K73F) and bPL(K73A), although the complex with these analogs was less stable than with bPL, whereas bPL(K73D) scarcely assembled a 1:1 complex. In contrast, bPL and the three analogs formed stable 1:2 complexes with rPRL-ECD. These results suggest that position 73 in bPL is more important for somatogenic than lactogenic properties and concurs with results from other groups, which have shown that R64, the analogous amino acid in hGH holds the same differential importance with respect to somatogenic binding.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PLACENTAS of primates, rodents, and ruminants secrete one or more polypeptide hormones that are structurally related to pituitary hormones, GH and PRL, into the maternal and fetal circulations. These hormones, referred to as placental lactogens (PLs) or chorionic somatotropic hormones, are usually 22- to 23-kDa proteins, some of them glycosylated, yielding higher molecular masses (1). The level of PL in maternal and fetal blood is highly species dependent, e.g. the concentration in ewes is relatively high, whereas in cows it is among the lowest (2). Although the biological functions of PLs are generally poorly understood, they probably have multiple biological effects, as has long been recognized for GH and PRL. There is evidence to suggest that PL may function as a unique fetal GH, based on findings that ovine (o) fetus responds to ovine or human (h) PL (3). Physiological effects of native bovine (b) PL in the fetus or maternal tissue may be mediated through its binding to specific PL receptors (R), the presence of which has not yet been conclusively proven, or to either bPRLR or bGHR. We have found that bPL is capable of acting through PRLRs in bovine mammary glands (4), as well as in the rat Nb2 lymphoma cell line (5). We have also provided kinetic evidence that unique bPLRs are present in the endometrium of pregnant cows (6) and have shown that bPL acts through GHRs in 3T3-F442A preadipocytes (7) and rat (r) hepatocytes (8). Thus, bPL, and most likely oPL as well (9), are unusual in that they are capable of recognizing and subsequently exhibiting their biological activity through three different types of receptors. The fact that bPL is primarily released into the fetal rather than maternal circulation raises as yet unanswered questions as to what extent bPL is involved in the regulation of such functions as maternal nutrient partitioning and mammary gland growth and differentiation. On the other hand, Breier et al. (10, 11) suggested that oPL and oGH interact with a common receptor. Bovine PL is also capable of interacting with hGHR, forming 1:2 complex with its recombinant extracellular domain (ECD) (12), as well as with several recombinant PRLR-ECDs (13).

In vivo biological effects of recombinant bPL in dairy cows have been recently investigated, indicating its possible effect in mammogenesis, energy balance during pregnancy, and support of fetal growth (for review see 14 . The in vivo effect of bPL and oPL in rat suggest potent somatogenic activity (15, 16). The in vivo effect in ewes and lambs is less clear, due to the limited amount of experimental data on this aspect (17, 18).

One possible way of studying the specific activity of bPL is to prepare analogs in which either the lactogenic or somatogenic activity of the hormone has been selectively modified. The first of these were aimed at successive truncation of bPL’s N-terminal domain (12, 19). Assuming structural similarity to porcine (p) GH (20), these mutations were aimed at removing amino acids beyond or at the beginning of the putative first {alpha}-helix. Results of these studies indicated that bPL can be selectively modified such that particular biological activities are changed while others remain relatively unaffected, although the effect was only partial. The more recent point-mutated bPL(T188F) exhibited such selective modification. Its binding to full-size somatogenic receptors, or their ECDs, and to bPLR in the endometrium, as well as somatogenic-receptor-mediated biological activities, were reduced or abolished, whereas binding to lactogenic receptors or their ECDs, and subsequent biological activity was either fully or almost fully retained (8). Another possible target for selective mutations is Lys 73. This residue corresponds to Arg 64 in hGH, which has been identified as important in the interaction with hGHR-ECD (21), but not with hPRLR-ECD (22). To evaluate the importance of this residue in bPL, three recombinant analogs were prepared and tested: bPL (K73A) and bPL (K73F) in which a small side-chain residue or bulky side-chain residue were introduced, respectively, and bPL (K73D), in which the positive charge was replaced by a negative one.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials
Recombinant hGH was obtained from Biotechnology General, Inc. (Israel) and oPRL (NIDKK AFP-8277E) from the National Hormone and Pituitary Program (Bethesda, MD). Recombinant bPL, nonglycosylated rabbit (rb) and rat PRLR-ECDs and hGHR-ECD were prepared as described previously (19, 23, 24, 25). Carrier-free Na[125I] was purchased from New England Nuclear Corp. (Boston, MA). Molecular-weight markers for gel electrophoresis, RPMI-1640 medium, lysozyme, Triton X-100, isopropyl-1-thio-ß-D-galactopyranoside (IPTG), nalidixic acid and BSA (RIA grade) were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). SDS-PAGE reagents and Protein Assay Kit were purchased from BioRad Laboratories (Richmond, CA). FCS and horse serum were purchased from Labotal Co. (Jerusalem, Israel) and a Superdex75 HR 10/30 column and Q-Sepharose (fast flow) were from Pharmacia LKB Biotechnology AB (Uppsala, Sweden). Reagents for sulfon plasmon resonance (SPR) including CM5 sensor chips, Hepes buffer saline (HBS), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), N-ethyl-N'-(3-diethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC), 2(2-pyridinyldithio)ethanamine hydrochloride (PDEA) and ethanolamine hydrochloride were obtained from Pharmacia Biotech Inc. (Uppsala, Sweden). All other chemicals were of analytical grade.

Construction of bPL-analog expression vectors
Synthetic genes for each bPL analog were constructed using PCR technology, with a GeneAmp PCR Reagent Kit (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT). Briefly, synthetic oligonucleotides (primers) were used to generate a double-stranded DNA that contained the mutation(s) of interest from a template, pMON3401 (24), in addition to restriction-enzyme sites for cloning. The forward primer encoded an NcoI restriction-enzyme site and an initiator methionine codon immediately upstream of the first mature codon (alanine) of bPL. The reverse primer encoded the mutation(s) of interest, as well as a HindIII restriction site and TAA termination codon immediately after the final codon (cysteine). The PCR products were purified using a Wizard PCR kit (Promega, Madison, WI) and digested with NcoI and HindIII restriction enzymes before ligation to parental vector pMON3401 using T4 DNA ligase. The resulting plasmids were sequenced using a Sequenase DNA Sequencing Kit (USB, Cleveland, OH) and the positive constructs were passaged through Escherichia coli strain LE392 before transformation of MON105 (26).

Expression, refolding, and purification of bPL analogs
Escherichia coli MON105 cells transformed with the expression plasmids containing the bPL variant genes were incubated in 500 ml of Terrific Broth (TB) medium (27) by shaking at 300 rpm at 37 C in 2-liter flasks to an A600 of 0.9, after which nalidixic acid (25 mg/flask) was added. The cells were incubated an additional 4 h, harvested by 5-min centrifugation at 10,000 x g, decanted, and then frozen at -20 C. Over 95% of the bPL protein was found in the inclusion bodies that were prepared as described previously (19). The inclusion-body pellet containing the bPL analogs was solubilized in 600 ml of 4.5 M urea buffered with 10 mM Tris base. The pH was increased to 11.3 with NaOH, cysteine was added to 0.1 mM, the clear solution was stirred at 4 C for 48 h and then dialyzed for 48 h against 5 x 10 l of 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9. The solution was then loaded at 120 ml/h onto a Q-Sepharose column (2.6 x 7 cm), preequilibrated with 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9.0 at 4 C. Elution was carried out using a discontinuous NaCl gradient in the same buffer at a rate of 120 ml/h, and 5-ml fractions were collected. Protein concentration was determined by absorbance at 280 nm, and monomer content by gel-filtration chromatography on a Superdex 75 column.

SDS-PAGE
SDS-PAGE was carried out according to Laemmli (28) using 15% gels. Gels were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R.

Circular dichroic (CD) spectra
CD spectra were collected at 4 C in a Jasco J-500C spectropolarimeter using either 0.2- or 0.5-mm cylindrical cells. The spectropolarimeter was routinely calibrated with D-10-(+)-camphor sulfonic acid at 290 nm. The CD spectra (average of four scans) were baseline-corrected and converted to mean residue molar ellipticity ([{theta}]) and analyzed by a least-squares-fitting procedure (29). Additionally, the {alpha}-helix content was estimated by the magnitude of [{theta}] at 222 nm (30). The absorbance was used to estimate the protein concentration for CD analysis using the method of Gill and von Hippel (31). A sample of myoglobin was analyzed in parallel with the bPL samples and was found to agree with literature values (~80% {alpha}-helix, 29 .

Determination of monomer content and complex formation
HPLC gel-filtration chromatography on a Superdex 75 HR 10/30 column was performed with 200-µl aliquots of Q-Sepharose-column-eluted fractions, freeze-dried samples dissolved in H2O or complexes between the soluble recombinant GHR- or PRLR-ECDs and bPL or bPL analogs, using methods described previously (8).

Binding experiments
Binding to intact IM-9 human lymphocytes, Nb2 rat lymphoma-cell homogenate, bovine liver-gland microsomal fractions, and soluble hGHR-ECD and rat and rabbit PRLR-ECD was carried out as described previously (8, 12, 23, 24).

Coupling of bPL or bPL analogs to a CM-dextran matrix via amino groups
The bPL analogs were covalently linked according to Johnsson et al. (32). HBS was injected at 5 µl/min and activation with 0.05 M EDC/NHS in HBS was carried out for 7–8 min. The analogs were then injected at a concentration of 100 µg/ml in 10 mM Na-acetate buffer, pH 5.4, yielding 1000–2000 resonance units (RU) of immobilized hormone. Nonreacted sites were blocked with an 8-min injection of 1 M ethanolamine hydrochloride at pH 8.5. Binding capacities were checked by repeated injections of 5 µM R-ECDs in HBS. Immobilized bPL or its analogs could be regenerated over 50 runs with 4.5 M MgCl2 pulses (1–2 min).

Kinetic measurements of R-ECD:hormone interactions
All experiments were performed at a flow rate of 5 µl/min in HBS at 25 C. Once the hormone being tested was covalently immobilized through amino-group coupling, serial dilutions of each R-ECD were injected for 6 min, and then washed out for 10 min before regeneration. Because the recombinant R-ECDs had been lyophilized with Na-bicarbonate buffers at a salt:protein ratio of 1:2, bulk refractive indexes varied with sample dilution, and these variations were corrected for by injecting the same dilutions into flow cells in which unrelated ligands had been immobilized.

Data analysis and calculation of kinetic constants
BIAcore incorporated software (BIA Evaluation and BIA Simulation) allowed us to: 1) fit experimental curves with 1:1 or 1:2 association/dissociation models and calculate the probabilities of each being the most accurate representation of reality; 2) calculate kinetic constants with SDs. Reverse verification of calculated data were performed by simulating the interaction assuming a variable relative occupation of the two sites.

In vitro bioassays
Three in vitro bioassays in which the signal was transduced through lactogenic receptors were performed: rat Nb2-11C lymphoma-cell-proliferation bioassay (33) and ß-casein production in a mouse HC-11 mammary cell line, nontransfected or transfected with full-size rbPRLR (8). Two in vitro bioassays in which the signal was transduced through somatogenic receptors were based on the proliferation of FDC-P1 cells transfected with rabbit (clone FDC-P1-B9) or human (clone FDC-P1-D11) GHRs (34, 35). Cells cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 5% FCS and hGH (100 ng/ml) were washed in PBS, resuspended in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 5% horse serum at a concentration of 50,000 cells/ml, and plated (one ml/well) in 24-well plates. The bPL or its analogs were then added and the cells were grown for an additional 48 h. Cell growth was determined by counting the cells with a Coulter counter (Coulter Electronics Inc., Hialeah, FL), and the number of doublings was calculated as described previously (33).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Purification of bPL analogs
A typical profile of bPL(K73F) elution from a Q-Sepharose column (Fig. 1Go) shows that over 50% of the protein was eluted with 0.15 M NaCl. Every third tube was analyzed for monomer content and fractions containing >98% pure monomer (tubes 26–44) were pooled, dialyzed against NaHCO3 (1:3 salt:protein ratio), and lyophilized. This fraction was further used for binding and biological studies. Fractions eluted with 0.4 M NaCl consisted mainly of oligomers (not shown). SDS-PAGE of the pooled monomeric fraction, performed with and without ß-mercaptoethanol, revealed only one band with a molecular mass of 23 kDa (not shown). The oligomeric fraction eluted at 0.4 M NaCl also yielded mostly 23-kDa band, indicating that the oligomers were formed by noncovalent interactions. Purification profiles of bPL(K73A) and bPL(K73D) were very similar to that of bPL (K73F) (not shown).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Purification of bPL(K73D) extracted from refractile bodies on a Q-Sepharose column. The column (2.6 x 6 cm) was equilibrated with 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9, at 4 C. The fraction containing refractile-body proteins solubilized in 4.5 M urea in 40 mM Tris-HCl at pH 11.3 (450 ml), was applied to the column at a rate of 120 ml/h. The column was then washed with 80 ml 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9. The eluate was not collected. Elution was carried out using a discontinuous NaCl gradient in the same buffer at 120 ml/h, and 5-ml fractions were collected. The protein concentration was determined by absorbance at 280 nm. The fractions eluted with 0.15 M NaCl (see overlined peak) were pooled. The purification procedure was performed several times, yielding almost identical results.

 
CD spectra of the recombinant bPL analogs
Analysis of the {alpha}-helix content (Table 1Go) revealed values close to (and within experimental error) those of bPL, indicating proper refolding.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Estimated secondary structure

 
Binding experiments
Because bPL is capable of binding to both homologous and heterologous somatogenic or lactogenic receptors, several binding assays were performed. A comparative binding assay in which the ability of bPL and bPL analogs to compete with [125I]hGH for binding to recombinant hGHR-ECD revealed that both bPL(K73F) and bPL(K73A) had lost over 95% of their binding potency, whereas the corresponding loss in bPL(K73D) was even greater (Fig. 2AGo). Binding to intact IM-9 human lymphocytes yielded similar results, although in this case the binding ability of bPL(K73D) was almost totally abolished (Fig. 2BGo). Binding of [125I]bPL to homologous somatogenic receptors in a microsomal fraction from bovine liver (Fig. 2CGo) also showed bPL(K73D) to be totally inactive, and the ability of bPL(K73F) and bPL(K73A) to compete with the labeled ligand as compared with wild-type bPL was reduced 13- and 25-fold, respectively.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Binding of [125I]hGH (A, B, E, F, G) or [125I]bPL (C, D) to hGHR-ECD (A), intact IM-9 lymphoma cells (B), liver microsomal fraction from nonpregnant heifers (C), rPRLR-ECD (D), Nb2 rat lymphoma-cell homogenate (E), rbPRLR-ECD (F) and rabbit mammary gland cell membranes (G). Competitive binding was determined by simultaneous addition of bPL ({square}), bPL(K73D) ({triangleup}), bPL(K73F) ({triangledown}) and bPL(K73A) ({circ}).

 
The ability of bPL and its K73 analogs to compete with [125I]bPL and [125I]hGH for binding to lactogenic receptors was tested by heterologous binding assays (Fig. 2Go, D–G). Homologous bPRLR-ECD or bovine mammary gland microsomal fractions were not used because the complex formed with bPL is very unstable due to rapid dissociation (13, 36), and therefore its existence can hardly be detected by standard methods. Competition curves of both bPL(K73A) and bPL(K73F) binding to rPRLR-ECD were similar to that of bPL, whereas the binding ability of bPL(K73D) was reduced by approximately 30-fold. In contrast, the binding abilities of bPL(K73A), bPL(K73F) and bPL(K73D) to homogenate of rat Nb2 lymphoma cells were only slightly reduced (Fig. 2EGo). Binding of bPL(K73A), bPL(K73F), and bPL(K73D) to rbPRLR-ECD was reduced by 2-, 5-, and 8-fold, respectively, as compared with bPL (Fig. 2FGo) and to the microsomal fraction from rabbit mammary gland by 3-, 4- and 6-fold, respectively (Fig. 2GGo).

Gel filtration experiments
The stoichiometries of interaction between hGHR-ECD or rPRLR-ECD and the bPL analogs were studied by preparing the respective complexes at increasing ECD:hormone ratios, while maintaining a constant concentration (2 µM) of the latter. In contrast to the binding experiments, both bPL(K73A) and bPL(K73F) were capable of dimerizing hGHR-ECD, similarly to bPL (Fig. 3Go, A–D). This observation is most likely related to the fact that the binding experiments, in contrast to the gel filtration experiments, were performed at pM to nM concentrations, which favor the dissociation of weak complexes. In contrast to these analogs, bPL(K73D) formed only weak 1:1 complex (Fig. 3BGo). These assumptions are based on a comparison of complex-peaks sizes and retention times. The effect of absolute concentration on complex formation was further analyzed at a 2:1 hGHR-ECD:bPL (or bPL analog) ratio by decreasing the absolute concentrations of both components 4- to 64-fold. Results of this test (Table 2Go) supported those of the binding experiments, indicating that complex formation is concentration-dependent in a analog-specific manner. Dilution of the bPL:hGHR-ECD complex from 2.0 to 0.03 µM had only a minor effect on its retention time, indicating a high-affinity complex. In contrast, dilution-dependent increases in retention time values were observed with both bPL(K73A) and bPL(K73F), and even more strikingly with bPL(K73D). In the latter analog, even at 2.0 µM the complex was hardly detected. Note that during the course of gel filtration, the injected material undergoes a 5- to 10-fold dilution. Thus, with weak complexes, partial dissociation occurs gradually, resulting in a widening and shifting of the complex peak to higher retention-time values, rather than in the appearance of separate peaks for the complex and its components. Interaction of rPRLR-ECD with bPL and bPL analogs indicated that at 2 µM, the wild-type bPL and its analogs retain full ability to form 2:1 complexes (Fig. 3Go, E–H). Complexes with wild-type bPL, bPL(K73A) and bPL(K73F) remained stable, even when their concentrations were decreased to 0.03 µM, whereas the complex with bPL(K73D) underwent partial or even full dissociation (Table 2Go).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Gel filtration of bPL, bPL(K73D), bPL(K73F), and bPL(K73A) complexes with hGHR-ECD (A, B, C, D) or with rPRLR-ECD (E, F, G, H) on a Superdex 75 HR 10/30 column. Complex formation was carried out during a 20-min incubation at room temperature, at various R-ECD to hormone ratios. Aliquots of 200 µl of the incubation mixture were applied to the column and complex formation was monitored by absorbance at 280 nm. The column was developed at 0.5 ml/min (A–D) or 1 ml/min (E–H) and calibrated with BSA (67 kDa, RT = 18.79 min [A–D], 8.82 min [E–H]), bPL (23 kDa, RT, 23.37 min [A–D], 11.10 min [E–H]), hGHR-ECD (28 kDa, RT = 22.72 min [A–D]) and rPRLR-ECD (25.6 kDa RT = 11.37 min [E–H]).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Retention times and apparent molecular masses of complexes of bPL and bPL analogues with hGHR-ECD or rPRLR-ECD, prepared at 2:1 R-ECD:hormone ratios and at different absolute concentrations as determined by chromatography on a Superdex column at 1.0 ml/min

 
Real-time kinetics of bPL and bPL analog interactions with bovine, rabbit and rat PRLR-ECDs and with hGHR-ECD
SPR experiments monitoring the interaction of bPL with rat or rabbit PRLR-ECDs or hGHR-ECD yielded in an apparent stoichiometry of 1:1.4–2, except with bPRLR-ECD in which only a 1:0.7 stoichiometry was found (Fig. 4Go and Table 3Go). Nevertheless, kinetic analysis revealed a very good fit in all cases to the two-site model and a poor fit to the one-site model, even in the latter case. The same situation also appeared to exist in the interaction of bPL(K73A), bPL(K73F) and bPL(K73D) with different R-ECDs. Thus, the lack of apparent 1:2 stoichiometry does not necessarily indicate its absence, but rather shows that the 1:2 complex is extremely transient, undergoing rapid dissociation to the 1:1 form. Table 3Go summarizes the effect of mutations on the kinetic and thermodynamic constants of the hormone:R-ECD interactions. The effect was highly selective. In the case of bPRLR-ECD, all three mutations increased the affinity of site 1 but had little effect on site 2. In contrast, all three mutations caused an up to 8-fold decrease in the affinity of site 1 toward rabbit and rat PRLR-ECDs. An even larger decrease (12- to 80-fold in the case of rbPRLR-ECD and 6 to 12-fold in the case of rPRLR-ECD) in the affinity of site 2 was found. In both cases the decrease in site 2 affinity resulted from the elevated koff values, whereas the effect on kon was small and in-consistent.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Interaction of bPL or bPL analogs covalently linked to CM-dextran with bPRLR-ECD, rbPRLR-ECD, rPRLR-ECD, and hGHR-ECD. Following bPL immobilization, serial dilutions (2-fold) of each R-ECD (starting at 1000 nM) were injected for 6 min at 5 µl/min. For other details see text.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Calculation of kinetic and thermodynamic constants of sites 1 and 2 for the interaction between bPL, bPL(K73A), bPL(K73D), and bPL(K73F) with bovine, rabbit, and rat PRLR-ECDs and hGHR-ECD

 
In the case of hGHR-ECD, the mutations strongly affected the interaction at both sites: the affinity of site 1 was reduced over 16-fold and the affinity of site 2 up to 11-fold. Here also, both changes resulted from destabilization of the complex as evidenced by the increased koff values that subsequently led to its decreased half-life. Although both bPL(K73F) and bPL(K73D) exhibited similarly elevated Kd values for both sites, kinetic analysis revealed that the latter analog had a highly increased value for site 2. Furthermore, the maximal apparent stoichiometry of hGHR-ECD:analog was only 0.2:1, whereas the corresponding value for bPL(K73F) was 1.2:1. Simulation curves for these interactions enable a visualization of the contribution of each site to the global RU, when both sites work independently and additively (the model that seems best suited to the observed curves). They show that despite small Kd differences between these analogs for both site 1 and site 2, differences in kinetic constants, particularly for site 2, account for the differences in the shapes of the curves, in both association and dissociation phases.

In vitro biological activity
Somatogenic-receptor-mediated biological activity of all three bPL analogs was severely impaired. In the experimental system using FDC-P1 cells transfected with hGHR (9D11 cell line), the biological activity of both bPL(K73A) and bPL(K73F) was reduced over 30-fold, and that of bPL(K73D) was completely lost (Fig. 5AGo). Similar results were also obtained in a cell line transfected with rbGHR (cell line 3B9) although in that case, the activities of bPL(K73A) and bPL(K73F) were reduced to a lesser extent (Fig. 5BGo).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Biological activity of bPL and bPL analogs in two in vitro somatogenic bioassays: proliferation of FDC-P1 mouse myeloid cells transfected with hGHR (A) and rbGHR (B). bPL ({square}),bPL(K73D) ({triangleup}), bPL(K73F) ({triangledown}) and bPL(K73A) ({circ}). No. of doublings was calculated after 48 h as described previously (33). The results are the means of two replicates.

 
In contrast, all three analogs retained their full mitogenic activity in a lactogenic- receptor-mediated proliferation bioassay performed with a rat lymphoma Nb2 cell line (Fig. 6CGo). In other lactogenic-receptor-mediated bioassays, the bioactivity was also totally or almost totally retained. In HC-11 cells (Fig. 6AGo) at a concentration of 2 nM, the activity of the analogs was 25 to 40% lower than that of bPL. At 20 nM, the results were similar, except for bPL(K73F), the activity of which equalled that of bPL. In HC-11 cells transfected with rbPRLR, the activities of both bPL(K73F) and bPL(K73D) were similar to that of bPL, whereas the activity of bPL(K73A) was lower (Fig. 6BGo). It should be noted that the quantitation of the results in these bioassays was based on scanning of the immunologically detected casein band on a ligand blot, a method that involves rather high experimental error.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Biological activity of bPL and bPL analogs in three in vitro lactogenic bioassays: ß-casein synthesis in HC-11 mouse mammary gland epithelial cells nontransfected (A) or transfected with rbPRLR (B) and Nb2–11C lymphoma cell proliferation (C). bPL ({square}), bPL(K73D) ({triangleup}), bPL(K73F) ({triangledown}) and bPL(K73A) ({circ}). No. of doublings was calculated after 72 h as described previously (33). The results are presented as the means of two replicates. The original blots are shown to the right of the relevant graphs (M, marker; C, no treatment; 1, 0.02 nM; 2, 0.22 nM; 3, 2.25 nM; 4, 22.5 nM).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The CD spectra of all three bPL analogs were identical to that of wild-type hormone, indicating proper refolding. We therefore conclude that the mutation at position 73 does not change the overall conformation of bPL. This conclusion was further verified by the characteristic in vitro biological activity mediated by heterologous lactogenic receptors exhibited by the purified bPL analogs in Nb2–11C rat lymphoma cells. Any changes resulting from the mutation should therefore be attributed to a specific local effect and not to a wrong refolding.

In binding experiments to intact cells, cell homogenate or microsomal fractions, mutations of K73 led to a remarkable decrease in binding to somatogenic receptors, whereas binding to the lactogenic receptor changed only slightly. The most dramatic effect was exhibited by bPL(K73D), whereas a lesser reduction was seen in the competitive ability of mutations bPL(K73A) and bPL(K73F). In most cases, binding to soluble PRLR-ECDs and to membrane-embedded receptors did not change, with the exception of bPL(K73D), whose binding ability to rPRLR-ECD was drastically decreased. This decreased ability was also demonstrated in the gel-filtration: while rPRLR-ECD formed stable 2:1 complexes with analogs bPL(K73A) and bPL(K73F) that did not dissociate upon dilution, the corresponding complex with bPL (K73D) was unstable. These differences were seen in the interaction with hGHR-ECD as well. At 2 µM, the analogs bPL(K73A) and bPL(K73F) formed a rather stable 2:1 complex that dissociated upon dilution, whereas the bPL(K73D) analog formed only a weak 1:1 complex that was detectable only at that molar concentration.

A detailed kinetic analysis by SPR was performed because neither the gel filtration nor the binding experiments provided a sufficient understanding of all the changes in binding properties. The advantage of the kinetic analysis stems from its ability to deduce the stoichiometry of interaction, even in transient ligand:receptor interaction, in addition to permitting kinetic calculations (kon and koff) for each of the two hormone’s binding sites. Because the kinetic analysis and simulation revealed that, in all cases, the analogs form a homodimeric complex with R-ECDs, that model was used to calculate the kinetic constants. Excluding the interaction with bPRLR-ECD in which the mutations increased the affinity of site 1 of the hormone, the affinities of both sites 1 and 2 were reduced in all other instances. This reduction originated mainly from the destabilization of the complex, as evidenced by the increased koff values. This was particularly true in the case of rat and rabbit PRLR-ECDs for the interaction with site 2, whereas the interaction with site 1 was affected to a lesser degree. On other hand, in hGHR-ECD, both sites were affected almost equally.

Data presented in this paper raise fundamental questions about the connection between the binding of bPL and its analogs to somatogenic or lactogenic receptors and the biological activity transduced as a result of this interaction. Two main features were observed: 1) the changes in binding properties to a soluble R-ECD were not always paralleled by corresponding changes in the binding to membrane-embedded receptors; 2) in spite of the reduced affinity toward both somatogenic and lactogenic receptors, dramatic reduction in biological activity mediated was observed in events mediated through somatogenic receptors. In contrast, in events mediated through lactogenic receptors, the activity was barely or not at all affected.

To provide a possible explanation for the first finding, we have to remember that, in general, the affinity toward soluble receptors (except for rbPRLRs) is less than that toward membrane-embedded receptors. Thus, the discrepancy may result from two reasons: 1) an additional as yet unidentified protein or glycolipid stabilizes the hormone-receptor interaction; or 2) the hormone-induced dimerization of the R-ECD in the full-size receptor subsequently leads to interactions in the cytosolic domain to further stabilize the complex. Modification in phosphorylation and dephosphorylation events of the cytosolic domain should be considered as potentially responsible for such stabilization.

The second finding may be explained in view of our recent suggestion that transient dimerization of PRLRs, lasting a few seconds or less, is sufficient to elicit full biological response (13). This assumption was supported by the finding that after the homodimeric complex is formed, receptor-associated JAK2 or other kinases are instantly activated by mutual transphosphorylation, forming docking sites for other downstream proteins (37, 38). Once this occurs, the receptor dimers are no longer needed. This hypothesis is likely to be true for biological events induced through both lactogenic and somatogenic receptors. However, quantitative differences in the duration of dimer existence may be important. Indeed, the results of the SPR experiments, in which the mutations caused rather similar changes in binding properties, suggest that the persistence of the homodimer life required for the activation of GHR must be longer than for PRLR. This conclusion may be related to the fact that in lactogenic receptors JAK2 kinase is constitutively associated with the receptor, whereas, in somatogenic receptors, the receptor:JAK2 association occurs subsequently to the interaction with the hormone (39).

Although the three-dimensional structure of bPL is not known, it is probably similar to that of hGH due to the high homology in primary structures, as well as to functional similarities. This comparison suggests that the K73 of bPL occupies a position parallel to that of R64 in hGH. K73 at this position is also found in other somatogenic and lactogenic hormones such as bGH, oPL, bovine, rat, and human PRLs, but not in hPL, in which this place is occupied by methionine. Structural data indicate that R64 of hGH interacts in two ways with the hGHR-ECD: its methylene groups are in van der Waals contact with W169 of the receptor at a distance of 3.8–4 A and its guanido group forms a salt bridge/hydrogen bond to D164 of the receptor at a distance of 2.8–2.9 A. It should be emphasized that K73 can exhibit the same interactions with both W169 and D164. In contrast, in the hGH:hPRLR-ECD complex, only the first of these interactions occurs. This is because the shift in the C-terminal receptor domain as compared with that of the hGHR-ECD has moved D134 of the hPRLR-ECD (analogous to D164 of the hGHR-ECD) away from R64 to a distance of about 4.0 A, making a direct, tight interaction impossible (A. M. de Vos, personal communication). Therefore, mutation of bPLs K73 to A, F, or D would abolish the salt bridge/hydrogen bond to D164 of the receptor, resulting in a total loss or at least a remarkable decrease in biological activity mediated through the somatogenic receptor. Several pieces of hGH mutagenesis data support this conclusion: 1) R64A in hGH reduced hGHR-ECD binding 16- to 21-fold, but hPRLR-ECD binding only 1.8-fold, whereas R64K increased hGH binding to the hGHR-ECD by 3-fold. (40, 41); 2) the double hGH mutation (R64 M/E56D) reduced hGHR-ECD binding 30-fold, but hPRLR-ECD binding only 2.1-fold (41); 3) the D164A mutation of hGHR-ECD decreased its ability to bind hGH 12.3-fold (42); 4) in hPL, which binds only very weakly to hGHR-ECD, mutation of M64R increased binding by 23-fold, while leaving binding to hPRLR-ECD unaffected (43).

In conclusion, we have shown that preparation of a selectively modified analog of bPL is feasible and have proposed a possible structural and functional explanation for this selectivity. Preparation of other selectively modified analogs is now in progress.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors are grateful to Dr. A. M. de Vos from Genentech Inc. (South San Francisco, CA) for his most helpful remarks concerning the structural evaluation of the mutants. We also thank Dr. A. Levanon from Biotechnology General (Israel) for recombinant hGH and the National Hormone Pituitary Program (University of Maryland School of Medicine) for ovine and bovine PRL.


    Footnotes
 
1 This research was supported by a grant from the USA-Israel Binational Agricultural and Development Fund (BARD), no. US-2109–92R. Back

Received March 19, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Forsyth IA 1986 Variations among species in the endocrine control of mammary growth and function: the roles of prolactin, growth hormone and placental lactogen. J Dairy Sci 69:866–878
  2. Byatt JC, Wallace CR, Bremel RD, Collier RJ, Bolt DJ 1987 The concentration of bovine placental lactogen and the incidence of different forms in fetal cotyledons and in fetal serum. Domest Anim Endocrinol 4:231–241[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Freemark M, Handwerger S 1986 The glycogenic effects of placental lactogen and growth hormone in ovine fetal liver are mediated through binding to specific fetal ovine placental lactogen receptors. Endocrinology 118:613–618[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Shamay A, Pines M, Waksman M, Gertler A 1990 Proliferation of bovine mammary epithelial cells in vitro is modulated by G-proteins. Mol Cell Endocrinol 69:217–226[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Byatt JC, Welply JK, Leimgruber RM, Collier RJ 1990 Characterization of glycosylated bovine placental lactogen and the effect of enzymatic deglycosylation on receptor binding and biological activity. Endocrinology 127:1041–1049[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Galosi SS, Gertler A, Elberg G, Laird DM 1991 Distinct placental and prolactin (lactogen) receptors in bovine endometrium. Mol Cell Endocrinol 78:229–236[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Vashdi D, Elberg G, Sakal E, Gertler A 1992 Biological activity of bovine placental lactogen in 3T3–F442A preadipocytes is mediated through a somatogenic receptor. FEBS Lett 305:101–104[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Vashdi-Elberg D, Staten NR, Sakal E, McKinnie RE, Djiane J, Krivi GG, Gertler A 1996 Selective modification of recombinant bovine placental lactogen by site-directed mutagenesis at its C-terminus. J Biol Chem 271:5558–5564[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Anthony RV, Liang R, Kayl EP, Pratt SL 1995 The growth hormone/prolactin gene family in ruminant placentae. J Reprod Fertil [Suppl]] 49:83–95[Medline]
  10. Breier BH, Kleemath M, Baumback WL, Bingham A, Gluckman PD, Skinner SJM 1992 Expression of ovine growth hormone receptor in COS-1 cells: evidence against a distinct placental lactogen receptor. J Endocrinol Invest [Suppl 4] 15–55 (Abstract 52)
  11. Breier BH, Funk B, Surus A, Ambler G, Wells C, Waters M, Gluckman PD 1994 Characterization of ovine growth hormone and ovine placental lactogen binding to fetal and adult hepatic tissue in sheep: evidence that oGH and oPL interact with a common receptor. Endocrinology 135:919–928[Abstract]
  12. Vashdi-Elberg D, Staten NR, Sakal E, Krivi GG, Gertler A 1995 N-terminus-truncated recombinant analogs of bovine placental lactogen: interaction with receptors of human growth hormone and somatogen receptor-mediated IGF-I secretion in rat hepatocytes. Endocrinology 136:1258–1266[Abstract]
  13. Gertler A, Grosclaude J, Strasburger CJ, Nir S, Djiane J 1996 Real-time kinetic measurements of the interactions between lactogenic hormones and prolactin-receptor extracellular domains from several species support the model of hormone-induced transient receptor dimerization. J Biol Chem 271:24482–24491[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Collier RJ, Byatt JC, McGrath MF, Eppard PJ 1995 Role of bovine placental lactogen in intracellular signalling during mammary growth and lactation. In: Wilde et al (eds) Intracellular Signalling in the Mammary Gland. Plenum Press, New York, pp 13–24
  15. Byatt JC, Staten NR, Schmuke JJ, Buomo FC, Galosy SS, Curran DP, Krivi GG, Collier RJ 1991 Stimulation of body weight gain of mature female rat by bovine GH and bovine placental lactogen. J Endocrinol 130:11–19[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Singh K, Ambler GR, Breier BH, Klempt M, Gluckman PD 1992 Ovine placental lactogen is a potent somatogen in the growth hormone (GH)-deficient rat: comparison of somatogenic activity with bovine GH. Endocrinology 130:2758–2766[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Ogawa E, Breier BH, Bauer MK, Gluckman PD 1995 Ovine placental lactogen lacks direct somatogenic and anticatabolic action in postnatal lamb. J Endocrinol 145:87–95[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Oliver MH, Harding JE, Breier BH, Evance PC, Gallaher BE, Gluckman PD 1995 The effects of ovine placental lactogen infusion on metabolites, insulin-like growth factors and binding proteins in the fetal sheep. J Endocrinol 144:333–338[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Gertler A, Hauser SD, Sakal E, Vashdi D, Staten NR, Freeman JJ, Krivi GG 1992 Preparation, purification and determination of the biological activities of twelve N-terminus truncated recombinant analogues of bovine placental lactogen. J Biol Chem 271:12655–12659[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Abdel-Meguid SS, Shieh HS, Smith WW, Dagringen HF, Violand BM, Bentle LA 1987 Three-dimensional structure of a genetically engineered variant of porcine growth hormone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:6434–6437[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. De Vos AM, Ultsch M, Kossiakoff AA 1992 Human growth hormone and extracellular domain of its receptor: crystal structure of the complex. Science 255:306–312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Somers W, Ultsch M, De Vos AM, Kossiakoff AA 1994 The X-ray structure of a growth hormone-prolactin receptor complex. Nature 372:478–481[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Bignon Ch, Sakal E, Belair L, Chapnik-Cohen N, Djiane J, Gertler A 1994 Preparation of recombinant extracellular domain of rabbit prolactin receptor expressed in Escherichia coli and its interaction with lactogenic hormones. J Biol Chem 269:3318–3324[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Sandowski Y, Nagano M, Bignon Ch, Djiane J, Kelly PA, Gertler A 1995 Recombinant extracellular domain of rat prolactin receptor interacts with different affinity and stoichiometry with various lactogenic hormones. Mol Cell Endocrinol 115:1–11[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Tchelet A, Sakal E, Vogel T, Krivi GG, Creely D, Gertler A 1993 Recognition of growth hormone receptor subtypes by recombinant analogues of human growth hormone and subsequent effect on biological activity. Pediatr Adolesc Endocrinol 24:114–126
  26. Obukowicz MG, Staten NR, Krivi GG 1992 Enhanced heterologous gene expression in novel rpoH mutant in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:1511–1523[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Tartof KD, Hobbs CA 1987 Improved media for growing plasmid and cosmid clones. Bethesda Res Lab Focus 9:12–20
  28. Laemmli UK 1970 Cleavage of structure proteins during assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Yang JT, Wu C-SC, Martinez HM 1986 Calculation of protein conformation from circular dichroism. Methods Enzymol 130:208–269[Medline]
  30. Chen YH, Yang JT, Martinez HM 1972 Determination of the secondary structures of circular dichroism and optical rotatory dispersion. Biochemistry 11:4120–4131[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Gill SC, von Hippel PH 1989 Calculation of protein extinction coefficients from amino acids sequence data. Anal Biochem 182:319–326[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Johnsson B, Loafs S, Lindquist G 1991 Immobilization of proteins to a carboxymethyldextran-modified gold surface for biospecific interaction analysis in surface plasmon resonance sensors. Anal Biochem 198:268–277[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Gertler A, Walker A, Friesen HG 1985 Enhancement of human growth hormone stimulated mitogenesis of Nb2 node lymphoma cells by tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA). Endocrinology 116:1636–1644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Rowlinson SW, Barnard R, Bastiras S, Robins AJ, Brinkworth R, Waters MJ 1995 A growth hormone agonist produced by targeted mutagenesis at binding site 1. J Biol Chem 270:16833–16839[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Rowlinson SW, Waters MJ, Lewis UJ, Barnard R 1996 Human growth hormone fragments 1–43 and 44–193: in vitro somatogenic activity and receptor binding characteristics in human and nonprimate systems. Endocrinology 137:90–95[Abstract]
  36. Tchelet A, Staten NR, Creely DP, Krivi GG, Gertler A 1995 Extracellular domain of prolactin receptor from bovine mammary gland: expression in Escherichia coli, purification and characterization of its interaction with lactogenic hormones. J Endocrinol 144:393–403[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Lebrun JJ, Ali S, Sofer L, Ulrich A, Kelly PA 1994 Prolactin-induced proliferation of Nb2 cells involves tyrosine phosphorylation of the prolactin receptor and its associated tyrosine kinase JAK2. J Biol Chem 269:5364–5368[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Kelly PA, Goujon L, Sotiropoulos S, Dinerstein H, Eposito M, Edery M, Findori J, Postel-Vinay MC 1995 The GH receptor and signal transduction. Horm Res 42:133–139
  39. Goffin V, Kelly PA 1997 The prolactin/growth hormone family: structure/function relationship. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2:7–17[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Cunningham BC, Wells JA 1993 Comparison of a structural and functional epitope. J Mol Biol 234:554–563[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Cunningham BC, Wells JA 1993 Rational design of receptor specific variants of human growth hormone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:3407–3411[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Clackson T, Wells JA 1995 A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor surface. Science 267:383–386[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Lowman HC, Cunningham BC, Wells JA 1991 Mutational analysis and protein engineering of receptor binding determinants in human placental lactogen. J Biol Chem 266:10982–10988[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
E. Biener, C. Martin, N. Daniel, S. J. Frank, V. E. Centonze, B. Herman, J. Djiane, and A. Gertler
Ovine Placental Lactogen-Induced Heterodimerization of Ovine Growth Hormone and Prolactin Receptors in Living Cells Is Demonstrated by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy and Leads to Prolonged Phosphorylation of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT)1 and STAT3
Endocrinology, August 1, 2003; 144(8): 3532 - 3540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Herman, C. Bignon, N. Daniel, J. Grosclaude, A. Gertler, and J. Djiane
Functional Heterodimerization of Prolactin and Growth Hormone Receptors by Ovine Placental Lactogen
J. Biol. Chem., February 25, 2000; 275(9): 6295 - 6301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Herman, D. Helman, O. Livnah, and A. Gertler
Ruminant Placental Lactogens Act as Antagonists to Homologous Growth Hormone Receptors and as Agonists to Human or Rabbit Growth Hormone Receptors
J. Biol. Chem., March 19, 1999; 274(12): 7631 - 7639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
E Juarez-Aguilar, F Castro-Munozledo, N. Guerra-Rodriguez, D Resendez-Perez, H. Martinez-Rodriguez, H. Barrera-Saldana, and W Kuri-Harcuch
Functional domains of human growth hormone necessary for the adipogenic activity of hGH/hPL chimeric molecules
J. Cell Sci., January 9, 1999; 112(18): 3127 - 3135.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Helman, N. R. Staten, J. Grosclaude, N. Daniel, C. Nespoulous, J. Djiane, and A. Gertler
Novel Recombinant Analogues of Bovine Placental Lactogen. G133K AND G133R PROVIDE A TOOL TO UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE ACTION OF PROLACTIN AND GROWTH HORMONE RECEPTORS
J. Biol. Chem., June 26, 1998; 273(26): 16067 - 16074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Helman, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gertler, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Helman, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gertler, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals