Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 12 5293-5300
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society
Both Androgen Receptor and Glucocorticoid Receptor Are Able to Induce Prostate-Specific Antigen Expression, but Differ in Their Growth-Stimulating Properties of LNCaP Cells1
C. B. J. M. Cleutjens,
K. Steketee,
C. C. E. M. van Eekelen,
J. A. G. M. van der Korput,
A. O. Brinkmann and
J. Trapman
Departments of Pathology (C.B.J.M.C., K.S., C.C.E.M.v.E.,
J.A.G.M.v.d.K, J.T.) and Endocrinology and Reproduction (A.O.B.),
Erasmus University DR Rotterdam 3000, The Netherlands
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. C. B. J. M. Cleutjens, Department of Pathology, Erasmus University, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail:
cleutjens{at}pa1.fgg.eur.nl
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Androgen receptor-positive LNCaP cells were stably transfected with a
rat glucocorticoid receptor (GR) expression plasmid. Ligand-binding
studies in the generated cell lines revealed high-affinity binding of
the cognate ligands to their receptors. Transfection experiments with
the newly derived cell lines showed that, like androgen receptor, GR
can induce activity of a prostate-specific antigen promoter fragment
linked to the luciferase gene. Similarly, dexamethasone can stimulate
expression of endogenous prostate-specific antigen messenger RNA. Cell
proliferation could be induced by R1881. In contrast, dexamethasone
treatment of the GR-positive sublines had no stimulatory effect on cell
growth. Using the differential display technique, a so far unknown
complementary DNA fragment, designated 21.1, specifically induced by
androgens and not by glucocorticoids, has been identified. In
conclusion, the newly generated cell lines, together with the parental
LNCaP cell line, form an attractive system with which to study the
mechanism of specificity of steroid hormone regulation of gene
expression.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
STEROID HORMONES affect many biological
activities of the cell by modulating gene activity via interaction with
specific nuclear receptors (1, 2, 3). Upon ligand binding, steroid
receptors interact with specific DNA sequences and regulate the
transcriptional activity of target genes (1, 2, 3, 4). The glucocorticoid
receptor (GR), mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), progesterone receptor
(PR), and androgen receptor (AR) bind with high affinity to a DNA
element composed of an inverted repeat, separated by a 3-bp spacer
sequence. The consensus high- affinity binding site for GR, MR, PR, and
AR (HRE: hormone response element) is identical (5, 6, 7, 8). Although there
are genes that can be regulated by more than one specific steroid
hormone receptor, the biological function of the different receptors is
quite distinct. This presents the problem of specific gene activation
in the event that multiple receptors, which recognize the same
DNA-binding site, are present in one and the same cell. Several
mutually nonexclusive mechanisms to explain specificity, including
subtle differences in receptor-DNA interaction, specificity of the
interaction of the receptor with other proteins, receptor levels, and
ligand availability, have been proposed (1, 2, 3).
LNCaP is an androgen-sensitive human prostatic carcinoma cell line (9)
that expresses AR, but lacks GR and PR (10, 11). It was shown
previously that growth of LNCaP cells, maintained in steroid-depleted
culture medium, is stimulated by the addition of androgens (11). The
synthetic androgen R1881, at a concentration of 10-10
M, increases the growth rate; a higher R1881 concentration
is suboptimal to cell proliferation and might even have no stimulatory
effect. Androgen treatment of LNCaP cells increases the messenger RNA
(mRNA) level and production and secretion of prostate-specific antigen
(PSA) (12, 13, 14).
In the present study we describe the generation and initial
characterization of LNCaP sublines, in which the GR was stably
expressed. In this way a system was established for comparison of AR
and GR molecular and biological functions in a well defined cell line
expressing comparable amounts of both receptors.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Cell culture
LNCaP prostate cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented
with 5% FCS (Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany) and antibiotics. For
transfection, cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 5% FCS.
Plasmids and probes
The rat GR expression plasmid PSTC-GR(3795) and the selection
plasmid pSV2Neo were described previously (15, 16).
PSA-61-LUC was generated by integration of a 6-kb
HindIII-HindIII (-6000/+12) fragment of the PSA
promoter in the multiple cloning site of pLUC (17). Southern and
Northern blots were hybridized with a rat (r) GR complementary DNA
(cDNA) fragment (nucleotide 22562543) obtained by PCR amplification
with primers: 5'-GAGTCTCACAAGACACTTCG-3' and 5'-GAAACATCCATGAGTACTG-3'
and plasmid PSTC-GR(3795) as template using standard methods.
Northern blots were hybridized with the 320-bp
EcoRI-ClaI fragment of PSA75 cDNA (18), and a
1.2-kb PstI-PstI hamster actin cDNA fragment as a
control.
Transfections
Stable transfection. LNCaP cells were transfected according
to the calcium phosphate precipitation method essentially as described
(19), using 3 x 106 cells per 10-cm dish, 10 µg
PSTC-GR(3795) and 2 µg pSV2Neo. After overnight
incubation with the precipitate, the culture medium was replaced by
PBS, containing 15% glycerol (incubation for 90 sec at room
temperature). Subsequently, transfected cells were incubated in culture
medium for 24 h. Next, culture medium was replaced by maintenance
medium supplemented with G418 (GIBCO BRL, Grand Island, NY) at a
concentration of 1.2 mg/ml. The resulting G418-resistant clones were
seeded into 96-well plates and selected for GR expression by
immunohistochemistry (see below).
Transient transfection. The GR-positive clones LNCaP-1B7 and
LNCaP-1F5 and the parental LNCaP cells were transiently transfected
according to the calcium phosphate method using 1 x
106 cells per 25-cm2 flask and 5 µg
PSA-61-LUC. After overnight incubation with the precipitate, the
culture medium was removed and cells were shocked in PBS, containing
15% glycerol (90 sec at room temperature). Subsequently, transfected
cells were incubated in culture medium in the absence or presence of 10
nM of the synthetic glucocorticoid dexamethasone (Dex)
(Sigma, St. Louis, MO) or 1 nM R1881 (DuPont NEN, Boston,
MA) for 24 h. Transfections were performed three times in
duplicate, using two independent plasmid isolates. Luciferase
activities were corrected for variations in protein concentrations in
100-µl cell extract samples.
Luciferase assay
Cells were washed once in PBS and subsequently lysed in 300 µl
lysis buffer (25 mM Tris-phosphate, pH 7.8, 8
mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1%
Triton X-100, 15% glycerol). Next, 100 µl 0.1 µM
luciferin (Sigma)/0.25 µM ATP were added to 100 µl
extract, and luciferase activity was measured in a LUMAC 2500 M
Biocounter (LUMAC, Landgraaf, The Netherlands). After a delay of 2 sec
(according to the supplier), the light emission during 5 sec was
recorded.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunostaining for GR was performed with the monoclonal anti-GR
(rat) antibody Mab 7 (20). Cells were seeded at a density of 3 x
105 cells per well on sterile micro slides in four-well
tissue culture plates (Heraeus Instruments, Hanau, Germany) in
maintenance medium supplemented with G418 and cultured until 5060%
confluence. Next, 10 nM Dex was added, and the incubation
was continued for 24 h. Cells were washed in PBS and fixed for 10
min in 10% phosphate-buffered formalin (pH 7.4). Subsequently, the
slides were rinsed in PBS (pH 7.4), and attached cells were made
permeable in methanol (-20 C, 5 min) and acetone (-20 C, 2 min).
After rehydration in PBS, the slides were incubated in 5% nonimmune
rabbit serum in PBS followed by overnight incubation in 1:1000 diluted
monoclonal antibody Mab7 at 4 C. Excess antibody was removed, and rGR
immunoreactivity was visualized using rabbit antimouse Ig (DAKO,
Glostrup, Denmark) as secondary antibody and mouse monoclonal
peroxidase antiperoxidase complexes (DAKO) as third-step reagent. After
three PBS washes, the slides were incubated with diaminobenzidine. The
reaction was stopped in water. Cells were counterstained with Mayers
hematoxylin.
Southern and Northern blot analysis
Total cellular DNA of LNCaP- and GR-positive sublines LNCaP-1F5
and LNCaP-1B7 was isolated using standard procedures (21). Ten
micrograms of DNA were digested with EcoRI for 16 h,
electrophoresed on 0.8% agarose gel, and transferred to a Hybond
N+ membrane (Amersham, Cardiff, UK). Filters were
hybridized at high stringency with random primed
32P-labeled probes. Both DNA transfer and filter
hybridization were carried out according to the protocol of the
manufacturer.
Isolation of total cellular RNA from the different cell lines was
carried out by the guanidinium thiocyanate method (22). Glyoxal
denatured RNA (10 µg/lane) was separated by electrophoresis on a 1%
agarose gel and transferred to a nylon membrane (Gene Screen, DuPont
NEN, Boston, MA). The blot was hybridized with random primed
32P-labeled rGR, PSA, or actin cDNA probes in 50%
formamide at 42 C, using standard conditions.
Radioligand binding assay
Cells were cultured in maintenance medium until 5060%
confluence. To deplete for steroids, cell culturing was continued in
RPMI 1640 supplemented with dextran-charcoal-stripped (dcc) serum for
48 h.
[3H]-R1881 (87 Ci/mmol) and unlabeled R1881
(methyl-trienolone) were purchased from DuPont NEN.
[3H]-Dex (94 Ci/mmol) was obtained from Amersham. For
radioligand-binding analysis, cells were rinsed in PBS and harvested as
a single-cell suspension by trypsinization. Cells were washed four
times, counted, and resuspended in ice-cold PBS. To measure the
cellular AR and GR content and ligand affinity of both receptors, cells
were incubated with serial [3H]R1881 dilutions (0.12516
nM, in the absence and presence of a 100-fold molar excess
of unlabeled R1881) or [3H]Dex dilutions (0.532
nM, in the absence and presence of a 100-fold molar excess
of unlabeled Dex) for 90 min at room temperature. Free steroid was
removed by extensive washing of the cells in ice-cold PBS.
Radioactivity was measured in a scintillation counter. Specific binding
of [3H]R1881 and [3H]Dex was calculated by
subtraction of nonspecifically bound radioactivity from total bound
radioactivity and used for Scatchard analysis with the
radioligand-binding analysis program Ebda/Ligand by G. A. Pherson
from Elsevier-BIOSOFT (Cambridge, UK). All assays were performed in
triplicate.
Cell growth studies
Cells were trypsinized, seeded in RPMI medium containing 5% FCS
in 25-cm2 tissue culture flasks at a density of 5 x
104 cells, and cultured for 3 days. Subsequently, medium
was replaced by medium containing 5% dcc serum, and the incubation was
continued for an additional 3 days. At this time point (t = 0),
medium was replaced by RPMI medium containing 5% dcc serum and
indicated hormones at different concentrations. R1881 was added to
final concentrations of 10-11, 10-10, and
10-9 M; Dex was added to final concentrations
of 10-10, 10-9, and 10-8
M, respectively. Control cultures without steroids were
supplemented with 0.1% (vol/vol) ethanol. At day 4, medium was
renewed. At day 8, cells were washed in PBS and trypsinized, and the
cell number in each tissue culture flask was determined using a
Bürkers cell-counting chamber. Experiments were performed in
triplicate.
Identification of differentially expressed genes
The mRNA Differentially Display PCR (DD-PCR) procedure used was
essentially identical to van Belzen et al. (23). In short,
LNCaP-1F5 cells were cultured in maintenance medium until 5060%
confluence and for an additional 72 h in RPMI 1640 supplemented
with 5% dcc serum. After this period, the medium was replaced by RPMI
medium containing 5% dcc serum supplemented with 1 nM
R1881, or 10 nM Dex, or without hormone, and cells were
incubated for an additional 24 h. Isolation of total cellular RNA
from the different cell lines was carried out according to Chirgwin
et al. (22). First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg
total RNA with M-MuLV RT and a mix of three anchored oligo-T primers:
5'-TTTTTTTTTTTTG-3', 5'-TTTTTTTTTTTTC-3', and 5'-TTTTTTTTTTTTA-3'. The
resulting cDNAs from RNA of LNCaP cells grown under the three different
growth conditions were amplified for two cycles at low stringency
annealing conditions (1 min at 94 C, 5 min at 35 C, 5 min of gradual
heating from 35 C to 72 C, and 5 min at 72 C), followed by 30 cycles at
high stringency annealing (1 min at 94 C, 2 min at 50 C, and 2 min at
72 C) using a 15- to 25-nucleotide arbitrary primer. All reactions were
performed in triplicate. The resulting PCR products were separated on a
7.5% polyacrylamide gel containing 7 M urea. The dried gel
was exposed to x-ray film. Bands of interest were eluted from gel by
incubation for 1 h at 65 C in TE (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.4; 1 mM EDTA). Subsequently, the eluted fragments were
amplified by an additional PCR step (30 cycles: 1 min at 94 C, 2 min at
50 C, and 2 min at 72 C). The amplified cDNAs were cloned in pGEM-T
(Promega, Madison, WI), and sequenced.
 |
Results
|
|---|
Generation of GR-expressing LNCaP transfectants
LNCaP cells were transfected with the available rat GR expression
vector PSTC-GR and the pSV2Neo selection plasmid. Because
of the high structural homology between the rat and human GR, human GR
is expected to give identical results. Cells were grown in medium
supplemented with G418 to select for transfected cells. After 3 weeks,
G418-resistant clones were selected. Clones were immunohistochemically
stained with the GR antibody MAb 7. Of 60 G418-resistant clones, five
showed strong reactivity with the antibody, indicating high GR
expression. Thirty-two clones showed low or heterogeneous GR
expression, whereas in the remaining clones, no GR immunoreactivity was
observed. Staining of two clones with high levels of GR expression
(LNCaP-1B7 and LNCaP-1F5) is shown in Fig. 1
, A and B; staining of the parental
LNCaP cells for GR was negative (Fig. 1C
). Note that the morphology of
GR+ sublines is different from that of the parental cells, indicating a
thus far unexplained specific effect of the activated GR on cell
physiology. LNCaP-1B7 and LNCaP-1F5 were selected for more detailed
studies.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Immunohistochemical staining of GR-positive LNCaP
sublines LNCaP-1B7 (A), LNCaP-1F5 (B), and the parental LNCaP cells (C)
with the anti-rat-GR monoclonal antibody Mab7, using the indirect PAP
technique (magnification 200 x). Cells were counterstained with
Mayers hematoxylin. Before immunohistochemical analysis, cells were
cultured for 24 h in the presence of Dex.
|
|
Characterization of LNCaP-1B7 and LNCaP-1F5
Southern blot analysis of EcoRI-digested genomic DNA
isolated from the LNCaP-1B7 and LNCaP-1F5 transfectants demonstrated
the presence of one or more copies of the complete CMV-GR cDNA fragment
in both clones (lanes 2 and 3, Fig. 2A
;
indicated by an arrow). The rat GR probe showed
cross-hybridization to two fragments corresponding to the endogenous
human GR gene (bands a and b; see also lane 1, containing parental
LNCaP DNA). Both LNCaP-1B7 and LNCaP-1F5 DNA contained also at least
one incomplete PSTC-GR fragment (bands c and d). Densitometric scanning
of the blot revealed the presence of 6 to 7, and two complete copies of
CMV-GR cDNA in LNCaP-1B7 and LNCaP-1F5, respectively.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Southern and Northern blot analysis of the
integrated GR cDNA (A), and GR mRNA expression (B) in GR+ LNCaP
sublines and parental LNCaP cells. A, Southern blot analysis of
EcoRI-digested genomic DNA from LNCaP (lane 1),
LNCaP-1B7 (lane 2), and LNCaP-1F5 (lane 3). DNA (10 µg/lane) was
hybridized with a rat GR cDNA probe, homologous to human GR cDNA. Bands
a and b, Endogenous human GR gene; bands c and d, integrated, partial
rGR cDNA fragments. The arrow indicates the position of
integrated, complete CMV-GR cDNA copies. B, Northern blot analysis of
10 µg total RNA from LNCaP (lane 1), LNCaP-1B7 (lane 2), and
LNCaP-1F5 (lane 3) hybridized with a rat GR cDNA probe. The
lower panel shows ß-actin mRNA expression.
|
|
Northern blot analysis of LNCaP-1B7 and LNCaP-1F5 RNA showed expression
of GR mRNA of the expected size (2.7 kb) in both clones; no
hybridization signal was observed in the parental LNCaP cell line (Fig. 2B
). The presence of more GR mRNA in LNCaP-1F5 as compared with
LNCaP-1B7 cells, despite the higher number of integrated GR cDNA copies
in LNCaP-1B7 cells, can be due to different genomic integration sites.
Radioligand-binding assays on LNCaP, LNCaP-1B7, and LNCaP-1F5 cells
were performed to establish the number of GR and AR molecules per cell
and the respective dissociation constants for both receptors (Fig. 3
).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Analysis of glucocorticoid- and androgen-binding
activity in parental LNCaP and the GR transfectant 1B7 and 1F5 cells.
Scatchard representation of R1881-binding activity (panel A) and
Dex-binding activity (panel B) of LNCaP, LNCaP-1B7, and LNCaP-1F5
cells. Cellular AR and GR concentrations were deduced from
(Bmax (M) x Nav)/number of cells per liter
(3 x 109 in panel A and 5 x 109 in
panel B). Receptor-bound 3H-labeled steroid was measured by
a whole cell assay in the presence and absence of a 100-fold molar
excess of unlabeled hormone. The values shown are the mean of a
triplicate experiment and represent specific binding after subtraction
of nonspecific binding.
|
|
The parental LNCaP cell line showed for R1881 a Bmax of 75
pM, which is equivalent to approximately 15,000 AR
molecules per cell (see legend to Fig. 3
). LNCaP-1B7 and LNCaP-1F5
contained approximately 30,000 and 32,000 AR molecules per cell,
respectively. This 2-fold higher level of AR in the newly generated
cell lines in comparison to the parental LNCaP is probably due to a
small variation in AR content in the parental LNCaP cells. All three
cell lines showed an identical binding affinity for R1881
(Kd 1.1 nM).
As expected, in the parental LNCaP cell line, binding of Dex could not
be detected. From the Bmax values it could be deduced that
LNCaP-1B7 contains approximately 31,000 GR copies per cell, and
LNCaP-1F5 contains 115,000 copies. The Kd for Dex binding
was 3.1 nM in both LNCaP sublines.
In the four lower panels of Fig. 3
, the values obtained at
the two highest ligand concentrations deviate from the calculated
straight line. The apparent curvilinearity of the Scatchard data are
most likely due to the low percentage of specific binding at high
ligand concentrations, which makes these data less reliable. The
program used for Scatchard and linear regression analyses took the
differences in specific binding into account. An alternative
explanation, interaction between GR and AR, is less likely, because
experiments were done in the presence of one hormone at a time (or
R1881 or Dex).
GR activity in GR-positive LNCaP sublines
To investigate whether the GR present in LNCaP-1B7 and LNCaP-1F5
cells was functionally active, the cells were transiently transfected
with PSA-61-LUC, which contains a 6-kb PSA promoter fragment. This
promoter contains a strong androgen-dependent enhancer region,
approximately 4.2 kb upstream of the transcription start site of the
PSA gene (17, 24). As expected, PSA-61-LUC showed clear, R1881-induced
luciferase activity in transfected parental LNCaP cells. No luciferase
activity was detected upon incubation of the PSA-61-LUC-transfected
parental LNCaP cells with Dex (Fig. 4
).
Transient transfection of LNCaP-1B7 and LNCaP-1F5 cells with the
PSA-61-LUC construct resulted in a comparable R1881-induced luciferase
activity, both in absolute luciferase activity and in induction level
(1310- and 1940-fold, respectively). Dex induced a slightly higher
PSA-61-LUC activity, clearly indicating the transactivating capacity of
the GR encoded by the stably integrated rGR expression vector (Fig. 4
).

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. R1881 and Dex regulation of the PSA promoter
activity in LNCaP and GR- positive LNCaP sublines. LNCaP, LNCaP-1B7,
and LNCaP-1F5 cells were transfected with the PSA-61-LUC reporter gene
construct as described in Materials and Methods. After
overnight incubation with the precipitate, cells were incubated for
24 h either in the presence or absence of 1 nM R1881
or 10 nM Dex. Activity in the absence of hormone is
indicated by a solid bar; activity in the presence of
R1881 is shown by a hatched bar and in the presence of
Dex by a gray bar. Fold-induction is displayed on
top of the bars. The absolute activity and relative
induction factor were calculated as the mean of three independent
transfection experiments, which were all done in duplicate. The
SE of the mean (SEM) of the absolute activity
is represented by a vertical stripe; the SEM
of induction is given in parentheses.
|
|
Regulation of endogenous PSA mRNA expression
In previous studies we and others (12, 13, 14) have shown that PSA
mRNA expression is induced upon androgen incubation of LNCaP cells. To
investigate whether GR can replace AR in induction of the endogenous
PSA gene, we performed Northern blot analysis with RNAs isolated from
the parental LNCaP cell line, and from LNCaP-1B7 and LNCaP-1F5 cells,
grown in the absence and in the presence of hormone (10 nM
Dex or 1 nM R1881). Hybridization with a PSA-specific cDNA
probe demonstrated that GR can replace AR in high, steroid
hormone-induced expression of the PSA gene (Fig. 5
). In the parental LNCaP cell line, PSA
mRNA expression was induced by R1881 but not by Dex. In contrast, in
the two GR-positive clones, Dex treatment clearly resulted in
stimulation of PSA mRNA expression, although to a slightly lower level
(approximately 3-fold) than R1881 up-regulated PSA mRNA.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. Expression of the rat GR renders the endogenous
androgen-regulated PSA gene inducible by Dex in the LNCaP sublines 1F5
and 1B7. Northern blot analysis of 10 µg total RNA of LNCaP-1F5
(lanes 13), LNCaP-1B7 (lanes 46), and LNCaP (lanes 79) cells
hybridized with a PSA cDNA probe. Cells were treated for 24 h with
10 nM Dex (lanes 3, 6, and 9), 1 nM R1881
(lanes 2, 5, and 8), or were grown in the absence of hormone (lanes 1,
4, and 7). The lower panel shows hybridization of the
ß-actin cDNA probe as a control.
|
|
Regulation of cell proliferation
Growth of LNCaP cells depends on androgens in a
concentration-dependent fashion. Previous studies indicated a
bell-shaped dose-response curve for the stimulatory effect of androgens
(11). Maximal growth stimulation of R1881 was observed at a
concentration of 0.1 nM. To find out whether GR was able to
replace AR in growth regulation of LNCaP cells, we compared the effects
of different R1881 and Dex concentrations on growth of LNCaP cells and
of the two GR-positive LNCaP sublines. At day 8 after addition of
hormone, all three cell lines showed a clear growth stimulation upon
treatment with 0.1 nM R1881 and to a somewhat lower extent
at 1 nM R1881. However, at none of the tested Dex
concentrations was a growth-stimulatory effect observed (Fig. 6
). Similar negative results were
obtained with hydrocortisone (data not shown). These results clearly
indicated that GR was unable to replace AR in growth stimulation of
LNCaP cells.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6. Effects of Dex and R1881 on cell growth of
parental LNCaP, and the GR+ 1B7 and 1F5 cells. At day 0, and at day 8
of incubation in the absence or presence of hormone, cells were washed,
trypsinized, and counted. The values shown are the mean of experiments
in triplicate; the SEM is represented by a vertical
stripe. *, P < 0.05 compared with cells
grown in the absence of hormone, or in the presence of different Dex
concentrations.
|
|
Detection of androgen-specific gene expression in LNCaP-1F5
cells
Using the DD-PCR method, a search for novel, differentially
expressed genes in the LNCaP-1F5 subline, grown in the presence of
R1881, or Dex, or in the absence of hormone, was initiated. Using 35
different arbitrary PCR primers, one fragment that was differentially
expressed was detected. The fragment, designated 21.1, was amplified
from RNA of LNCaP-1F5 cells, cultured in the presence of R1881
(arrow in Fig. 7A
), and not
from RNA of Dex- incubated LNCaP-1F5 cells, or cells incubated in the
absence of hormone. Using fragment 21.1 as a hybridization probe, on a
Northern blot of LNCaP-1F5 RNA, a mRNA of approximately 5 kb was
detected, and the differential expression pattern was confirmed (Fig. 7B
). The sequence of the 504-bp 21.1 fragment is available in GenBank
under accession number AF007835.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7. Identification and regulation of expression of
21.1 mRNA. A, DD-PCR was performed on LNCaP-1F5 RNA as described in
Materials and Methods, using primer
5'-ATGACAGCCTGGTTG-3'. Experiments were done in triplicate. The
arrow indicates the position of band 21.1, which is
present in the R1881 lanes and absent in the Dex and minus hormone
lanes. B, Northern blot hybridization of 10 µg RNA from LNCaP-1F5
cells grown in the presence of 1 nM R1881, or 10
nM Dex, or in the absence of hormone, using purified
fragment 21.1 as a probe. The lower panel shows the
control hybridization, using the ß-actin probe.
|
|
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
In this paper we describe the generation and properties of LNCaP
sublines that express not only AR but also GR. These novel cell lines
facilitate the direct comparison of GR and AR effects on cellular
functioning. Furthermore, they can be employed for investigation of
interference between GR- and AR-activated molecular and biological
processes. We demonstrated that AR- and GR-positive cells behave
identically in up-regulation of the expression of a transfected PSA
promoter-driven reporter gene, and the expression of the endogenous PSA
gene. Interestingly, they were found to differ in hormone- induced
effects on cell proliferation. Additionally, one novel, differentially
expressed gene was identified.
At least part of the effects of steroid hormone receptors on gene
expression is on transcription initiation. Upon ligand binding, steroid
receptors interact with specific DNA sequences (HREs) and regulate the
transcription of target genes. The GGT/AACAnnnTGTTCT consensus sequence
for high-affinity DNA binding of GR, MR, PR, and AR is identical
(5, 6, 7, 8). Despite this common DNA-binding site, the different receptors
mediate distinct cellular responses. Many independent mechanisms to
achieve specificity of the steroid hormone response have been proposed
(see for reviews Refs. 3 and 25). These include differential affinities
to natural receptor-binding sites, or to binding sites in their natural
DNA context (26, 27, 28, 29, 30), differential affinity to general and specific
transcription factors (31, 32, 33, 34), differences in interaction with
receptor-specific accessory proteins or coactivators (35, 36, 37),
differential modification of specific chromatin structures (38, 39),
differences in cellular concentration of the specific receptors (40),
and variations in ligand availability (41, 42).
The observation that PSA mRNA was Dex inducible in the GR-expressing
LNCaP sublines showed that the steroid receptor content determines, at
least in part, the specific activation of the PSA gene in wild-type
LNCaP cells. Transient transfection of the 6-kb PSA promoter to the
LNCaP sublines resulted also in activation by both AR and GR. In
contrast, in the case of the MMTV promoter, differences have been
reported on the effect of GR and PR on transiently transfected reporter
gene constructs and stably integrated plasmids (38, 39). It appears
that the native chromatin structure can prevent PR activation and
permits GR stimulation of the stably integrated target gene.
AR activation of the PSA promoter involves at least three androgen
response elements, two in the 600-bp proximal promoter region and one
in a far upstream enhancer region (17, 43). Although ultimate PSA
promoter induction is comparable for AR and GR, it cannot be excluded
as yet, that AR and GR affect the individual regulatory regions
differentially. Such an observation has been made for GR and PR
activation of the MMTV promoter, which contains four HREs. Differences
might be accounted for by distinct chromatin structures over the
individual HREs, and the ability of the different receptors to affect
these structures, and/or the interaction with other specific
transcription factors (34).
As shown above, in contrast to normal human prostate tissue, GR
expression cannot be detected in wild type LNCaP cells (44). However,
in normal prostate highest GR expression is in the stromal compartment.
In epithelial cells expression of AR appears much higher than GR
expression. In prostate cancer, GR expression seems even to decrease.
Therefore, GR might not be a major factor in PSA expression. No data
are available relating to PR expression in prostate tissue, another
candidate for regulation of PSA expression (17).
The stimulatory effect of androgens on LNCaP cell proliferation shows a
bell-shaped dose-response curve (11, 45). At low androgen
concentrations (up to 10-10 M R1881),
LNCaP cells proliferate in a dose-dependent manner; at higher
hormone concentration, the proliferation rate is less. The molecular
mechanism of growth stimulation by androgens, including the remarkable
dose response, is not fully understood, although it has been proposed
that TGFß1 mediates at least part of the growth arrest observed at
high androgen concentration (46). The cell growth studies clearly
demonstrated that Dex was unable to induce proliferation of LNCaP-1B7
and LNCaP-1F5 cells. The molecular mechanism responsible for the
differential effects of glucocorticoids and androgens on growth remains
to be investigated. In a probably oversimplified view it can be
hypothesized that a limited number of differentially expressed genes
are involved. Differential AR and GR regulated TGFß and other growth
factors or inhibitors, and their corresponding receptors should be
considered in this regard.
The novel clone 21.1 described here might be another candidate involved
in a specific AR function in LNCaP. Isolation and characterization of
full-length 21.1 cDNA and the accompanying gene, which might provide
information on 21.1 function and regulation of expression, are in
progress.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
We thank Dr. S. Rusconi for providing us with PSTC-GR(3795)
and Dr. M. Brönnegård for the gift of Mab7. We are indebted to
Dr. F. T. Bosman for critical reading of the manuscript, Dr. M.
Verheggen and Dr. N. van Belzen for technical advice, Ms. A. C. J. van
der Made for technical assistance, and to Mr. F. van der Panne for
photography.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
1 This work was supported by a grant from the Dutch Cancer
Society. 
Received March 20, 1997.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Carson-Jurica MA, Schrader WT, OMalley BW 1990 Steroid receptor family: structure and functions. Endocr Rev 11:201220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Beato M, Herrlich P, Schütz G 1995 Steroid
hormone receptors: many actors in search of a plot. Cell 83:851857[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Beato M, Chávez S, Truss M 1996 Transcriptional regulation by steroid hormones. Steroids 61:240251[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Yamamoto KR 1985 Steroid receptor regulated
transcription of specific genes and gene networks. Annu Rev Genet 19:209252[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Nordeen SK, Suh B, Kühnel B, Hutchinson III
CA 1990 Structural determinants of a glucocorticoid receptor
recognition element. Mol Endocrinol 4:18661873[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lieberman BA, Bona BJ, Edwards DP, Nordeen SK 1993 The constitution of a progesterone response element. Mol Endocrinol 7:515527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Roche PJ, Hoare SA, Parker MG 1992 A consensus
DNA-binding site for the androgen receptor. Mol Endocrinol 6:22292235[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lombès M, Binart N, Obin M-E, Joulin V, Baulieu
EE 1993 Differential intracellular localization of human
mineralocorticosteroid receptor on binding of agonists and antagonists.
Biochem J 292:577583
-
Horoszewicz JS, Leong SS, Kawinski E, Karr JP,
Rosenthal H, Ming Chu T, Mirand EA, Murphy GP 1983 LNCaP model of
human prostatic carcinoma. Cancer Res 43:18091818[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Berns EMJJ, de Boer W, Mulder E 1986 Androgen-dependent growth regulation of and release of specific
protein(s) by the androgen receptor containing human prostate tumor
cell line LNCaP. Prostate 9:247259[Medline]
-
Schuurmans ALG, Bolt J, Voorhorst MM, Blankenstein RA,
Mulder E 1988 Regulation of growth and epidermal growth factor
receptor levels of prostate tumor cells by different steroids. Int J
Cancer 42:917922[Medline]
-
Riegman PHJ, Vlietstra RJ, van der Korput JAGM,
Brinkmann AO, Trapman J 1991 The promoter of the prostate-specific
antigen gene contains a functional androgen responsive element. Mol
Endocrinol 5:19211930[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Young CY-F, Montgomery BT, Andrews PE, Qiu S, Billhartz
DL, Tindall DJ 1991 Hormonal regulation of prostate-specific
antigen messenger RNA in human prostatic adenocarcinoma cell line
LNCaP. Cancer Res 51:37483752[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Henntu P, Liao S, Vikho P 1992 Androgens upregulate
the human prostate specific antigen messenger ribonucleic acid, but
down regulate the prostatic phosphatase mRNA in LNCaP cells.
Endocrinology 130:766772[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Severne Y, Wieland S, Schaffner W, Rusconi S 1988 Metal binding finger structures in the glucocorticoid receptor
defined by site-directed mutagenesis. EMBO J 7:25032508[Medline]
-
Southern PJ, Berg P 1982 Transformation of
mammalian cells to antibiotic resistance with a bacterial gene under
control of the SV40 early gene promoter. J Mol Appl Genet 1:327341[Medline]
-
Cleutjens KBJM, van der Korput HAGM, Van Eekelen CCEM,
Van Rooij HCJ, Faber PW, Trapman J 1997 An androgen response
element in a far upstream enhancer region is essential for high,
androgen-regulated activity of the prostate-specific antigen promoter.
Mol Endocrinol 11:148161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Riegman PHJ, Klaasen P, van der Korput JAGM, Romijn JC,
Trapman J 1988 Molecular cloning and characterization of novel
prostate-specific antigen cDNAs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 155:181188[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Chen C, Okyama H 1987 High efficiency
transformation of mammalian cells by plasmid DNA. Mol Cell Biol 7:27452752[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Okret S, Wikström A-C, Wrange Ö, Andersson
B, Gustafsson J-A 1984 Monoclonal antibodies against the rat liver
glucocorticoid receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:16091613[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Blin N, Stafford DW 1976 A general method for
isolation of high molecular weight DNA from eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids
Res 3:23032308
-
Chirgwin JM, Przybyla AE, MacDonald RJ, Rutter WJ 1979 Isolation of biological active ribonucleic acid from sources
enriched in ribonuclease. Biochemistry 18:52945299[CrossRef][Medline]
-
van Belzen N, Dinjens WNM, Diesveld MPG, Groen NA, van
der Made ACJ, Nozawa Y, Vlietstra R, Trapman J, Bosman FT 1997 A
novel gene which is upregulated during colon epithelial cell
differentiation and downregulated in colorectal neoplasms. Lab Invest 77:8592[Medline]
-
Schuur ER, Henderson GA, Kmetec LA, Miller JD, Lamparski
HG, Henderson DR 1996 Prostate-specific antigen expression is
upregulated by an upstream enhancer. J Biol Chem 271:70437051[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Katzenellenbogen JA, OMalley BW, Katzenellenbogen
BS 1996 Tripartite steroid hormone receptor pharmacology:
interaction with multiple effector sites as a basis for the cell- and
promoter-specific action of these hormones. Mol Endocrinol 10:119131[Free Full Text]
-
Ho K-C, Marschke KB, Tan J, Power SGA, Wilson EM, French
FS 1993 A complex response element in intron 1 of the
androgen-regulated 20-kDa protein gene displays cell type-dependent
androgen receptor specificity. J Biol Chem 268:2722627235[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rennie PS, Bruchovsky N, Leco KJ, Sheppard PC, McQueen
SA, Cheng H, Snoek R, Hamel A, Bock ME, MacDonald BS, Nickel BE, Chang
C, Liao S, Cattini PA, Matusik RJ 1993 Characterization of two
cis-acting DNA elements involved in the androgen regulation
of the probasin gene. Mol Endocrinol 7:2326[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Claessens F, Alen P, Devos A, Peeters B, Verhoeven G,
Rombauts W 1996 The androgen-specific probasin response element 2
interacts differentially with androgen and glucocorticoid receptors.
J Biol Chem 271:1901319016[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Baer J, Yamamoto KR 1994 Analysis of the
DNA-binding affinity, sequence specificity and context dependence of
the glucocorticoid receptor zinc finger region. J Mol Biol 239:664688[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Rundlett SE, Miesveld RL 1995 Quantitative
differences in androgen and glucocorticoid receptor DNA binding
properties contribute to receptor-selective transcriptional regulation.
Mol Cell Endocrinol 109:110[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Adler AJ, Schuller A, Robins DM 1993 The stringency
and magnitude of androgen-specific gene activation are combinatorial
functions of receptor and nonreceptor binding site sequences. Mol Cell
Biol 10:63266335
-
Adler AJ, Danielsen M, Robins DM 1992 Androgen-specific gene activation via a consensus glucocorticoid
responsive element is determined by interaction with nonreceptor
factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:1166011663[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pearce D, Yamamoto KR 1993 Mineralocorticoid and
glucocorticoid receptor activities distinguished by nonreceptor factors
at a composite response element. Science 259:11611165[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Le Ricousse S, Gouilleux F, Fortin D, Joulin V,
Richard-Foys H 1996 Glucocorticoid and progestin receptors are
differently involved in the cooperation with a structural element of
the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:50725077[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Oñate SA, Tsai SY, Tsai M-J, OMalley BW 1995 Sequence and characterization of a coactivator for the steroid
hormone receptor superfamily. Science 270:13541357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Voegel JJ, Heine MJS, Zechel C, Chambon P, Gronemeyer
H 1996 TIF2, a 160 kDa transcriptional mediator for the
ligand-dependent activation function AF-2 of nuclear receptors. EMBO J 15:36673675[Medline]
-
Yeh S, Chang C 1996 Cloning and characterization of
a specific coactivator, ARA70, for the androgen receptor in
human prostate cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:55175521[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Archer TK, Zanieuwski E, Moyer ML, Nordeen SK 1994 The differential capacity of glucocorticoids and progestins to alter
chromatin structure and induce gene expression in human breast cancer
cells. Mol Endocrinol 8:11541162[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Archer TK, Lee H-L, Cordingley MG, Mymryk JS, Fragoso G,
Berard DS, Hager GL 1994 Differential steroid hormone induction of
transcription from the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. Mol
Endocrinol 8:568576[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Strähle U, Boshart M, Klock G, Stuwart F,
Schütz G 1989 Glucocorticoid- and progesterone-specific
effects are determined by differential expression of the respective
hormone receptors. Nature 339:629632[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Funder JW 1993 Mineralocorticoids, glucocorticoids,
receptors and response elements. Science 259:11321133[Free Full Text]
-
Kralli A, Bohnen SP, Yamamoto KR 1995 LEM1, an
ATP-binding-cassette transporter, selectively modulates the biological
potency of steroid hormones. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:47014705[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cleutjens KBJM, van Eekelen CCEM, van der Korput HAGM,
Brinkmann AO, Trapman J 1996 Two androgen response regions
cooperate in steroid hormone regulated activity of the prostate
specific antigen promoter. J Biol Chem 271:63796388[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mohler JL, Chen Y, Hamil K, Hall SH, Cidlowski JA,
Wilson EM, French FS, Sar M 1996 Androgen and glucocorticoid
receptors in the stroma and epithelium of prostatic hyperplasia and
carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2:889895[Abstract]
-
Lee C, Sutkowski PM, Sensibar JA, Zelner D, Kim I, Amsel
I, Shaw N, Prins GS, Kozlowski JM 1995 Regulation of proliferation
and production of prostate-specific antigen in androgen-sensitive
prostate cancer cells LNCaP by hydrotestosterone. Endocrinology 136:796803[Abstract]
-
Kim IY, Kim J-H, Zelner DJ, Ahn H-J, Sensibar JA, Lee
C 1996 Transforming growth factor-ß1 is a mediator of
androgen-regulated growth arrest in an androgen-responsive prostatic
cancer cell line, LNCaP. Endocrinology 137:991999[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. Centenera, J. M. Harris, W. D. Tilley, and L. M. Butler
Minireview: The Contribution of Different Androgen Receptor Domains to Receptor Dimerization and Signaling
Mol. Endocrinol.,
November 1, 2008;
22(11):
2373 - 2382.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Niu, S. Yeh, H. Miyamoto, G. Li, S. Altuwaijri, J. Yuan, R. Han, T. Ma, H.-C. Kuo, and C. Chang
Tissue Prostate-Specific Antigen Facilitates Refractory Prostate Tumor Progression via Enhancing ARA70-Regulated Androgen Receptor Transactivation
Cancer Res.,
September 1, 2008;
68(17):
7110 - 7119.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Xiao, A. Mirwald, M. Papaioannou, A. Baniahmad, and J. Klug
Secretoglobin 2A1 Is under Selective Androgen Control Mediated by a Peculiar Binding Site for Sp Family Transcription Factors
Mol. Endocrinol.,
December 1, 2005;
19(12):
2964 - 2978.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Steketee, A. C J Ziel-van der Made, H. A G M van der Korput, A. B Houtsmuller, and J. Trapman
A bioinformatics-based functional analysis shows that the specifically androgen-regulated gene SARG contains an active direct repeat androgen response element in the first intron
J. Mol. Endocrinol.,
October 1, 2004;
33(2):
477 - 491.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. S. Taneja, S. Ha, N. K. Swenson, I. P. Torra, S. Rome, P. D. Walden, H. Y. Huang, E. Shapiro, M. J. Garabedian, and S. K. Logan
ART-27, an Androgen Receptor Coactivator Regulated in Prostate Development and Cancer
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 2, 2004;
279(14):
13944 - 13952.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Heinlein and C. Chang
Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer
Endocr. Rev.,
April 1, 2004;
25(2):
276 - 308.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Callewaert, G. Verrijdt, V. Christiaens, A. Haelens, and F. Claessens
Dual Function of an Amino-terminal Amphipatic Helix in Androgen Receptor-mediated Transactivation through Specific and Nonspecific Response Elements
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 28, 2003;
278(10):
8212 - 8218.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Markus, S. S. Taneja, S. K. Logan, W. Li, S. Ha, A. B. Hittelman, I. Rogatsky, and M. J. Garabedian
Identification and Characterization of ART-27, a Novel Coactivator for the Androgen Receptor N Terminus
Mol. Biol. Cell,
February 1, 2002;
13(2):
670 - 682.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Koutsilieris, C. Mitsiades, T. Dimopoulos, A. Ioannidis, A. Ntounis, and T. Lambou
A Combination Therapy of Dexamethasone and Somatostatin Analog Reintroduces Objective Clinical Responses to LHRH Analog in Androgen Ablation-Refractory Prostate Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
December 1, 2001;
86(12):
5729 - 5736.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Cinar, K. S. Koeneman, M. Edlund, G. S. Prins, H. E. Zhau, and L. W. K. Chung
Androgen Receptor Mediates the Reduced Tumor Growth, Enhanced Androgen Responsiveness, and Selected Target Gene Transactivation in a Human Prostate Cancer Cell Line
Cancer Res.,
October 1, 2001;
61(19):
7310 - 7317.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-M. Ning and D. M. Robins
AML3/CBFalpha 1 Is Required for Androgen-specific Activation of the Enhancer of the Mouse Sex-limited Protein (Slp) Gene
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 22, 1999;
274(43):
30624 - 30630.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|