help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrinology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller-Lindholm, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ruddon, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller-Lindholm, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ruddon, R. W.
Endocrinology Vol. 138, No. 12 5459-5465
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Human Chorionic Gonadotropin-ß Gene Expression in First Trimester Placenta1

Amanda K. Miller-Lindholm2, C. J. LaBenz, Jacques Ramey, Elliott Bedows and Raymond W. Ruddon

Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases (A.K.M.-L., E.B., R.W.R.); Departments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (A.K.M.-L., R.W.R.), Obstetrics and Gynecology (J.R.), and Pharmacology (E.B., R.W.R.), University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198; and Women’s Services Professional Corporation (C.J.L.), Omaha, Nebraska 68132

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Raymond W. Ruddon, Corporate Office of Science and Technology, Johnson & Johnson, 410 George Street, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901. E-mail: rruddon{at}corus.jnj.com


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The hCGß gene family contains six genes linked in tandem on chromosome 19 and labeled ß genes 7, 8, 5, 1, 2, and 3. Previous studies on a small number of placentas have indicated that ß gene 5 was the most highly expressed gene during the first trimester of pregnancy, followed by genes 3 and 8. ß genes 7, 1, and 2 were expressed at very low levels. The purpose of this study was to determine 1) whether this pattern of expression was typical during normal pregnancy by sampling a large number of first trimester placentas, and 2) whether there was a correlation between gestational age and the pattern of hCGß gene expression. Total RNA from 27 first trimester placentas varying in age from 6–16 weeks was reverse transcribed into complementary DNA. The complementary DNA was amplified by PCR, and the amount of DNA representative of each hCGß gene was quantified by Genescan analysis. In 14 of the 27 placentas, hCGß gene 5 accounted for 50% or more of the total ß messenger RNA expressed. ß gene 3 was expressed at levels ranging from 1–42% of the total, and ß gene 8 expression ranged from 12–32% of the total. Gene 7 expression was less than 3% of the total ß expression in all 27 placentas. Although there appeared to be a trend toward lower expression of ß gene 3 in placentas beyond 10 weeks gestational age, there was no correlation of the pattern of ß expression with placental age. ß gene expression was also examined in two blighted ova, a spontaneous abortion sample, and a hydatidiform mole as well as in cultured JAR choriocarcinoma cells. With the exception of JAR cells, these abnormal tissues had low levels of gene 3 expression, but these levels were within the range of the patterns observed in normal placentas. These data suggest that it is the total amount of hCGß gene expression rather than the expression of individual ß genes that is important for the maintenance of normal pregnancy. . A previous study of a first trimester placenta showed that all 6 hCGß genes were expressed; however, 3 were expressed at much higher levels than the others (2). hCGß gene 5 was found to account for 64% of the total hCGß expression. Genes 3 and 8 were each responsible for 18% of the total expression, and hCGß gene 7 accounted for less than 2% of the total expression. Genes 1 and 2 were also detected, but at levels of less than 1% of the total. In our study, we examined 27 placentas from 6–16 weeks gestational age to determine whether this pattern of hCGß expression was typical of a normal pregnancy and whether the expression pattern varied with gestational age.

hCGß apparently evolved from gene duplication events of the LHß gene. Although the nucleotide sequences of hCGß and LHß are 94% homologous (4), at the amino acid level there is 85% homology between hCGß and LHß over the first 114 of 121 amino acids of LHß (5). There are slight differences in the promoter regions of the genes, which may account for their differential tissue expression, i.e. LHß expression in the pituitary and hCGß expression in the placenta.

Genes 5, 3, and 8 give rise to identical proteins. The gene 7 product differs by one amino acid from the others, a Pro to Met at codon 4 (3). Genes 1 and 2, due to 5'-splice differences, give rise to unique open reading frames that may result in proteins with functions different from those of the other hCGß gene proteins (2). There are also differences among the individual hCGß genes in the promoter regions that may play a role in the differences in expression among these genes. We were interested in determining whether the individual hCGß genes were up- or down-regulated during developmental stages in early pregnancy, perhaps yielding an expression pattern unique to each phase of early embryo growth. To begin to answer this question, we obtained placentas of various gestational ages and screened for hCGß expression of genes 5, 3, 8, and 7.

It is also possible that unusual hCGß expression patterns play a role in the etiology of some clinical conditions, or that they could serve as unique biochemical markers in such cases as spontaneous abortion, blighted ovum, hydatidiform mole, choriocarcinoma, or ectopic hCG-producing cancers. For example, bladder cancers were recently found to produce hCGß, and the level of hCGß gene expression from genes 5, 3, and 8 correlated with the stage of the tumor (6). Transcription levels of these three hCGß genes increased with the stage of disease, whereas only ß gene 7 was expressed in normal urothelial tissue (6).

In the study reported here, the levels of expression of ß genes 5, 3, 8, and 7 were examined in 27 normal placentas of 6–16 weeks gestational age as well as in tissue samples obtained from spontaneous abortion, blighted ova, hydatidiform mole, and cultured JAR choriocarcinoma cells. In most of the normal placentas, gene 5 was the most highly transcribed gene, but there was significant variation in the percentage that gene 5 contributed to the total hCGß gene transcription. There were also highly variable contributions of genes 3 and 8 to the total amount of hCGß messenger RNA (mRNA) produced. Moreover, although the overall patterns of hCGß gene expression varied among the normal placentas, there was no correlation with gestational age. The pattern of expression among the abnormal tissues was not unique and was also seen in 1 or more of the normal placentas. These data suggest that a functional level of hCGß subunit can be obtained by expression of various ß genes and that it is the total level of hCGß produced rather than the expression of individual ß genes that is important for maintenance of early pregnancy.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
RNA isolation
Twenty-seven normal placenta samples were obtained from patients of the Women’s Services Clinic Professional Corporation (Omaha, NE) in accordance with protocols approved previously by the University of Nebraska Medical Center internal review board (080–95-EX). Case histories were obtained, and the placentas were examined for abnormal structure by gross inspection and by histopathology. The 27 placentas used for this study were all deemed to be normal. Two spontaneously aborted placentas, 1 hydatidiform mole specimen, and 2 implanted blighted ovum tissues were obtained from patients of the University of Nebraska Medical Center according to internal review board 348–93 specifications. JAR cells were cultured in DMEM to confluence. Tissues or cells were disrupted with TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) and a Polytron homogenizer (Brinkmann Instruments, Westbury, NY). Total RNA was isolated from 50–100 mg tissue homogenized in 1 ml TRIzol. Chloroform (200 µl) was added, and samples were shaken for 15 sec, incubated at 21 C for 3 min, and then centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 15 min. The clear aqueous phase was transferred into 0.5 ml sterile isopropanol and incubated at 21 C for 10 min, then centrifuged for 10 min. The alcohol was removed from the pellet, and the RNA was washed once with 1 ml sterile 75% ethanol. The pellet was allowed to air-dry for approximately 5 min and then was resuspended in 50–100 µl diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated water.

RT-PCR
The RNA PCR strategy and subsequent Genescan analysis were adapted and modified slightly from the methods of Lazar et al. (6). Contaminating DNA was digested away from the total RNA with ribonuclease-free deoxyribonuclease I, and the resulting products were quantified by measuring absorption at 260/280 nm ratios. The first strand complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized from 1 µg total RNA isolated from tissue, with Superscript II (Life Technologies) at a final concentration of 2.5 U in the Life Technologies first strand buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 37.5 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 4 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM of each deoxy-NTP, and 2.5 µM of random hexamers. Incubation was performed at 42 C for 50 min, followed by 70 C for 15 min. RNA was then digested with ribonuclease H at 37 C for 20 min. The PCR reaction mixture totaled 50 µl and consisted of 5 µl first strand reaction product, 2.5 U Taq polymerase (Life Technologies), and PCR buffer solution (Life Technologies) containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 50 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM of each deoxy-NTP, and 10 pmol of each of the hCGß-directed ß1 and ß2 oligonucleotide primers or the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) sense and antisense primers. Oligonucleotide primers were synthesized by the Eppley Institute Molecular Biology Core Laboratory on an Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA) model 394 DNA/RNA synthesizer. hCGß oligonucleotides were designed (Fig. 1Go) based on data from Lazar et al. (6). Both ß1 and ß2 primers completely matched the flanking sequences of each of the hCGß genes 5, 3, 8, and 7, resulting in similar amplification efficiencies for the ß genes, amplifying them proportionally to their transcript ratios (7).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A, Schematic representation of hCGß 8, 5, 3, and 7 mRNAs [adapted from Lazar et al. (6)]. The three exons are indicated by boxes, and the numbering system is based on that of Hollenberg et al. (16). The bold horizontal arrows indicate the cDNA-binding sites for the sense (ß1) and antisense (ß2) oligonucleotide primers. The vertical arrows indicate restriction enzyme sites for DraI (D) and HhaI (H). B, The nucleotide sequences of the primers used to amplify hCGß and GAPDH cDNA.

 
6-Carboxyfluorescein was incorporated into the 5'-end of the antisense primer, ß2. GAPDH primers were designed using the published nucleotide sequence data from the human GAPDH gene (8). Primer sequences are indicated in Fig. 1BGo. hCGß and GAPDH cDNA fragments were amplified from the cDNA templates in a Perkin-Elmer (Foster City, CA) model 2400 thermal cycler using a hot start of 94 C for 4 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 C for 30 sec, 60 C for 30 sec, 72 C for 30 sec, and a final extension of 72 C for 7 min.

Genescan analysis
Fifteen microliters of the RT-PCR products with 7.5 µl methyl green/yellow food coloring-50% glycerol were electrophoresed on a 1% (wt/vol) agarose gel in Tris-glacial acetic acid-EDTA buffer. The gel contained 0.2 µg/ml ethidium bromide to visualize the amplified hCGß and GAPDH amplicons. The hCGß RT-PCR products (17.25 µl) were digested with 2.5 U DraI and 5 U HhaI (New England Biolabs, Beverley, MA). Figure 1AGo illustrates the mRNA structures of the four hCGß genes under examination and the locations of the ß primers. DraI and HhaI restriction sites are labeled, and resulting size fragments are indicated. Digested DNA fragments were then coelectrophoresed with the Genescan 500 6-carboxy-X-rhodamine (ROX) size standards on a denaturing 6% acrylamide gel run on a 373 ABI sequencing apparatus by the Eppley Institute Molecular Biology Core Laboratory. The gel was analyzed by 672 Genescan software, which determines the length of the fragments in each lane, calculates the intensity of the 6-carboxyfluorescein dye in the ß2 primer, and expresses the absorbance intensity in relative fluorescence units. The data are then expressed as an electrophoretogram displaying the gel DNA bands as peaks that illustrate the intensity of the dye-labeled primer for each hCGß gene in terms of peak height and area.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
hCGß genes 5, 3, 8, and 7 from normal placentas were amplified with primers ß1 and ß2 to yield a 423-bp product (Fig. 1AGo). These PCR products were then digested with restriction enzymes DraI and HhaI, which gave different sized fragments for each gene: ß5, 341 bp; ß3, 360 bp; ß8, 233 bp; and ß7, 391 bp (Fig. 1AGo). The smaller restriction products were not seen because only the ß2 primer, incorporated into each large restriction product, was fluorescein labeled. The bands on the 6% acrylamide gel were converted to peaks by the Genescan 672 analysis software, and the fluorescent peak intensity was calculated for each gene.

Examples of some of the different types of gene expression patterns are illustrated in Genescan electrophoretograms in Fig. 2Go, A–D. Figure 2AGo depicts the 5 > 3 = 8 >> 7 gene pattern detected by Bo et al. (2). Figure 2BGo depicts a 5 > 8 >> 3 = 7 gene expression pattern, Fig. 2CGo shows a 5 = 3 = 8 >> 7 pattern, and Fig. 2DGo shows a 5 = 3 > 8 >> 7 pattern. Figure 2DGo has a unique peak at approximately 45 bp that is probably a primer dimer or a nonspecific amplification artifact in this particular sample. To control for possible genomic DNA contamination of RNA, samples were also run without Superscript reverse transcriptase, and no amplification of hCGß was detected by Genescan analysis (Fig. 2EGo). The small peaks detected in this panel are the Genescan 500 ROX internal lane size standards.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Genescan 672 electrophoretograms showing hCGß RT-PCR amplicons from normal placental mRNA. The y-axis is the relative intensity of fluorescence, and the x-axis represents the size of DNA fragments in base pairs. The large peaks in A–D indicate hCGß DNA fragments: the gene 8 fragment is located at 233 bp, gene 5 at 341 bp, gene 3 at 360 bp, and gene 7 at 390 bp. A, Fourteen-week-old placenta with gene expression pattern of ß5 > ß3 = ß8 >> ß7. B, Eleven-week-old placenta expressing genes ß5 > ß8 >> ß3 = ß7. C, Thirteen-week-old placenta expressing genes ß5 = ß3 = ß8 >> ß7. D, Nine-week-old placenta expressing genes ß5 = ß3 > ß8 >> ß7. E, Ten-week-old placenta lacking Superscript reverse transcriptase in the RT-PCR reaction, indicating that there is no contaminating genomic DNA present in the reaction. The small peaks in this lane are the Genescan 500 ROX internal lane size standards.

 
Primers were designed to amplify the housekeeping gene GAPDH (8) for use with RT-PCR to show that similar amounts of GAPDH cDNA were being amplified in each sample and that the RNA was of good quality (Fig. 3Go).



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. RT-PCR of GAPDH RNA from first trimester placentas. One microgram of total RNA isolated from 6- to 11-week-old placentas was reverse transcribed into cDNA and subsequently amplified with GAPDH primers. Products were electrophoresed on a 1% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized under UV light. Lane 1 is the 1-kilobase size standard, lane 2 is a 6-week-old placenta, lane 3 is a 7-week-old placenta, lanes 4–7 are 8-week-old placentas, lane 8 is a 9-week-old placenta, lanes 9 and 10 are 10-week-old placentas, lane 11 is an 11-week-old placenta, and lane 12 is a negative control lacking reverse transcriptase in the RT-PCR reaction.

 
Twenty-seven normal placental samples ranging from 6–16 weeks of age were analyzed in this manner. Eleven of the 27 normal placental samples displayed the hCGß gene expression pattern previously identified by Bo et al. (2) in that the order of high to low expression was 5 > 3 = 8 >> 7. However, the percent expression of each ß gene described by Bo et al. was 64:18:18 for genes 5, 3, and 8, respectively, whereas in our study of the 11 samples showing a similar pattern, gene 5 was responsible for between 40–60% of the total hCGß expression, and genes 3 and 8 were responsible for between 20–30% each. Several samples displayed other unique hCGß expression patterns: 5 = 3 > 8 >> 7 (n = 5), 5 > 8 > 3 = 7 (n = 5), and 5 = 3 = 8 >> 7 (n = 4). Two other expression patterns were detected in low frequency, 5 > 3 > 8 >> 7 (n = 1) and 5 = 8 > 3 >> 7 (n = 1). In all cases, gene 7 was only responsible for approximately 1–2% of the hCGß expression, except in one 8-week-old specimen in which gene 7 was undetectable. hCGß gene expression of genes 5, 3, 8, and 7 from all 27 placentas is plotted in Fig. 4Go. The mean percent expression for genes 5, 3, 8, and 7 and the SD for each are shown in Table 1Go for each of the 27 placentas.



View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Percentage of total hCGß gene expression produced by hCGß genes 5, 3, 8, and 7 in 27 normal placenta samples ranging in age from 6–16 weeks. The vertical axisrepresents the percentage of gene expression, and the horizontal axis is the gestational age of the placentas examined. Each bar in the graph is divided into four parts; each part represents one of the four hCGß genes. Each tissue sample was analyzed by PCR and Genescan three times, and the mean values are shown. SDs ranged from ±0.1–10.6%.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Percentage of hCGB gene expression and SD for ß genes 5, 3, 8, and 7 for 27 normal, first trimester placentas and clinical specimens

 
An oligonucleotide of sequence 5'-ATCTGAGAGAGAGCAGCCA-3' was designed for PCR with the ß2 primer to examine expression of hCGß genes 1 and 2 in several of the normal, first trimester placentas. RT-PCR was performed as described above for primers ß1 and ß2. Concentrated products were then examined by Genescan analysis (data not shown). A 399-bp product was visualized in half of the specimens examined; however, the signal was below the level of nonspecific background PCR products. A 13-week-old specimen displaying 80% of total ß expression due to gene 5 was diluted 1:50 with water, and the fluorescent intensity was barely detectable (data not shown); therefore, we conclude that genes 1 and 2 are expressed in a quantity less than 1/50th the amount of gene 5.

Several other tissues from different clinical conditions, such as hydatidiform mole, blighted ovum, and spontaneous abortion, were analyzed to determine their hCGß gene expression (Fig. 5Go). The hydatidiform mole displayed hCGß gene expression pattern 5 > 8 >> 3 = 7. Two blighted ovum specimens were analyzed and found to display a 5 > 8 >> 3 >= 7 pattern of hCGß gene expression. Although these samples showed low levels of gene 3, the levels were within the range of expression observed in the normal placentas. It may be noteworthy that in one of the blighted ovum samples, hCGß gene 7 was responsible for 6% of total hCGß expression. This was the highest gene 7 expression detected in any of the samples we examined. The spontaneously aborted placenta also had a normal pattern of gene expression: 5 > 3 = 8 >> 7. The JAR choriocarcinoma cell line was also analyzed to determine which hCGß genes were transcribed, and a gene expression pattern of 3 > 5 > 8 >> 7 was detected (Fig. 5Go). Although JAR cells expressed a higher percentage of total expression from gene 3 and a lower percentage from gene 5 than was seen in most of the normal placentas, the expression pattern, 5 = 3 > 8 >> 7, was not unusual. The mean percent expression for genes 5, 3, 8, and 7 and the SD for each of the clinical specimens are shown in Table 1Go.



View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Percentage of total hCGß gene expression contributed to by hCGß genes 5, 3, 8, and 7 in abnormal tissues. The vertical axis represents the percentage of gene expression, and the horizontal axis is the type of specimen examined. BO1 and BO2 are blighted ovum samples, HM is the hydatidiform mole specimen, SA is the spontaneously aborted placenta, and JAR is a choriocarcinoma cell line known to express hCGß. Each bar in the graph is divided into four parts; each part represents one of the four hCGß genes. Each tissue sample was analyzed by PCR and Genescan three times, and the mean values are shown. SDs ranged from ±0.1–8.1%.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The purposes of this study were to characterize hCGß gene expression in a number of normal placentas to determine which genes are expressed during normal pregnancy and to determine whether there was evidence of hCGß gene switching with increasing gestational age. To carry out this study, we used the methods of Lazar et al. (6), which employed RT-PCR followed by restriction enzyme digestion and Genescan analysis of hCGß genes 5, 3, 8, and 7 in each sample.

Our results indicate that normal placentas express genes 5, 3, and 8 in amounts detectable by RT-PCR. However, the expression levels of each gene seem to vary among individuals. In all placentas, hCGß gene 5 was highly expressed, ranging from 35–82% of the total hCGß, but in many cases genes 3 and 8 were also responsible for high levels of expression. Transcription of gene 3 was quite variable, ranging from 1–42% of the total ß gene expression. In two placental samples, gene 3 accounted for only 1–2% of the hCGß expression, whereas in 17 samples it accounted for 25% or less of the ß gene transcript. Gene 8 transcription varied from 12–32% of the total. Gene 7 was also transcribed in detectable levels, except in one 8-week-old tissue specimen that displayed no gene 7 transcript. These data indicate that there is heterogeneity in the levels of expression of each gene in individual placentas. Thus, it appears that the important factor during the first trimester of pregnancy is the total amount of hCGß gene transcription and not necessarily from which gene the mRNA is derived. As the amount of hCGß protein during pregnancy is regulated at the transcriptional level (9), it is likely that the amount of ß gene transcripts correlates with the amount of hCGß protein in the placentas examined in this study.

We were also interested in determining whether the six hCGß genes were being up- or down-regulated with increasing gestational age. No clear pattern of ß gene transcription could be correlated with placental age. The later age placentas appear to have the same heterogeneous gene expression as the earlier age placentas. There does, however, appear to be a slight shift in regulation of hCGß gene 3 as gestational age increases. Some samples of 11 weeks or older showed very low levels of gene 3 expression, and this was not detected in any of the 6- to 10-week-old placentas. More placentas would need to be analyzed to confirm this as a normal event during pregnancy.

To investigate the question of whether atypical patterns of hCGß gene expression occur in some disease states, specimens from the JAR choriocarcinoma cell line, hydatidiform mole, blighted ovum, and spontaneous abortion tissues were examined. These data were then compared with the normal pregnancy data. The hydatidiform mole is a gestational trophoblastic tumor that originates from placental tissue (10). Blighted ovum pregnancies are those that do not develop a fetal pole for unknown reasons (11). If these specimens were to display unusual patterns of hCGß gene expression, then analysis of these patterns could have diagnostic significance. For example, if hCGß gene expression and tumor stage could be correlated for hCG-producing malignancies, then analysis of surgical or biopsy samples could be used to predict prognosis or response to therapy. Similarly, ß gene expression patterns in abortuses might reveal some defect in gene expression in individuals experiencing frequent spontaneous abortions. However, none of the abnormal specimens examined had a pattern of ß gene transcription outside of the variation seen in normal placentas. Further studies on a larger number of specimens need to be conducted to determine whether unusual hCGß gene expression correlates with a particular clinical condition.

There are several possible explanations for the differential expression of the hCGß genes in individuals. First, the nucleotide sequence differences among the promoters for each of the four hCGß genes appear be in areas that make them stronger or weaker promoters (12). Chimeras formed by adding either a portion of the gene 7 promoter to gene 5, or the gene 5 promoter to gene 7 display no activity or full activity, respectively, when transfected into Y1 cells (12). This suggests that it is the nucleotide differences in the promoter region from MstII (-187) and SpeI (+103) that are partially responsible for the disparity in transcription levels (12). A number of putative transcription factor-binding sites have been identified in this region of the hCGß promoters. There are two cAMP regulatory element-binding sites (13, 14), three to four trophoblast-specific element (TSE)-binding sites that would aid in activation of the hCGß genes (15), and an Oct 3/4-binding site that is probably involved in repression of hCGß gene transcription in during early stages of pregnancy (16). There are two putative Sp-1-binding sites with the sequence GGGAGG in this portion of the proximal promoter region of gene 5. Sp-1 is hypothesized to play a role as a tether to anchor basal transcription factors in the initiation complex of TATA-less promoters, such as hCGß (4, 17). The hCGß genes differ in their nucleotide sequences in these regions, and perhaps this is the cause of the differential expression among the genes. For example, hCGß 7 differs by three nucleotides from gene 5 in the first two TSE-binding sites. The only other differences in binding site regions occur in the Sp-1 sites. As the TSE regions are believed to be only weak activators of the hCGß genes, it may be the changes in the Sp-1 sites that are important for transcription. If these binding sites are indeed used by transcription factors in vivo, then it may be possible that these base changes are responsible for the differential expression of these genes. Mutational analysis experiments have been performed in some of these potentially critical areas. For example, by mutating wild-type hCGß gene 5 from GG at -55 and -54 to TT, which is the native sequence for gene 7, transcription is down-regulated 5-fold (17). Other unique polymorphisms may exist in the population in these regions that also play roles in differential expression of the hCGß genes. Polymorphisms may create better or worse recognition binding sites for the transcription factors, resulting in unique levels of expression in individuals. There is also a distal promoter region (-3700 to -1700) upstream from the proximal promoter in the hCGß genes that plays a role in the expression of the ß genes. Deletion mutants in this region have been shown to affect hCGß basal transcription (1, 4). Nucleotide changes in these distal promoter regions may also change the amount of expression among individuals. Another possible reason for the differential hCGß expression among individuals is that differences in methylation can up- or down-regulate transcription of particular hCGß genes, and perhaps different individuals have unique amounts of methylation in the promoter regions of these genes. It will be of interest to examine a random population of people to gain information on the polymorphisms that exist in the promoter regions and to examine them for methylation differences.


    Acknowledgments
 
The helpful discussions of Dr. Oksana Lockridge and Cindy Bartels during the course of this study and the preparation of this manuscript are gratefully acknowledged. We thank Kristi Sauer for the use of a liquid nitrogen tank to transport tissue specimens, and Dr. Valerie Scholten for providing us with a blighted ovum specimen. We thank Jan Williamson and Greg Kubik for synthesis of primers and for running the Genescan gels. Robin Amerine’s help in creating Fig. 3Go is also gratefully acknowledged.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by NCI Grant CA-32949 (to R.W.R.). Back

2 Recipient of Skala and McDonald Fellowships and currently the recipient of an Emley Fellowship. Back

Received May 28, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Jameson JL, Lindell CM 1988 Isolation and characterization of the human chorionic gonadotropin ß subunit (CGß) gene cluster: regulation of a transcriptionally active CGß gene by cyclic AMP. Mol Cell Biol 8:5100–5107[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bo M, Boime I 1992 Identification of the transcriptionally active genes of the chorionic gonadotropin ß gene cluster in vivo. J Biol Chem 267:3179–3184[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Policastro PF, Daniels-McQueen S, Carle G, Boime I 1986 A map of the hCGß-LHß gene cluster. J Biol Chem 261:5907–5916[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Merz WE 1996 Biosynthesis of human chorionic gonadotropin: a review. Eur J Endocrinol 135:269–284[Medline]
  5. Ryan RJ, Keutmann HT, Charlesworth MC, McCormick DJ, Milius RP, Calvo FO, Vutyavanich T 1987 Structure-function relationships of gonadotropins. Recent Prog Horm Res 43:383–429
  6. Lazar V, Diez SG, Laurent A, Giovangrandi Y, Radvanyi F, Chopin D, Bidart JM, Bellet D, Vidaud M 1995 Expression of human chorionic gonadotropin ß subunit genes in superficial and invasive bladder carcinomas. Cancer Res 55:3735–3738[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Wang AM, Doyle MV, Mark DF 1989 Quantitation of mRNA by the polymerase chain reaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:9717–9721[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Tso JY, Sun X-H, Kao T-h, Reece KS, Wu R 1985 Isolation and characterization of rat and human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase cDNAs: genomic complexity and molecular evolution of the gene. Nucleic Acids Res 13:2485–2502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Boothby M, Kukowska J, Boime I 1983 Imbalanced synthesis of human choriogonadotropin {alpha} and ß subunits reflects the steady state levels of the corresponding mRNAs. J Biol Chem 258:9250–9253[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP 1996 Chorionic tumors. N Engl J Med 335:1740–1748[Free Full Text]
  11. Mazur MT, Kurman RJ 1987 Gestational trophoblastic disease. In: Kurman RJ (ed) Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female Genital Tract. Springer-Verlag, New York, p 853
  12. Otani T, Otani F, Krych M, Chaplin DD, Biome I 1988 Identification of a promoter region in the CGß gene cluster. J Biol Chem 263:7322–7329[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Fenstermaker RA, Milsted A, Virgin JB, Miller WL, Nilson JH 1989 The transcriptional response of the human chorionic gonadotropin ß-subunit gene to cAMP is cycloheximide sensitive and is mediated by cis-acting sequences different from that found in the {alpha}-subunit gene. Mol Endocrinol 3:1070–1076[Abstract]
  14. Pestell RG, Hollenberg AN, Albanese C, Jameson JL 1994 c-Jun represses transcription of the human chorionic gonadotropin {alpha} and ß genes through distinct types of CREs. J Biol Chem 269:31090–31096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Steger DJ, Büscher M, Hecht JH, Mellon PL 1993 Coordinate control of the {alpha}- and ß-subunit genes of human chorionic gonadotropin by trophoblast-specific element-binding protein. Mol Endocrinol 7:1579–1588[Abstract]
  16. Liu L, Roberts RM 1996 Silencing of the gene for the ß subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin by the embryonic transcription factor Oct-3/4. J Biol Chem 271:16683–16689[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Hollenberg AN, Pestell RG, Albanese C, Boers M-E, Jameson JL 1994 Multiple promoter elements in the human chorionic gonadotropin ß subunit genes distinguish their expression from the luteinizing hormone ß gene. Mol Cell Endocrinol 106:111–119[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
K. Rull, P. Hallast, L. Uuskula, J. Jackson, M. Punab, A. Salumets, R.K. Campbell, and M. Laan
Fine-scale quantification of HCG beta gene transcription in human trophoblastic and non-malignant non-trophoblastic tissues
Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 14(1): 23 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. Henke, C. Marc Luetjens, M. Simoni, and J. Gromoll
Chorionic Gonadotropin {beta}-Subunit Gene Expression in the Marmoset Pituitary Is Controlled by Steroidogenic Factor 1, Early Growth Response Protein 1, and Pituitary Homeobox Factor 1
Endocrinology, December 1, 2007; 148(12): 6062 - 6072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
C. Leisser, L. Saleh, S. Haider, H. Husslein, S. Sonderegger, and M. Knofler
Tumour necrosis factor-{alpha} impairs chorionic gonadotrophin {beta}-subunit expression and cell fusion of human villous cytotrophoblast
Mol. Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 12(10): 601 - 609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Rull and M. Laan
Expression of {beta}-subunit of HCG genes during normal and failed pregnancy
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2005; 20(12): 3360 - 3368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
M. Jiang, M.-L. Savontaus, H. Simonsen, C. Williamson, R. Mullenbach, J. Gromoll, N. Terwort, M. Alevizaki, and I. Huhtaniemi
Absence of the genetic variant Val79Met in human chorionic gonadotropin-beta gene 5 in five European populations
Mol. Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2004; 10(10): 763 - 766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Knofler, L. Saleh, S. Bauer, B. Galos, H. Rotheneder, P. Husslein, and H. Helmer
Transcriptional Regulation of the Human Chorionic Gonadotropin {beta} Gene during Villous Trophoblast Differentiation
Endocrinology, April 1, 2004; 145(4): 1685 - 1694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
G. Zimmermann, D. Baier, J. Majer, and H. Alexander
Expression of beta hCG and alpha CG mRNA and hCG hormone in human decidual tissue in patients during tubal pregnancy
Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2003; 9(2): 81 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
A. P. N. Themmen and I. T. Huhtaniemi
Mutations of Gonadotropins and Gonadotropin Receptors: Elucidating the Physiology and Pathophysiology of Pituitary-Gonadal Function
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2000; 21(5): 551 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Knofler, L. Saleh, S. Bauer, R. Vasicek, G. Griesinger, H. Strohmer, H. Helmer, and P. Husslein
Promoter Elements and Transcription Factors Involved in Differentiation-Dependent Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin-{alpha} Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Expression of Term Villous Trophoblasts
Endocrinology, October 1, 2000; 141(10): 3737 - 3748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
R. Goshen
What factors regulate HCG production in Down's syndrome pregnancies?: Screening for Down's syndrome using HCG concentrations - a common practice but still and enigma
Mol. Hum. Reprod., October 1, 1999; 5(10): 893 - 895.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. K. Miller-Lindholm, E. Bedows, C. F. Bartels, J. Ramey, V. Maclin, and R. W. Ruddon
A Naturally Occurring Genetic Variant in the Human Chorionic Gonadotropin-{beta} Gene 5 Is Assembly Inefficient
Endocrinology, August 1, 1999; 140(8): 3496 - 3506.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller-Lindholm, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ruddon, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller-Lindholm, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ruddon, R. W.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals