| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ARTICLES |
Molecular Angiogenesis Group (L.Z., R.B.), Imperial Cancer Research Fund Laboratories, Institute of Molecular Medicine, and Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (L.Z., I.Z.M., M.C.P.R.), University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Roy Bicknell, Molecular Angiogenesis Group, Imperial Cancer Research Fund Laboratories, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom. E-mail: bicknelr{at}icrf.icnet.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and interferon-
. In contrast, in normal
endometrial stromal cells, interferon-
gave, by far, the strongest
induction of PD-ECGF/TP. Expression of the enzyme was not regulated by
ovarian hormones alone. Although treatment of NEE cells with a
physiological concentration of progesterone (5 x
10-8 M) or transforming growth
factor-ß1 (10 ng/ml) alone had no effect on PD-ECGF/TP
expression, when delivered together at the same dose they induced a
48-fold increase in expression. This expression correlates with cyclic
changes in progesterone and transforming growth factor-ß1
levels in the uterus. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Human endometrium has the unique property of undergoing benign angiogenesis, a process otherwise restricted to a few other physiological processes, such as ovarian follicular development and during wound healing. The endometrium is a mucosa supplied by a microvascular blood supply that develops cyclically under the influence of sequential estradiol and progesterone (P), secreted by the ovary during each menstrual cycle. In this study, we have examined a possible role of PD-ECGF/TP in endometrial angiogenesis. We have developed techniques that permit the preparation and long-term culture of pure isolates of normal endometrial epithelial (NEE) and stroma. The isolates are known as NEE and normal endometrial stromal (NES) cells. In view of strong in vivo expression of PD-ECGF/TP in these cells in the luteal endometrium we have attempted to identify what regulates this expression by using the cells in culture.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-32P]-cytidine
triphosphate (400 Ci/mmol) and enhanced chemiluminescence detection
kits from Amersham plc, Amersham, UK. Ultrapure deoxynucleotide
triphosphates, di-deoxy-nucleotide triphosphates, and ribonucleotide
triphosphates were from Pharmacia. Endothelial cell growth supplement,
collagenase type 1A, dextran-coated charcoal (DCC)-stripped FCS,
17-ß-estradiol (E), and P were from Sigma. RU 486 was a gift from
Hoechst Marion/Rousel Ltd., Broadwater Park, Uxbridge, UK. Human
recombinant tumor necrosis factor-
(TNF-
), human recombinant
interleukin 1-
(IL-1
), human recombinant interferon-
(IFN-
), and human recombinant transforming growth
factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1) were from R. and D.
Systems, Abingdon, UK. All routine laboratory chemicals were supplied
by Sigma or BDH, unless otherwise stated.
Cell culture and cytokine and/or steroid treatment
All cell cultures were maintained at 37 C in a humidified
atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air and, by regular screening,
shown to be mycoplasma free. NEE and NES cells were isolated and
cultured as described (8). Other cells were routinely cultured in
HEPES-buffered DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS, penicillin (100
units/ml), streptomycin (10 units/ml), and glutamine (2
mM). For gene expression experiments with steroids and/or
cytokines, NEE or NES cells were cultured to confluence in 15-cm Petri
dishes and then left to quiesce for 1 week in estrogen-free medium
[phenol red-free (PRF)-DMEM with 10% DCC-stripped FCS]. Cells were
then treated with fresh PRF-DMEM/10% DCC-stripped FCS containing the
cytokines or steroids under study. Endometrial carcinoma cells were
seeded at low density, cultured in estrogen-free medium to confluence,
and then treated with steroids and/or cytokines as described as above.
Total RNA was prepared either 6 h (RL952) or 24 h (NEE and
NES) after treatment. Cell lysates were prepared 30 h (NEE or NES)
after treatment.
Preparation of total cellular RNA
Isolation of total cellular RNA was carried out by acid
guanidinium-thiocyanate-phenol chloroform extraction (9) or by the CsCl
ultracentrifugation method described by Ausubel et al. (10).
RNA concentrations were calculated from the OD at 260 nm (A260 of
1 = 40 mg/ml). Purity of RNA was assessed from the A260/A280 ratio
and by agarose gel electrophoresis.
RNase protection analysis
RNase protection analysis was performed as described by Ausubel
et al. (10). The template for GAPDH has been described (11).
To prepare a template for PD-ECGF/TP, a 241-bp fragment (corresponding
to nt 817-1058 of the coding region of PD-ECGF/TP) was released from
plasmid PL-5 (1) and cloned into the
EcoRV/HindIII sites of pBluescript KS+. The
resulting construct was linearized with HindIII and
transcribed with T3 polymerase to obtain a template. Twenty
nanograms of total cellular RNA was used in each protection.
Immunoblotting
After treatment with cytokines and/or steroids, confluent cells
in either 10- or 15-cm Petri dishes were washed twice with ice-cold
PBS, scraped into 100 µl of ice-cold Tris-buffered saline and lysed
by mild sonication (Soniprep 150). Insoluble debris was removed by
centrifugation. Supernatants were then concentrated using an Amicon-30
concentrator (Amicon, Inc., Beverly, MA). Before electrophoresis, 100
µg of soluble cell lysate was boiled in SDS sample buffer (0.125
M Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 1% SDS, 1% 2-mercaptoethanol, 5%
glycerol, 0.005% bromophenol blue). After SDS-PAGE, immunoblotting was
performed as detailed by Ausubel et al. (10), with minor
modifications. Briefly, SDS-PAGE gels were soaked in transfer buffer
[25 mM Tris base, 150 mM glycine, 15%
methanol (pH 8.38.4], and proteins subsequently transferred onto
Immobilon-P membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA) by electroblotting at 110
V for 1 h or 15 V overnight in a Bio-Rad minitransblot apparatus.
Membranes were blocked for 2 h at room temperature with blocking
buffer (0.1% Tween-20 and 5% Marvel fat-free milk powder in PBS).
Monoclonal anti-TP (PGF44c) was diluted to 16 µg/ml in blocking
buffer and incubated with the filter for 1 h at room temperature.
Membranes were then washed for 15 min in blocking buffer (x3) before
visualization by ECL.
Densitometry
To obtain values of fold-induction, messenger RNA (mRNA)
abundance (determined by RNase protection assay) or protein abundance
(from immunoblot analysis) were quantitated from the signal on
autoradiographic film by scanning laser densitometry using a Millipore
Bioimage Analyzer.
Immunohistochemistry
Normal human endometrial (n = 30) and carcinoma tissue
(n = 30) was obtained from the archival files of the
Histopathology Department of the John Radcliffe Hospital. Specimens of
normal tissue were from premenopausal women with documented normal
menstrual cycles. The phase of the menstrual cycle was identified from
the patients menstrual history, and histologically by an independent
histopathologist (12, 13). Of the 30 samples examined, 10 were
proliferative, luteal, or menstrual. Paraffin-embedded human
endometrial sections were immunostained with anti-PD-ECGF/TP monoclonal
antibody (PGF44c) (7). Antibodies were visualized by the alkaline
phosphatase antialkaline phosphatase method.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
, IL-1
, and IFN-
induce
PD-ECGF/TP expression in several carcinoma cell lines but not in normal
human fibroblasts (14, 15). The effect of inflammatory cytokines on
PD-ECGF/TP expression in NEE cells was examined first. Figure 2A
, IL-1
,
IFN-
, or various combinations of the three. Basal expression of
PD-ECGF/TP in cultured NEE cells was not detectable. It is seen that
treatment with no single factor alone affected PD-ECGF/TP expression
but that a combination of TNF-
and IFN-
induced strong expression
(205-fold). PD-ECGF/TP induction was unique to this particular
combination of the three cytokines; thus, neither TNF-
+ IL-1
or
IL-1
+ IFN-
induced PD-ECGF/TP expression. A strong induction
also was seen on treatment with all three cytokines, but no greater
(140-fold) than on treatment with TNF-
+ IFN-
(205-fold) (Fig. 2A
|
, IL-1
, and IFN-
.
Maximum physiological concentrations (outside of pregnancy) of E
(5 x 10-10 M) and of P (5 x
10-8 M) were used. E and P alone were without
effect on PD-ECGF/TP expression. Preliminary (single-point) assays
suggested that E and P may modulate the induction of PD-ECGF/TP by a
combination of the three cytokines TNF-
, IL-1
, and IFN-
.
However, a repeat of the analysis in triplicate (i.e.
treating three dishes of cells and extracting and analyzing the RNA
separately) showed this modulation not to be statistically significant
(Fig. 2B
Regulation of PD-ECGF/TP expression in the endometrial
adenocarcinoma cell line RL952
Figure 3A
shows that PD-ECGF/TP
expression was induced in the RL952 cell line by treatment with
either TNF-
alone (12-fold); a mixture of the three cytokines:
TNF-
, IL-1
, and IFN-
; or of these three +
TGF-ß1. IL-1
, IFN-
, and TGF-ß1 alone
had no detectable effect on PD-ECGF expression (Fig. 3A
). As in NEE
cells, the basal expression of PD-ECGF/TP mRNA was barely detectable in
RL952 cells (Fig. 3A
).
|
Regulation of PD-ECGF/TP expression in NES cells
Figure 4A
shows that NES cells
exhibit a different cytokine PD-ECGF/TP mRNA induction profile than NEE
cells. Thus, TNF-
, IL-1
, and TGF-ß1 alone had no
effect on expression, but IFN-
strongly induced PD-ECGF/TP by
260-fold (P < 0.01, n = 3). A mixture of all
three or four factors also increased expression, but not markedly, more
than that seen on treatment with IFN-
alone (data not shown).
|
, was then examined. The effect of E and P
alone on PD-ECGF/TP mRNA expression in NES cells was similar to that in
NEE cells, namely, a modest induction by E (5 x
10-10 M, 5.6-fold, P < 0.05,
n = 3) (Fig. 4B
, neither E or P had a statistically significant effect on
PD-ECGF/TP expression (Fig. 4B
The effect of P and transforming growth factor-ß1 on PD-ECGF/TP
expression in NEE cells
Treatment of NEE cells with a physiological dose of either P
(10-8 M) or TGF-ß1 (10 ng/ml)
had no effect on PD-ECGF/TP mRNA expression. In marked contrast, when
administered together, P and TGF-ß1 induced a 48-fold
increase in PD-ECGF/TP mRNA expression (P < 0.05, Fig. 5A
). Immunoblotting confirmed that the P
+ TGF-ß1-stimulated expression of PD-ECGF/TP mRNA also
occurred at the protein level (Fig. 5B
). This response was, by far, the
strongest induction of PD-ECGF/TP by an ovarian steroid. Further, the
response was unique to the combination of P with TGF-ß1;
thus, no induction of PD-ECGF/TP expression was detected on treatment
with combinations of P with TNF-
, IL-1
, or IFN-
. Figure 5B
shows that the induction by P + TGF-ß1 is efficiently
blocked by the P antagonist RU486. Finally, an identical treatment of
NES cells with P and TGF-ß1 had no effect on PD-ECGF/TP
mRNA or protein expression.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The menstrual cycle-related changes in PD-ECGF/TP expression show a
shift in the cell type, in that expression moves from stroma to
epithelium as the cycle progresses. This would be consistent with
expression being under the control of ovarian steroids. A mixture of
the inflammatory cytokines (TNF-
, IL-1
, and IFN-
) has been
reported to enhance PD-ECGF/TP expression in several carcinoma lines
but not in normal fibroblasts (14). It is known that these same
cytokines are present in human endometrium throughout the menstrual
cycle (18, 19), and thus, they are potential mediators of hormonally
modulated PD-ECGF/TP expression in human endometrium. Expression of
TNF-
and IFN-
in the endometrium does not vary throughout the
cycle. The establishment of isolated human epithelial and stromal
endometrial cell cultures (8) has now permitted an exploration of the
mechanisms underlying the regulation of PD-ECGF/TP expression in
endometrial isolates.
The data presented here clearly demonstrate that expression of
PD-ECGF/TP is regulated by cytokines and ovarian steroids in human
endometrial isolates. The pattern of cytokine induction of PD-ECGF/TP
was cell dependent. This suggests that different mechanisms of
regulation of expression occur in the epithelium and stroma. In stromal
(NES) cells, IFN-
gave, by far, the strongest induction. In
epithelial (NEE) cells, no single cytokine alone significantly induced
PD-ECGF/TP mRNA expression; however, a combination of IFN-
and
TNF-
strongly induced PD-ECGF/TP expression. The combined presence
of IFN-
and TNF-
often results in an enhanced or diminished
biological response. For example, IFN-
increases production of
TNF-
and expression of the cell surface receptors for TNF-
in a
variety of different cell types (20, 21, 22, 23). In turn, TNF-
stimulates
IFN-
production by natural killer cells (22, 23, 24, 25).
The strongest ovarian hormone induction of PD-ECGF/TP occurred with a combination of P and TGF-ß1 in NEE but not in NES cells. In a recent paper, an induction of PD-ECGF/TP in NES cells by P was reported (26), although a fold induction was not given. We have found this induction in NES cells to be small (3-fold) and not to be enhanced when combined with TGF-ß1. These authors also showed that PDECGF/TP is expressed in the human endometrium predominantly in the stroma, and not in the glands, during the early secretory phase of the cycle. The reason for this discrepancy between the work of Osuga et al. (26) and ours is not known but may arise as a result of using different antibodies, specimens, and staining techniques.
Expression of TGF-ß1 mRNA and protein in human endometrium occurs in the luminal and glandular epithelial cells and varies during the menstrual cycle, with the highest level in the late proliferative and early to midluteal phases of the cycle (27). P receptor expression is high in the glands of the proliferative phase of the cycle and then falls (28). P receptor expression on the stromal component of the endometrium is largely cycle independent (28). P alone stimulates TGF-ß1 and ß2 expression in endometrial epithelium in ovariectomized rats (29) and TGF-ß1 expression in human endometrial stroma (30). Serum P levels increase after ovulation and peak in the midluteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Thus, the increase in the expression of PD-ECGF/TP in glandular epithelium, seen on immunohistochemistry, parallels the appearance of P and TGF-ß1 in endometrium. We postulate from the in vitro experiments that it is this unique combination of P and TGF-ß1 that is principally responsible for PD-ECGF/TP expression in the endometrium. This would explain why the expression of PD-ECGF/TP was not detected in endometrial adenocarcinomas, which in all cases examined, were from postmenopausal women in whom P is absent.
Lymphoid aggregates are a common feature in the endometrial basalis during the luteal and menstrual phases of the cycle. These aggregates secrete the cytokines (amongst others) that have been shown to induce PD-ECGF/TP expression, and it was not surprising to find strong immunostaining of PD-ECGF/TP in the epithelium and stroma adjacent to such aggregates.
PD-ECGF/TP is highly expressed in the normal human endometrium but not in endometrial carcinoma; this is in stark contrast to expression in other tissues, where increased expression has been found in neoplastic tissue, compared with that in normal tissue (31, 32). Expression is particularly strong in the mammary carcinoma, compared with normal breast tissue (5, 7). Curiously, despite the lack of PD-ECGF/TP expression in endometrial carcinoma described here and postulated to be caused by the absence of P in those patients, this is clearly not the case in breast carcinoma, where most of the cases we previously examined were from postmenopausal women (5). It is unclear, at present, what mechanism(s) is responsible for these dramatic differences in PD-ECGF/TP expression in the breast and endometrium, especially in that both tissues are influenced by the ovarian steroids.
In summary, this study has demonstrated that PD-ECGF/TP is present in the human endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle and that its expression is differentially regulated by cytokines and ovarian steroids. In vitro studies point to the regulation of PD-ECGF/TP expression in this tissue by a unique combination of P and TGF-ß1; this is in accord with the immunohistochemistry. These findings are consistent with PD-ECGF/TP playing a critical role in the regeneration of microvasculature during endometrial development.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received April 4, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L.L. Nikitenko, I.Z. MacKenzie, M.C.P. Rees, and R. Bicknell Adrenomedullin is an autocrine regulator of endothelial growth in human endometrium Mol. Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2000; 6(9): 811 - 819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Sivridis, A. Giatromanolaki, M. I Koukourakis, R. Bicknell, A. L Harris, and K. C Gatter Thymidine phosphorylase expression in normal and hyperplastic endometrium J. Clin. Pathol., September 1, 2000; 53(9): 704 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hague, L. Zhang, M. K. Oehler, S. Manek, I. Z. MacKenzie, R. Bicknell, and M. C. P. Rees Expression of the Hypoxically Regulated Angiogenic Factor Adrenomedullin Correlates with Uterine Leiomyoma Vascular Density Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2000; 6(7): 2808 - 2814. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |