help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ge, R.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ge, R.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, M. P.
Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 12 5089-5095
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Developmental Changes in Glucocorticoid Receptor and 11ß-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Oxidative and Reductive Activities in Rat Leydig Cells1

Ren-Shan Ge, Dianne O. Hardy, James F. Catterall and Matthew P. Hardy

The Population Council and Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Matthew P. Hardy, The Population Council, 1230 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021. E-mail: hardy{at}popcbr.rockefeller.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Glucocorticoids directly regulate testosterone production in Leydig cells through a glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-mediated repression of the genes that encode testosterone biosynthetic enzymes. The extent of this action is determined by the numbers of GR within the Leydig cell, the intracellular concentration of glucocorticoid, and 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11ßHSD) activities that interconvert corticosterone (in the rat) and its biologically inert derivative, 11-dehydrocorticosterone. As glucocorticoid levels remain stable during pubertal development, GR numbers and 11ßHSD activities are the primary determinants of glucocorticoid action. Therefore, in the present study, levels of GR and 11ßHSD messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein were measured in rat Leydig cells at three stages of pubertal differentiation: mesenchymal-like progenitors (PLC) on day 21, immature Leydig cells (ILC) that secrete 5{alpha}-reduced androgens on day 35, and adult Leydig cells (ALC) that are fully capable of testosterone biosynthesis on day 90. Numbers of GR, measured by [3H]dexamethasone binding, in purified cells were 6.34 ± 0.27 (x103 sites/cell; mean ± SE) for PLC, 30.45 ± 0.74 for ILC, and 32.54 ± 0.84 for ALC. Although GR binding was lower in PLC, steady state levels for GR mRNA were equivalent at all three stages (P > 0.05). Oxidative and reductive activities of 11ßHSD were measured by assaying the conversion of radiolabeled substrates in incubations of intact Leydig cells. Both oxidative and reductive activities were barely detectable in PLC, intermediate in ILC, and highest in ALC. The ratio of the two activities favored reduction in PLC and ILC and oxidation in ALC (oxidation/reduction, 0.33 ± 0.33 for PLC, 0.43 ± 0.05 for ILC, and 2.12 ± 0.9 for ALC, with a ratio of 1 indicating equivalent rates for both activities). The mRNA and protein levels of type I 11ßHSD in Leydig cells changed in parallel with 11ßHSD reductive activity, which increased gradually during the transition from PLC to ALC, compared with the sharp rise that was seen in oxidative activity. We conclude that Leydig cells at all developmental stages have GR and that their ability to respond to glucocorticoid diminishes as net 11ßHSD activity switches from reduction to oxidation. This provides a mechanism for the Leydig cell to regulate its intracellular concentration of corticosterone, thereby varying its response to this steroid during pubertal development.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
GLUCOCORTICOIDS play a fundamental role in the differentiation and growth of animal tissues by modulating gene expression (1). The effects of glucocorticoids are exerted through their receptors (GR), which, when bound to ligand, associate with specific DNA sequences, termed glucocorticoid response elements, that are present in the target gene promoter and either increase or repress transcription (2). GR can also interfere with the transcriptional activity of factors such as the AP-1 transcription complex by direct protein to protein interactions (3). The Leydig cell responds to glucocorticoids and is known to contain GR (4, 5). Although the main function of glucocorticoids in adult Leydig cells is inhibition of testosterone biosynthesis (6, 7, 8), glucocorticoids may have other functions during Leydig cell development. In this regard, glucocorticoids have been shown to increase the ability of Leydig cell precursors to respond to LH (9). In addition, GR-modulated genes such as 3{alpha}-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3{alpha}HSD) and insulin-like growth factor I are expressed in Leydig cell precursors (10, 11); however, the role of 3{alpha}HSD in the testis has not been determined. Furthermore, the presence of GR in Leydig cell precursors has not been directly established.

11ßHSD, which catalyzes the interconversion of glucocorticoid [corticosterone (CORT) in the rat] and its biologically inert metabolite, 11-dehydrocorticosterone (11DHC), is an important determinant of the intracellular level of bioactive steroid (reviewed in Ref.12). Predominance of the oxidative activity results in glucocorticoid inactivation, whereas the reverse reaction, 11ßHSD reduction, has the opposite effect. In organs such as liver and lung, 11ßHSD acts primarily as a reductase, increasing the availability of active glucocorticoids (13, 14). Recent studies show that reductase activity predominates in both human and rat type I 11ßHSD (15, 16). In contrast, the other 11ßHSD isoform, type II, has been found to be exclusively oxidative in other organs, such as the kidney, where it lowers glucocorticoid concentrations, preventing this steroid from binding nonspecifically to mineralocorticoid receptors (17). In humans, the condition of apparent mineralocorticoid excess results from deficient 11ßHSD oxidation, which is believed to be responsible for the abnormal increase in intracellular glucocorticoid; this is associated with mutations in the gene for type II, not type I (reviewed in Ref.18).

It has been established that 11ßHSD is a predominant oxidase in freshly isolated intact adult Leydig cells (19). However, Phillips et al. (20) observed that type I 11ßHSD is abundantly expressed in Leydig cells only after 4 weeks postpartum near the midpoint of puberty. Therefore, it was unclear whether GR-mediated action and glucocorticoid metabolism by 11ßHSD are involved in Leydig cell development. In the present study, we asked whether GR and 11ßHSD messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein are present in Leydig cells undergoing pubertal differentiation. Postnatal development of Leydig cells can be divided conceptually into three distinct stages of differentiation: initially, they exist as mesenchymal-like progenitors (PLC) by day 21; subsequently, as immature Leydig cells (ILC) by day 35, they acquire steroidogenic organelle structure and enzyme activities, but metabolize most of the testosterone that they synthesize; finally, as adult Leydig cells (ALC) by day 90, they actively produce testosterone (reviewed in Ref.21). Steady state levels of GR mRNA and numbers of glucocorticoid-binding sites were measured at these three distinct stages, as were 11ßHSD mRNA and oxidative and reductive activities. In contrast to the adult, 11ßHSD net reduction prevailed over oxidation in precursor stages of the Leydig cell.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
Sprague-Dawley rats (dams with litters of male pups, immature males, and adult males) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA). The males rats were 21, 35, and 90 days of age on the day of cell isolation. The animals were killed by asphyxiation with CO2. The animal protocol was approved by the institutional animal care and use committee of the Rockefeller University (Protocol 91200).

Cell isolation
PLC from 20 21-day-old rats, ILC from 15 35-day-old rats, and ALC from six 90-day-old rats were purified as described previously (22). Purities of Leydig cell fractions were evaluated by histochemical staining for 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity, with 0.4 mM etiocholanolone as the steroid substrate (23). In the PLC fraction, approximately 90% of the cells were lightly stained, and of the remaining 10%, 6% were intensely stained. More than 95% ILC and ALC were intensely stained.

[3H]Dexamethasone binding
The measurement of competitive binding to [3H]dexamethasone was performed using intact Leydig cells as previously described (24). In brief, Leydig cells were incubated in suspension (1 x 106 cells in 0.4 ml) at 34 C for 1 h in phenol red-free Leydig cell medium (DMEM-Ham’s F-12), containing 0.78–50 nM [3H]dexamethasone (DuPont-New England Nuclear, Boston, MA; 46 Ci/mmol). A preliminary study showed that incubation for 1 h was sufficient to reach steady state binding. To correct for nonspecific binding, control tubes were incubated in the presence of a 200-fold excess of unlabeled dexamethasone. After incubation, cells were centrifuged and washed three times with 1.5 ml ice-cold PBS (0.01 M; pH 7.4) containing 1% BSA and pelleted by centrifugation. The cell pellets were lysed with 0.5 ml hyamine hydroxide (ICN Radiochemicals, Irvine, CA), and radioactivity was determined in a ß-counter.

Determination of 11ßHSD oxidative and reductive activities
11ßHSD oxidative and reductive activities were measured in intact Leydig cells as previously described (25). For the assay of 11ßHSD oxidative activity, isolated intact Leydig cells (0.2 x 106) were incubated with 25 nM [3H]CORT (DuPont-New England Nuclear; 88 Ci/mmol) in 0.5 ml phenol-red free medium (DMEM) at 34 C for 5 min. For 11ßHSD reductive activity, 25 nM [3H]11DHC, synthesized from [3H]CORT according to the technique described by Lakshmi and Monder (26), was used instead of [3H]CORT. The reaction was stopped by adding 2 ml ice-cold ethyl acetate. The steroids were extracted with ethyl acetate, and the organic layer was dried under nitrogen. The steroids were separated chromatographically on thin layer plates in chloroform-methanol (90:10), and the radioactivity was measured with a scanning radiometer (System 200/AC3000, Bioscan, Washington DC). The percent conversion of CORT to 11DHC and of 11DHC to CORT was calculated by dividing the radioactive counts identified as 11DHC (or CORT, respectively) by the total counts associated with CORT plus 11DHC.

RT-PCR detection of GR and 11ßHSD mRNAs
Rat GR and 11ßHSD complementary DNA (cDNA) fragments were amplified by RT-PCR using total RNA from Leydig cells according to a previously described procedure (27). In brief, total RNA was extracted from isolated Leydig cells by a single step method, using phenol and guanidinium thiocyanate (Tri-Reagent, Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH). Leydig cell total RNA (400 ng) was used as the template for avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase in the presence of random hexamers and deoxyribonucleotides at 42 C for 75 min, and the reaction was terminated by heating at 95 C for 5 min. GR or type I 11ßHSD cDNA was coamplified with ribosomal protein S16 (RPS16) cDNA as an internal standard. PCR was initiated by Taq DNA polymerase in the presence of [{alpha}-32P]deoxy-CTP and was allowed to proceed for 30 cycles with an annealing temperature of 50 C. The sequences of primers for GR (forward, 5'-TGCAGCAGTGAAATGGGCAA-3'; reverse, 5'-GGGAATTCAATACTCATGGTC-3') were based on the rat GR cDNA sequence (28). The primer sequences for type I 11ßHSD (forward, 5'-GAAGAAGCATGGAGGTCAAC-3'; reverse, 5'-CTCAAGATTATCCCAGAGGT-3') were based on the sequence of rat type I 11ßHSD cDNA (29). The GR PCR product (533 bp) was confirmed by sequence analysis. The identity of the PCR product for type I (288 bp) 11ßHSD was confirmed by restriction enzyme analysis after digestion with FokI. Primer sequences for RPS16 were reported previously (27). Radioactive PCR bands were visualized on autoradiographic film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY). Quantitative analysis of mRNA levels was performed by scanning the films with a densitometer (Ultrascan, LKB, Bromma, Sweden). The films were exposed and developed so that the optical densities of bands fell within a linear gray scale on the response curve. The background signals from the blank areas of the films were subtracted from the specific, band-associated signals, after which the signal intensities for GR and type I 11ßHSD were normalized to RPS16.

Western blot analysis of type I 11ßHSD
Leydig cells were homogenized and boiled in equal volumes of sample loading buffer, a Tris-Cl buffer (pH 6.8) containing 20% glycerol, 5% SDS, 3.1% dithiothreitol, and 0.001% bromophenol blue. Homogenized samples (25 µg protein) of PLC, ILC, and ALC and a positive control, liver, were electrophoresed on 10% polyacrylamide gels containing SDS (30). Proteins were electrophoretically transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes, and after 30-min exposure to 10% nonfat milk to block nonspecific binding, the membranes were incubated with a 1:2000 dilution of a rabbit polyclonal antitype I 11ßHSD antibody (no. 56-127) that was generated by immunizing animals (31) with type I 11ßHSD purified from rat liver. The membranes were then washed and incubated with a 1:2000 dilution of goat antirabbit antiserum that was conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. The washing step was repeated, and immunoreactive bands were visualized by chemiluminescence using a kit (ECL, Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). Protein levels were measured by densitometry of the films as described for PCR band analysis and normalized to liver type I 11ßHSD.

Data analysis
In each experiment, data were obtained from triplicate assays, and the results are expressed as the mean ± SE. The dissociation constants (Kd) and the maximal binding (Bmax) for [3H]dexamethasone in Leydig cells were estimated by calculation of the Scatchard plots of the ratio of the amount of ligand bound (B) to the amount of free ligand (F) on the y-axis against the amount of B on the x-axis (32). Statistical analysis of the changes in [3H]dexamethasone-binding sites and 11ßHSD oxidative and reductive activities was performed by Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA followed by multiple comparisons testing to identify significant differences between groups (33). Statistical analysis of the relative levels of GR mRNA and type I 11ßHSD mRNA and protein was performed after arcsin transformation of the ratio data (31).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
[3H]Dexamethasone-binding sites and GR mRNA in Leydig cells
To determine whether precursors in the Leydig cell lineage contain GR, intact PLC, ILC, and ALC were analyzed for [3H]dexamethasone binding. As shown in Fig. 1aGo, all three stages of the Leydig cell possessed [3H]dexamethasone-binding sites, indicating that they contained GR. The binding affinity of Leydig cell binding sites was unchanged during pubertal development, with dissociation constants (Kd) of 5.05 ± 0.91, 4.91 ± 0.53, and 4.64 ± 0.55 nM for PLC, ILC, and ALC, respectively. However, the numbers of binding sites were higher in ILC and ALC compared with PLC (Fig. 1bGo), with 30.45 ± 0.74 (x103 sites/cell; mean ± SE; P < 0.05) in ILC and 32.54 ± 0.84 in ALC vs. 6.34 ± 0.27 in PLC. This suggested that GR was present in each of the three stages of the Leydig cell, and that GR numbers increase in Leydig cells as they differentiate.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Binding of [3H]dexamethasone ([3H]DEX) to Leydig cells. Specific binding of [3H]dexamethasone to glucocorticoid receptors in Leydig cell progenitors (•), immature Leydig cells ({circ}), and adult Leydig cells ({blacksquare}) was determined in intact cells as described in Materials and Methods. Binding was determined over a concentration range of 0.8–50 nM [3H]dexamethasone in the absence or presence of a 500-fold excess of unlabeled dexamethasone for 1 h at 34 C. The saturation plot is shown in a. The inset presents the Scatchard plot of the binding data. The numbers of glucocorticoid binding sites are calculated for conditions of maximum binding (b). Each point is the mean of triplicate assays and is representative of three experiments performed. Shared alphabet letters refer to groups that were not significantly different at P < 0.05.

 
A RT-PCR assay was performed to evaluate steady state GR mRNA levels in Leydig cells. A PCR fragment (533 bp in length) generated from rat GR was detected in all three stages of Leydig cell. Quantification of the results was possible because the RT-PCR assays were performed under conditions that produced a linear range of specific amplification of GR mRNA (data not shown). After normalization to RPS16, steady state mRNA levels for GR were equivalent in all three stages of the Leydig cell (Fig. 2Go). It is unlikely, therefore, that the number of GR is transcriptionally regulated.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Steady state mRNA levels for GR in Leydig cells at three distinct stages of differentiation. Total RNA (400 ng) from PLC, ILC, and ALC was reverse transcribed, and the cDNA products were coamplified in the presence of primer pairs for GR and ribosomal protein S16 (RPS16) by PCR (30 cycles) and were detected by autoradiography. A PCR fragment (533 bp) identified as GR cDNA was present in PLC, ILC, and ALC (upper panel). Steady state mRNA levels for GR normalized to the RPS16 internal control are shown in the lower panel. Values represent the mean ± SE from three independent experiments. Shared alphabet letters refer to groups that were not significantly different at P < 0.05.

 
11ßHSD oxidative and reductive activities in Leydig cells
The response of Leydig cells to glucocorticoid depends not only on the number of GR and the circulating concentration of glucocorticoid, but also on the ratio of 11ßHSD oxidative and reductive activities (12). When oxidation predominates over reduction, 11ßHSD decreases the intracellular availability of active glucocorticoid, attenuating GR-mediated responses. In contrast, if reductive activity predominated over oxidation, 11ßHSD would facilitate responses to glucocorticoid (13, 14). Therefore, 11ßHSD oxidative and reductive activities were measured in the presence of endogenous cofactors. Both 11ßHSD oxidative and reductive activities were low in PLC. Both activities increased during Leydig cell differentiation, and were highest in ALC. Oxidative activities were 0.06 ± 0.06 pmol/min·106 cells (mean ± SE) for PLC, 0.52 ± 0.06 for ILC, and 4.74 ± 0.19 for ALC. Reductive activities were 0.18 ± 0.08 for PLC, 1.21 ± 0.13 for ILC, and 2.23 ± 0.18 for ALC (Fig. 3Go). Although 11ßHSD oxidative and reductive activities both increased from PLC to ILC, the magnitudes of the increases were different. 11ßHSD reduction was favored in PLC and ILC, as demonstrated by ratios of oxidative to reductive activity (0.33 ± 0.33 in PLC and 0.43 ± 0.05 in ILC; with a ratio of 1 indicating equivalent rates for both activities). In contrast, 11ßHSD oxidation was favored over reduction in ALC by a ratio of 2.13 ± 0.09. These results suggested that 11ßHSD oxidative and reductive activities varied independently of one another during Leydig cell differentiation. Moreover, 11ßHSD reductive activity predominated in Leydig cell precursors, whereas in ALC, the enzyme was primarily oxidative.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. 11ßHSD oxidative and reductive activities in Leydig cells at three distinct stages of differentiation. Determination of 11ßHSD oxidative and reductive activities in PLC, ILC, and ALC was performed as described in Materials and Methods. Values represent the mean ± SE from nine different assays in three independent experiments. Shared alphabet letters refer to groups that were not significantly different at P < 0.05.

 
Developmental changes in type I 11ßHSD mRNA and protein in Leydig cells
Previous studies showed that Leydig cells contain type I, but not type II 11ßHSD (25, 34, 35). As type I 11ßHSD is known to have both oxidative and reductive activities, its mRNA levels were measured in the three stages of the Leydig cell. A PCR fragment (288 bp in length) was detected and confirmed by restriction enzyme analysis to be type I. Quantification of type I 11ßHSD mRNA was performed under conditions generating a linear range of amplification (data not shown). After normalization to RPS16, the steady state mRNA levels for type I 11ßHSD were found to increase developmentally, being lowest in PLC, intermediate in ILC, and highest in ALC (Fig. 4Go). Type II 11ßHSD mRNA levels were undetectable in all stages of Leydig cells (data not shown).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Steady state mRNA levels for type I 11ßHSD in Leydig cells at three distinct stages of differentiation. Total RNA (400 ng) from PLC, ILC, and ALC was reverse transcribed, and the complementary DNA products were coamplified in the presence of primer pairs for 11ßHSD and ribosomal protein S16 (RPS16) by PCR (30 cycles) and detected by autoradiography. A PCR fragment (288 bp) identified as 11ßHSD cDNA was present in PLC, ILC, and ALC (upper panel). Steady state mRNA levels of 11ßHSD normalized to the RPS16 internal control are shown in the lower panel. Values represent the mean ± SE from three independent experiments. Shared alphabet letters refer to groups that were not significantly different at P < 0.05.

 
To evaluate further whether type I 11ßHSD protein is associated with 11ßHSD reductive activity in Leydig cells, identical amounts of total protein from PLC, ILC, and ALC were immunoblotted using antitype I 11ßHSD antibody (no. 56-127) and normalized to a positive control liver (Fig. 5Go). As shown in Table 1Go, the increase in type I mRNA and protein in Leydig cells corresponded closely to 11ßHSD reductive activity during the transitions from PLC to ILC and from ILC to ALC. The same did not hold true for oxidative activity, which increased disproportionately during the transition from ILC to ALC. This suggested that type I 11ßHSD contributes both oxidative and reductive activities in the precursor stages of Leydig cells, with the reductive activity being predominant. The large increase in 11ßHSD oxidative activity seen in ALC could either result from a novel isoform expressed in the mature stage in addition to type I (25) or through posttranslational modification of the type I protein.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Protein levels of type I 11ßHSD in Leydig cells at three distinct stages of differentiation. Type I 11ßHSD protein levels in PLC, ILC, and ALC homogenates (25 µg total protein) were measured by immunoblotting using antitype I 11ßHSD antiserum (no. 56-127). Type I 11ßHSD-immunoreactive bands were visualized by chemiluminescence (upper panel). Type I protein levels in Leydig cells were normalized to liver (a positive control tissue). Values represent the mean ± SE for three independent experiments. Shared alphabet letters refer to groups that were not significantly different at P < 0.05.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. 11ßHSD mRNA, protein, oxidative activity, and reductive activity: comparison of Leydig cell stages during pubertal development

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results of the present study show that Leydig cells have GR from early stages of differentiation and have increased capacity for 11ßHSD oxidation in the later stages. A discrepancy was observed between GR mRNA levels, which did not change, and the number of glucocorticoid-binding sites, which showed a large increase between days 21 and 35. It is possible that increased Leydig cell expression of heat shock protein-90 is responsible for the developmental rise in GR binding, because this protein is needed for GR binding activity (36, 37).

The high levels of GR in ILC on day 35 indicate that ILC can respond to glucocorticoid at a time when bioactive CORT reaches its highest serum concentrations (38). Activities of 11ßHSD activities were higher in ILC than in PLC, and 11ßHSD reductive activity predominated over oxidation. As with other tissues in which type I 11ßHSD is postulated to increase concentrations of active glucocorticoid (13, 14), reductive activity was predominant in prepubertal Leydig cells. The high intracellular concentration of CORT resulting from 11ßHSD activity in precursor stages of the Leydig cell is significant in light of studies showing that glucocorticoids potentiate the sensitivity of prepubertal Leydig cells to LH (9) and stimulate the expression of 5{alpha}-reductase and 3{alpha}HSD (39, 40), enzymes that are transiently elevated during Leydig cell differentiation (10, 41). The transient rise in 5{alpha}-reductase and 3{alpha}HSD expression leads to secretion of 5{alpha}-reduced androgens by precursor stages of the Leydig cell (reviewed in Ref.21). In adult Leydig cells, however, glucocorticoids inhibit testosterone production. Therefore, the predominance in oxidative 11ßHSD activity, as we have shown, would be required to inactivate CORT and lower expression of 5{alpha}-reductase and 3{alpha}HSD (10, 30).

The present data show that 11ßHSD oxidative and reductive activities have distinct developmental trends in Leydig cells. As type II 11ßHSD is exclusively oxidative, the reductive activity can only originate from type I 11ßHSD. Accordingly, we examined the relationship between 11ßHSD reductive activity and the amount of the type I isoform in differentiating Leydig cells. The trends for 11ßHSD reductive activity and type I mRNA and protein were parallel, indicating that 11ßHSD reductive activity is conferred by this isoform. In contrast, the predominance of 11ßHSD oxidation in adult Leydig cells is difficult to reconcile with the enzymatic properties of the two known isoforms. Previous studies demonstrated that adult Leydig cells contain type I 11ßHSD mRNA and protein (19, 25) and NADPH-dependent 11ßHSD reductive activity (25). If adult Leydig cells contained type I alone, 11ßHSD reductive activity should predominate, as has been shown for liver, lung, uterus (13, 14, 15, 16), and cell lines transfected with type I 11ßHSD cDNA (42, 43). Type II 11ßHSD is a high affinity NAD-dependent oxidase, but is not detected in adult Leydig cells by Northern blot, in situ hybridization (34, 35), or RT-PCR (25). We have recently shown that ALC contain a high affinity (Km = 41 nM) NADP-dependent 11ßHSD in addition to low affinity oxidative and reductive activities that are typical of type I (25). A high affinity NADP-dependent 11ßHSD in adult Leydig cells would account for the predominance of oxidative activity in the enzyme at the physiological levels of glucocorticoids; under conditions of stress CORT levels (>100 nM), this low capacity component becomes saturated, and the high capacity type I 11ßHSD reductase would then predominate (25, 44).

A low Km, NADP-dependent 11ßHSD with exclusively oxidative activity is also present in sheep kidney and the choriocarcinoma cell line, JEG-3 (45, 46). The presence of a high affinity NADP-dependent 11ßHSD oxidative activity could result from the presence of a third isoform or from posttranslational modification of type I 11ßHSD: type I 11ßHSD is a glycosylated protein, and glycosylation of the correct amino acid residues is required for full enzymatic activity. Mutation in the first potential N-linked glycosylation site (asparagine-X-serine, residues 158–160) had a negligible effect on dehydrogenase activity, but caused a 50% decline in reductive activity. Mutations in the second site (asparagine-X-serine, residues 203–205) completely abolished both activities of the enzyme (47).

In conclusion, GR exist in Leydig cells at all three stages of pubertal development. The presence of GR and the predominance of 11ßHSD reductive activity in prepubertal Leydig cells may be important for their differentiation. The switch in the predominant direction of catalysis of 11ßHSD from reduction to oxidation in adult Leydig cells may protect this cell type from glucocorticoid-mediated inhibition of steroidogenesis. In this way, testosterone production is maintained in the presence of normal serum concentrations of corticosterone and is inhibited only if 11ßHSD oxidative capacity in Leydig cells is exceeded by high levels of corticosterone under stress conditions.


    Acknowledgments
 
The technical assistance of Ms. Chantal Manon Sottas is gratefully acknowledged.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by The Population Council and NIH Grants R29-HD-32588 and R01-HD-33000. Back

Received July 8, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Schmid W, Cole TJ, Blendy JA, Schutz G 1995 Molecular genetic analysis of glucocorticoid signaling in development. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 53:33–35[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Landers JP, Spelsberg TC 1992 New concepts in steroid hormone action: transcription factor proto-oncogenes and the cascade model for steroid regulation of gene expression. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 2:19–63[Medline]
  3. Jonat C, Rahmsdorf HJ, Park KK, Cato ACB, Gebel S, Ponta H, Herrlich P 1990 Antitumor promotion and antiinflammation: down-modulation of AP-1 (Fos/Jun) activity by glucocorticoid hormone. Cell 62:11189–11204
  4. Stalker A, Hermo L, Antakly T 1989 Covalent affinity labeling, radioautography, and immunocytochemistry localize the glucocorticoid receptor in rat testicular Leydig cells. Am J Anat 186:369–377[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Schultz R, Isola J, Parvinen M, Honkaniemi J, Wikstrom AC, Gustafsson JA, Pelto-Huikko M 1993 Localization of the glucocorticoid receptor in testis and accessory sexual organs of male rat. Mol Cell Endocrinol 95:115–120[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Smals AGH, Kloppenborg PWC, Benraad TJ 1977 Plasma testosterone profiles in Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 45:240–245[Abstract]
  7. Bambino T, Hsueh A 1981 Direct inhibitory effect of glucocorticoids upon testicular luteinizing hormone receptor and steroidogenesis in vivo and in vitro. Endocrinology 108:2142–2148[Abstract]
  8. Monder C, Miroff Y, Marandici A, Hardy MP 1994 11ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase alleviates glucocorticoid-mediated inhibition of steroidogenesis in rat Leydig cells. Endocrinology 134:1199–1204[Abstract]
  9. Engel W, Frowein J 1974 Glucocorticoids and hCG sensitivity of rat testicular Leydig cells. Nature 251:146–148[Medline]
  10. Shan L-X, Phillips DM, Bardin CW, Hardy MP 1993 Differential regulation of steroidogenic enzymes during differentiation optimizes testosterone production by adult rat Leydig cells. Endocrinology 133:2277–2283[Abstract]
  11. Lin T, Wang D, Calkins JH, Guo H, Chi R, Hausley PR 1990 Regulation of insulin-like growth factor-I messenger ribonucleic acid expression in Leydig cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 73:147–152[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Monder C, White PC 1993 11ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. Vitam Horm 47:187–271[Medline]
  13. Walker BR, Connacher AA, Lindsay RM, Webb DJ, Edwards CR 1995 Carbenoxolone increases hepatic insulin sensitivity in man: a novel role for 11-oxosteroid reductase in enhancing glucocorticoid receptor activation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:3155–3159[Abstract]
  14. Hundertmark S, Buhler H, Ragosch V, Dinkelborg L, Arabin B, Weitzel HK 1995 Correlation of surfactant phosphatidylcholine synthesis an 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in the fetal lung. Endocrinology 136:2573–2578[Abstract]
  15. Moore CC, Mellon SH, Murai J, Siiteri PK, Miller WL 1993 Structure and function of the hepatic form of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in the squirrel monkey, an animal model of glucocorticoid resistance. Endocrinology 133:368–375[Abstract]
  16. Burton PJ, Dharmarajan AM, Hishen S, Waddell BJ 1996 Induction of myometrial 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type I messenger ribonucleic acid and protein expression late in rat pregnancy. Endocrinology 137:5700–5706[Abstract]
  17. Rusvai E, Naray-Fejes-Toth A 1993 A new isoform of 11-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in aldosterone target cells. J Biol Chem 268:10717–10720[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. White PC, Mune T, Agarwal AK 1997 11ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and the syndrome of apparent mineralocorticoid excess. Endocr Rev 18:135–156[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Gao HB, Ge RS, Lakshmi V, Marandici A, Hardy MP 1997 Hormonal regulation of oxidative and reductive activities 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in rat Leydig cells. Endocrinology 138:156–161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Phillips DM, Lakshmi V, Monder C 1989 Corticosteroid 11ß-dehydrogenase in rat testis. Endocrinology 125:209–216[Abstract]
  21. Benton L, Shan LX, Hardy MP 1995 Differentiation of adult Leydig cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 53:61–68[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Shan LX, Hardy MP 1992 Developmental changes in the levels of luteinizing hormone receptor and androgen receptor in rat Leydig cells. Endocrinology 131:1107–1114[Abstract]
  23. Payne AH, Downing JR, Wong KL 1980 Luteinizing hormone receptors and testosterone synthesis in two distinct population of Leydig cells. Endocrinology 106:1424–1429[Abstract]
  24. Naray-Fejes-Toth A, Rusvai E, Fejes-Toth G 1994 Is the renal type III corticosteroid-binding site the collecting duct-specific isoform of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase? Endocrinology 134:1671–1675[Abstract]
  25. Ge RS, Gao HB, Nacharaju VL, Gunsalus GL, Hardy MP 1997 Identification of a kinetically distinct activity of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in rat Leydig cells. Endocrinology 138:2435–2442[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Lakshmi V, Monder C 1985 Evidence for independent 11-oxidase and 11-reductase activities of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase: enzyme latency, phase transitions, and lipid requirements. Endocrinology 116:552–560[Abstract]
  27. Shan L-X, Hardy DO, Catterall JF, Hardy MP 1994 Effects of luteinizing hormone (LH) and androgen on steady state levels of messenger ribonucleic acid for LH receptors, androgen acceptors, and steroidogenic enzymes in rat Leydig cell progenitors in vivo. Endocrinology 136:1686–1693[Abstract]
  28. Miesfeld R, Rusconi S, Godowski P, Maler B, Okret S, Wikstrom A, Gustafsson J, Yamamoto K 1986 Genetic complementation of a glucocorticoid receptor deficiency by expression of cloned receptor cDNA. Cell 46:389–399[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Agarwal AK, Monder C, Eckstein B, White PC 1989 Cloning and expression of rat cDNA encoding corticosteroid 11ß-dehydrogenase. J Biol Chem 264:18939–18943[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl 1995 Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Greene and Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 10.0.1–10.20.11
  31. Monder C, Lakshmi V 1990 Corticosteroid 11ß-dehydrogenase of rat tissues: immunological studies. Endocrinology 126:2435–2443[Abstract]
  32. Scatchard G 1949 The attractions of proteins for small molecules and ions. Ann NY Acad Sci 51:660–672[CrossRef]
  33. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ 1995 Biometry, ed 3. Freeman, New York
  34. Roland BL, Funder JW 1996 Localization of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 in rat tissues: in situ studies. Endocrinology 137:1123–1128[Abstract]
  35. Li KXZ, Smith RE, Ferrari P, Funder JW, Krozowski ZS 1996 Rat 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 enzyme is expressed at low levels in the placenta and is modulated by adrenal steroids in the kidney. Mol Cell Endocrinol 120:67–75[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Whitesell L, Cook P 1996 Stable and specific binding of heat shock protein 90 by geldanamycin disrupts glucocorticoid receptor function in intact cells. Mol Endocrinol 10:705–712[Abstract]
  37. Mendel DB, Bodwell JE, Munck A 1986 Glucocorticoid receptors lacking hormone-binding activity are bound in nuclei of ATP-depleted cells. Nature 324:478–480[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Henning SJ 1978 Plasma concentration of total and free corticosterone during development in the rat. Am J Physiol 235:E451–E456
  39. Viger RS, Robaire B 1995 Steady state steroid 5{alpha}-reductase messenger ribonucleic acid levels and immunocytochemical localization of the type I protein in the rat testis during postnatal development. Endocrinology 136:5409–5415[Abstract]
  40. Carsia RV, Scanes CG, Malamed S 1984 Self-suppression of corticosteroidogenesis: evidence for a role of adrenal 5{alpha}-reductase. Endocrinology 115:2464–2472[Abstract]
  41. Penning TM 1996 3{alpha}-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase: three dimensional structure and gene regulation. J Endocrinol 150:S175–S187
  42. Duperrex H, Kenouch S, Gaeggeler HP, Seckl JR, Edwards CR, Farman N, Rossier BC 1993 Rat liver 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase complementary deoxyribonucleic acid encodes oxoreductase activity in a mineralocorticoid-responsive toad bladder cell line. Endocrinology 132:612–619[Abstract]
  43. Low SC, Chapman KE, Edwards CR, Seckl JR 1994 ‘Liver-type’ 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase cDNA encodes reductase but not dehydrogenase activity in intact mammalian COS-7 cells. J Mol Endocrinol 13:167–174[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Leckie CM, Seckl JR Rat testicular 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and Leydig cell function. 10th International Congress of Endocrinology, San Francisco CA, 1996, p 540 (Abstract)
  45. Gomez-Sanchez EP, Cox DL, Foecking M, Ganjam V, Gomez-Sanchez CE 1996 11ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase of the choriocarcinoma cell line JEG-3 and their inhibition by glycyrrhetinic acid and other natural substances. Steroids 61:110–115[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Gomez-Sanchez EP, Ganjam V, Chen YJ, Cox DL, Zhou MY, Thanigaraj S, Gomez-Sanchez CE 1997 The sheep kidney contains a novel unidirectional, high affinity NADP+-dependent 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11ß-HSD-3). Steroids 62:444–450[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Agarwal AK, Mune T, Monder C, White PC 1995 Mutations in putative glycosylation sites of rat 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase affect enzymatic activity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1248:70–74[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
K. J Teerds, E. Rijntjes, M. B Veldhuizen-Tsoerkan, F. F G Rommerts, and M. de Boer-Brouwer
The development of rat Leydig cell progenitors in vitro: how essential is luteinising hormone?
J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2007; 194(3): 579 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
L M Thurston, D R E Abayasekara, and A E Michael
11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase expression and activities in bovine granulosa cells and corpora lutea implicate corticosteroids in bovine ovarian physiology
J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2007; 193(2): 299 - 310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. C. Jonas, C. Chandras, D. R. E. Abayasekara, and A. E. Michael
Role for Prostaglandins in the Regulation of Type 1 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase in Human Granulosa-Lutein Cells
Endocrinology, December 1, 2006; 147(12): 5865 - 5872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
Y. Ozaki, M. Higuchi, C. Miura, S. Yamaguchi, Y. Tozawa, and T. Miura
Roles of 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase in Fish Spermatogenesis
Endocrinology, November 1, 2006; 147(11): 5139 - 5146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
K. Lister, D. J. Autelitano, A. Jenkins, R. D. Hannan, and K. E. Sheppard
Cross talk between corticosteroids and alpha-adrenergic signalling augments cardiomyocyte hypertrophy: A possible role for SGK1
Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2006; 70(3): 555 - 565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
R.-S. Ge, Q. Dong, E.-m. Niu, C. M. Sottas, D. O. Hardy, J. F. Catterall, S. A. Latif, D. J. Morris, and M. P. Hardy
11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase 2 in Rat Leydig Cells: Its Role in Blunting Glucocorticoid Action at Physiological Levels of Substrate
Endocrinology, June 1, 2005; 146(6): 2657 - 2664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. N. Hewitt, E. A. Walker, and P. M. Stewart
Minireview: Hexose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase and Redox Control of 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 1 Activity
Endocrinology, June 1, 2005; 146(6): 2539 - 2543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R.-S. Ge, Q. Dong, C. M. Sottas, H. Chen, B. R. Zirkin, and M. P. Hardy
Gene Expression in Rat Leydig Cells During Development from the Progenitor to Adult Stage: A Cluster Analysis
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2005; 72(6): 1405 - 1415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
Q. Dong, A. Salva, C. M. Sottas, E. Niu, M. Holmes, and M. P. Hardy
Rapid Glucocorticoid Mediation of Suppressed Testosterone Biosynthesis in Male Mice Subjected to Immobilization Stress
J Androl, November 1, 2004; 25(6): 973 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
J. W. Tomlinson, E. A. Walker, I. J. Bujalska, N. Draper, G. G. Lavery, M. S. Cooper, M. Hewison, and P. M. Stewart
11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 1: A Tissue-Specific Regulator of Glucocorticoid Response
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2004; 25(5): 831 - 866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
A Wagner and R Claus
Involvement of glucocorticoids in testicular involution after active immunization of boars against GnRH
Reproduction, February 1, 2004; 127(2): 275 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
B. J. Waddell, S. Hisheh, Z. S. Krozowski, and P. J. Burton
Localization of 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Types 1 and 2 in the Male Reproductive Tract
Endocrinology, July 1, 2003; 144(7): 3101 - 3106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. P. Hardy, C. M. Sottas, R. Ge, C. R. McKittrick, K. L. Tamashiro, B. S. McEwen, S. G. Haider, C. M. Markham, R. J. Blanchard, D. C. Blanchard, et al.
Trends of Reproductive Hormones in Male Rats During Psychosocial Stress: Role of Glucocorticoid Metabolism in Behavioral Dominance
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2002; 67(6): 1750 - 1755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M.L. Barreiro, F. Gaytan, J.E. Caminos, L. Pinilla, F.F. Casanueva, E. Aguilar, C. Dieguez, and M. Tena-Sempere
Cellular Location and Hormonal Regulation of Ghrelin Expression in Rat Testis
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2002; 67(6): 1768 - 1776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
I. J. Bujalska, E. A. Walker, M. Hewison, and P. M. Stewart
A Switch in Dehydrogenase to Reductase Activity of 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 1 upon Differentiation of Human Omental Adipose Stromal Cells
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2002; 87(3): 1205 - 1210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H.-B. Gao, M.-H. Tong, Y.-Q. Hu, Q.-S. Guo, R. Ge, and M. P. Hardy
Glucocorticoid Induces Apoptosis in Rat Leydig Cells
Endocrinology, January 1, 2002; 143(1): 130 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
R. M. Sapolsky, L. M. Romero, and A. U. Munck
How Do Glucocorticoids Influence Stress Responses? Integrating Permissive, Suppressive, Stimulatory, and Preparative Actions
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2000; 21(1): 55 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
E. P. Gomez-Sanchez
Editorial: First There Was One, Then Two . . . Why More 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenases?
Endocrinology, December 1, 1997; 138(12): 5087 - 5088.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ge, R.-S.