help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Varlamov, O.
Right arrow Articles by Leiter, E. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Varlamov, O.
Right arrow Articles by Leiter, E. H.
Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 11 4883-4892
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

ß-Cell Lines Derived from Transgenic Cpefat/Cpefat Mice Are Defective in Carboxypeptidase E and Proinsulin Processing1

Oleg Varlamov, Lloyd D. Fricker, Hisasi Furukawa, Donald F. Steiner, Stephen H. Langley and Edward H. Leiter

Department of Molecular Pharmacology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine (O.V., L.D.F.), Bronx, New York 10461; the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (H.F., D.F.S.) and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (D.F.S.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637; and The Jackson Laboratory (S.H.L., E.H.L.), Bar Harbor, Maine 04609

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Lloyd D. Fricker, Ph.D., Department of Molecular Pharmacology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, New York 10461.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A spontaneous point mutation in the coding region of the carboxypeptidase E (CPE) gene in Cpefat/Cpefat mice affects proinsulin processing. Cell lines derived from the pancreatic ß-cells of Cpefat/Cpefat mice were generated by crossing C57BLKS/J-Cpefat/+ mice with NOD mice expressing the simian virus 40 large T oncogene under the control of the rat insulin II promoter. Two cell lines, designated NIT-2 and NIT-3, were cultured from adenomatous islets obtained from F2 littermates and were compared with the NIT-1 cell line previously developed from mice with wild-type CPE. Electron microscopy of the cultured NIT-2 and -3 cells showed increased numbers of enlarged and electron-lucent granules compared with NIT-1 cells. Pro-CPE, but not the mature form of CPE, is present in NIT-2 and -3 cells, and neither pro-CPE nor CPE are secreted into the medium. Immunocytochemistry shows the pro-CPE to be localized to an endoplasmic reticulum-like structure in NIT-3 cells. Proinsulin is less extensively processed in NIT-2 and -3 cells than in NIT-1 cells, indicating that the Cpefat mutation affects both the endopeptidase and carboxypeptidase reactions. The secretion of insulin/proinsulin from NIT-2 and -3 cells is significantly elevated by secretagogues, indicating that CPE is not required for sorting proinsulin into the regulated pathway.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
LIKE MOST peptide hormones, insulin is initially produced as a precursor that requires processing by endopeptidases and carboxypeptidases to produce the mature peptide (1). Two endopeptidases, prohormone convertases 2 and 3 (PC2 and PC3, which is also known as PC1) initially cleave the proinsulin at paired basic cleavage sites (2). The products of this reaction contain basic residues on the C-termini of insulin and the C peptide. A carboxypeptidase is then required to remove the C-terminal basic residues and generate the mature form of insulin. CPE (EC 3.4.17.10, also known as carboxypeptidase H) is present in insulin-containing secretory vesicles and is able to cleave arginine-extended insulin to produce the mature peptide (3). CPE is also present in numerous other tissues and has been implicated in the processing of a variety of peptide hormones and neurotransmitters (4, 5).

A missense mutation in the CPE gene (Cpe) is the molecular basis for the recessive obesity-producing mutation on mouse chromosome 8 originally named fat (6) and now designated Cpefat. Although a full-length messenger RNA transcript is produced, and CPE protein is translated, the protein is inactive due to a 729TCT to 729CCT point mutation in the gene effecting replacement of serine 202 by proline 202 in a highly conserved region of the enzyme (7). No CPE activity can be detected in any of the Cpefat/Cpefat mouse endocrine/neuroendocrine tissues examined, including pancreatic islets, pituitary, brain, and intestine (8, 9). Pulse-chase analysis shows that the mutant protein is extremely unstable, being degraded intracellularly within hours after synthesis (10). The absence of functional CPE in ß-granules leads to an incomplete conversion of proinsulin to fully mature, active insulin, producing the phenotype of hyperproinsulinemia (7). Approximately 80% of the insulin measured in the serum of homozygous Cpefat mice is comprised of proinsulins I and II and their C-terminally extended (diarginyl) forms. This material has low biological potency compared with fully processed insulins and explains the insulin responsiveness of the hyperglycemic syndrome that develops in C57BLKS/J-Cpefat/Cpefat male mice.

The finding that some mature insulin is generated in Cpefat/Cpefat mice indicates that an additional enzyme is able to compensate for the deficiency of CPE. Recently, a second carboxypeptidase, designated metallocarboxypeptidase D (CPD), has been identified in the secretory pathway (11). CPD has similar enzymatic properties as CPE, but different physical properties (11). CPD is predominantly a 180-kDa protein that is attached to membranes by a conventional transmembrane-spanning domain (11, 12), whereas CPE is a 50- to 56-kDa protein found in soluble and membrane-associated forms (13, 14). CPD has a broader tissue distribution than CPE (12, 15). Whereas CPE is enriched in secretory vesicles, CPD is enriched in the trans-Golgi network (Varlamov, O., and L. D. Fricker, submitted).

The mechanism by which the defect in CPE reduces the processing of proinsulin by the prohormone convertases in the Cpefat/Cpefat mice is not well understood. Cultured ß-cells provide a model to study the effect of the CPE mutation on the processing and secretion of insulin in a system without the pressure to compensate for reduced levels of insulin. One purpose of the present study was to investigate whether the CPE defect is sufficient to affect proinsulin processing in a cell culture system. In the present study, we have produced two immortalized ß-cell lines homozygously expressing the Cpefat mutation. The CPE defect alters proinsulin processing in these cultured cells, indicating that it is the mutation itself that causes the proinsulin-processing defect and not a feedback mechanism resulting from the reduction in mature insulin in the Cpefat/Cpefat mice. Another purpose of the present study was to test the proposal that CPE is a sorting receptor required for the targeting of proinsulin into the regulated pathway (16). The finding that insulin/proinsulin is secreted from NIT-2 and -3 cells via the regulated pathway indicates that CPE is not essential for the targeting of proinsulin. NIT-2 and -3 cells provide an important research tool for further analysis of the role of the CPE deficiency in the aberrant processing of proinsulin.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Establishment of NIT-2 and NIT-3 cell lines
A complementary DNA containing 2715 bp of the simian virus 40 large T antigen ligated to 688 bp of the rat insulin II promoter sequence (RIP-Tag) has previously been used to generate transgenic NOD/Lt mice spontaneously developing ß-cell adenomas (17). These adenomas are readily amenable to establishment of differentiated ß-cell lines in vitro (18). The NIT-1 ß-cell line represents one such insulin-secreting line produced from an adenoma-bearing NOD/Lt-Tg(RIPTag)1Lt female (17). To produce ß-cell lines deficient in CPE activity, females of an N10 congenic stock of C57BLKS/J-Cpefat/+ maintained in a research colony at The Jackson Laboratory were outcrossed with young NOD/Lt-Tg(RIPTag)1Lt males obtained from the Induced Mutant Resource of The Jackson Laboratory. As the RIPTag oncogene had been previously fixed in a homozygous state in our NOD/Lt-Tg(RIPTag)1Lt stock, F1 hybrids produced in this cross all inherited this oncogene (obligate heterozygous). F1 mice heterozygous for the Cpefat mutation were identified by PCR detection in tail-snip DNA of HRS/J alleles at D8Mit69 and D8Mit131 (7). The mutation originally arose on the HRS/J inbred strain background, such that introgression of this mutation onto the C57BLKS/J background is accompanied by the linked HRS/J alleles at D8Mit69 (2.1 centimorgans proximal) and D8Mit131 (0.4 centimorgans distal). F1 mice heterozygous for RIP-Tag transgenes and Cpefat were intercrossed, and DNA from tail-snips of F2 progeny was analyzed for homozygosity for D8Mit131. These mice (putative Cpefat/Cpefat homozygotes) were fed ad libitum and provided with 5% sucrose in chlorinated drinking water to retard the eventual development of hypoglycemia in those segregants heterozygous or homozygous for RIP-Tag transgenes and hence developing ß-cell adenomas. Development of obesity by 8 weeks of age empirically confirmed Cpefat homozygosity, and loss of body weight accompanied by falling plasma glucose confirmed tumor development. Before establishing cell cultures from tumors, Cpefat/Cpefat tumor donors were further selected by PCR typing for the presence of NOD H2g7 alleles in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) using the polymorphic microsatellite D17Mit21 (H2-Ab) primers. This was performed so that the newly derived cell lines would be MHC matched with the NOD-derived NIT-1 ß-cell line used as a control for wild-type CPE activity in this study.

The NIT-2 cell line was derived from dissociated adenomas from a 10-week-old F2 male; NIT-3 was established from cells from a 12-week-old female sibling. After death, pancreata were inflated by bile duct injection of 4 mg/ml collagenase P (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany). Adenomatous islets were isolated using the method of Gotoh et al. (19). The largest islets were transferred by micropipette through three rinses in sterile Hanks’ solution and then dispersed into a cell suspension by a 10-min digestion at 37 C in 0.025% trypsin-0.1 mM EDTA in calcium-magnesium free (CMF)-Hanks’ solution. Cells were pelleted at 500 x g for 2 min, and the pellet was resuspended and repelleted in DMEM supplemented with glucose to a final concentration of 16.5 mM, with HEPES to 15 mM, and with gentamicin sulfate to 50 µg/ml and further supplemented with Eagle’s MEM nonessential amino acid formulation. Heat-inactivated and dialyzed FBS was added at 10% (vol/vol). All culture reagents were obtained from Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY). Washed pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of the above medium and inoculated into 25-cm2 plastic tissue culture flasks (Corning Plastics, Corning, NY). After a 30-min incubation at 37 C in a CO2 incubator, nonadherent cells were decanted into a single well of a plastic six-well cluster dish and maintained in a humidified CO2 incubator. Cultures were fed twice weekly, with one change of medium lacking serum to eliminate any contaminating fibroblasts. NIT-2 cells were first subcultured into 25-cm2 flasks after 2 weeks of growth in the primary culture, whereas the primary culture of NIT-3 expanded more rapidly, such that first passage was performed within a week, and second passage was performed 3 weeks thereafter. Cells were subcultured by 10-min incubation at 37 C in nonenzymatic cell dissociation solution (C-5789, Sigma, St. Louis, MO; diluted 1:10 in CMF-Hanks’ solution), followed by mechanical agitation and trituration with CMF-Hanks’ solution. After the 12th passage, cell growth was rapid, such that cell harvests from a single 25-cm2 flask were split at 1:3 or 1:4 ratios. The NIT-1, NIT-2, and NIT-3 lines have been deposited with the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD).

Ultrastructural characterization
Cells detached from the substratum as described above were rinsed in serum-free culture medium and then fixed for 1 h in ice in 2% paraformaldehyde-1% glutaraldehyde buffered in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, pH 7.4. Fixed pellets were Epon embedded, thin sectioned, and examined in a JEOL transmission electron microscope (model JEOL 1000 CXII, Peabody, MA). NIT-1 cells (passage 24) were used as a CPE-positive control for comparison.

Western blot analysis of CPE and CPD
NIT cells were cultured on 10-cm plates in high (i.e. 25 mM) glucose DMEM containing 10% heat-inactivated FBS (Life Technologies). The cells were washed three times with PBS and then incubated at 37 C in 2 ml serum-free medium. After 4 h of incubation, media were removed, the cells were resuspended in 1 ml 10 mM NaAc, pH 5.5, and aliquots of both fractions (30 µl cells and 100 µl media) were analyzed by a Western blot using the antiserum to the C-terminal region of CPE (10) and antiserum to the 180-kDa form of CPD (15).

Affinity purification and enzymatic assays of CPE
Media were diluted to 5 ml with 200 mM NaAc, pH 5.5, and cells were extracted with 5 ml 50 mM NaAc buffer, pH 5.5, containing 1 M NaCl and 1% Triton X-100. The media or cell extracts were then subjected to purification on p-aminobenzoylarginine Sepharose 6B affinity columns as previously described (11, 13). CPE was eluted with 2 ml 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, containing 100 mM NaCl and 0.01% Triton X-100. The CPE-containing aliquots of affinity-purified fraction were analyzed by Western blot, as described above. Carboxypeptidase activity was measured using 200 µM dansyl-Phe-Ala-Arg in 100 mM NaAc, pH 5.5, buffer as previously described (20).

Pulse-chase analysis of CPE
NIT-1 and NIT-3 cells cultured on six-well plates were labeled with [35S]Met (180 µCi/ml) in high glucose DMEM lacking unlabeled Met for 30 min (pulse) and then washed twice with DMEM containing nonradioactive Met. Some of the plates were further incubated in high glucose DMEM with nonradioactive Met for different time periods. Media were removed, and the cells were frozen in 100 µl 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, in the presence of 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride. The cells and media were then subjected to immunoprecipitation as previously described (21) using antiserum to the N-terminal region of CPE (13).

Immunocytochemistry
NIT-1 and NIT-3 cells were cultured for 24 h on 18-mm coverslips precoated with 1 mg/ml polylysine (Sigma). Cells were washed with DMEM, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, and then permeabilized for 15 min in 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS. After 1 h of blocking in 5% BSA, the cells were immunostained for 1 h with the primary antisera (1:2500 dilution): rabbit polyclonal antisera directed against the C-terminal region of CPE, the pro region of CPE, the 180-kDa form of CPD, or calnexin (gift from Ari Helenius, Yale University). The cells were washed three times with 0.2% Tween-20 in PBS and then incubated with fluorescein-labeled antirabbit secondary antibody and rhodamine-labeled wheat-germ agglutinin (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA; 1:200 dilution) for 1 h, followed by extensive PBS washing. Immunofluorescence staining was examined using a Bio-Rad confocal microscope (Richmond, CA).

Insulin biosynthesis
Cells grown to near confluence in 60-mm plastic disks in DMEM with 10% FBS and 2 mg/ml (11 mM) glucose were rinsed with Hanks’ Balanced Salt solution and then labeled for periods of 2 or 8 h by incubation at 37 C in HEPES-buffered Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate (KRB) buffer containing 2.0 mg/ml BSA, 3.0 mg/ml glucose (16.7 mM), and 100 µCi/ml [3H]Arg and [35S]Met (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) and supplemented with 48 µg/ml Cys, 584 µg/ml Gln, 146 µg/ml Lys, 72 µg/ml Tyr, 105 µg/ml Leu, 105 µg/ml Ile, 94 µg/ml Val, 16 µg/ml Trp, 66 µg/ml Phe, 95 µg/ml Thr, and 42 µg/ml His. After incubation, the medium was removed and saved for analysis. The cells were rinsed three times with cold KRB buffer and then extracted with acid-ethanol, essentially as previously described (22). The protein pellet after alcohol-ether precipitation was dissolved in a small volume of 3 M acetic acid and applied to a 1 x 50-cm column of Bio-Gel P30 eluted with 3 M acetic acid containing 50 µg/ml BSA (22). Radioactivity in small aliquots of each fraction was measured in a liquid scintillation counter. The proinsulin- and insulin-containing fractions were then pooled separately, divided into aliquots, and evaporated to dryness. Aliquots of the proinsulin- and insulin-containing fractions were redissolved in RIA buffer (0.13 M sodium borate, pH 8.0; 0.003 M NaN3; and 5 µg/ml BSA) and assayed for insulin immunoreactivity (23). Aliquots of the insulin peak (which also contains C peptide) were reserved for analysis by HPLC (23), whereas others were treated with carboxypeptidase B (CPB) to determine the portion of C-terminally extended material. For treatment of the insulin peak fractions with CPB, dried aliquots were dissolved in 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.4, and treated for 5 min at 37 C with 14.5 µg/ml CPB (Worthington Biochemical Corp., Freehold, NJ). After incubation, the reaction mixture was quenched with 50% acetic acid and applied to Bio-Gel P30 columns for rechromatography as described above. Fractions were counted in a liquid scintillation spectrometer.

Secretion of insulin/proinsulin from NIT cells
Cells were cultured in six-well plates. Medium was removed, and cells were washed three times with PBS and then incubated in KRB buffer containing 0.1% BSA for 1 h. This medium was discarded and replaced with 1 ml KRB-0.1% BSA containing no addition, 16.7 mM glucose, and/or 45 mM KCl. After 2-h incubation, the medium was removed and assayed for insulin/proinsulin by RIA. This assay has been previously described (24) and detects both insulin and proinsulin. Cells were extracted with 2 M acetic acid, and an aliquot was assayed for insulin/proinsulin.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
At the light microscopic level, NIT-2 and NIT-3 cells resembled the previously described NIT-1 cell line in exhibiting an epithelioid morphology, with cells forming islet-like clusters after subculture. Previous ultrastructural analysis showed that, in contrast to ß-cells from normal mice, the secretory granule population in ß-cells of Cpefat/Cpefat mutants was characterized by an accumulation of immature secretory granules exhibiting a more electron-lucent core than the typical dense granule cores found in mature ß-granules (7). Ultrastructural comparison of NIT-2 and NIT-3 cells to NIT-1 cells showed that this Cpefat characteristic was maintained in the immortalized cell lines. Figure 1AGo shows the typical morphology of NIT-1 cells; most of the ß-granules were typically dense core, mature granules found at the periphery of the cells, indicating a state of active secretion. Cell surface shedding of an endogenously encoded type C ecotropic retrovirus is also characteristic of this cell line (17). Figure 1BGo, depicting NIT-2 cells, shows the enlarged and more electron-lucent (immature) appearance of many of the ß-granules. A similar result was observed in NIT-3 cells (data not shown). Neither NIT-2 nor NIT-3 cells exhibited budding type C retroviral particles at their cell surfaces, indicating that they may carry C57BLKS/J rather than the NOD genome on proximal chromosome 11, the location of the Emv30 locus encoding the retrovirus expressed in NIT-1 cells (25). The cell lines were H2 typed using a polymorphism in a simple sequence repeat in the H2-Ab gene (D17Mit21). NIT-1 cells derive directly from NOD/Lt mice and, thus, are homozygous for NOD alleles comprising the H2g7 haplotype. The NIT-2 and NIT-3 cells, which were derived from F2 hybrids between NOD and C57BLKS/J (H2d haplotype), are H2g7/H2d heterozygous. Thus, transplantation of these cells in vivo will require either a (NOD x C57BLKS/J) F1 host or an immunocompromised NOD/LtSz-scid/scid (severe combined immunodeficiency) host.



View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Secretory granule morphology distinguishes NIT-1 from NIT-2 cells. A, NIT-1 cells (passage 24) showing small dense core secretory granules (arrowheads) primarily located toward the cell perimeter, indicating active secretion. The arrow denotes a budding type C ecotropic retrovirus. Magnification, x28,000. B, NIT-2 cells (passage 9) shown at the same magnification as NIT-1 cells in A. Secretion granules are considerably larger than observed in NIT-1 cells, with a large proportion exhibiting the less electron-dense cores characteristic of immature ß-granules (arrowhead). Magnification, x28,000.

 
Western blot analysis of CPE in NIT-1 cells and media showed a band of approximately 53 kDa (Fig. 2Go, left). This size corresponds to that of the mature form of CPE found in various bovine and rat tissues (13). In contrast, the CPE in NIT-2 and NIT-3 cells was approximately 56 kDa, which corresponds to the size of pro-CPE (i.e. the precursor form of CPE that contains 14 additional N-terminal amino acids). Although the levels of immunoreactive CPE/pro-CPE in NIT-1, -2, and -3 cells were generally similar, CPE was only detected in the medium from NIT-1 cells (Fig. 2Go). Immunoreactive CPD was also detected in NIT cells, with a major band of approximately 180 kDa (Fig. 2Go, right). This size corresponds to the predominant form of CPD in bovine pituitary and other tissues (11, 15). The levels of immunoreactive CPD in NIT-1, -2, and -3 cells were comparable. No immunoreactive CPD was detected in the medium, consistent with the previous finding that the major form of CPD is a membrane-bound protein (11, 15).



View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Western blot analysis of CPE and CPD in NIT-1, -2, and -3 cells and media. Cells in a 10-cm plate were incubated with 2 ml serum-free medium for 4 h, and then the cells were homogenized in 1 ml 10 mM NaAc, pH 5.5, buffer. Aliquots of the cells (30 µl) or media (100 µl) were analyzed on a Western blot, which was probed with antiserum directed against the C-terminal region of CPE (left) or the 180 kDa form of CPD (right). The position and size of prestained mol wt markers (Bio-Rad) are indicated. Similar results were observed in three separate experiments.

 
To test whether the CPE in NIT-2 and -3 cells is active, cellular extracts were passed over a p-aminobenzoyl-Arg Sepharose column. This column binds the active forms of CPE (10, 13). Despite the similar amounts of immunoreactive CPE in NIT-1, -2, and -3 cells, only the CPE in NIT-1 cells was able to bind to the affinity column (Fig. 3AGo). The affinity column eluate from NIT-2 and -3 cells had no detectable CPE activity, whereas the material from NIT-1 cells showed a relatively large amount of enzyme activity (Fig. 3BGo). In contrast, all three cell lines contained CPD activity (data not shown), which eluted from the affinity column in a later fraction than CPE (11). The medium from NIT-1 cells, but not the medium from NIT-2 or -3 cells, contained detectable levels of CPE-like enzyme activity (Fig. 3BGo). The CPE activity secreted from NIT-1 cells over 4 h was 11-fold lower than the cellular activity, indicating that these cells secrete approximately 2% of the cellular CPE per h in high glucose medium.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Western blot and enzymatic assays of CPE in NIT-1, -2, and -3 cells and media after fractionation on a substrate affinity column. Cell extracts and media from 10-cm dishes of cells were applied to a p-aminobenzoyl-Arg Sepharose affinity column as described in Materials and Methods. A, Western blot analysis was performed on an aliquot of the material purified from the cell extracts, using the antiserum directed against the C-terminal region of CPE. The position and size of prestained mol wt markers (Bio-Rad) are indicated. The results shown are from a representative experiment; similar results were obtained in three separate experiments. B, Carboxypeptidase assays of the affinity-purified material were performed with 200 µM dansyl-Phe-Ala-Arg, as described in Materials and Methods. Units are total nanomoles per min carboxypeptidase activity in the affinity column elute. The assay was performed in triplicate with less than 10% variation between identical tubes, and the entire experiment was performed twice with comparable results.

 
Pulse-chase analysis of NIT-1 cells showed that CPE was initially produced as a 56-kDa protein that corresponds to the size of pro-CPE (Fig. 4Go). After 30 min of chase, a second band of approximately 53 kDa was present at levels comparable to the 56-kDa band, and then by 90 min of chase, the 53-kDa band was the predominant form (Fig. 4Go). In contrast to the results with NIT-1 cells, NIT-3 cells showed only the 56-kDa form of pro-CPE, with no detectable conversion to a smaller form (Fig. 4Go). After 6 h of chase, there was virtually no labeled pro-CPE remaining in NIT-3 cells (Fig. 4Go). As CPE is not found in the medium of NIT-3 cells (Fig. 2Go), the disappearance of labeled pro-CPE presumably reflects degradation.



View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Pulse-chase analysis of CPE in NIT-1 and NIT-3 cells. Cells cultured on six-well plates were labeled with [35S]Met for 30 min and then chased for the indicated time in medium containing unlabeled Met, as described in Materials and Methods. Cellular CPE was immunoprecipitated using antiserum directed against the N-terminal region of CPE, as described. The position and size of prestained mol wt markers (Bio-Rad) are indicated. The entire experiment was performed three times with comparable results.

 
The NIT-1 and -3 cells were further analyzed by immunocytochemistry. The antiserum to the C-terminal region of CPE showed punctate staining throughout the cytoplasm of NIT-1 cells, with accumulation in a perinuclear structure and, to a lesser extent, in the tips of the cell processes (Fig. 5Go, top left). The antiserum to the pro region of CPE (i.e. raised against a peptide corresponding to the 14-residue N-terminal extension on pro-CPE that was not present on the mature form of CPE) only showed perinuclear staining and did not stain the tips of NIT-1 cells (Fig. 5Go, top middle). This observation was similar to what was found in the AtT-20 cell line and fits with the proposal that the processing of pro-CPE into CPE occurs in the trans-Golgi network (TGN) or immature secretory vesicles (26). In contrast, NIT-3 cells showed diffuse staining throughout the cell with either of these two antisera (Fig. 5Go, bottom). This diffuse staining pattern was similar to that observed with calnexin (Fig. 5Go, right), a resident protein of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (27). The defect in NIT-3 cells was not a general defect in ER to Golgi transport, as immunoreactive CPD was detected in a perinuclear compartment in both NIT-1 and NIT-3 cells (Fig. 6Go, left). This perinuclear staining was similar to that observed with wheat-germ agglutinin (Fig. 6Go, right), a Golgi marker (28).



View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Immunocytochemistry of CPE, pro-CPE, and calnexin in NIT-1 and NIT-3 cells. Cells were cultured on coverslips precoated with polylysine, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with Triton X-100, and then stained with 1:2500 dilutions of rabbit polyclonal antisera to the C-terminal region of CPE, the pro region of CPE, or calnexin. The primary antisera were detected with fluorescein-labeled antirabbit secondary antiserum, as described in Materials and Methods. The entire experiment was repeated three times with comparable results. The scale bar indicates 25 µm.

 


View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Immunocytochemistry of CPD and wheat-germ agglutinin (WGA) in NIT-1 and NIT-3 cells. Cell were cultured, fixed, and stained as described in Fig. 5Go and Materials and Methods, using antiserum to the 180-kDa form of CPD (1:2500 dilution). During the incubation with secondary antiserum, rhodamine-labeled WGA (1:200 dilution) was included in the buffer. The same cells are shown under conditions that detect the fluorescein label (CPD) or the rhodamine label (WGA). The entire experiment was repeated twice with comparable results.

 
The biosynthesis of insulin was studied in the cultured NIT cells by comparing the incorporation of [3H]Arg and [35S]Met. There are three Arg residues at the cleavage sites in each of the two mouse proinsulins, one within each of the mouse insulins and one within the C-peptide of mouse proinsulin 1 (mPI1); one Met residue is present only in the B chain of mouse (pro) insulin 2 (mPI2). The [35S]Met data thus monitor the biosynthesis and conversion of proinsulin 2 (the more abundant isoform in mice), whereas [3H]Arg monitors both proinsulins and also provides an index of the amount of C-terminally extended insulin and C peptide derived from proinsulin (29). The data in Fig. 7AGo show the relative proportions of [3H]Arg-labeled proinsulin in the three cell lines after an 8-h labeling period. The NIT-2 and NIT-3 cells showed an increased level of proinsulin (55.1% and 44.1%, respectively) compared with NIT-1 cells (27.2%). Similar results were obtained for the 35S-labeled material (Fig. 7BGo), confirming that proinsulin is present in increased amounts within NIT-2 and NIT-3 cells. When total immunoassayable insulin and proinsulin were measured in cell extracts fractionated by Bio-Gel P30 chromatography, a similar pattern of elevated proinsulin was demonstrated in the two CPE-deficient cell lines (Table 1Go). These results confirm the existence of a block in proinsulin conversion and correlate with the observed immature morphology of the secretory granules in NIT-2 and NIT-3 cell lines (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Increased levels of proinsulin in NIT-2 and NIT-3 cells demonstrated by incorporation of labeled amino acids into proinsulin and insulin during an 8-h incubation. The relative proportion of proinsulin was assessed from incorporation of [3H]Arg (A) or [35S]Met (B). Cells were labeled, extracted, and fractionated as described in Materials and Methods. Proinsulin- and insulin-related materials were immunopurified using guinea pig antiinsulin antisera coupled to Affi-Gel 10 agarose beads (34), eluted, and analyzed by Bio-Gel P30 gel chromatography.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Immunoreactive proinsulin and insulin in NIT cell lines

 
When insulin-like material labeled with [3H]Arg was isolated by P30 gel chromatography and reanalyzed on the same columns, no free Arg was released (data not shown). However, after treatment with carboxypeptidase B and rechromatography, significant amounts of [3H]Arg radioactivity were released from both NIT-2 and NIT-3 insulin peaks, as indicated by the radioactivity in the included column volume (Fig. 8Go), confirming the presence of some B chain-extended diarginyl insulin and C peptide-Lys-Arg in the insulin fractions. From these results the relative amounts of extended material in the CPE-deficient cell lines could be calculated (Table 2Go). The presence of only about 4–15% of extended material in NIT-2 and NIT-3 cells, compared with about 40% found in pancreas extracts of Cpefat/Cpefat mice (7), may reflect the presence of increased levels of CPD or other carboxypeptidases in the transformed NIT cell lines compared to those in the nondividing ß-cells in vivo.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Analysis of C-terminal [3H]Arg extended insulin in NIT-2 and NIT-3 cells. NIT cells were labeled for 2 h with [3H]Arg, and the insulin-containing fractions were isolated, treated with CPB, and chromatographed on Bio-Gel P30 columns. Arrows indicate elution fractions of insulin and free [3H]Arg. Squares, 3H; circles, 35S.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Levels of insulin and Arg-extended insulin in NIT cell lines

 
Under basal conditions in the absence of glucose or other secretagogues, NIT-1, -2, and -3 cells secrete 1–2 pmol/ml immunoreactive insulin (which includes proinsulin)/h. The insulin/proinsulin secreted over 2 h represents 0.27%, 0.24%, and 0.21% of the cellular insulin/proinsulin for NIT-1, NIT-2, and NIT-3 cells, respectively (Fig. 9Go). High glucose (16.7 mM) stimulates the secretion of immunoreactive insulin/proinsulin approximately 4-fold from NIT-1 cells and 1-fold (i.e. a 100% increase) from NIT-2 and NIT-3 cells (Fig. 9Go). KCl (45 mM) causes a 14-fold increase in immunoreactive insulin/proinsulin secretion from NIT-1 cells and a 5- to 6-fold increase from NIT-2 and -3 cells (Fig. 9Go).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. Secretion of insulin/proinsulin from NIT cell lines. Cells were cultured in six-well plates (35-mm area/well) to approximately 50–80% confluence. Cells were preincubated in KRB containing 0.1% BSA for 1 h, and then incubated for 2 h at 37 C in 1 ml fresh KRB-BSA alone (C) or in KRB-BSA containing 16.7 mM glucose (G) or 45 mM KCl (K). The medium was removed and assayed in duplicate for insulin using a RIA that also detects proinsulin (24). Levels of secreted insulin/proinsulin are shown as the percentage of the total cellular insulin/proinsulin within a similar number of untreated cells. Error bars indicate SE of the mean for three wells of cells per treatment. Statistical significance of the difference between secretagogue-stimulated and control secretion was determined using Student’s t test: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. The entire experiment was performed twice with comparable results.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The NIT-2 and -3 cell lines resemble the ß-cells in the Cpefat/Cpefat mouse in several important properties. 1) Although pro-CPE protein is made, it is not stable and is degraded before secretion. 2) Another carboxypeptidase, CPD, is present in the cells and is primarily located in the TGN. 3) The majority of secretory vesicles in NIT-2 and -3 cells appear immature, lacking the electron-dense cores typical of mature vesicles. 4) There is a modest accumulation of the proinsulin-processing, intermediate-containing basic Arg residues on the C-terminus of the insulin B-chain. 5) The processing of proinsulin is reduced. The similarity of NIT-2 and -3 cells to the pancreatic ß-cells of the Cpefat/Cpefat mouse validates the cells as a model system.

The size of the immunoreactive CPE produced in NIT-2 and -3 cells is consistent with the size of pro-CPE, and not with the mature form of CPE that predominates in NIT-1 cells and in many tissues (13, 30). Previous studies on the AtT-20 mouse corticotropic cell line have found that pro-CPE is converted to CPE in the TGN or in a post-Golgi compartment (26). The present results from pulse-chase analysis and immunocytochemistry suggest that the wild-type pro-CPE in NIT-1 cells is also processed to CPE in a late Golgi or post-Golgi compartment. The size change in CPE observed during the pulse-chase analysis of NIT-1 cells is presumably due to removal of the pro region and processing within the C-terminal region, as previously found for CPE in the AtT-20 cell line (26). In contrast, the mutant form of pro-CPE in NIT-3 cells is not converted into CPE, based on the size of the immunoreactive protein and on the pulse-chase analysis. Furthermore, the mutant CPE in NIT-3 cells does not appear in a perinuclear compartment typical of Golgi proteins. These findings are similar to those obtained when the Pro202 mutant form of pro-CPE was expressed in AtT-20 cells (10). The substitution of Pro for Ser202 presumably affects the folding of pro-CPE; this Ser is predicted to be present in a ß-sheet, and a Pro would significantly alter the structure. Misfolded proteins are thought to be degraded either in the ER or by proteosomes after transit out of the ER (31).

The lack of transport and processing of the mutant pro-CPE is not due to a general transport defect in NIT-3 cells, as CPD appears in a perinuclear compartment in both NIT-1 and NIT-3 cells. CPD is enriched in the TGN in AtT-20 cells (Varlamov, O., and L. D. Fricker, submitted). As found for other enzymes that are present in the TGN, CPD cycles to the surface of the AtT-20 cells and returns to a TGN-like perinuclear compartment (Varlamov, O., and L. D. Fricker, submitted). Preliminary studies have found a similar cell surface expression and recycling of CPD in NIT-1 cells (data not shown).

Studies on the processing of proinsulin in NIT-2 and -3 cells show only a moderate accumulation of arginine-extended forms of insulin. This result is generally similar to that found for insulin processing in the pancreatic islets of the Cpefat/Cpefat mouse (7) and for the processing of other peptides in various tissues of these mice (8, 9, 32). In all cases, there is a decrease in the levels of correctly processed peptide and an accumulation of the substrate for the carboxypeptidase reaction. These results are consistent with a role for CPE in the processing of the various peptides. However, the presence of correctly processed peptide indicates that another enzyme can substitute for the defective CPE in the Cpefat/Cpefat mice. CPD is a potential candidate for this alternative enzyme. The levels of CPD protein do not appear elevated in the Cpefat/Cpefat mouse (8) or in NIT-2 and -3 cells compared with those in NIT-1 cells. Even though NIT-2 and -3 cells appear to express similar levels of immunoreactive CPD, these two cell lines differ in the relative amount of Arg-extended insulin. This finding suggests that factors other than the level of immunoreactive CPD protein can affect the C-terminal processing of Arg-extended insulin.

The relative increase in proinsulin-like immunoreactive material in NIT-1 cells shown in Table 1Go (~30% in contrast to <5% in normal islets) probably reflects the increased proportion of ER-derived material in relation to diminished granule stores in these transformed ß-cells. If this amount is deducted from the proinsulin percentages shown in Table 1Go, the values for stored proinsulin in NIT-2 and NIT-3 cells range from 10–30%, a somewhat lower value than that for proinsulin retention in the Cpefat/Cpefat mouse pancreatic extracts (~40%) (7). Although the accumulation of arginine-extended forms of insulin were predicted for an inactivating mutation of CPE, the increased levels of proinsulin were unexpected. The present finding that this increase occurs in cultured NIT-2 and -3 cells indicates that the defect in CPE is responsible, and that the effect is not merely due to increased secretory demand on the ß-cells of the Cpefat/Cpefat mice. The difference in accumulation of proinsulin in NIT-2 and NIT-3 cells may be due to levels of the endoproteases; NIT-2 cells have lower levels of both PC2 and PC3 than NIT-3 cells (Lindberg, I., personal communication). However, variability in the endopeptidases does not account for the accumulation of proinsulin in NIT-3 cells, as these cells have similar levels of PC2 and PC3 as NIT-1 cells (Lindberg, I., personal communication).

The mechanism by which the defect in CPE leads to abnormal proinsulin processing in Cpefat/Cpefat mice is unclear, and two models have been proposed (10). In one model, the absence of CPE activity leads to the accumulation of a peptide with C-terminal basic residues, and this peptide then inhibits the proinsulin-processing endopeptidases. Evidence in favor of this model is the finding that a fragment of 7B2 with C-terminal lysines is a potent inhibitor of PC2, and this inhibition is eliminated when CPE is added to the reaction (33). The other model is that CPE protein is required for the sorting of proinsulin into the regulated secretory pathway, and the absence of CPE from the TGN leads to the abnormal sorting of proinsulin. Our finding that NIT-2 and -3 cells are capable of secreting insulin/proinsulin via the regulated pathway indicates that CPE is not obligatory for the proper targeting of proinsulin. The magnitude of the glucose- and KCl-stimulated secretion of insulin/proinsulin from NIT-2 and -3 cells is lower than that from NIT-1 cells, but in the same range as that in other mouse pancreatic ß-cell lines produced by the same method (24). Thus, it is possible that CPE contributes to the regulated pathway sorting of proinsulin; due to inherent variability between cell lines, this could not be addressed in the present study. Evidence supporting this latter model is the recent finding that CPE binds to POMC and is required for the efficient sorting of this prohormone to the regulated secretory pathway (16). A key finding was that pituitary cells cultured from Cpefat/Cpefat mice did not secrete POMC-derived peptides via a regulated pathway (16). Cool et al. proposed that CPE may also be involved in the sorting of proinsulin based on the ability of these two proteins to interact (16). However, CPE is clearly not essential for the targeting of proinsulin in the TGN.


    Acknowledgments
 
Confocal microscopy was performed in the Analytical Imaging Facility of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Electron microscopy was performed by Dr. Margaret Hogan of the Jackson Laboratory’s Biological Imaging Service. For the experiments examining the regulated secretion of insulin/proinsulin, the RIAs were performed by Drs. Manju Surana and Norman Fleischer, Diabetes Research and Training Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by NIH Grants DK-51271 and DA-04494, Research Scientist Development Award DA-00194, and a grant from the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation (to L.D.F.); the American Diabetes Association and NIH Cancer Center Core Grant CA-34196 (to E.H.L.); and NIH Grants DK-13914 and DK-20595 and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (to D.F.S.). Back

Received April 10, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Steiner DF 1991 The biosynthesis of biologically active peptides: a perspective. In: Fricker LD (ed) Peptide Biosynthesis and Processing. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–16
  2. Steiner DF, Smeekens SP, Ohagi S, Chan SJ 1992 The new enzymology of precursor processing endoproteases. J Biol Chem 267:23435–23438[Free Full Text]
  3. Docherty K, Hutton JC 1983 Carboxypeptidase activity in the insulin secretory granule. FEBS Lett 162:137–141[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Fricker LD 1988 Carboxypeptidase E. Annu Rev Physiol 50:309–321[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Schafer MK-H, Day R, Cullinan WE, Chretien M, Seidah NG, Watson SJ 1993 Gene expression of prohormone and proprotein convertases in the rat CNS: a comparative in situ hybridization analysis. J Neurosci 13:1258–1279[Abstract]
  6. Coleman DL, Eicher EM 1990 Fat (fat) and tubby (tub), two autosomal recessive mutations causing obesity syndromes in the mouse. J Hered 81:424–427[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Naggert JK, Fricker LD, Varlamov O, Nishina PM, Rouille Y, Steiner DF, Carroll RJ, Paigen BJ, Leiter EH 1995 Hyperproinsulinemia in obese fat/fat mice associated with a point mutation in the carboxypeptidase E gene and reduced carboxypeptidase E activity in the pancreatic islets. Nat Genet 10:135–142[Medline]
  8. Fricker LD, Berman YL, Leiter EH, Devi LA 1996 Carboxypeptidase E activity is deficient in mice with the fat mutation: effect on peptide processing. J Biol Chem 271:30619–30624[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Udupi V, Gomez P, Song L, Varlamov O, Reed JT, Leiter EH, Fricker LD, Greeley Jr GH 1997 Effect of carboxypeptidase E deficiency on progastrin processing and gastrin mRNA expression in mice with the fat mutation. Endocrinology 138: 1959–1963
  10. Varlamov O, Leiter EH, Fricker LD 1996 Induced and spontaneous mutations at Ser202 of carboxypeptidase E: effect on enzyme expression, activity, and intracellular routing. J Biol Chem 271:13981–13986[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Song L, Fricker LD 1995 Purification and characterization of carboxypeptidase D, a novel carboxypeptidase E-like enzyme, from bovine pituitary. J Biol Chem 270:25007–25013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Xin X, Varlamov O, Day R, Dong W, Bridgett MM, Leiter EH, Fricker LD 1997 Cloning and sequence analysis of cDNA encoding rat carboxypeptidase D. DNA Cell Biol 16:897–909[Medline]
  13. Fricker LD, Das B, Angeletti RH 1990 Identification of the pH-dependent membrane anchor of carboxypeptidase E (EC 3.4.17.10). J Biol Chem 265:2476–2482[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Varlamov O, Fricker LD 1996 The C-terminal region of carboxypeptidase E involved in membrane binding is distinct from the region involved with intracellular routing. J Biol Chem 271:6077–6083[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Song L, Fricker LD 1996 Tissue distribution and characterization of soluble and membrane-bound forms of metallocarboxypeptidase D. J Biol Chem 271:28884–28889[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Cool DR, Normant E, Shen F, Chen H, Pannell L, Zhang Y, Loh YP 1997 Carboxypeptidase E is a regulated secretory pathway sorting receptor: genetic obliteration leads to endocrine disorders in Cpefat mice. Cell 88:73–83[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Hamaguchi K, Gaskins HR, Leiter EH 1991 NIT-1, a pancreatic ß-cell line established from a transgenic NOD/Lt mouse. Diabetes 40:842–849[Abstract]
  18. Efrat S, Linde S, Kofod H, Spector D, Delannoy M, Grant S, Hanahan D, Baekkeskov S 1988 Beta cell lines derived from transgenic mice expressing a hybrid insulin gene-oncogene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:9037–9041[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Gotoh M, Maki T, Kiyoizumi T, Satomi S, Monaco AP 1985 An improved method for the isolation of mouse pancreatic islets. Transplantation 40:437–438[Medline]
  20. Fricker LD 1995 Methods for studying carboxypeptidase E. Methods Neurosci 23:237–250
  21. Mitra A, Song L, Fricker LD 1994 The C-terminal region of carboxypeptidase E is involved in membrane binding and intracellular routing in AtT-20 cells. J Biol Chem 269:19876–19881[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Tager HS, Rubenstein AH Steiner DF 1975 Methods for the assessment of peptide precursors. Studies on insulin biosynthesis. In: O’Malley BW, Hardman JG (eds) Methods in Enzymology, vol 37, part B. Academic Press, New York, pp 326–345
  23. Carroll RJ, Hammer RE, Chan SJ, Swift HH, Rubenstein AH, Steiner DF 1988 A mutant human proinsulin is secreted from islets of Langerhans in increased amounts via an unregulated pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:8943–8947[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. D’Ambra R, Surana M, Efrat S, Starr RG, Fleischer N 1990 Regulation of insulin secretion from beta-cell lines derived from transgenic mice insulinomas resembles that of normal beta-cells. Endocrinology 126:2815–2822[Abstract]
  25. Prochazka M, Serreze DV, Frankel WN, Leiter EH 1992 NOR/Lt; MHC-matched diabetes-resistant control strain for NOD mice. Diabetes 41:98–106[Abstract]
  26. Song L, Fricker LD 1995 The processing of procarboxypeptidase E into carboxypeptidase E occurs in secretory vesicles. J Neurochem 65:444–453[Medline]
  27. Hammond C, Helenius A 1994 Quality control in the secretory pathway: retention of a misfolded viral membrane glycoprotein involves cycling between the ER, intermediate compartment, and Golgi apparatus. J Cell Biol 126:41–52[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Meiniel A, Molat JL, Meiniel R 1988 Complex-type glycoproteins synthesized in the subcommissural organ of mammals. Cell Tissue Res 253:383–395[Medline]
  29. Kemmler W, Steiner DF, Borg J 1973 Studies on the conversion of proinsulin to insulin. J Biol Chem 248:4544–4551[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Parkinson D 1990 Two soluble forms of bovine carboxypeptidase H have different NH2-terminal sequences. J Biol Chem 265:17101–17105[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Wiertz EJHJ, Tortorella D, Bogyo M, Yu J, Mothes W, Jones TR, Rapoport TA, Ploegh HL 1996 Sec61-mediated transfer of a membrane protein from the endoplasmic reticulum to the proteasome for destruction. Nature 384:432–438[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Rovere C, Viale A, Nahon J, Kitabgi P 1996 Impaired processing of brain proneurotensin and promelanin-concentrating hormone in obese fat/fat mice. Endocrinology 137:2954–2958[Abstract]
  33. Zhu X, Rouille Y, Lamango NS, Steiner DF, Lindberg I 1996 Internal cleavage of the inhibitory 7B2 CT peptide by PC2: a potential mechanism for its inactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:4919–4924[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Ostrega D, Polonsky K, Nagi D, Yudkin J, Cox LJ, Clark PMS, Hales CN 1995 Measurement of proinsulin and intermediates: validation of immunoassay methods by high-performance liquid chromatography. Diabetes 44:437–440[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
L. D. Fricker
Neuropeptidomics to Study Peptide Processing in Animal Models of Obesity
Endocrinology, September 1, 2007; 148(9): 4185 - 4190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. L. Garcia, S.-K. Han, W. G. Janssen, Z. Z. Khaing, T. Ito, M. J. Glucksman, D. L. Benson, and S. R. J. Salton
A Prohormone Convertase Cleavage Site within a Predicted {alpha}-Helix Mediates Sorting of the Neuronal and Endocrine Polypeptide VGF into the Regulated Secretory Pathway
J. Biol. Chem., December 16, 2005; 280(50): 41595 - 41608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
M. Hosaka, T. Watanabe, Y. Sakai, T. Kato, and T. Takeuchi
Interaction between secretogranin III and carboxypeptidase E facilitates prohormone sorting within secretory granules
J. Cell Sci., October 15, 2005; 118(20): 4785 - 4795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
L. Marzban, G. Soukhatcheva, and C. B. Verchere
Role of Carboxypeptidase E in Processing of Pro-Islet Amyloid Polypeptide in {beta}-Cells
Endocrinology, April 1, 2005; 146(4): 1808 - 1817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Hosaka, M. Suda, Y. Sakai, T. Izumi, T. Watanabe, and T. Takeuchi
Secretogranin III Binds to Cholesterol in the Secretory Granule Membrane as an Adapter for Chromogranin A
J. Biol. Chem., January 30, 2004; 279(5): 3627 - 3634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
X. Guo, J. N. Rao, L. Liu, T.-T. Zou, D. J. Turner, B. L. Bass, and J.-Y. Wang
Regulation of adherens junctions and epithelial paracellular permeability: a novel function for polyamines
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 2003; 285(5): C1174 - C1187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. V. Kalinina and L. D. Fricker
Palmitoylation of Carboxypeptidase D. IMPLICATIONS FOR INTRACELLULAR TRAFFICKING
J. Biol. Chem., March 7, 2003; 278(11): 9244 - 9249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
P. A. Halban and J.-C. Irminger
Mutant Proinsulin That Cannot Be Converted Is Secreted Efficiently from Primary Rat beta -Cells via the Regulated Pathway
Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2003; 14(3): 1195 - 1203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
N. X. Cawley, Y. M. Rodriguez, A. Maldonado, and Y. P. Loh
Trafficking of Mutant Carboxypeptidase E to Secretory Granules in a {beta}-Cell Line Derived from Cpefat/Cpefat Mice
Endocrinology, January 1, 2003; 144(1): 292 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
R. Kuliawat, D. Prabakaran, and P. Arvan
Proinsulin Endoproteolysis Confers Enhanced Targeting of Processed Insulin to the Regulated Secretory Pathway
Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 2000; 11(6): 1959 - 1972.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Qian, O. Varlamov, and L. D. Fricker
Glu300 of Rat Carboxypeptidase E Is Essential for Enzymatic Activity but Not Substrate Binding or Routing to the Regulated Secretory Pathway
J. Biol. Chem., April 23, 1999; 274(17): 11582 - 11586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
C.-F. Zhang, C. R. Snell, and Y. Peng Loh
Identification of a Novel Prohormone Sorting Signal-Binding Site on Carboxypeptidase E, a Regulated Secretory Pathway-Sorting Receptor
Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 1999; 13(4): 527 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
G. D. Ciccotosto, M. R. Schiller, B. A. Eipper, and R. E. Mains
Induction of Integral Membrane PAM Expression in AtT-20 Cells Alters the Storage and Trafficking of POMC and PC1
J. Cell Biol., February 8, 1999; 144(3): 459 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
P. S. Dannies
Protein Hormone Storage in Secretory Granules: Mechanisms for Concentration and Sorting
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 1999; 20(1): 3 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
S. E. Reznik, C. M. Salafia, J. M. Lage, and L. D. Fricker
Immunohistochemical Localization of Carboxypeptidases E and D in the Human Placenta and Umbilical Cord
J. Histochem. Cytochem., December 1, 1998; 46(12): 1359 - 1368.