| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLES |
Division of Neurophysiology, National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London, NW7 IAA, United Kingdom; and Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey 07065
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: I. C. A. F. Robinson, Division of Neurophysiology, National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London, NW7 IAA, United Kingdom. E-mail: irobins{at}nimr.mrc.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies with radiolabeled peptide and nonpeptide GHSs identified binding sites in both pituitary and hypothalamic membranes (14, 15, 16), leading to the identification, cloning, and sequencing of the first specific GHS receptor (GHS-R) in swine and human (17). This work established the existence of an endogenous receptor mediating GHS-induced GH release and confirmed its expression in both pituitary and hypothalamus (17). The rat GHS-R homolog has recently been cloned (18) and an initial mapping study of GHS-R identified its expression in both hypothalamic and extrahypothalamic sites in the rat brain (19). However, nothing is yet known about the regulation of this receptor in brain. Semiquantitative in situ hybridization has proved useful in studying the distribution and expression of the hypothalamic factors regulating GH secretion and their sensitivity to GH feedback (20, 21). Accordingly, we have used this method to study the expression of GHS-R in the rat hypothalamus and its regulation by GH, using a homologous riboprobe corresponding to the full length rat GHS-R cDNA.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Probe preparation
Full-length antisense and sense transcripts incorporating
35S-UTP (NEN Research Products, Stevenage, Herts, UK) were
generated from appropriate plasmid probes using an Sp6/T7 transcription
kit according to the manufacturers instructions (Boehringer Mannheim,
Lewes, East Sussex, UK). Transcripts were stored at -70 C until use.
The GHS-R probe was generated from the full-length rat GHS-R cDNA (18).
Riboprobes for GHRH were generated from a 500 bp HindIII
fragment of exon 5, subcloned from a GHRH cDNA (23) (kindly provided by
Dr. K. E. Mayo, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL) into pGEM
7Z. The NPY riboprobe used was a 370bp PCR fragment of a rat NPY cDNA
corresponding to nucleotides 79449 cloned into pGEM 5Zf (courtesy of
Dr. D. M. Flavell, NIMR).
In situ hybridization
This was carried out essentially as previously described (21, 24). Briefly, sections were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, acetylated,
dehydrated, and delipidated in chloroform. Sections were hybridized
overnight at 50 C, in buffer containing 1 x 106
cpm/slide of denatured riboprobe in 50% formamide, 0.025 M
Tris, pH 7.5, 0.001 M EDTA, pH 8.0, 0.4 M NaCl,
1 x Denhardts solution (0.02% Ficoll, 0.02%
polyvinylpyrrolidone, and 0.02% BSA), and 10% dextran sulfate (mol wt
500,000), under Nescofilm coverslips (Bando Chemical Industries, Ltd.,
Kobe, Japan). Following hybridization, the slides were washed and then
incubated in 20 µg/ml RNase A for 30 min at 37 C. Sections were then
washed in 2 x SSC/50% formamide at 50 C, rinsed in water, then
air dried.
Image analysis
Slides were apposed to autoradiographic film (Biomax MR, Kodak,
Rochester, NY) for up to 7 days and the resulting images analyzed
densitometrically, running the program called Image (W. Rasband, NIMH,
Bethesda, MD). The values represent integrated optical density
expressed in arbitrary units. For each transcript, comparisons were
made with the same batch of labeled probe on sections from all animals
exposed concurrently in Fig. 2
. However, the relative abundance of the
different peptide transcripts measured in Fig. 3
differed
substantially, so different exposures were necessary to quantify these.
Therefore, the optical density values should not be compared between
the different panels in Fig. 3
. For higher resolution images, some
slides were then dipped in photographic emulsion NB2 (Kodak, Rochester,
NY), made up according to the manufacturers instructions. Slides were
exposed for 1021 days then developed in D-18 developer (Kodak,
Rochester, NY). The slides were counter stained in cresyl-fast violet,
dehydrated, cleared in histoclear, and mounted in DPX.
|
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
To examine whether these changes in dwarf rats could be reversed by GH
treatment, sections were also analyzed from a group of five
dw/dw rats given bGH (200 µg/day sc for 6 days) by osmotic
minipump. Administration of bGH completely reversed these changes in
ARC and VMN with GHS-R expression falling in ARC and VMN to levels
significantly below those in normal rats (P < 0.05 in
both cases) (Fig. 3
, A and B). The raised
levels of GHS-R expression in dwarf hippocampus were also reduced by
bGH but not significantly below normal (Fig. 3C
). GHRH and NPY
transcripts were also measured in consecutive sections from the same
animals. As expected, GHRH levels were significantly raised
(P < 0.05) in dwarf rats and normalized by GH
administration (Fig. 3D
), whereas NPY levels in the ARC were reduced in
dwarf rats (P < 0.001), and increased by GH treatment
(P < 0.05) (Fig. 3E
).
Distribution of GHS-R, GHRH, and NPY transcripts
Serial sections from some animals were also hybridized to GHRH or
NPY riboprobes and their distributions compared with that of GHS-R.
Although these signals overlapped in ARC, particularly with the more
abundant NPY-positive cells, the overall patterns were quite distinct
(Fig. 4
). GHS-R was also expressed in
regions of VMN, not showing NPY or GHRH expression.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This may simply be a matter of sensitivity because GHS-R transcripts can be demonstrated in rat pituitary RNA extracts by RNAse protection but with relatively large amounts of poly A+ RNA (18). However, GHS-R transcripts were readily detectable in the hypothalamus by in situ hybridization under the same conditions, so their abundance may be much greater, consistent with the idea that the hypothalamus is the major physiological target for GHS-induced GH release in vivo (10, 25, 26). Another explanation might be heterogeneity of pituitary GHS-R mRNAs. The existence of subtypes of pituitary GHS-Rs has been inferred from analog studies (27). If these exist, their transcripts might be recognized differentially by the short oligonucleotides used earlier (19) vs. the full length riboprobes corresponding to GHS-R type 1a, used here. A truncated form of the GHS-R transcript (type 1b) arises by alternative splicing (17, 18), but this would also be recognized by the riboprobe used in the present study. Furthermore, we found no evidence for differential expression of type 1b GHS-Rs in the rat brain (19).
The demonstration of significant GHS-R gene expression in ARC confirms earlier work suggesting that this is a major target for GHS action. Following peripheral GHS administration, increases in GHRH release or pulsatility in portal blood have been demonstrated (11, 28), and increased GHRH mRNA levels in the posterior region of the ARC have also been reported in dwarf rats treated with GHRP-6 (29). The distribution of cells showing a Fos response to GHS-R (7, 9) parallels the GHS-R positive cells in ARC and includes the narrow ventrolateral tract of GHRH neurones extending toward the VMN. Although some of the cells that respond to GHSs with Fos expression contain GHRH, a larger proportion appear to be NPY cells (12). However, comparison of the overall distribution of GHS-R cells with that of NPY and GHRH in consecutive sections shows that, while they overlap in ARC, their distributions are distinct. Quantification of the extent of their co-expression will require double labeling studies.
In addition to GHRH, the other endogenous peptide controlling GH release is SRIF (30); there is indirect evidence to suggest that GHSs may also interact with SRIF (29, 31). However, specific GHS-R mRNA signal was not seen in PeN, (the location of the major hypophysiotropic SRIF-containing cell bodies), so our results suggest that PeN SRIF cells are not major direct targets for GHS action. However, in situ hybridization only detects mRNA, so it is possible that the GHS-R protein could be transported to terminals projecting to PeN (32). GHS-Rs could also be expressed on SRIF neurons within the ventral ARC (33), which may regulate GHRH via SRIF receptors on GHRH cells (34).
GH deficiency could also alter the production of the unidentified ligand for GHS-R, which might itself alter GHS-R expression. Desensitization to the effects of GHSs has been documented (3, 6) and could occur at the level of GHS-R gene transcription. We observed no significant changes in ARC or VMN GHS-R gene expression following continuous sc GHRP-6 infusions but cannot exclude the possibility that a different duration, route, or pattern of GHS administration might affect GHS-R gene expression, because GH release and growth stimulation is sensitive to these parameters of GHS administration (3, 8, 31, 35).
GHS-R is also strongly expressed in regions of the VMN that are neither GHRH-positive nor show Fos responses to GHSs. Indeed, expression in VMN was more intense than in ARC, delineated in at least two distinct subregions. The cell type involved is unknown and does not correspond to NPY (present study) or SRIF distribution (P. A. Bennett, unpublished data) in this nucleus. The immediate role for GHS-R in VMN is unclear. As VMN GHS-R expression was also sensitive to GH status, it could be involved in GH control, conceivably via projections to ARC or PeN. However, GHSs have other hypothalamic effects, for example to release ACTH probably by releasing, or synergizing with, CRF or AVP (26, 36). These effects could be mediated by GHS action in the PVN itself, or via projections from GHS-R-positive cells in VMN or ARC (32). VMN is also involved in the regulation of food intake, and this is known to be stimulated by GHSs independently from their effects on GH in rats (37). As no Fos expression is seen in VMN following GHS administration (7), other cellular responses to GHSs will need to be identified to confirm that GHS-R transcripts in sites other than ARC are indeed translated to functional GHS receptors.
GH regulates its own release through negative feedback loops acting in the hypothalamus via GH receptors in ARC and PeN (20, 21). In GH deficiency, PeN SRIF expression is reduced, whereas ARC GHRH expression is increased, and these changes are reversed in GH excess, implicating GH feedback as an important long-term regulator of these systems (38). GH receptors in ARC are expressed on NPY cells and on some GHRH-positive cells (39, 40) and are also sensitive to GH feedback (21). If GHS-R expression in the ARC is involved in the endogenous control of GH release, we reasoned that GHS-R expression might also be sensitive to GH feedback. This proved to be the case. Brains from dw/dw rats with chronic severe isolated GH deficiency (22) showed an obvious increase in GHS-R signal compared with normal controls, not only in ARC, but also in other brain areas. Furthermore, treatment of dw/dw rats with bGH reduced GHS-R transcript abundance to normal levels in the VMN and significantly lower than normal levels in ARC. These changes parallel the changes in GHRH expression in dw/dw rats with or without GH treatment, and were diametrically opposite to the changes seen in NPY or GH receptor expression (21, 41).
The simplest explanation for our results is that GH feedback regulation of GHRH (39, 40) also regulates GHS receptor expression in a parallel fashion. If so, both GHS-R and the endogenous GHS ligand(s) may be part of the GH feedback system. The GHS system may fulfill a slightly different role than GHRH because the latter is also important for somatotroph proliferation via activation of adenylate cyclase (42), whereas the effects of GHSs seem to be primarily on GH release, via a different intracellular mechanism (43, 44) and only indirectly affect cAMP via synergism with GHRH (5, 45).
It is possible that the changes in GHS-R expression induced by GH are indirect. Expression of GHS-R could be inhibited by IGF-1, which is also reduced in GH deficiency and increased in GH excess, and there is some evidence that effects of GHSs on GH release may be reduced by sustained increases in IGF-1 (46). However, this issue will need to be addressed in other studies in which IGF-I is administered and/or endogenous plasma IGF-1 levels measured.
What might be the functional significance of changing GHS-R expression with GH status? The pituitary GH response to GHRP-6 is low in dw/dw rats (47) but this probably reflects the reduced amount of pituitary GH available, rather than reduced sensitivity to GHSs. This is not reflected in the hypothalamic responses to GHSs, because dw/dw rats show a robust ARC Fos response to GHSs (13). This difference is even more pronounced in the lit/lit mouse that exhibits a marked hypothalamic Fos response to GHSs (13), with no detectable pituitary GH response to GHSs (48).
Increased hypothalamic GHS-R expression in GH deficiency could lead to enhanced sensitivity to the central actions of GHSs. Both GH release (35) and Fos responses (8) are sensitive to lower doses of GHSs when administered centrally rather than peripherally, but it is not clear whether this sensitivity is increased in GH-deficient animals. It is also important to recall that some ARC cells are inhibited by GHS administration (8) and that larger doses of GHSs administered via the icv route can inhibit GH release in the conscious rat (49). Thus, the effects of changing GHS-R expression in several hypothalamic areas may be difficult to predict. GHS responses are greater in females than in males (50), but the only sex difference in hypothalamic GHS-R expression we observed was in the VMN; no sex difference in ARC GHS-R expression was found.
Although not the primary focus of this study, we confirmed the conspicuous expression of GHS-R in the hippocampus (19). Although not an obvious site of GH control, we have previously shown that hippocampal GH receptors are also regulated by GH and gonadal steroids (21, 24). We report here that hippocampal GHS-R expression was also sensitive to GH regulation, being increased in GH-deficient dwarves and normalized by GH treatment. GHS-Rs are also expressed in many other regions of the rat brain (19), which do not express GH receptors in adulthood. As GHSs are now known to have activities that appear unrelated to GH release (37, 51), further studies on the regulation of GHS-R expression in these extrahypothalamic CNS sites are clearly warranted.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received May 1, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Chen, Z. Tang, A. Yan, W. Li, and H. Lin Molecular cloning and mRNA expression analysis of two GH secretagogue receptor transcripts in orange-spotted grouper (Epinephelus coioides) J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2008; 199(2): 253 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Reed, S. C. Benoit, P. T. Pfluger, M. H. Tschop, D. A. D'Alessio, and R. J. Seeley Mice with chronically increased circulating ghrelin develop age-related glucose intolerance Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, April 1, 2008; 294(4): E752 - E760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Farhy, C. Y. Bowers, and J. D. Veldhuis Model-projected mechanistic bases for sex differences in growth hormone regulation in humans Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): R1577 - R1593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E Mitchell, R. Nogueiras, K. Rance, D V. Rayner, S. Wood, C. Dieguez, and L. M Williams Circulating hormones and hypothalamic energy balance: regulatory gene expression in the Lou/C and Wistar rats. J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2006; 190(3): 571 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, J. N. Roemmich, E. J. Richmond, and C. Y. Bowers Somatotropic and Gonadotropic Axes Linkages in Infancy, Childhood, and the Puberty-Adult Transition Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2006; 27(2): 101 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Iqbal, Y. Kurose, B. Canny, and I. J. Clarke Effects of Central Infusion of Ghrelin on Food Intake and Plasma Levels of Growth Hormone, Luteinizing Hormone, Prolactin, and Cortisol Secretion in Sheep Endocrinology, January 1, 2006; 147(1): 510 - 519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Huerta-Ocampo, H. C. Christian, N. M. Thompson, M. M. El-Kasti, and T. Wells The Intermediate Lactotroph: A Morphologically Distinct, Ghrelin-Responsive Pituitary Cell in the Dwarf (dw/dw) Rat Endocrinology, November 1, 2005; 146(11): 5012 - 5023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kojima and K. Kangawa Ghrelin: Structure and Function Physiol Rev, April 1, 2005; 85(2): 495 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Nogueiras, S. Tovar, S. E. Mitchell, D. V. Rayner, Z. A. Archer, C. Dieguez, and L. M. Williams Regulation of Growth Hormone Secretagogue Receptor Gene Expression in the Arcuate Nuclei of the Rat by Leptin and Ghrelin Diabetes, October 1, 2004; 53(10): 2552 - 2558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. van der Lely, M. Tschop, M. L. Heiman, and E. Ghigo Biological, Physiological, Pathophysiological, and Pharmacological Aspects of Ghrelin Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2004; 25(3): 426 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Anderson, S. Jeftinija, and C. G. Scanes Growth Hormone Secretion: Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms and In Vivo Approaches Experimental Biology and Medicine, April 1, 2004; 229(4): 291 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lall, N. Balthasar, D. Carmignac, C. Magoulas, A. Sesay, P. Houston, K. Mathers, and I. Robinson Physiological Studies of Transgenic Mice Overexpressing Growth Hormone (GH) Secretagogue Receptor 1A in GH-Releasing Hormone Neurons Endocrinology, April 1, 2004; 145(4): 1602 - 1611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Hurley, D. V. Birch, M. C. Almond, I. J. Estrada, and C. J. Phelps Reduced Hypothalamic Neuropeptide Y Expression in Growth Hormone- and Prolactin-Deficient Ames and Snell Dwarf Mice Endocrinology, November 1, 2003; 144(11): 4783 - 4789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Thompson, J. S Davies, A. Mode, P. A. Houston, and T. Wells Pattern-Dependent Suppression of Growth Hormone (GH) Pulsatility by Ghrelin and GH-Releasing Peptide-6 in Moderately GH-Deficient Rats Endocrinology, November 1, 2003; 144(11): 4859 - 4867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Zigman and J. K. Elmquist Minireview: From Anorexia to Obesity--The Yin and Yang of Body Weight Control Endocrinology, September 1, 2003; 144(9): 3749 - 3756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.L. Barreiro, J.S. Suominen, F. Gaytan, L. Pinilla, L.K. Chopin, F.F. Casanueva, C. Dieguez, E. Aguilar, J. Toppari, and M. Tena-Sempere Developmental, Stage-Specific, and Hormonally Regulated Expression of Growth Hormone Secretagogue Receptor Messenger RNA in Rat Testis Biol Reprod, May 1, 2003; 68(5): 1631 - 1640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Tannenbaum, J. Epelbaum, and C. Y. Bowers Interrelationship between the Novel Peptide Ghrelin and Somatostatin/Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone in Regulation of Pulsatile Growth Hormone Secretion Endocrinology, March 1, 2003; 144(3): 967 - 974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Richmond, A. D. Rogol, D. Basdemir, O. L. Veldhuis, W. Clarke, C. Y. Bowers, and J. D. Veldhuis Accelerated Escape from GH Autonegative Feedback in Midpuberty in Males: Evidence for Time-Delimited GH-Induced Somatostatinergic Outflow in Adolescent Boys J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2002; 87(8): 3837 - 3844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Tolle, M.-H. Bassant, P. Zizzari, F. Poindessous-Jazat, C. Tomasetto, J. Epelbaum, and M.-T. Bluet-Pajot Ultradian Rhythmicity of Ghrelin Secretion in Relation with GH, Feeding Behavior, and Sleep-Wake Patterns in Rats Endocrinology, April 1, 2002; 143(4): 1353 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Lawrence, A. C. Snape, F. M.-H. Baudoin, and S. M. Luckman Acute Central Ghrelin and GH Secretagogues Induce Feeding and Activate Brain Appetite Centers Endocrinology, January 1, 2002; 143(1): 155 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Petersenn, A. C. Rasch, M. Penshorn, F. U. Beil, and H. M. Schulte Genomic Structure and Transcriptional Regulation of the Human Growth Hormone Secretagogue Receptor Endocrinology, June 1, 2001; 142(6): 2649 - 2659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Muller, J. A. Janssen, L. J. Hofland, S. W. Lamberts, M. Bidlingmaier, C. J. Strasburger, and A. J. van der Lely Blockade of the Growth Hormone (GH) Receptor Unmasks Rapid GH-Releasing Peptide-6-Mediated Tissue-Specific Insulin Resistance J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2001; 86(2): 590 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Korbonits, S. A. Bustin, M. Kojima, S. Jordan, E. F. Adams, D. G. Lowe, K. Kangawa, and A. B. Grossman The Expression of the Growth Hormone Secretagogue Receptor Ligand Ghrelin in Normal and Abnormal Human Pituitary and Other Neuroendocrine Tumors J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2001; 86(2): 881 - 887. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. Nass, J. Gilrain, S. Anderson, B. Gaylinn, A. Dalkin, R. Day, M. Peruggia, and M. O. Thorner High Plasma Growth Hormone (GH) Levels Inhibit Expression of GH Secretagogue Receptor Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Levels in the Rat Pituitary Endocrinology, June 1, 2000; 141(6): 2084 - 2089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Asa, K. T. Coschigano, L. Bellush, J. J. Kopchick, and S. Ezzat Evidence for Growth Hormone (GH) Autoregulation in Pituitary Somatotrophs in GH Antagonist-Transgenic Mice and GH Receptor-Deficient Mice Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2000; 156(3): 1009 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tivesten, E. Bollano, K. Caidahl, V. Kujacic, X. Y. Sun, T. Hedner, A. Hjalmarson, B.-A. Bengtsson, and J. Isgaard The Growth Hormone Secretagogue Hexarelin Improves Cardiac Function in Rats after Experimental Myocardial Infarction Endocrinology, January 1, 2000; 141(1): 60 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. C. Palyha, S. D. Feighner, C. P. Tan, K. K. McKee, D. L. Hreniuk, Y.-D. Gao, K. D. Schleim, L. Yang, G. J. Morriello, R. Nargund, et al. Ligand Activation Domain of Human Orphan Growth Hormone (GH) Secretagogue Receptor (GHS-R) Conserved from Pufferfish to Humans Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2000; 14(1): 160 - 169. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Phelps and D. L. Hurley Pituitary Hormones as Neurotrophic Signals: Update on Hypothalamic Differentiation in Genetic Models of Altered Feedback Experimental Biology and Medicine, October 2, 1999; 222(1): 39 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Drisko, T. D. Faidley, D. Zhang, T. J. McDonald, S. Nicolich, D. F. Hora, P. Cunningham, C. Li, E. Rickes, L. McNamara, et al. Administration of a Nonpeptidyl Growth Hormone Secretagogue, L-163,255, Changes Somatostatin Pattern, But Has No Effect on Patterns of Growth Hormone-Releasing Factor in the Hypophyseal-Portal Circulation of the Conscious Pig Experimental Biology and Medicine, October 2, 1999; 222(1): 70 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Korbonits, G. Kaltsas, L. A. Perry, P. Putignano, A. B. Grossman, G. M. Besser, and P. J. Trainer The Growth Hormone Secretagogue Hexarelin Stimulates the Hypothalamo-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis via Arginine Vasopressin J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 1999; 84(7): 2489 - 2495. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ghigo, L. Gianotti, E. Arvat, J. Ramunni, M. R. Valetto, F. Broglio, M. Rolla, F. Cavagnini, and E. E. Müller Effects of Recombinant Human Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Administration on Growth Hormone (GH) Secretion, Both Spontaneous and Stimulated by GH-Releasing Hormone or Hexarelin, a Peptidyl GH Secretagogue, in Humans J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 1999; 84(1): 285 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kaji, S. Tai, Y. Okimura, G. Iguchi, Y. Takahashi, H. Abe, and K. Chihara Cloning and Characterization of the 5'-Flanking Region of the Human Growth Hormone Secretagogue Receptor Gene J. Biol. Chem., December 18, 1998; 273(51): 33885 - 33888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Giustina and J. D. Veldhuis Pathophysiology of the Neuroregulation of Growth Hormone Secretion in Experimental Animals and the Human Endocr. Rev., December 1, 1998; 19(6): 717 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Skinner, R. Nass, B. Lopes, E. R. Laws, and M. O. Thorner Growth Hormone Secretagogue Receptor Expression in Human Pituitary Tumors J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 1998; 83(12): 4314 - 4320. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Korbonits, R. A. Jacobs, S. J. B. Aylwin, J. M. Burrin, P. L. M. Dahia, J. P. Monson, J. Honegger, R. Fahlbush, P. J. Trainer, S. L. Chew, et al. Expression of the Growth Hormone Secretagogue Receptor in Pituitary Adenomas and Other Neuroendocrine Tumors J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 1998; 83(10): 3624 - 3630. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. F. Carmignac, P. A. Bennett, and I. C. A. F. Robinson Effects of Growth Hormone Secretagogues on Prolactin Release in Anesthetized Dwarf (dw/dw) Rats Endocrinology, August 1, 1998; 139(8): 3590 - 3596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Barkan M.D. Editorial: When the Light Turns Blue Endocrinology, November 1, 1997; 138(11): 4527 - 4529. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |